ScottSaunders2 wrote:
that was worse than last week
but ...
forget lynch 2.7, he had a couple soft free kicks paid, the rest where pretty much against the boundary line. Either Richmond was sending him there, or we where forcing them wide with our structure, making the shots on goal harder.
they got some tin arse freekicks that lead to direct goals. yeah yeah, we only one by 4 points, but if not for the interaction of the umpires it would have been 9 goals to 2 in the first half..
what i find frustrating is
young ... we know what we are going to get, yet we have Derksen who we don't know about. Lets role the dice and play him. It cant be worse.
fogarty ... abit the same for me. we know what his limit is. Bryne, looks more likely already.
cripps ... I couldn't believe the stats after the game. 32 possessions. he seems a mile off at the moment
mckay ... needs to be played at CHF. He is not a full forward, we need Kemp to take that mantle, and at the very least if he cant take the grab, bring it to grounds for the likes of Ainsworth / Haywood / Bryne
lij ... possible our worst game for us.
chesser ... I'm not sold on yet either ... he was cheap, for a reason it seems at the moment.
lack of talk ... too many run down scenarios ... can they not hear, or are we not communicating.
I didn't mind the move of McGovern forward.
the interesting aspect for me is the stand on the mark rule. we simple cant defend the overlap. it burns us so easily. Gulden/Swans put on an exhibition last week, Richmond in the 2nd half did the same thing ... but what i found interesting, if we had the same scenario, there was a Richmond player about 7 to 10m behind the mark, to stop the overlap and run ...
i was as flat as anyone last night ... but we are still a team that has close to half its side, not being familiar with each other. its going to take time.
That worked best when McLovin was at CHF and McKay was at FF, in the first quarter of course.