Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jul 11, 2025 4:50 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 10:27 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 10:45 pm
Posts: 423
a lock for the spoon.
some of the young guys are okay but when you're as bad as carlton you need your young kids to be stars to get you out of it, and carlton's quite simply aren't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 1:47 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 713
Location: New York
I suspect that any change to the priority pick system will be a modification rather than a baby out with the bath water response. I think the system that will be in place next year will be to look at a team's performance over a three year period so that at team that has consistently performed poorly will obtain the priority pick. I think any move to totally abolish the priority pick system will completely undermine the credibility of St Kilda's success which would be unfair on them because they have drafted very well with the picks they received. I suspect that such a response would be an untenable situation for the league. Just my opinion. Based on that kind of criteria, we should qualify for the pick. Having said that, I agree with Blue Bird let's defer any discussion of tanking until we at least loose the first 6 games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 8:53 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
If we don't improve next year, the knives may well be out for Pagan's head. As good as he is, I would expect some sort of improvement, at least by winning 8-10 games.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 9:29 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
We dont have a platform to win 8 to 10 games next year CC..

Our problem is we think we have automatic passage to being a gread side FAST.. due to our mid to recent history....

Were going to take 4 years like ALL clubs that start with NOTHING.

In 3 years we should be like the Doggies but wont because the Doggies still have B Johnston, Darcy, Grant, West and Smith...

We have nothing so an extra year will be needed.

Players like Waite will be middle aged footballers.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 9:55 am 
Online
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18075
I dont care what the reality is.
I want to get down to PP for the first day of pre season with unrealistic hopes.
I'll watch AW run the park in record time, muse about the recruits, comment about how many kilos Waitey has put on.
I'll sit back with the sun on my face and dream about going forward.

All you realists can sit elsewhere. :wink:
Hope re emerges in a couple of months.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:03 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8190
fjanyc wrote:
I suspect that any change to the priority pick system will be a modification rather than a baby out with the bath water response. I think the system that will be in place next year will be to look at a team's performance over a three year period so that at team that has consistently performed poorly will obtain the priority pick.


Over 2 years would be much fairer, for those clubs that haven't benefited so much from the system. And also it would mean weak sides aren't anchored firmly to the bottom for the foreseeable future.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:04 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
Now that is some post BV! Stuff dreams are made of!

Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:23 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Blue Vain wrote:
I dont care what the reality is.
I want to get down to PP for the first day of pre season with unrealistic hopes.
I'll watch AW run the park in record time, muse about the recruits, comment about how many kilos Waitey has put on.
I'll sit back with the sun on my face and dream about going forward.

All you realists can sit elsewhere. :wink:
Hope re emerges in a couple of months.


You can run but you cant hide.... :lol: :P

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 6:18 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
fjanyc wrote:
I suspect that any change to the priority pick system will be a modification rather than a baby out with the bath water response. I think the system that will be in place next year will be to look at a team's performance over a three year period so that at team that has consistently performed poorly will obtain the priority pick. I think any move to totally abolish the priority pick system will completely undermine the credibility of St Kilda's success which would be unfair on them because they have drafted very well with the picks they received. I suspect that such a response would be an untenable situation for the league. Just my opinion. Based on that kind of criteria, we should qualify for the pick. Having said that, I agree with Blue Bird let's defer any discussion of tanking until we at least loose the first 6 games.


I agree with you fja. But, the only trouble is the AFL has proven they don't care if they put themselves in an untenable position. Stripping our draft picks after trade week is one example of this. Do you think Richmond would have traded pick #4 if they knew it was really pick #2?

That said, I think a tweak to priority selections will be what happens too.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 7:03 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:25 am
Posts: 787
I think in 2006 we will be like Hawthorn this year. Fairly exciting team with some good youngsters and improving but not many more wins. I would be happy with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:49 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2143
I would like to analyse this after round 5,2006. If Carlton are an improved team and can challenge for the finals then good and well - continue along that path. (I can dream if I want to Synbad) If they get thrashed by over 15 goals by anyone up to round 5 then i think it is time for bottoming out again.


