Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jul 04, 2025 12:50 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 58  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 3:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35950
Location: Half back flank
I've been avoiding the media all week but can still tell we've been copping it in the media :grin:

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 3:26 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6762
Effes wrote:
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/the-big-problem-with-carlton-s-list-key-takeouts-from-round-15-20250622-p5m9cl.html

It is also unclear what 188-centimetre forward Ashton Moir will become. Some recruiters across the league would not have drafted Moir at all but the Blues used a top-30 pick on him.

Quote:
Agresta’s job description included player acquisition and list management when he worked for Silvagni, but the Blues’ draft selections since he became recruiting manager from 2020 make for underwhelming reading.

His national draft picks since then are Durdin (pick 37), Matt Carroll (41), Motlop (27), Ollie Hollands (11), Lachie Cowan (30), Jaxon Binns (32), Harry Lemmey (47), Moir (29), Billy Wilson (34), Jagga Smith (3), Harry O’Farrell (40), Ben Camporeale (43) and Lucas Camporeale (54).

The disclaimer is Agresta had just one top-10 pick as a result of trades for more established players, and only three first-round selections. Injuries have not helped, but this is largely a pedestrian group.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25495
Location: Bondi Beach
I am very happy for Wilson and Young playing their debut for Carlton

The pair become Carlton’s sixth and seventh AFL debutants for season 2025 - the first time since 2017. Wilson will become Carlton player No.1249, and Young Carlton player No.1250.

Is that the sign of an established team, or a rebuild?

I will be interested to see the teams tonight and see how many SOS drafted/traded for and compare that with Austin.

I've got a good idea, and its not a pretty picture for SOS group of players, especially when you take out his first draft where he used 4 first round picks on 3 talls Weitering, McKay and Curnow, and Cuningham delisted. Let alone the gimme FS Silvagni who he didn't pick.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25495
Location: Bondi Beach
Sidefx wrote:
Effes wrote:
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/the-big-problem-with-carlton-s-list-key-takeouts-from-round-15-20250622-p5m9cl.html

It is also unclear what 188-centimetre forward Ashton Moir will become. Some recruiters across the league would not have drafted Moir at all but the Blues used a top-30 pick on him.

Quote:
Agresta’s job description included player acquisition and list management when he worked for Silvagni, but the Blues’ draft selections since he became recruiting manager from 2020 make for underwhelming reading.

His national draft picks since then are Durdin (pick 37), Matt Carroll (41), Motlop (27), Ollie Hollands (11), Lachie Cowan (30), Jaxon Binns (32), Harry Lemmey (47), Moir (29), Billy Wilson (34), Jagga Smith (3), Harry O’Farrell (40), Ben Camporeale (43) and Lucas Camporeale (54).

The disclaimer is Agresta had just one top-10 pick as a result of trades for more established players, and only three first-round selections. Injuries have not helped, but this is largely a pedestrian group.


That's unfair on Agresta. They all developing players and WTF does pedestrian mean? Obvious agenda here. I'm happy with all picks, minus Motlop, Moir and Binns.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25495
Location: Bondi Beach
CK95 wrote:
I've been avoiding the media all week but can still tell we've been copping it in the media :grin:



Mate, its such a pile on, its not funny.

Lucky I'm busy shopping for my OS trip.

Shopping for clothes and a property overseas to keep my mind off the media and some of the bias I and agendas I am ready here, and everywhere.

I can't believe how all the focus is on Voss. I'm not sticking up for him, but he was good whenthe going was good. Who let me down.

People are like over protective mothers. The players are not our kids. They are contracted to perform, not miss set shots, not handball to the feet of a team mate, not miss a team mate, not be, scared to take the game on, not......

Can all the Voss detractors please be honest and tell us how much blame have you apportioned to the players? At this stage, none.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2886
bondiblue wrote:
I am very happy for Wilson and Young playing their debut for Carlton

The pair become Carlton’s sixth and seventh AFL debutants for season 2025 - the first time since 2017. Wilson will become Carlton player No.1249, and Young Carlton player No.1250.

