The part i found most interesting was that Luke Shuey only got 93.75 points for his HEAD HIGH BUMP on Keefe who was in hospital with pins and needles. Repeat..........HEAD HIGH BUMP.
The inconsistency is a joke.

Michael Jamison, Carlton, has been charged with a Level Three engaging in rough conduct offence against Ricky Henderson, Adelaide Crows, during the first quarter of the NAB Challenge match between Carlton and the Adelaide Crows, played at Visy Park on Friday March 4, 2011.

In summary, he can accept a two-match sanction with an early plea.

The incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), high impact (three points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Three offence, drawing 325 demerit points and a three-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 243.75 points and a two-match sanction.

Luke Shuey, West Coast, has been charged with a Level One engaging in rough conduct offence against Tom Hunter, Collingwood, during the first quarter of the NAB Cup semi final between West Coast and Collingwood, played at Patersons Stadium on Saturday March 5, 2011.

In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record with an early plea.

The incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.

Riewoldt threatens thin Blues line
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/r ... 1bl6q.html

WE'RE DOOMED according to Michael Gleeson

Essendon* cheated, simple as that

I like how all our defensive players are rooted because of a lack of preparation etc, but Riewoldt is primed to tear us a new one after he plays his first practice match for the year this week

Sorry but this is very, very weak from our administration!
Eddie was able to get Maxwell off and we again just lay down and bent over for very much less.
I now ask, what does the AFL have over us that we cannot stand up for our rights?

Sorry but this is very, very weak from our administration!
Eddie was able to get Maxwell off and we again just lay down and bent over for very much less.
I now ask, what does the AFL have over us that we cannot stand up for our rights?

Are you talking about 2009?

The AFL changed the rule after that incident.

Try facts instead of outrage.

The only difference is that the MRP assessed Jammo's as "high impact", and Schuey's as "low impact".

I didn't see either, so I don't know if this is a fair assessment or not; just clarifying the issue.

http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/208/default ... sid=108940

Are you talking about 2009?

The AFL changed the rule after that incident.

Try facts instead of outrage.

I'm struggling to find what rule Jamison broke? The bump wasn't high.

How do you explain Henderson being knocked out then? It was high.

Maybe you can explain to me and others how the Jamison hip & shoulder was different to the Embley one? Considering neither hit the other player in the head, fact!
Maybe you can explain to me how Kennedy's snipe was overlooked, yet Jamison's legal bump wasn't?
The facts are they pick and choose who they charge and when. Fact!

As per normal however there are some amongst us who still love towing the AFL line, even after shafting us again and again and again. Flower me we have some either naive or *snip* amongst us these days!