Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 5:29 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 177 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:47 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 776
Location: UK
woof wrote:
Mordan wrote:
TheGame wrote:
I don't know Mordan but I have no doubt Walker would be just as good at any club under any coach.


I tend to agree, but if you're going to hold Pagan responsable for all the things that go wrong while he's in charge, then equally you must give him credit for the things that go right. Otherwise you're not holding an oppinion, you're holding a prejudice.


Andrew Walker is playing better and more consistent football than Adam Cooney. Is that Rodney Eade's fault?


I'm not arguing that Pagan, Eade or any other coach is 100% responsable for the performances of their players. Just that if you're going to hold someone responsable for all the bad, you must equally credit them with all the good. I'm not doing either.

I also think that comparing two players just because they were picks one and two in the same draft is pointless. As soon as you make your selection in the draft, you get a player. You don't use your selection to get a "pick 2", you get a player. Each one is different, they develop at different rates, have different strengths etc.

Also, Cooney and Walker play different positions, and are at different points in their development. Very hard to directly compare them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:05 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34568
Location: The Brown Wedge
GWS wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
GWS wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Why is it when ever I post a negative about Pagan there is a dozen or so poster who jump to his defence


Because they don't agree with you?


You cant keep making excuses for him - Time for excuses finished 2 years ago


I didn't make an excuse - I simply held a different opinion.

If you read my post you'll see that I wrote this:

GWS wrote:
There are a number of things that Pagan's done that deserve criticism but I think the way Walker's been brought through isn't one of them.


The problem I and many others have with many of your posts is that it appears that anything and everything that is wrong with the Carlton Football Club is Denis Pagan's fault. No-one else appears to have any responsibility for anything.

When you can actually debate an issue (such as the development of Andrew Walker) by looking at a number of variables rather than one (Pagan) then not only will the quality of your posting improve but others might actually take some of your drivel seriously.

Unfortunately you only seem to be able to manage "Pagan's shit - get rid of him".

I'm happy to criticize Pagan when I believe it's deserved but not when I believe it's not. That's fair. Laying the blame for everything at his feet isn't.


Beautifully said!

I don't agree with DP with every move, he frustrates me no end sometimes (as you'd expect when you sitting last on the ladder) but some posters have an amazing ability to swing each and every issue back on Pagan, yet give credit for the little success we've had to the most obscure sources!!

Just try to stand back and understand the situation and post objectively rather than with an agenda behind every statement.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:33 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8232
woof wrote:
Mordan wrote:
TheGame wrote:
I don't know Mordan but I have no doubt Walker would be just as good at any club under any coach.


I tend to agree, but if you're going to hold Pagan responsable for all the things that go wrong while he's in charge, then equally you must give him credit for the things that go right. Otherwise you're not holding an oppinion, you're holding a prejudice.


Andrew Walker is playing better and more consistent football than Adam Cooney. Is that Rodney Eade's fault?
Developing as individuals and developing as a team are world's apart. Eade's developed his team, ours hasn't been developed, irrespective of howsome individuals have really come on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:37 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Aw is abit different again because he tries too hard. He often tries to drill a pass to someone who is 50 meters away instead of passing it accurately to somebody say 30 meters away (like Murph does). Its just his competitive temeprament and he will settle down as he continues playing.


Those who play football will know this is called vision/footy smarts. This can not be taught to players, it is an awareness that divides the athletes from the footballers. Murphy obviously can see his options available to him a lot quicker than Walker. This may be the reason Walker blazes away and kicks the footy 50 metres because that is the only option he sees in the split second he has time to think about it.

Walker is a great athlete but lacks the footy smarts Murphy has. This is why he is being used as a tagger. Tagging a player means you are lead to the ball which is a lot easier than trying to find the pill yourself.

Walker is only 20 years old so he will get better no doubt. He is just not as gifted as Murphy in the football brain department (not many are).

Walker will be a great player for us and has showed excellent improvement this year. What Walker lacks in footy smarts, he will be compensated with his hard work, dedication and athleticism just like our very own Kouta.