Is that the sign of an established team, or a rebuild?

I will be interested to see the teams tonight and see how many SOS drafted/traded for and compare that with Austin.

I've got a good idea, and its not a pretty picture for SOS group of players, especially when you take out his first draft where he used 4 first round picks on 3 talls Weitering, McKay and Curnow, and Cuningham delisted. Let alone the gimme FS Silvagni who he didn't pick.


Last bit is a bit harsh, he made the most of the system by letting Jack slide as far as possible. Now had he not matched, that’d be a different story


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:32 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2886
bondiblue wrote:
Who would you trust more kicking a set shot at goal 40 out, in front, on a 45 degree angle, and on the boundary?

Membrey or Charlie/ Harry?

Milocek or Charlie/ Harry?

Elliot or Motlop/ Fogarty/ Durdin?

Scultz or Motlop/ Fogarty/ Durdin?

Hill or Motlop/ Fogarty/ Durdin?

and if any of our smalls are missing, try White and Evans.

There's your list problems right there.


Elliot over anyone, just sayin….


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25495
Location: Bondi Beach
DesEnglish wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I am very happy for Wilson and Young playing their debut for Carlton

The pair become Carlton’s sixth and seventh AFL debutants for season 2025 - the first time since 2017. Wilson will become Carlton player No.1249, and Young Carlton player No.1250.

Is that the sign of an established team, or a rebuild?

I will be interested to see the teams tonight and see how many SOS drafted/traded for and compare that with Austin.

I've got a good idea, and its not a pretty picture for SOS group of players, especially when you take out his first draft where he used 4 first round picks on 3 talls Weitering, McKay and Curnow, and Cuningham delisted. Let alone the gimme FS Silvagni who he didn't pick.


Last bit is a bit harsh, he made the most of the system by letting Jack slide as far as possible. Now had he not matched, that’d be a different story


Get off the sauce Des.

SOS didnt select his son. That's public knowledge.
He walked away after his last pick, and let others look after the last 3 picks.
When his son was taken at pick 55, he came back and felt comfortable to pick the rookies O'Shea and deBois.
The recruitment of Jack was a FREE hit. Please don't give credit to SOS for that pick, other than his reluctant commitment to play 100 games for Carlton.
You know he wanted to go to Hawthorn, don't you?
Yopu know how many times he held the club for ransom for more money?
You know SOS was the guy who lagged on the club, about the brown paper bag?
Its no wonder he was embarrassed to walk back into the club.

A bit precious there Des. I'm noticing a trend here, SOS is untouchable and free from blame..

And, I heard the constant Voss is shit from you, what do you thionk of the players on the list? Do you know how many set shots they have missed individually in the forward line?

I'm pointing the blame at a lot of things and a lot of people, and I'm not missing a target. Voss included. He's the one who selects the tea. He's the one responsible for discipline. He's the one who should have done exactly what he did to Binns, but done the same to a lot more. Its a fkn holiday at Carlton, with everyone mates and happy happy joy joy sing a longs after a loss. They don't give a fk. So why pick them. Oh yeah, they cupboard is bare.....and here we go...every team has them, he should be able to play players in positions that suit them....yeah right. He's been given 20 HD flankers.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Last edited by bondiblue on Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:39 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13492
Location: Melbourne
SurreyBlue wrote:
https://chloekatie.wordpress.com/2025/06/24/stronger-together-no-more/


I read that last night. Interesting take, hadn't really taken into account that we'd let so much go game-experience wise and also camaraderie-wise.

Doesn't explain everything but it's a factor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:42 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2886
bondiblue wrote:
CK95 wrote:
I've been avoiding the media all week but can still tell we've been copping it in the media :grin:



Mate, its such a pile on, its not funny.

Lucky I'm busy shopping for my OS trip.

Shopping for clothes and a property overseas to keep my mind off the media and some of the bias I and agendas I am ready here, and everywhere.

I can't believe how all the focus is on Voss. I'm not sticking up for him, but he was good whenthe going was good. Who let me down.

