Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 10:00 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Any reason why?
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 9:57 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Is there any reason why these two articles were published simultaneously in the Hun today?

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/ ... 22,00.html

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/ ... 22,00.html

It is IMPERATIVE that we finish below Hawthorn and hope that they finish 3rd last or better because of the PSD. However, I'm worried that Hawthorn will finish 2nd last and ask Whitnall to walk for free. I don't see other teams wanting him. With $1 million to spend, Whits might get 300K at Hawthorn rather than the 200K he'd probably be offered at Carlton, that is if he stayed at Carlton.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:12 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10627
And here I was thinking he was shit and you didn't want him anyway. :roll: Make up your mind CC.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:25 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21622
Location: North of the border
SurreyBlue wrote:
And here I was thinking he was shit and you didn't want him anyway. :roll: Make up your mind CC.


Surrey you misread CC he does think Whitnal is shit but he wants to get a 1st or 2nd round pick for him as a trade

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:29 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
If the Hawks are that desperate and there are no other options then you'd go Lance wouldn't you?

Lance is sh*t if the ball is not kicked to him at half-distance pass. He needs the ball speared in, he can be very good if he can get it. Pity that no-one at Carlton can give him a half-distance pass either because they don't carry the ball deep enough through midfield so that they kick to a Whitnall lead or they just blindly bomb it *CONTRARY to instructions*.

With the Hawks midfield like it is, Whitnall would do well.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:37 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
Shit players do not go for 1st round picks.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:40 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
And where did I say he would go for a 1st round pick? :lol:

I've said we'd like to get a 1st round pick for him, whether he fetches that, is up to Lance's form, body and attitude. Personally a 2nd round pick up to about 30 would do me fine.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Last edited by CarltonClem on Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:41 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21622
Location: North of the border
BlueMark wrote:
Shit players do not go for 1st round picks.


Nathan Thompson
Brad Ottens

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:57 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10627
Sydney Blue wrote:
BlueMark wrote:
Shit players do not go for 1st round picks.


Nathan Thompson
Brad Ottens


We deserve "two" first picks for Whitnall then. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:01 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
I think you have brought up a good point CC. Whit may not be waht the Hawks want, but he may be the best available and they may get him for nothing, which is a worry. I think Whit has a lot of talent in the right team with a gameplan that suits. He's not a mobile high leaping CHF as we know (but not many are). I think the Hawks should understand that we are going to be down a bit longer than them and what goes around comes around. We're a fair chance to go back to back spoons. If they take one of ours for nothing they better have every one else very tightly held! The other scenario is the bombers coming 15th. Suit Sheeds ego to take a struggling Blue and try to get something out of him. And Whit, in a forward line with Lloyd and Lucas might go okay.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:07 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
Sydney Blue wrote:
BlueMark wrote:
Shit players do not go for 1st round picks.


Nathan Thompson
Brad Ottens


You have a point.

Although I put them into the "What da hell were you thinkin'' catergory.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:20 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Whitnall into the PSD and we get nothing would be a distinct possibility with Hawthorn picking him up....
He wont be staying for 200K, hopefully Essendon* and a few other clubs can create a market for him and we get something in return...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:32 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21077
Location: Missing Kouta
http://www.hawkheadquarters.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=15685
http://www.hawkheadquarters.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=15730
Interesting reading on HHQ about what they'd other for Whitnall and other key forwards.They seem to be hoping Lance will go into the PSD and they'll get him for nicks if we finish last.Otherwise they want to offer a second round pick or Nick Ries or some other hack.
:evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18066
Sydney Blue wrote:
BlueMark wrote:
Shit players do not go for 1st round picks.


Nathan Thompson
Brad Ottens


Darren Jolly.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:57 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
I wouldn't mind Ries, he could play in-and-under but we'd want a pick as well with Ries as extra change.

This scenario worries me and if he walks, I'm sure we'll all be filthy. There needs to be interest from other clubs in order to create a market where clubs will offer a pick.

If there's no market, he goes into the PSD. And there is no way we can stop that.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Last edited by CarltonClem on Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:57 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2159
Location: East Melbourne
I don't really want to see him go. I think he has been great for us over the past few weeks - even earlier actually because he had to go to CHB when we were deficiant in that area and he did quite well.

We always stuff up trades or have nil-all draws. I am sick of that. If we pick up a good kid in the draft who is able to play CHF in a year or two surely it would be worth keeping Whits to help him learn the game. We could even stick Whits in the pocket in his later years as a foil for Fev.

If we have to pay Whits a bit extra than we want to then let's do it. We certainly won't have to pay what we have in the past. I just don't want him going for nothing. So don't let him go... unless it is going to give us another top 3 draft pick. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:23 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:49 pm
Posts: 3038
I luv Lance, Fev can be outstanding, but Lance would never drop his head and mope around the forward line, and complain about the delivery (even if it is bad), hes is more of a general in the forward line and back line when he is there, when our team gets better, Lance will be King.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21622
Location: North of the border
CarltonClem wrote:
I wouldn't mind Ries, he could play in-and-under but we'd want a pick as well with Ries as extra change.

This scenario worries me and if he walks, I'm sure we'll all be filthy. There needs to be interest from other clubs in order to create a market where clubs will offer a pick.

If there's no market, he goes into the PSD. And there is no way we can stop that.


Come on CC you cant have a bet each way you either want him or you dont. If the club fails to make him an offer and he walks for nothing they get what they deserve then. IMO if he has three of four more games like the last two he will stay. Lance would be not far off the veterans list and Kouta is not far off retiring with noone else other than Campo being eligable . Lance will be good value then

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:52 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21077
Location: Missing Kouta
http://www.footywire.com/fw/web/ft_player_games?pid=270

These are Ries's stats for this year and hopefully with Hurn on the list as well as Blackwell, Bentick and Smith.We'd have no need to trade a KP player who can kick 4 goals at his best for an in and under midfielder with average disposal.

Whats more, I don't see Lance as the type (even the Saints did a deal) who'd walk into the draft without getting adequate compensation for the club.And even if the Hawks are after him, they'll have to come up with something better than Ries.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 3:03 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
We dont want any shelf fill rubbish from Hawthorn.....no to Ries..draft picks only...if they get rid of Hay to WC or Freo maybe whateva is coming back across the border in return but not Lance for some hack like Ries...he cant command a spot in the second bottom team so no thanks...
Sorry Clem I dont rate Ries at all....I would rather Lance in the PSD than pick up any more rubbish...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 3:09 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Lance is 4 or 5 years off the vets list Sydney. 2009 would be the earliest.

What's your point? I'm stating scenarios and I'm allowed a bob each way because at the moment he's at the crossroads. If he's not offered a contract by the club, then he can walk BUT OBVIOUSLY this is NOT the best scenario for the club.

Where have I stated an opinion re: Whitnall staying or going in this thread? :roll: I've just listed his options and at the moment, they don't look too good for the CFC if he's not wanted.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group