Yes but did you see Kouta at Walkers age????

If you did see Kouta at Walkers age would you have called him footy smart???

If you couldnt call him footy smart.. would you say that at no time in his footy career was Kouta footy smart??

See???

Its a ridiculous statement you make isnt it???

there is a thing called development ... or every footballer rafted in the league would remain the same as the immature kid drafted.

Murphy has more smarts than Walker... but Walker plays a different role to Murphy... and Murphy cant do some of the things and play some of the roles to Walker...


What youre saying is Walker wont be able to play his passes within himself ever.....
I guess that makes them different....thats all.

Isnt it amazing how simplistic people are about stuff???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:09 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1651
gerry atric wrote:
We certainly need some quality, I don't know who is better out of Hansen and Gibbs, but I hope it's Gibbs because we need the best player in the draft and we need about three super midfielders....not to mention a ruckman. Gee our decision to draft Livo, Sporn and Wiggo while Daniel Kerr remained in the 2000 draft is looking sound....

Hawthorn have loaded up in the draft and in a few years are going to be a handy side.

Who teaches tackling? Stevens would be the worst tackler and overhead mark in the league. Also again outcoached. I wouldn't blame Setanta, Franklins first goal in the second quarter was because the coaching staff allowed Hawthron to set up with lots of space from the centre square and the others he kicked were just half / quarter chances that he took through sublime unmatchable skill. He would have kicked them on anyone.

Well two more years of pain folks, by which stage we will have about 10,000 members and be playing a few games on the Gold Coast, but we will then have lots of young guns that Don Pyke or John Longmire may be able to mould into a side. The 2004 performance was indeed an oddity. We won several games narrowly against sides who were barley trying. Never mind Franklin I would have loved to get Griffen in that draft. Franklin has got exceptional talent but not sure if his opportunist style will win finals. HAndy icing on the cake man.


Buddy kicked his 6 on who? Carlos? McGrath? I reckon I could snag a couple on these blokes. Buddy will potentially develop into the most damaging half forward since a young Chris Tarrant burst onto the scene.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:45 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
Synbad wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Aw is abit different again because he tries too hard. He often tries to drill a pass to someone who is 50 meters away instead of passing it accurately to somebody say 30 meters away (like Murph does). Its just his competitive temeprament and he will settle down as he continues playing.


Those who play football will know this is called vision/footy smarts. This can not be taught to players, it is an awareness that divides the athletes from the footballers. Murphy obviously can see his options available to him a lot quicker than Walker. This may be the reason Walker blazes away and kicks the footy 50 metres because that is the only option he sees in the split second he has time to think about it.

Walker is a great athlete but lacks the footy smarts Murphy has. This is why he is being used as a tagger. Tagging a player means you are lead to the ball which is a lot easier than trying to find the pill yourself.

Walker is only 20 years old so he will get better no doubt. He is just not as gifted as Murphy in the football brain department (not many are).

Walker will be a great player for us and has showed excellent improvement this year. What Walker lacks in footy smarts, he will be compensated with his hard work, dedication and athleticism just like our very own Kouta.



Yes but did you see Kouta at Walkers age????

If you did see Kouta at Walkers age would you have called him footy smart???

If you couldnt call him footy smart.. would you say that at no time in his footy career was Kouta footy smart??

See???

Its a ridiculous statement you make isnt it???

there is a thing called development ... or every footballer rafted in the league would remain the same as the immature kid drafted.

Murphy has more smarts than Walker... but Walker plays a different role to Murphy... and Murphy cant do some of the things and play some of the roles to Walker...


What youre saying is Walker wont be able to play his passes within himself ever.....
I guess that makes them different....thats all.

Isnt it amazing how simplistic people are about stuff???


Twist, turn, swings and roundabouts, rant, rant, change the subject like a lot of your posts Synbad (not all). :lol:

I was only responding to your excuse for Walker for not choosing the right option....you said it was "his competitive temeprament". I believe it comes down to football smarts and I also noted that he will compensate his lack of footy smarts through hard work as he continues his learning.