People are like over protective mothers. The players are not our kids. They are contracted to perform, not miss set shots, not handball to the feet of a team mate, not miss a team mate, not be, scared to take the game on, not......

Can all the Voss detractors please be honest and tell us how much blame have you apportioned to the players? At this stage, none.


I blame the senior players, kids not so much.

I blame Voss for continuing to select said senior players when they continue to make the errors that you highlight. There are no standards, and I don’t give a shit if we play 2 kids that aren’t up to it if it gives the senior players a foot in the arse. Play Moir, instead of gifting games to Motlop and Fogarty in the hope they’ll improve, I know which one I’d rather have kicking for goal. At the moment none of the senior players fear losing their spot. Drop Curnow, make a statement, what’s the worst thing, we lose?

Voss is supposed to be a great motivator, but it looks to me that his shortcomings from Brisbane are materialising here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25495
Location: Bondi Beach
DesEnglish wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Who would you trust more kicking a set shot at goal 40 out, in front, on a 45 degree angle, and on the boundary?

Membrey or Charlie/ Harry?

Milocek or Charlie/ Harry?

Elliot or Motlop/ Fogarty/ Durdin?

Scultz or Motlop/ Fogarty/ Durdin?

Hill or Motlop/ Fogarty/ Durdin?

and if any of our smalls are missing, try White and Evans.

There's your list problems right there.


Elliot over anyone, just sayin….


You're not playing the game. Its a probing post. Meant to evoke rich discussion and thought.

You may as well go back and throw all your vitriol to Voss. That will make you feel better. And when the next coach comes to move hearts and minds of our pea heart players, you'll just want to sack the coach, but keep all the deck chairs just the same.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25495
Location: Bondi Beach
missnaut wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
https://chloekatie.wordpress.com/2025/06/24/stronger-together-no-more/


I read that last night. Interesting take, hadn't really taken into account that we'd let so much go game-experience wise and also camaraderie-wise.

Doesn't explain everything but it's a factor.


We have been discussing these problems her in TC and the impact it has had on depth, and Kennedy was a heart and sole player. Despite his devotion to his religion, was one of the boys and most liked team mate. A clean skin if you like.

I will read the article, but I'm sure its the same story.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:50 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2886
bondiblue wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I am very happy for Wilson and Young playing their debut for Carlton

The pair become Carlton’s sixth and seventh AFL debutants for season 2025 - the first time since 2017. Wilson will become Carlton player No.1249, and Young Carlton player No.1250.

Is that the sign of an established team, or a rebuild?

I will be interested to see the teams tonight and see how many SOS drafted/traded for and compare that with Austin.

I've got a good idea, and its not a pretty picture for SOS group of players, especially when you take out his first draft where he used 4 first round picks on 3 talls Weitering, McKay and Curnow, and Cuningham delisted. Let alone the gimme FS Silvagni who he didn't pick.


Last bit is a bit harsh, he made the most of the system by letting Jack slide as far as possible. Now had he not matched, that’d be a different story


Get off the sauce Des.

SOS didnt select his son. That's public knowledge.
He walked away after his last pick, and let others look after the last 3 picks.
When his son was taken at pick 55, he came back and felt comfortable to pick the rookies O'Shea and deBois.
The recruitment of Jack was a FREE hit. Please don't give credit to SOS for that pick, other than his reluctant commitment to play 100 games for Carlton.
You know he wanted to go to Hawthorn, don't you?
Yopu know how many times he held the club for ransom for more money?
You know SOS was the guy who lagged on the club, about the brown paper bag?
Its no wonder he was embarrassed to walk back into the club.

A bit precious there Des. I'm noticing a trend here, SOS is untouchable and free from blame..

And, I heard the constant Voss is shit from you, what do you thionk of the players on the list? Do you know how many set shots they have missed individually in the forward line?

