Fair enough, Parko did have a big role in curing Earl's yips. He recognised that Earl was overthinking his set shots (and as with a lot of players, his running shots were much better than his set shots). He advised him not to spend a lot of time setting up for a kick. He was to back up a set number of steps and then he was to immediately run in and kick. It worked a treat.
But that is one out of the box. At the same time, Sticks' goalkicking deteriorated somewhat - the helicopter punt became more prevalent. SOS's kicking was sometimes a bit erratic. And noone had to teach Bradley, Campo or Diesel how to kick.
Unfortunately, many players reach the AFL without receiving much training on their skills. At junior levels, there just aren't the resources to provide that, and the concentration is on teaching them teamwork, positional play and strategy. Some players have inherent weaknesses in their techniques. And with lists of 44, individual coaching would be difficult at AFL level too.
But there have been successes already. We can't forget that Santy and Aisake haven't picked up their kicking skills by osmosis. I have seen Libba working with the boys on their kicking after training and I'm sure that is only the tip of the iceberg. Apparently, Libba has also been working with Walker over the break as well. I'm sure there are efforts to teach technique to those whose techniques are flawed. But as with learning a musical instrument, that tuition has to be followed by a lot of practice in the absence of the teacher. To commit changes in technique to muscle memory, you need about 1000 repetitions, and as Barassi used to say, "Practice doesn't make perfect - perfect practice makes perfect". So if a player isn't committed to entrenching the changes, the old technique will return under pressure.
The practice that players put into their technique shouldn't take place at main training sessions. There are only about 3 sessions a week in a preseason that lasts only about 3 months before practice matches and preseason competitions start. They are needed for moulding set plays, strategies, styles of play and teamwork. And for building fitness. As they say, the players are at their fittest and most muscular at the start of the season, and it then just a case of trying to slow down the deterioration over the course of the season. Particularly for key forwards and defenders, core strength and power have always been tools of the trade. And in an era where the midfielders run half-marathons each game, it is not surprising that this is the most basic building block for success.
Just as a player who is short of fitness should be running outside training sessions, so a player with a problem with his kicking should be doing work by himself or with some teammates in his own time.
But I am a bit mystified about the claims that our training sessions don't incorporate skills training. The boys don't just stand around hitting each other with pillows. I have seen drills focussing on running goal kicking, on kicking to a player leading from the goalsquare, on circle work involving handpasses and then kicks to leading players, on working the ball out by foot from the defensive 50. Yes, there are tackle bags, and I for one would like to see our players make their tackles stick unlike some of the disgraceful attempts in the game against Geelong, for example. The drills involving the players wearing bags attempting to bump the player with the ball are to simulate some physical pressure to allow the players to practice kicking and handpassing under match-like pressure. Remember when the boys at North marvelled at the exploits of McAdam who was able to lob long kicks into the ball-bins? Players at other clubs made it clear that they wouldn't be impressed by that until ball-bins became a part of football games. I would rather see the boys practising kicking, marking and handballing under match-like pressure than playing kick-to-kick.
So what is it about Port's training sessions which are so much better at developing players' skills than ours? I haven't seen any other club's training sessions, so treat this as a real inquiry rather than as a rhetorical question.
|