Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 05, 2026 5:08 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1718 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 82, 83, 84, 85, 86  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2026 11:14 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 9032
Location: Bendigo
Sidefx wrote:
Maybe, but we needed Newman, Florent and Hayward.
Wilson, Carroll and Cowan have come into their own but that has happened 2 years past that window and 1 year after losing key players that we now have to go out and replace.
You also can't underestimate what Dean has done to our backline.

So, he got it right then?

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2026 11:31 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 22095
Location: North of the border
Crusader wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Maybe, but we needed Newman, Florent and Hayward.
Wilson, Carroll and Cowan have come into their own but that has happened 2 years past that window and 1 year after losing key players that we now have to go out and replace.
You also can't underestimate what Dean has done to our backline.

So, he got it right then?
Nope
He could have got Houston with 1st round pick used the 2nd 1st round pick on Murphy Reid and that would have kept JSOS at the club with his mate.
He also gave Martin Durdin and Kennedy away for next to nothing

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2026 11:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 16486
Location: Sydney
Durdin and Kennedy were traded for picks that became Byrne and HOF, that's far from nothing


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 12:42 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 9032
Location: Bendigo
Sydney Blue wrote:
Crusader wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Maybe, but we needed Newman, Florent and Hayward.
Wilson, Carroll and Cowan have come into their own but that has happened 2 years past that window and 1 year after losing key players that we now have to go out and replace.
You also can't underestimate what Dean has done to our backline.

So, he got it right then?
Nope
He could have got Houston with 1st round pick used the 2nd 1st round pick on Murphy Reid and that would have kept JSOS at the club with his mate.
He also gave Martin Durdin and Kennedy away for next to nothing

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

Sooooo… he got it right then?

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 8:37 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 20194
Location: threeohfivethree
Sydney Blue wrote:
He could have got Houston with 1st round pick used the 2nd 1st round pick on Murphy Reid and that would have kept JSOS at the club with his mate.


Was that your suggestion before the draft?

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 9:41 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 22095
Location: North of the border
GWS wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
He could have got Houston with 1st round pick used the 2nd 1st round pick on Murphy Reid and that would have kept JSOS at the club with his mate.


Was that your suggestion before the draft?


To get Houston - And I have been banging on for years that you can't build through draft

We are currently in a phase where we are trading 2x 1st round picks to get one . We have brought in a plethora of high end draft picks over the years - You would think the penny would dropped by now

Gold coast currently have 12 top 10 draft picks with 5 taken in the top 2 - How is it working out for them

Then you look at Hawks who have sky rocket up the ladder - Barass - Battle Chol -Impey Ginivan- Newcombe - D Ambrosia -Meek-Scrimshaw and brought back oldman Gunston - the only top end draft picks they have had are Ward - Day and Watson - They haven't won anything yet but it wont be long as they will be there abouts for years to come

We made Prelim in 2023 - had a shocking run of injuries in 2024 and Austin blew the place up -where we went into 2025 with zero depth and a heap of players 21 or younger and a lot of them not much chop

What happened this year with bringing in Haywood Ainsworth and Florent should have happened a year earlier with similar types of players

Carlton needed a run of 6 to 8 years of making finals and playing finals not chucking the baby out with the bath water because we didnt win our first prelim in 25 years

Austin was sacked for a reason

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 9:44 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 20194
Location: threeohfivethree
Sure but where did you say we should take Murphy Reid with a second rounder?

Because if you did that’s a great plan.

If not then it’s just more after the draft fluff.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 9:50 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 20194
Location: threeohfivethree
BTW Syd, I’m not defending the two picks for one player thing and I hope this year is the last time we do it even though all three of those players look like generational talent, but I think we can go hard in the draft AND trade for experienced players.

And I think we did that last year.

Our biggest problem as a club has been overvaluing our own and not trading them out when they’re still worth something.

I hope following the Curnow deal we’ve learnt how valuable that strategy is. You’d do that deal every day of the week.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 9:55 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 27639
Location: Bondi Beach
Sydney Blue wrote:
So Austin basically confirmed what I said about him. He is an idiot.
If you are continually challenging its okay for 1 year to go to draft. But when you have been shitte for 30 years and you are finally making finals you top up.

Only one team in the history of the draft has completely rebuilt and gone on to success and that was Hawks in early 2000's.

If accumulating young talent via the draft was the secret to success GWS Sun's and North would be unbeatable.
It takes far to long and to big a gamble to hope picking 18 year olds will lead to success.
We had the nucleus for a good competitive team.
Austin blew it up

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk


Actually what has been shown from the interview is that the List decisions, strategy and direction were not made solely by one man. Coach and Footy Director had a say.