I'm pointing the blame at a lot of things and a lot of people, and I'm not missing a target. Voss included. He's the one who selects the tea. He's the one responsible for discipline. He's the one who should have done exactly what he did to Binns, but done the same to a lot more. Its a fkn holiday at Carlton, with everyone mates and happy happy joy joy sing a longs after a loss. They don't give a fk. So why pick them. Oh yeah, they cupboard is bare.....and here we go...every team has them, he should be able to play players in positions that suit them....yeah right. He's been given 20 HD flankers.


Whether he walked away or not, Jack plays for Carlton. Are you suggesting he should have picked him earlier? Is that it? Despite the system he should have picked earlier?

Goes as hard as you want at whoever you want, I don’t give flower, but don’t make shit up. He was taken in the manner the draft promotes, I.e., take guaranteed players as late as you can.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:53 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25495
Location: Bondi Beach
SurreyBlue wrote:
If our midfield is so one paced and slow as you say, which I don’t disagree btw, when was the last time Motlop, Ollie, Lord, Williams, Durdin, anyone with a bit of run had a go through the middle? I’ll tell you - not this year. We keep going with Hewett, Cripps, Cerra and Walsh. Try something, anything but our coaches don’t!


All those you mentioned have had a go this year.

Ollie played there during preseason and in round 1. That's when sidex started giving his opinion Ollie is too light. I agree Durdin not enough, and like Lord a bonafide mid before coming to Carlton.

I agree with a few posters, well they've proven me wrong, Crusader, Stefchook, Effes...Cripps hogs it, and wants to be the be all for the team. He's been badly out of form, and last wek was the week he was going to reverse his form and "level ip", and got beaten bu North Kids.

Our misfield group of Walsh Hewett and Cerra have been our best, and they they have won their battles vs other midfield groups.

Last week Walsh was missing and Cerra had a mare of a game.

Jagga was the one with zip, so has Durdin. Motlop has one goodf quarter ortherwise he's a ball watcher. We need tyo share the load, like you allude. We need to a group of 6-7 mids, Pies have 10 who run through thjeir midfield.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:55 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25495
Location: Bondi Beach
Bruce Mathieson article in yesterday's The Age

He cares.

Quote:
The outspoken critic slammed the list saying the club were once again five years away from having real success and said he could not point to one player under the age 25 who was an A-grader.


Recruiting has been a failure, and its worse when we overlook the Pick 1 players Walsh and Weitering who were no brainers to be selected pick 1 in their draft.

Quote:
He said as difficult as it might be the club had no option but to restart the journey again.
“We are five years away, at best, from having a good side. We have got to start again,” Mathieson told The Age.
He said 21-year-old Ollie Hollands was a good player but not an elite player while No.3 pick from last year’s national draft Jagga Smith has been sidelined with a knee injury. The injured Sam Walsh turns 25 next week.
“We have not got one good player under 25, other than Ollie Hollands and is he an A-grader? We haven’t got one,” Mathieson said.


Richmond's haul of 7 players within pick 27 was similar, if not better than Carlton's haul in 2015 with 4 first rounders. We have done fk all since that Draft.

Quote:
I admire Richmond, look at the players they gave away to get those young blokes. You look at North Melbourne, they have got young blokes coming on. We have got no one.”


Quote:
Since selecting All-Australian midfielder Walsh with pick one in the 2018 national draft, the Blues went five seasons without a top 10 pick before they traded up to select Smith with pick three in last year’s national draft. Smith suffered an ACL injury in a pre-season practice match ruling him out for the season.


SOS 2015-2020 Pick 1 Walsh
Austin 2021-2025 Pick 3 Smith

Quote:
The Blues have 23 players under 25 years on their list. Those 23 players have played 105 games in total in 2025 with Walsh, Hollands, Jesse Motlop and Cooper Lord the only under 25 players to have played 10 matches or more.
By comparison Geelong’s 24 players aged under 25 have played 128 games this season with eight of their under 25 players playing 10 matches or more in 2025.


The Dumbell list.

Heavy with stars on one end, skinny in the middle group, and heavy on the kids.

Its a kindergarten with no real stars in the kindergarten. Well they aren't obvious right thios minute.

Quote:
Carlton need a complete overhaul of their football department


The head of that Football Dept is Lloyd. He's had a long enough drink from the trough.

