Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 6:53 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:42 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
Synbad wrote:

Why is it F@%&#!?????

Wont you be there????

This is a blockbuster thaT could potentially be a game for the woodenspoon that neither team would want to win because it effects draft choices.

Why would a station responsible to its shareholders take it?

Who said we thought the AFL controlled which games get shown on tv... it controls fixturing.

Some people are really losing the plot.........

Youre going to tell me if we stayed at Optus we would have had that game free to air ????


since when has carlton v collingwood played at OO and since when has the pies v blues not been shown on FTA on a delayed start?

thats right - since the great move from OO where we are supposed to be better off with FTA and an assortment of other benefits which im yet to see either.

look, im so disenchanted with this game at the moment.

when you get rewarded for being shit i.e. us this year and the way some supporters carrying on about how good it will be to lose.

when you get a set of rules for our club and a set of rules for every other club

when you get a board that seems so scared to ruffle any feathers as not to upset the AFL

when you own supporters want to lose so that you can get extra draft picks

we are playing like crap at the moment - and i can handle that - losing is apart of the game - but the off field shit we have gone through and are going through and the way the supporters are carrying on.

well im over it. just dont care anymore.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:47 am 
Offline
Footscray Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:41 am
Posts: 1583
Location: Melbourne
Biggest furphy of all time is that interstate matches do not rate in Melbourne. Channel 10 broadcast the Western Derby in Round 22 2003 (which was a finals shaping match, and ended up being one of the games of the season) and got one of their best ratings results in Melbourne for the year.

Showdowns, particularly at night, are bruising encounters and belters. For a final 8/top 4 place up for grabs this match will be no exception. By contrast, the Collingwood v Carlton match looks likely to have no bearing at all on finals calculations, so Channel 10 have simply made what they believe to be the best choice for them.

_________________
"You've got no fear of The Underdog, that's why you will not survive"
- Spoon, 2007
- Western Bulldogs, 2016


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:08 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 3844
Location: Canberra Town!
gee this thread is funny.

all these melbourne based carlton supporters are bleating cause the game wont be on a one hour delay at home any more, but instead will be on live in 90% of watering holes in melbourne LIVE.
so now to watch the game they will either A have to go to a Pub or B actually go to THE game!


gee you poor bastards.

doesnt worry me because i'm in Canberra and already KNOW i'll be AT THE GAME!

guys it's time to realise that this isnt the VFL anymore, and we are not a sucessful club anymore and non carlton supporters dont give hoot about us!

Ten has made the correct choice, and Scotty why would Ten Televise two games in one night? first of all i'm pretty sure they only have the right to one game while fox gets the other and they cant double dip and televise one in one state and one in another, becaus eits going to harm Fox's ratings and they would want to anyway as they have the extra expense of covering two games. makes no sence


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:09 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:26 pm
Posts: 834
Did anybody else notice the picture for this article in The Age...Looks like Scotland has had enough of Campo (i.e looks like he is punching him in the face..)... :lol: :lol:

I would put this picture up if i knew how to...Can anyone help me with this..

[/img]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:10 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:00 pm
Posts: 4055
Location: Recovering from the 1st effort
Channel 10 has totally lost the plot. Surely they are interested in ratings and there would have to be more Carlton/Collingwood fans in Melb than any other combination. End of the day I follow Carlton, not football. I would rather watch Carlton playing off for the wooden spoon than any other match ..... period. I couldnt care less about Adelaide, the top 4, South Australian rivalry etc etc. I am sure that the croweaters dont care about our rivalry with the filth!!!

I actually never even watch the Grand Final if Carlton aren't playing. Could not give a stuff about any other team, and there would be plenty more like me. I once read somebody write that football was about romance and hope. The hope that things would get better etc, the romance of an underdog win etc. Didnt the EJ Whitten legends game rate through the roof?? There was nothing at stake there, save a potential visit to the cardio vascular ward for some of the perticipants.

We all want a little bit of tradition, rivalry, something with a touch of the cinderella about it. Something more than the homogenised, pasteurised, low risk option, play by numbers crud, rehashed by the same kind of kids each weekend, but in slightly different coloured jumpers.


Please, please, please, please, please can the TV ratings guy call me on the Monday following the game. I'd love to tell him all about how I never watch:

Police Drama Shows,
Medical Drama Shows,
Hell, Drama shows full stop,
re-runs of 'Everybody Loves Raymond'
Reality Shows, or
Football games not involving Carlton.


Shame on you Ch 10. At least I have Fox Footy!

