The Tyrant wrote:
DOES ANYONE BESIDE MOLSEY ACTUALLY THINK GALLAGHER WAS FAST??????
Did I say he was fast? I said his pace was not the reason for his career ending... very different things. His turnovers were continual and even when he sourced the ball, using his pace for instance, he gave it up. He worked very hard but couldnt convert it to advantage.
Your contention seems to have slipped over the past few days too youngster - you seem to be saying he was too slow for the back pocket... and not slow overall. What are you saying?
I'm not saying he was too slow to play back pocket... he was too slow to play AFL!