You probably agree with me but you would never admit. And just because you have the last say, doesn't make you right but it can make you look ridiculous? :P

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:30 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Mordan wrote:
Also, Cooney and Walker play different positions, and are at different points in their development. Very hard to directly compare them.


Whether you like it or not, whether it is difficult or not they will be compared for the rest of their lives. No different to Judd, Ball and Hodge, all different players, all at different stages in development all compared.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:32 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:22 pm
Posts: 1499
Location: Sydney
From what I can see Walker busts his gut each week and tries to take on all comers. Its exciting to see him attack with his head over the ball and come smashing out a a pack with the possesion. Sure sometimes his kicks let him down but is it entirely his fault?

Kouta in 2 of the last 3 games has shown his footy smarts :roll: as people call it when winning the ball chiping/kicking around the body over an opponent putting the ball in space and allowing a team mate to run onto it in the clear and set us up forward.

The biggest difference from what I can tell is that when Kouta has the ball team mates expect him to do something with it and thus break forward and present options. At the moment I doubt our players have quite the same faith in 1AW. Imagine everytime he hit a pack our other players thought hey thats Walks I better make an option cause he will win the contest he'd only have to look up and see options presenting everywhere. Sure at the moment it might bite us in the bum but we are losing anyway - might as well do it in style and get some confidence into our kids.

Should be criticise a player becuase he has busted his gut winning the football and his team mates wern't smart enough to make position for him? Should be criticse a player who has attacked the ball with everything he has and disposes of the ball at full speed becuase teamates didn't shepherd or tell him he was clear and had time to settle?

For me Walker is our future Kouta of old - the bloke who can take a game apart by himself whilst everyone will watch in awe - Murphy will be our Diesel, you know the bloke who just seems to keep winning the ball and making all the right options despite not being lighting quick or built like a Greek Adonis.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:46 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 776
Location: UK
woof wrote:
Mordan wrote:
Also, Cooney and Walker play different positions, and are at different points in their development. Very hard to directly compare them.


Whether you like it or not, whether it is difficult or not they will be compared for the rest of their lives. No different to Judd, Ball and Hodge, all different players, all at different stages in development all compared.


Sure they will. Doesn't make the comparisons particularly meaningful.

Most of time it will be people trying to pump up or put down a player. You just find someone high/lower in the draft order who is further along in their progress (regardless of position, type of player, where they started from etc) and compare them. It's probably the most common player comparison done, yet that doesn't mean that it's really of any value at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:20 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 580
Synbad wrote:
Blues2005 wrote:
Not a Jordan Russell fan Synbad?


I would prefer Buddy and Deledio over him.. and he lacks real confidence BB2005.

He might be a Jordon McMahon type if we encourage him to play like that.

His best attribute is his pace but you would never guess it by looking at him.

Watch Danyil Pierce and see how he plays footy using his pace????

JR is in his second year and has a long long long way to go..

Needs a heap of confidencve instilled before he will be anything. Right now he is playing very timid footy.

Id like to see him given full games and instructions to take the ball and run.

thats his strength.


what do you reckon they saw in him to draft him at 9??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:47 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 395
Abaddon wrote:
malleefowl wrote:
I love it when Walks has the ball tucked in and is streaming through the midfield. No one can stop him when he is in full flight.


and then he disposes of the ball.
oh the humanity!!!
its painful to watch

Ok.I know i am speaking out of school here,but you Abaddon need to realise that every listed Carlton player religously log's into TC to view your posts.Hell ,every player is instructed to print your views,and there is now a Tuesday night gazetted by the Club to discuss your considered opinions.
My greatest fear is that you and your (negative) ilk may be dumb,stupid and narcisstic enough to believe any of the above.
And the moderators can(as opposed to shall)take exeption to this post.
Posters continually abuse and belittle their own players(jib,squib,etc)when the players are in combat for all to see,30K+ at a stadium,probably 300K+on TV plus print media,and posters can hide behind a user name-the hypocrisy is breathtaking!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:08 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3195
Location: Whistler
I'm very happy with AW.