Now listen to the SEN podcast with Nick Davis. He will clear your view of what's needed, and surprise surprise, its not necessarily the coach. The coach may have to change his message and his game plan, and that's doable.

This is what needs to be the focus for the remainder of the year.

WE need new blood. Charlie and Harry are not delivering. TDK is not worth a Million Dollars.

Trading a couple stars might be the tonic we need. Swans were better in H&A when Buddy was injured, and after he left. The other KPF they had was the injury prone Sam Reid.

We do have kids I believe in, and you have to remember they are only unproven kids: Hollands 20yo, O'Keefe 20yo, B.Camporeale 19yo, Carroll 20yo, Lord 20yo, Cowan 20yo, Wilson 20yo, and I think Lemmey 21yo may just come good in a couple more years.

We know we will add Dean this year, Walker next year, and Abdullah NGA in 2027, the kids after this lot aren't going to be ready to play in 2030 and beyond, like Riley Scotland, Lukas Kouta, Ari Walker, Betetsy's kid, Scotland 2, Oscar Judd, so we need a bit more class to add to Walsh and Hollands imo.

WE may have to give up on our 3 NGA's and just go for Dean, I'm sure we will need points for him if we are looking to Trade in mid tier players.

We have to decide which kids we keep, add some class from the draft and Trade for a lot of cheap middle tier players, or the coach for the next 5 years is going to be under resourced with this list of unskilled, lazy so and so's.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 8:38 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21605
Location: North of the border
missnaut wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
https://chloekatie.wordpress.com/2025/06/24/stronger-together-no-more/


I read that last night. Interesting take, hadn't really taken into account that we'd let so much go game-experience wise and also camaraderie-wise.

Doesn't explain everything but it's a factor.
I was saying this last October
It was a bizarre decision to do what they did.
I think the Russell injury curse clouded their thinking. They banked on improvement in the one area we really suck at and that was injury management

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 8:53 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13492
Location: Melbourne
bondiblue wrote:
missnaut wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
https://chloekatie.wordpress.com/2025/06/24/stronger-together-no-more/


I read that last night. Interesting take, hadn't really taken into account that we'd let so much go game-experience wise and also camaraderie-wise.

Doesn't explain everything but it's a factor.


We have been discussing these problems her in TC and the impact it has had on depth, and Kennedy was a heart and sole player. Despite his devotion to his religion, was one of the boys and most liked team mate. A clean skin if you like.

I will read the article, but I'm sure its the same story.


Yes well aware of the Matt Kennedy discussions.

It was more losing the injury prone guys we (rightly) cut I hadn't really thought about - that's 150-200 games gone right there plus they'd all been around for a while.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2025 10:39 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2768
bondiblue wrote:
CK95 wrote:
I've been avoiding the media all week but can still tell we've been copping it in the media :grin:



Mate, its such a pile on, its not funny.

Lucky I'm busy shopping for my OS trip.

Shopping for clothes and a property overseas to keep my mind off the media and some of the bias I and agendas I am ready here, and everywhere.

I can't believe how all the focus is on Voss. I'm not sticking up for him, but he was good whenthe going was good. Who let me down.

People are like over protective mothers. The players are not our kids. They are contracted to perform, not miss set shots, not handball to the feet of a team mate, not miss a team mate, not be, scared to take the game on, not......

Can all the Voss detractors please be honest and tell us how much blame have you apportioned to the players? At this stage, none.


I don’t consider myself a Voss detractor. I’m a huge fan of his. As a coach, I think there are not many who could better lead a group of men into a deep finals campaign as effectively.
However…
I do not believe that so many of our players are as bad as they look at the moment. And the same players look so good when we click into gear and play a fast, forward motion, bold game lowering our eyes to easily hit moving targets close to goal. (It really pisses me off when our ball carrier looks forward and nobody is moving!!)

