TheGame wrote:
At the beginning of the year the Hawks were many people's tip for the spoon. We were tipped by most to finish around the middle of the ladder.
Which, depending on your perspective means people either misread where we were at or we underachieved.
Considering our list versus Hawthorn's, in hindsight it's hard to see why people would have rated us so much higher than them (including myself) other than the fact that they were backing Pagan over Clarkson and the Wizard Cup results increased that faith.
Is Pagan a victim of other people's expectations or is our list really a mid-table list?
I can't find another 7 or 8 lists I'd rate below ours.