But don't get me started on Abaddon .... his record speaks for itself. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:21 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 395
Headplant wrote:
I'm very happy with AW.

But don't get me started on Abaddon .... his record speaks for itself. :wink:

With all due respect.Was not an AW issue(he can live by his own performance).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:22 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
DOA wrote:
Posters continually abuse and belittle their own players(jib,squib,etc)when the players are in combat for all to see,30K+ at a stadium,probably 300K+on TV plus print media,and posters can hide behind a user name-the hypocrisy is breathtaking!

Would the players prefer supporters to confront them day in and day out face to face with their abuse & belittlement? I think not.
You, I & every human being on earth has been rubbished behind their backs. So what?? Get over it & do the best you can and be proud you did the best you can!! In the end who gives a stuff what I, that dill abbadon or anyone else thinks!!
If a player can't handle the heat (whether it be right or wrong) he doesn't belong in the kitchen.
Rubbishing footy players down the pub with a group of mates (which has been going on forever) or rubbishing them on TC ...not much difference.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:39 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 395
budzy wrote:
DOA wrote:
Posters continually abuse and belittle their own players(jib,squib,etc)when the players are in combat for all to see,30K+ at a stadium,probably 300K+on TV plus print media,and posters can hide behind a user name-the hypocrisy is breathtaking!

Would the players prefer supporters to confront them day in and day out face to face with their abuse & belittlement? I think not.
You, I & every human being on earth has been rubbished behind their backs. So what?? Get over it & do the best you can and be proud you did the best you can!! In the end who gives a stuff what I, that dill abbadon or anyone else thinks!!
If a player can't handle the heat (whether it be right or wrong) he doesn't belong in the kitchen.
Rubbishing footy players down the pub with a group of mates (which has been going on forever) or rubbishing them on TC ...not much difference.

And when you arrive home from the pub.Tell me ,will that make you or CFC any better?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18789
Location: threeohfivethree
DOA wrote:
And when you arrive home from the pub.Tell me ,will that make you or CFC any better?


It's a tricky question.

Did you pick up a kebab on the way home?

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:02 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 10:45 pm
Posts: 423
its not like im speaking lies. Walkers disposal is shithouse.

and don't get me started on Headplant. He was talking up the prospects of Sporn, Beasy, Livingston, Doering, Campbell etc. no more than 2 seasons ago.
:roll:
his record speaks for itself...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:05 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
DOA wrote:
budzy wrote:
DOA wrote:
Posters continually abuse and belittle their own players(jib,squib,etc)when the players are in combat for all to see,30K+ at a stadium,probably 300K+on TV plus print media,and posters can hide behind a user name-the hypocrisy is breathtaking!

Would the players prefer supporters to confront them day in and day out face to face with their abuse & belittlement? I think not.
You, I & every human being on earth has been rubbished behind their backs. So what?? Get over it & do the best you can and be proud you did the best you can!! In the end who gives a stuff what I, that dill abbadon or anyone else thinks!!
If a player can't handle the heat (whether it be right or wrong) he doesn't belong in the kitchen.
Rubbishing footy players down the pub with a group of mates (which has been going on forever) or rubbishing them on TC ...not much difference.

And when you arrive home from the pub.Tell me ,will that make you or CFC any better?

bagging/cheering footy players is part of footy culture DOA and has been for 100+ years
and I'm sure the players appreciate all those feral supporters' membership fees when it's all said and done right??

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:07 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Abaddon wrote:
Walkers disposal is shithouse.

I disagree :-D

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:14 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
budzy wrote:
Abaddon wrote:
Walkers disposal is shithouse.

I disagree :-D


it couldnt be worse than shit house? :wink:









na, i dont think his disposal is too bad its improved a hell of a lot since last year anyway and people tend to get judged on their previous actions, i know he's had a stack of clangers this year but that number is getting less too, maybe if we had players who were able to lead in the rigth directions and make it easy for their temmates he wouldnt look so bad. walker will be a superstar of our club.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 177 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group