Therefore, my best assessment (which I admit is one of several competing, valid criticisms of our club) is that something is breaking down with our game plan and/or our execution of it. If it is the game plan, that is largely on Voss, and his assistants to a lesser degree which he had the opportunity to change at the end of last season when the same problems were already evident. I believe that, with a better game plan that is better understood, the skills of our players would suddenly look a lot better because a good game plan allows for margin of error and relies more on receivers running onto a ball delivered into space which has been cleared out by other players etc… rather than a stroke of brilliance from an individual.

Or it’s a problem with how we respond when the opposition puts up some sort of roadblock on our plan A, which also mostly sits in the coaches box… either from a tactical perspective re plans B & C, or a motivational perspective (keep the faith, push through etc…).

So, i think the answer PRIMARILY sits with the coach and/or the assistants.
And yes, i also believe there are some players who are letting the team down through decision making and/footy IQ. For various reasons. They can be dealt with either by removing, better preparation/motivation, discipline etc.. but I think these cases are at the margins.
And there are basic skill errors that I don’t believe these players came to the club with… e.g. the hair thinning handball to a teammates feet or behind them as they run forward, or the coach killing grubber pass to an opponent instead of the teammate 3m away. I feel like this is a product of the poor game plan and the confusion/stress the players feel about what to do. When we had that run in 2023, Voss famously lifted the shackles, simplified the game plan and just let them play more freely. The problem was that once teams had a chance to work us out over summer, we needed other layers. And perhaps, we could practise the basics more during the week.

Now, it is important to note that I am not 100% sure about this, as many others are. Some of those others are very astute observers of the game; others are less so. But fine, there is enough evidence for me to believe it is the players more than the coach. Or that it comes down from the Board, the footy department or the culture of the club (we certainly seem to get ahead of ourselves after small samples of success…).

But, if I had to make a hard call from what I’ve seen over the past few years, my number 1 option would be. Keep Voss, replace some assistants, trade out some players, prioritise others who can run, kick and think.
a) Make sure Voss is prepared to modify the game plan and prepared to get the right assistants in to help devise and execute that.
b) Bring in at least two fresh assistants, with the tactical chops and teaching skills required (This may be an ex-senior coach, and I’d even be open to bringing in someone like James Hird although I doubt Voss would accept that level of ‘threat’ to his position)
c) Gather the highest paid of our players and explain that everyone needs to take a smallish haircut if we want to win premiership(s). Like Brody Grundy, if you’re not prepared to do that, we’ll facilitate trades. Similarly, I’d set a firm ceiling on what we can pay for TDK which is a similar amount to what we would pay Charlie, Weitering, Walsh after their haircuts.
d) I feel like after several years, it is time to move on Brad Lloyd. I’m not expert in this area like many others are, but it seems to me like our on-field performance, fitness, and recruiting/list management could all be doing better…
e) I would move out a few players who are either past it, or not up to it, or surplus to need. I would look to trade up for a couple of experienced players who can run and kick. If we can secure a top 10 pick, I’d use that on the draft. If our best option is after pick 20, I’d probably prefer another proven player.

My 2nd option would be to move on Voss.
3rd in line for me would be a large revamp of the list.

I very much hope that Wright has been developing a strong plan after close assessment throughout the year. Id suggest he has much better information and experience than any of us. Assuming he is not a Collingwood plant, I will back whatever decisions he makes.

In the meantime, I am hoping to see better performances each week and snippets of future stardom from our several debutants and other youngsters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2025 11:11 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25495
Location: Bondi Beach
DesEnglish wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I am very happy for Wilson and Young playing their debut for Carlton

The pair become Carlton’s sixth and seventh AFL debutants for season 2025 - the first time since 2017. Wilson will become Carlton player No.1249, and Young Carlton player No.1250.

Is that the sign of an established team, or a rebuild?

I will be interested to see the teams tonight and see how many SOS drafted/traded for and compare that with Austin.

I've got a good idea, and its not a pretty picture for SOS group of players, especially when you take out his first draft where he used 4 first round picks on 3 talls Weitering, McKay and Curnow, and Cuningham delisted. Let alone the gimme FS Silvagni who he didn't pick.