_________________
"Who discovered we could get milk from cows, and what did he think he was doing at the time?" Billy Connolly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:17 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
As a Carlton member (who is unable to go to games) and part of approx. 80% of the population who don"t subscribe to Foxtel, this is a further kick in the guts as I won't be able to see the age old rivalry of these two great clubs go at it once again.
Very disheartened at the moment and pondering whether membership is worth it for me if I can't see the team play (especially against Collingwood).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:37 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
thegezman wrote:
gee this thread is funny.

all these melbourne based carlton supporters are bleating cause the game wont be on a one hour delay at home any more, but instead will be on live in 90% of watering holes in melbourne LIVE.
so now to watch the game they will either A have to go to a Pub or B actually go to THE game!


gee you poor bastards.

doesnt worry me because i'm in Canberra and already KNOW i'll be AT THE GAME!

guys it's time to realise that this isnt the VFL anymore, and we are not a sucessful club anymore and non carlton supporters dont give hoot about us!

Ten has made the correct choice, and Scotty why would Ten Televise two games in one night? first of all i'm pretty sure they only have the right to one game while fox gets the other and they cant double dip and televise one in one state and one in another, becaus eits going to harm Fox's ratings and they would want to anyway as they have the extra expense of covering two games. makes no sence


a little short sighted there gerry. this isnt about interstate viewers v melbourne viewers.

i would imagine that both clubs - carlton and collingwood would have agreed in principals for their sponsors to have a certain amount of FTA coverage and i dont think it too unreasonably of them to consider a carlton v collingwood as almost guarantee that it would be shown on FTA.

so the decision made by channel 10 not to show a game, which would otherwise be shown normally you would think, could possibly cost both clubs money in sponsorship revenue.

and another thing - and i know this will shit alot of you - but melbourne is still the centre of the AFL - you may not want to admit it, but Carlton, Collingwood, Essendon* and Richmond are the clubs that have floated this competition for a long long time and it will continue to do so.

harping on about the fact that its a national competition is fine but it is those 4 clubs that generate the most support.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:55 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 3844
Location: Canberra Town!
i dont think it's short sighted at all.

if carlton were a finals contender the game would probably on FTA.

so who do we blame for this? Channel 10? makes no sense.

10 has their own interests at stake and i can understand whole heartedly why the made the decision they did. the point i was make about it being a national comp was because like i said the majority of non carlton supporters out there dont give a stuff about us and if given the choice would rather watch two decent teams fighitng it out in game that while shape the 8/4. not two bottom four clubs with little to play for.

Quote:
Very disheartened at the moment and pondering whether membership is worth it for me if I can't see the team play (especially against Collingwood).
why penalise the club? you either support them or your dont. i live in canberra (previously Batemans Bay) and i have been a paid up member since i was 15 with my own money.

is there a pub near buy with the game on you maight be able to go too? know anyone who has fox? Maybe going to the game it'self could be an option with the way flights are cheap these days. i can understand your dissapointment at missing the game but dont penalise the club when it needs as much support as it can muster. Heck write to the club expressing your dissapointment if you like.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
ThePrez wrote:

and another thing - and i know this will shit alot of you - but melbourne is still the centre of the AFL - you may not want to admit it, but Carlton, Collingwood, Essendon* and Richmond are the clubs that have floated this competition for a long long time and it will continue to do so.

harping on about the fact that its a national competition is fine but it is those 4 clubs that generate the most support.


In the past yes, like really in the past. But season 2005 is clearly showing that the AFL functions quite effectively when all four teams are not a powerful team on gameday. You're kidding yourself if you think the AFL would not exist without one or all of the "big four" clubs. Imagine the sponsorship dollars freed up for all the other clubs, be they in Melbourne or not, if Collingwood didn't exist.

And you might want to take a look at the membership figures of all the AFL clubs too Prez. ;)

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:23 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
thegezman wrote:

Quote:
Very disheartened at the moment and pondering whether membership is worth it for me if I can't see the team play (especially against Collingwood).
why penalise the club? you either support them or your dont. i live in canberra (previously Batemans Bay) and i have been a paid up member since i was 15 with my own money.


I've been a (financial) supporter for a lot longer than 7 years buddy but let's not start a pissing contest.

Why penalise the club? I don't want to, but the things that I love about the club and the game are slowly disappearing one by one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:29 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Well it could be worse. It could be Carlton vs Collingwood at the Adelaide Oval on Foxtel :D

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:30 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
camelboy wrote:
ThePrez wrote:

and another thing - and i know this will shit alot of you - but melbourne is still the centre of the AFL - you may not want to admit it, but Carlton, Collingwood, Essendon* and Richmond are the clubs that have floated this competition for a long long time and it will continue to do so.

harping on about the fact that its a national competition is fine but it is those 4 clubs that generate the most support.


