Wolfister wrote:
Synbad wrote:
There are a few problems i dont know if that was one.
One is .... The assistant coach had to go.
Two is because he was being forced to play the kids.
Three is Gardiner
And why are Pagan and Sticks in that rumour choosing the pick???
If thats fair dinkum were done!!!
Before the Brisbane game, Sticks was on the radio talking about picking the older players. He said something like "going into the Adelaide game I (Sticks) said to Denis, I think you'll need some bigger bodies this week to compete, so if you want to play some of the older blokes, I'll back you"
So which one is for and which one was against playing the kids?
Wolfister run out of your one percenters contribution?
I knew this would happen... i tipped it...
Maybe you cant read... i already said. Sticks has been pushing for the kids to play and Denis has been playing them kicking and screaming didnt i??.. and this has been part of the friction???
Any other questions???

Maybe you can't read oh great one... Sticks said on the radio that prior to the Adelaide game he went to Dennis and told him he needed to play the older bodies.
Pity that doesn't fit your latest made up tabloid theory I guess.
BlueWorld wrote:
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,20454437%255E19742,00.html
Quote:
The club has a coach (Denis Pagan) it wanted to dump, and Pagan is seen to be residing on Death Row, despite a contract for two more seasons.
The media release this week from president Graham Smorgon, reaffirming what the club says is its youth policy, further undermines Pagan.
Surely the board is playing out a plot to freeze him out, to force him into submission.
That's if the Smorgon board survives long enough.
that would be the scummy way of doing it... Browns way is the right way.
Brown's way... which is effectively bullying... that's a surprise that you'd be advocating that Mr Synbad...