The lesson from SOS' severe shedding of the playing group is that complete List rebuilds are rarely successful. You point out only one success with that strategy; Hawks. SOS' idea was to repeat his GWS strategy and that required a plethora of First round picks. Unfortunately, 8 of his Carlton first round picks were fails. Eight (who could be playing today). His misses with GWS First round picks was much worse. That says more about the man (working as a silo) than the strategy imo. ie Coach, Footy director, Football Manager, recruitment staff had no say.

We failed from a long way back, and obviously when looking at the 2023 team we overrated the list. Houston wouldnt have got us further than we did in 2024. An injury to Curnow before the GWS game derailed our season. One player. That's as brittle as it can get imo.

We move forward, this time, we have a solid Group of players, where we have lost 3 (Curnow, TDK and SOS) and added 3 (Hayward, Ainsworth, Florent), and high end kids Jagga, Dean and Walker, with two men with full support of the Board to make the right decisions with our war chest, and 20 kids under the age of 23yo. Feels different from the past.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Last edited by bondiblue on Thu Jul 02, 2026 10:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 10:35 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 27639
Location: Bondi Beach
Sydney Blue wrote:

We made Prelim in 2023 - had a shocking run of injuries in 2024 and Austin blew the place up -where we went into 2025 with zero depth and a heap of players 21 or younger and a lot of them not much chop

What happened this year with bringing in Haywood Ainsworth and Florent should have happened a year earlier with similar types of players

Carlton needed a run of 6 to 8 years of making finals and playing finals not chucking the baby out with the bath water because we didnt win our first prelim in 25 years



As you know, I accept the above, and felt the same at the time (Bracketed below reflects Rnd selection used on player).

After 2023 we moved on some failed selections Plowman (1), Dow, (1), O'Brien (1), Philp (1) Fisher (2) Ed (R) but failed to replenish players reflecting the calibre/experience/age of the loss with Hollands (1), Moir (2), Wilson (2), Fantasia, Carroll (R), Lord (R). That's where we either failed to identify talent to replace losses

After 2024 we moved on injury prone Marchbank (1), Cuningham (1), Martin (1), and Carroll (4), Durdin (R) Mirkov (R) and traded Kennedy(1) and Owies (R) but failed to replenish players reflecting the calibre/experience/age of the loss of these and previous year's losses or made the wrong decision depending on your preferred strategy. I was with you back then SB: to replace good players with good players or better.

And, SB, your point remained valid at the end of 2024 but we went for more youth in Smith, O'Farrell, Campo, Campo, Charleson Carroll. Houston imo, wasn't the answer for the loss the previous 2 years. IMO, we made our bed end of 2023. Group decision.

Sacking Austin IMHO was a case of looking for a scapegoat, given it was a group decision. But I also add I have NFI of the calibre, breadth and depth of the recruiting team Austin had at his disposal in Vic and Interstate to determine if he the best information/ options or not.

I'm past all that now. Its 2026. Austin and Voss are goneski. We have Walker to add to the kids, with a few 2nds and 2027 picks in tact to Trade and use a War chest for FA or two, to replenish and add to this strong group.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 11:48 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 9032
Location: Bendigo
GWS wrote:
I’m not defending the two picks for one player thing and I hope this year is the last time we do it

It’s the price of every halfway decent academy pick.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 12:05 pm 
Online
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 11719
Location: Australia
bondiblue wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
So Austin basically confirmed what I said about him. He is an idiot.
If you are continually challenging its okay for 1 year to go to draft. But when you have been shitte for 30 years and you are finally making finals you top up.

Only one team in the history of the draft has completely rebuilt and gone on to success and that was Hawks in early 2000's.

If accumulating young talent via the draft was the secret to success GWS Sun's and North would be unbeatable.
It takes far to long and to big a gamble to hope picking 18 year olds will lead to success.
We had the nucleus for a good competitive team.
Austin blew it up

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk


Actually what has been shown from the interview is that the List decisions, strategy and direction were not made solely by one man. Coach and Footy Director had a say.

The lesson from SOS' severe shedding of the playing group is that complete List rebuilds are rarely successful. You point out only one success with that strategy; Hawks. SOS' idea was to repeat his GWS strategy and that required a plethora of First round picks. Unfortunately, 8 of his Carlton first round picks were fails. Eight (who could be playing today). His misses with GWS First round picks was much worse. That says more about the man (working as a silo) than the strategy imo. ie Coach, Footy director, Football Manager, recruitment staff had no say.

We failed from a long way back, and obviously when looking at the 2023 team we overrated the list. Houston wouldnt have got us further than we did in 2024. An injury to Curnow before the GWS game derailed our season. One player. That's as brittle as it can get imo.