In the past yes, like really in the past. But season 2005 is clearly showing that the AFL functions quite effectively when all four teams are not a powerful team on gameday. You're kidding yourself if you think the AFL would not exist without one or all of the "big four" clubs. Imagine the sponsorship dollars freed up for all the other clubs, be they in Melbourne or not, if Collingwood didn't exist.

And you might want to take a look at the membership figures of all the AFL clubs too Prez. ;)


its as simple as this

you take carlton, collingwood, Essendon* and richmond out of the AFL

there is no AFL

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:44 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Like I said, you kidding yourself if you reckon that is the case. Those days are long gone.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:16 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 3844
Location: Canberra Town!
Quote:
I've been a (financial) supporter for a lot longer than 7 years buddy but let's not start a pissing contest.

just take one line out of what i said and disregard the rest.
:roll:
did you happen to notice my suggestions after that line? i guess not.
if thats the way you feel then i'm sorry to hear it and all the best with whatever else you do with your time.

who said anything about a pissing contest?
I was just trying to illistrate the point that just because you cant see them play doesnt mean you shouldn't support them.

would you have the same attitude if we were winning, and for whatever reason you still couldnt see the game? Times are tough at the moment, everyone knows it, thats why the club needs everyone support more than ever.


stay tough


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:25 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
camelboy wrote:
Like I said, you kidding yourself if you reckon that is the case. Those days are long gone.


how long do you honestly think the afl would continue to be successful if you took those 4 clubs out of the competition?

you are kidding yourself if you think the AFL could sustain itself without those 4 teams.

get jarusa on this but i recall reading a stat that those for clubs contribute 60% of what the afl needs to sustain themselves, with the other 12 clubs contributing 40%.

Dont believe the shit the AFL spews about the game being in the best condition it has ever been. Remove those 4 from the game and watch the game fall around its knees.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:28 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
ThePrez wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Like I said, you kidding yourself if you reckon that is the case. Those days are long gone.


how long do you honestly think the afl would continue to be successful if you took those 4 clubs out of the competition?

you are kidding yourself if you think the AFL could sustain itself without those 4 teams.


hate to side with the AFL, but there's record crowds this year with three of those teams playing like shit.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:56 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 3844
Location: Canberra Town!
i reckon the AFL would suffer big time if the big for were excluded at once for sure, but we all know that will never happen.

the beauty of the top 4 is that they are always stong in terms of support regardless where they sit on the ladder.
richmond has dropped off a bit slightly due 20 odd poor years, and have a bit of a bandwagon factor at the moment, but carlton, collingwood and the dons are all still as stong as they have ever been.

my point is that the AFL is bigger than those four clubs though, and the sake of expaning nationally and into new areas is more of prioity for the AFL at the moment.

Carlton just need to keep plugging away and when we are winning again the media coverage and sponsorship dollars will take care of them selves


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:05 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:22 pm
Posts: 55
I wonder if its motivation by the AFL/MEDIA to hasten the Carlton Roos merger? we will eventually be sucked dry by those pricks if we keep bending over.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:45 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
thegezman wrote:
Quote:
I've been a (financial) supporter for a lot longer than 7 years buddy but let's not start a pissing contest.

just take one line out of what i said and disregard the rest.
:roll:
did you happen to notice my suggestions after that line? i guess not.
if thats the way you feel then i'm sorry to hear it and all the best with whatever else you do with your time.

who said anything about a pissing contest?
I was just trying to illistrate the point that just because you cant see them play doesnt mean you shouldn't support them.

would you have the same attitude if we were winning, and for whatever reason you still couldnt see the game? Times are tough at the moment, everyone knows it, thats why the club needs everyone support more than ever.


stay tough


lol...you can be as high & mighty as you like gezman but footy isn't as great as it used to be to a lot of people these days. Whether that affects clubs' membership in the future I doubt it, but we'll wait and see.


IMO the next media rights deal should include the the following packages up for bidding:
- live/delayed free to air coverage (minimun 6 games per round)
- live paytv games
- paytv full game replays
- 2 hour fta highlights package (eg. Monday night 10.30pm timeslot)
- Internet coverage rights.

Carlton vs Collingwood being restricted to a maximum 20% of the population (Foxtel) is wrong IMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:48 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:08 pm
Posts: 2585
Location: Hoppers Crossing
Deano Supremo wrote:
ThePrez wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Like I said, you kidding yourself if you reckon that is the case. Those days are long gone.


how long do you honestly think the afl would continue to be successful if you took those 4 clubs out of the competition?

you are kidding yourself if you think the AFL could sustain itself without those 4 teams.


hate to side with the AFL, but there's record crowds this year with three of those teams playing like shit.


:roll: :roll: You are lapping up their propaganda Deano. Look WHO is getting those crowds. Oh shit, it's Carlton, Collingwood and Essendon*!

Hope it bites you on the ass Channel 10


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group