Last bit is a bit harsh, he made the most of the system by letting Jack slide as far as possible. Now had he not matched, that’d be a different story


Get off the sauce Des.

SOS didnt select his son. That's public knowledge.
He walked away after his last pick, and let others look after the last 3 picks.
When his son was taken at pick 55, he came back and felt comfortable to pick the rookies O'Shea and deBois.
The recruitment of Jack was a FREE hit. Please don't give credit to SOS for that pick, other than his reluctant commitment to play 100 games for Carlton.
You know he wanted to go to Hawthorn, don't you?
Yopu know how many times he held the club for ransom for more money?
You know SOS was the guy who lagged on the club, about the brown paper bag?
Its no wonder he was embarrassed to walk back into the club.

A bit precious there Des. I'm noticing a trend here, SOS is untouchable and free from blame..

And, I heard the constant Voss is shit from you, what do you thionk of the players on the list? Do you know how many set shots they have missed individually in the forward line?

I'm pointing the blame at a lot of things and a lot of people, and I'm not missing a target. Voss included. He's the one who selects the tea. He's the one responsible for discipline. He's the one who should have done exactly what he did to Binns, but done the same to a lot more. Its a fkn holiday at Carlton, with everyone mates and happy happy joy joy sing a longs after a loss. They don't give a fk. So why pick them. Oh yeah, they cupboard is bare.....and here we go...every team has them, he should be able to play players in positions that suit them....yeah right. He's been given 20 HD flankers.


Whether he walked away or not, Jack plays for Carlton. Are you suggesting he should have picked him earlier? Is that it? Despite the system he should have picked earlier?

Goes as hard as you want at whoever you want, I don’t give flower, but don’t make shit up. He was taken in the manner the draft promotes, I.e., take guaranteed players as late as you can.



You have completely missed the point Des.

We have failed with our list management after 2015, That's what I am saying in a nutshell.

I am saying don't give credit to SOS for the Jack selection, that was a gimme. That's all. We would have taken him because he IS a FS, who kicked 6 goals in a TAC GF. He' was a good player at TAC and AFL. If we didn't have a free hit and Jack was worth more than pick 55, then some other team would have taken him, for sure. Dodoro was the only List Manager who didn't want us to have a free hit.

I may have read you wrong, but your response suggested I was a bit harsh pointing the finger at SOS for our problems today?

I'm not focussing on the coach being as the main problem, because in doing so one is dismissing all the factors that have led us to this point.

I'm saying is if you look at all SOS's picks with the exception of Pick 1's and Jack as FS, his selections in the drafts post 2015 were mostly failures. SOS was not a great List Manager. He had so many picks he thought it was GWS when he could pick 40 players in the hope 15 of them create a great team. He failed. SOS traded in and drafted over 40 players. How many of those would be playing in other teams? Our spine, Walsh and TDK, and that's about it. We have overrated our players, and focussed all our problems on Voss. We have to look deeper.

Sorry if I read you wrong.

I came on TC tonight, in a state of despondence with Carlton, to stick up for sidex. He's respectful, adds value and food for thought, but heaps of posters are just wanting to vent about the fkn coach. fk Voss. I don't care if he's gone, or not, and whilst I'd love to think that sacking the coach is answer to our problems, I can see the problem is beyond the Voss. List Management has screwed us up big time.
Lets not hide away from our situation and let the players off.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2025 11:14 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9958
Location: Australia
17th Premiership wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
CK95 wrote:
I've been avoiding the media all week but can still tell we've been copping it in the media :grin:



Mate, its such a pile on, its not funny.

Lucky I'm busy shopping for my OS trip.

Shopping for clothes and a property overseas to keep my mind off the media and some of the bias I and agendas I am ready here, and everywhere.

I can't believe how all the focus is on Voss. I'm not sticking up for him, but he was good whenthe going was good. Who let me down.

People are like over protective mothers. The players are not our kids. They are contracted to perform, not miss set shots, not handball to the feet of a team mate, not miss a team mate, not be, scared to take the game on, not......

Can all the Voss detractors please be honest and tell us how much blame have you apportioned to the players? At this stage, none.