We move forward, this time, we have a solid Group of players, where we have lost 3 (Curnow, TDK and SOS) and added 3 (Hayward, Ainsworth, Florent), and high end kids Jagga, Dean and Walker, with two men with full support of the Board to make the right decisions with our war chest, and 20 kids under the age of 23yo. Feels different from the past.


Agree, Houston was just another messiah, hopefully we've gone beyond the Messiah's and can now focus on building a solid list.

Once we've blown all our first round picks on Walker that is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 4:34 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 11514
You can't avoid giving 2 picks for FS or Academies being selected top 5 -10. That's the system, unless of course it gets changed again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 5:44 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3515
when I think about how much fun it is watching our list play at the moment, other than a couple of obvious holes, i can't find a reason to cry over spilt milk.

Haynes, lord, O'Farrell, smith, Byrne, dean, ison, moir, wilson over the last 3 years are players I am backing.....other than Moir (who is a question) that bunch will all be 100 game players


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 9:22 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 8160
Crusader wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Maybe, but we needed Newman, Florent and Hayward.
Wilson, Carroll and Cowan have come into their own but that has happened 2 years past that window and 1 year after losing key players that we now have to go out and replace.
You also can't underestimate what Dean has done to our backline.

So, he got it right then?

Yeah, nah.
I think you missed the point, like we missed our window.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 9:38 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 8160
london blue wrote:
when I think about how much fun it is watching our list play at the moment, other than a couple of obvious holes, i can't find a reason to cry over spilt milk.

Haynes, lord, O'Farrell, smith, Byrne, dean, ison, moir, wilson over the last 3 years are players I am backing.....other than Moir (who is a question) that bunch will all be 100 game players

Could've still had all those players except smith if we got Houston.
And if Houston was able to keep us competitive and in the top 4 we would've also kept a key ruck and a key forward (now players we have to find) as well as attracting potential out of contract UFA players like the ones that walk to clubs like Geelong, Hawks and Lions keeping them relevant year in year out.

Then there is also the reputation of a club that walks away from a deal when a player has chosen them, not a good look.

Hopefully with CD and GW in charge we don't do that again and seize the moment.
Although the Buku deal was a bit off, but maybe we told him we will get him this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2026 10:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 25012
Location: Kaloyasena
Crusader wrote:
GWS wrote:
I’m not defending the two picks for one player thing and I hope this year is the last time we do it

It’s the price of every halfway decent academy pick.



It’s the price you have to pay now - not what Brisbane had to pay for theirs - or how much Collingwood had to pay for their father/sons - it’s the Australian way - pull the ladder up after you’ve stuck your snout in the trough - not looking at you Albanese. :roll:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2026 9:03 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 8697
AGRO wrote:
Crusader wrote:
GWS wrote:
I’m not defending the two picks for one player thing and I hope this year is the last time we do it

It’s the price of every halfway decent academy pick.



It’s the price you have to pay now - not what Brisbane had to pay for theirs - or how much Collingwood had to pay for their father/sons - it’s the Australian way - pull the ladder up after you’ve stuck your snout in the trough - not looking at you Albanese. :roll:


Not to mention Hawkins and Gaz Ablett at the Cats . Heaven help us if Hodge jnr is any good . Imagine the uproar from Jeff .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2026 9:11 am 
Online
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 9:58 pm
Posts: 4443
Don't forget Scarlett. Hasn't stopped C.Scott advocating for end of father sons in first round. I mean cats have already built their dynasty on the back of it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2026 9:17 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3515
Sidefx wrote:
london blue wrote:
when I think about how much fun it is watching our list play at the moment, other than a couple of obvious holes, i can't find a reason to cry over spilt milk.

Haynes, lord, O'Farrell, smith, Byrne, dean, ison, moir, wilson over the last 3 years are players I am backing.....other than Moir (who is a question) that bunch will all be 100 game players

Could've still had all those players except smith if we got Houston.
And if Houston was able to keep us competitive and in the top 4 we would've also kept a key ruck and a key forward (now players we have to find) as well as attracting potential out of contract UFA players like the ones that walk to clubs like Geelong, Hawks and Lions keeping them relevant year in year out.

Then there is also the reputation of a club that walks away from a deal when a player has chosen them, not a good look.

Hopefully with CD and GW in charge we don't do that again and seize the moment.
Although the Buku deal was a bit off, but maybe we told him we will get him this year.

Give me smith any day over the ‘saviour’ Houston. And the argument that we would still have a key forward and ruck in Curnow and TDK…..I’m not convinced at all. We are way better off list wise and culturally post the curnow deal. As for TDK? How could anyone justify holding him at those $….????

We are making the right moves.

With respect to reputation….well, thats complete speculation


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1718 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 82, 83, 84, 85, 86  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cazzesman and 199 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group