jamespul65 wrote:
what makes a coach successful? Ans cattle /players clarkson had ,roughie buddie,lewis,hodge,mitchell.burgyone,cyrill,bruest,gibson,birchall,hill.shields etc etc and now ross lyon , roo, del santo,gilbert,goddard,kozzie,montagna,milne,hayes,baker etc etc have we got any of these types on our list . weits/macca/ walsh,charlie .king, probably be in our next premiership team ,so my point is without the correct players doesnt matter who coaches us
How many of those players did Clarkson actually make into good players? I reckon over half. Lyon likewise.
I reckon roughie, buddy and hodge were natural superstars. Burgoyne was a serious player under a massive injury cloud. Mitchell was a bonafide accumulator and had won the rising star if I recall and Lewis was a hard nut competitor and early draft pick. Breust, Gibson, Birchall, Hill, Shiels, Sewell, Young etc were the type who would have been average or below under a coach without system, drive and game plan.
Great players will be great players.
Shit players will be shit players.
Great coaches, systems and game plans drag the middle tier up to a level beyond what other coaches could get out of them.
Put Breust, Gunston, Gibson, Birchall, Hill, Shiels etc into this current Carlton side under this current coaching team and they'd be bang average.
A good coach lifts the mid-tier players. A shit coach relies on talented players alone.
Was it Clarkson, or a rolling combination of Clarkson, Fagan, Hardwick, Ratten, Simpson, et al?
Just saying, he’s not making too many good players without them.