Anything can happen in the first 5 rounds in this competition... Carlton could even win 4 or 5 of them. Imagine what may have been if we beat north in round 1 this year.


Don't get me wrong - I am glad we are getting priority picks but chance and injuries do have a place in every year's competition.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:12 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Bottom four, no finals for a while..agree with Blue Bird..
The task was greater than most of us realised and the fact we have had to take a few steps backward might give some ammunition to those who want Denis Pagan out. Likewise any poor trading ie Fev to Collingwood and Fev having a good year might also bring more pressure on DP..for mine I think we should retain both Denis Pagan and Fev and not expect too much too soon...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:47 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 437
Location: The Pratt Stand
I have a mate who is well connected at the club and he told me that we will win 6 games next year. It is a done deal and this comes from someone VERY high up. I can't say who it is, but trust me it is high.

Not only that, he told me that we will win two of those games by 1 point and two others by over 10 goals...again that is a done deal.

Also told me that we will be trading Clarke for Judd...a done deal.

Don't shoot the messenger, but this comes from very high up.

_________________
Number 17 - come on down!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Teddy wrote:
I have a mate who is well connected at the club and he told me that we will win 6 games next year. It is a done deal and this comes from someone VERY high up. I can't say who it is, but trust me it is high.

Not only that, he told me that we will win two of those games by 1 point and two others by over 10 goals...again that is a done deal.

Also told me that we will be trading Clarke for Judd...a done deal.

Don't shoot the messenger, but this comes from very high up.


I believe you....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 2:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18761
Location: threeohfivethree
tap in 79 wrote:
Anything can happen in the first 5 rounds in this competition... Carlton could even win 4 or 5 of them. Imagine what may have been if we beat north in round 1 this year.


We may have ended up with 5.5 wins and Marc Murphy would be dressing as a jailbird every weekend for the next 10 years. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:42 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 797
Location: Funky Town
I would love to see Carrots, Bentick, Simpson, Waite, Fisher, Livo, AW really stand up and play 22 solid consistant games. We would also need to beat Collingwood, Richmond, and Essendon*.

......And Campo to win the Brownlow medal :-D
.......And Prenda to learn how to kick, ruck, and handball properly :shock:

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 9:56 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:22 pm
Posts: 1499
Location: Sydney
Id expect a similar year to this.

I believe though that this depends on how Pagan coaches. Quite often this year I was baffled by coaching decisions. I feel that they coaching staff were deliberately holding some back in the VFL while others were taken from their comfort zones and played out of position.

I would expect Setanta to play almost all senior games and his brother to start playing a role in the Bullants firsts. Hopefully elevating Setanta will continue a trend of young and enthusiastic players stepping up and putting more pressure on senior players to be accoutable.

The biggest variable will be how the trading season pans out. At present we a have forward that on its day could tear a new arseh*** against any other side. However our midfield is just to inconsistant to supply them with the ball often enough. Our defense is the worst in the comp. We have players filling key positions that they arnt suited to. and drop their heads far to quickly when things go bad. Maybe with a few badly needed KPP additions we could threaten the 8 but is this wise? Do we have enough young kids with the ability to continue this sort of rise long term?

I initially though Id be happy with us being very competitive but what would this do to morale. Competitve but still losing? Id rather see a few big wins a few hard fought victories, quite a few close losses and just a couple times being on the receiving end of belts from the top 4 sides. This would at least give the impression of improvement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:05 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Teddy wrote:
I have a mate who is well connected at the club and he told me that we will win 6 games next year. It is a done deal and this comes from someone VERY high up. I can't say who it is, but trust me it is high.

Not only that, he told me that we will win two of those games by 1 point and two others by over 10 goals...again that is a done deal.

Also told me that we will be trading Clarke for Judd...a done deal.

Don't shoot the messenger, but this comes from very high up.


Franga told you this yeah?

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:57 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
He lied. ;)

We'll win the flag now won't we ... now that the Messiah is ours for the taking.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue Vain, bluechampion, Google [Bot] and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group