I don’t consider myself a Voss detractor. I’m a huge fan of his. As a coach, I think there are not many who could better lead a group of men into a deep finals campaign as effectively.
However…
I do not believe that so many of our players are as bad as they look at the moment. And the same players look so good when we click into gear and play a fast, forward motion, bold game lowering our eyes to easily hit moving targets close to goal. (It really pisses me off when our ball carrier looks forward and nobody is moving!!)

Therefore, my best assessment (which I admit is one of several competing, valid criticisms of our club) is that something is breaking down with our game plan and/or our execution of it. If it is the game plan, that is largely on Voss, and his assistants to a lesser degree which he had the opportunity to change at the end of last season when the same problems were already evident. I believe that, with a better game plan that is better understood, the skills of our players would suddenly look a lot better because a good game plan allows for margin of error and relies more on receivers running onto a ball delivered into space which has been cleared out by other players etc… rather than a stroke of brilliance from an individual.

Or it’s a problem with how we respond when the opposition puts up some sort of roadblock on our plan A, which also mostly sits in the coaches box… either from a tactical perspective re plans B & C, or a motivational perspective (keep the faith, push through etc…).

So, i think the answer PRIMARILY sits with the coach and/or the assistants.
And yes, i also believe there are some players who are letting the team down through decision making and/footy IQ. For various reasons. They can be dealt with either by removing, better preparation/motivation, discipline etc.. but I think these cases are at the margins.
And there are basic skill errors that I don’t believe these players came to the club with… e.g. the hair thinning handball to a teammates feet or behind them as they run forward, or the coach killing grubber pass to an opponent instead of the teammate 3m away. I feel like this is a product of the poor game plan and the confusion/stress the players feel about what to do. When we had that run in 2023, Voss famously lifted the shackles, simplified the game plan and just let them play more freely. The problem was that once teams had a chance to work us out over summer, we needed other layers. And perhaps, we could practise the basics more during the week.

Now, it is important to note that I am not 100% sure about this, as many others are. Some of those others are very astute observers of the game; others are less so. But fine, there is enough evidence for me to believe it is the players more than the coach. Or that it comes down from the Board, the footy department or the culture of the club (we certainly seem to get ahead of ourselves after small samples of success…).

But, if I had to make a hard call from what I’ve seen over the past few years, my number 1 option would be. Keep Voss, replace some assistants, trade out some players, prioritise others who can run, kick and think.
a) Make sure Voss is prepared to modify the game plan and prepared to get the right assistants in to help devise and execute that.
b) Bring in at least two fresh assistants, with the tactical chops and teaching skills required (This may be an ex-senior coach, and I’d even be open to bringing in someone like James Hird although I doubt Voss would accept that level of ‘threat’ to his position)
c) Gather the highest paid of our players and explain that everyone needs to take a smallish haircut if we want to win premiership(s). Like Brody Grundy, if you’re not prepared to do that, we’ll facilitate trades. Similarly, I’d set a firm ceiling on what we can pay for TDK which is a similar amount to what we would pay Charlie, Weitering, Walsh after their haircuts.
d) I feel like after several years, it is time to move on Brad Lloyd. I’m not expert in this area like many others are, but it seems to me like our on-field performance, fitness, and recruiting/list management could all be doing better…
e) I would move out a few players who are either past it, or not up to it, or surplus to need. I would look to trade up for a couple of experienced players who can run and kick. If we can secure a top 10 pick, I’d use that on the draft. If our best option is after pick 20, I’d probably prefer another proven player.

My 2nd option would be to move on Voss.
3rd in line for me would be a large revamp of the list.

I very much hope that Wright has been developing a strong plan after close assessment throughout the year. Id suggest he has much better information and experience than any of us. Assuming he is not a Collingwood plant, I will back whatever decisions he makes.

In the meantime, I am hoping to see better performances each week and snippets of future stardom from our several debutants and other youngsters.


OMG, go and wash your mouth out with soap and apologise to everyone here for suggesting such an abommination!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 58  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group