missnaut wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
baz_baz wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Need to look at the guy in charge of rotations - to many times when a team gets a run on we have the star power sitting on the bench
The only time we looked dangerous yesterday up forward was when Harry was there -
In the last quarter Rampe was minding Levi while Harry was warming the bench - He just left Levi a couple of times and attended the contest and rebounded out
The forward line with TDK / Levi wouldn't scare anyone .
I know they all need a spell but we have had 150 games to realise Levi offers nothing and we still keep picking him
I have been the biggest sack the coach person in the last 20 years - I have laid off Teague but if he and the selection panel keep picking blokes like Levi who offer nothing ( Cotrell and Gibbons are others ) I will quickly jump on send the Teague train over a cliff
It sounds like you think your opinion makes a difference.

People Power.
The fans got restless with Bolton, Malthouse, even Ratten.
The Marketers got a whiff and knew they had to settle the natives.
Once theres enough on the send the Teague Train over the cliff, it wont take lone before he's outed.
Let me say this. There's already questions being asked about Teague at the club.
If he doesn't make the Finals, and we fade in the 2nd half, there will be trouble for Teague.
That's part of the problem too.
Supporters shouldn't have such an influence, and after sacking 3 coaches in the last 10 or so years is sacking another going to make a difference anyway?
In hindsight we should have kept Ratten on another year or two. Remember, we had a really shit run with injuries that year too.
Then we'd hopefully have avoided the coach merry go round or at least avoided Malthouse.
True to a degree. There's pros and cons.
Ratten was given up by the players and then the supporters got wind that the players were not playing for him.
I loved Ratten and was respectful of the injury list he mad to manage with. Dito Wayne Brittain in 2002.
Malthouse...he had to go.
Bolton...paralysis through analysis. Players didn't want to hear anymore complex theory...supporters got wind of it...anyway, players didn't seem to be developing either and we were copping some awful smackings and could NOT score. What should we have done in that case?
If the players stop playing for the coach and the Board isn't doing anything because its their nature or favouritism or whatever...what should supporters do in that case? Support the status quo, or support change.
I like people power. It keeps everyone internally on notice and on their toes.
If the Executive are really that smart to do the right thing with the info they are privy to, they would know when to not listen to supporters eg the sack Hardwick campaign the preseason prior to their first Flag in decades...they knew something and bought in great assistant coaches and Dimma took a diffferent approach.