Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 12, 2025 12:27 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Fevola or Whitnall. which one would you trade?
Lance 50%  50%  [ 45 ]
Fev 50%  50%  [ 45 ]
Total votes : 90
Author Message
 Post subject: Lance or Fevola
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:46 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Who wpuld you keep....(Next year)

Its one or the other.. cant say neither...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Can someone run the poll????

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:57 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:25 am
Posts: 787
Keep Fevola.

Keep Lappin.

Trade Campo and Lance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:00 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Lance.
Fev has higher trade value.

Lance offers more to the forward line in terms of player direction/movement which will be beneficial for setantas development going forward and has better on field leadership. Has also had his first real injury free season (esp preseason) for a few years. Should get better next year (and with the consistency will come the higher trade value IF we decide to go that way). Having said that though, I wouldnt be prepared to pay more than 350k/year for lance.

If however the club only wanted to trade one player and Fev was that player, I would probably be prepared to offer a 1 year, 400k incentive loaded contract for lance - incentive being based on skinfolds, fitness levels and B&F finish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:02 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: Elwood
Trade lance (this year ) he had a "Great Year " :wink: has value is uncontracted, we have the element of fear for him PSD hence he will move this year if deemed the right thing by the club. Walk talk is rubbish...

Keep Fev hang him out to dry next season... He makes the transition to being a Clubman /Leader of tomorrow or he gets traded seasons end has no option but to go as the club please.

The beauty of this is we are not putting all our eggs in one basket. And we still keep Quality player on the list.

Answer Lance...

Pity for both individuals but with success comes hard sometimes harsh decisions.

_________________
I know a little secret. And i'm not sharing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:07 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
I selected Lance thinking the poll was "Who do you want the club to trade away?" type question.

For the record, I would almost advocate getting rid of both but with the consensus being that next years draft is a super one, I would like to keep Fev for one more year and perhaps put him up for trade next year. I think that he will inevitably continue in his petulant, sulky, immature ways and only frustrate the club and supporters further.

I think it is dangerous for the club to cull too many 'senior' players (and I use that term loosely!!!). Draft picks will be more valuable next year so keep something to deal with. In an ideal world, Campo gone, Lance gone and Lappin, well, to achieve his big final contract he might need to go. 3 years is absurd.

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
maybe we can delete this poll and start again?
I almost did the same thing....

Just word it....

Who should go???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:11 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:25 am
Posts: 787
Synbad wrote:
maybe we can delete this poll and start again?
I almost did the same thing....

Just word it....

Who should go???


To confusing. I voted Fev meaning he is kept. Can the mods clean this poll up a little to be "who is traded"?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:12 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:59 pm
Posts: 2134
Location: Feeding the ducks at the Percy Treyvaud Memorial Park
Bye Fev.

_________________
In Bolts we trust.......Until we don't anymore


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19596
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
4thchicken wrote:
Lance.
Fev has higher trade value.

Lance offers more to the forward line in terms of player direction/movement which will be beneficial for setantas development going forward and has better on field leadership. Has also had his first real injury free season (esp preseason) for a few years. Should get better next year (and with the consistency will come the higher trade value IF we decide to go that way). Having said that though, I wouldnt be prepared to pay more than 350k/year for lance.

If however the club only wanted to trade one player and Fev was that player, I would probably be prepared to offer a 1 year, 400k incentive loaded contract for lance - incentive being based on skinfolds, fitness levels and B&F finish.


I think mobile forwards are the way forward - Lance is not mobile and doesn't show any onfield leadership. Fancy him asking for 400K after his lack of effort the past 4 years (besides his last year, which is the last year on his contract)

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:28 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Effes wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Lance.
Fev has higher trade value.

Lance offers more to the forward line in terms of player direction/movement which will be beneficial for setantas development going forward and has better on field leadership. Has also had his first real injury free season (esp preseason) for a few years. Should get better next year (and with the consistency will come the higher trade value IF we decide to go that way). Having said that though, I wouldnt be prepared to pay more than 350k/year for lance.

If however the club only wanted to trade one player and Fev was that player, I would probably be prepared to offer a 1 year, 400k incentive loaded contract for lance - incentive being based on skinfolds, fitness levels and B&F finish.


I think mobile forwards are the way forward - Lance is not mobile and doesn't show any onfield leadership. Fancy him asking for 400K after his lack of effort the past 4 years (besides his last year, which is the last year on his contract)


400k is incentive loaded - if he can maintain good skinfolds/fitness and finishes top5 in the B&F then he will have had a good year. Which means 2 consecutive good years - which means higher trade value as opposed to this year. If he doesnt achieve everything in the contract he would end up a fair way below 400k (ie 250-300k).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:13 pm
Posts: 1191
Location: Narre Warren VIC
If people wants to get rid of Fevola, u might as well Get rid of them all, Close the Club and lets go find ourseleves another Club to barrack for...


We have one of the best potential players in the league who is the only one who can kick 50+ goals and nails them.... he Can turn a game so quickly and win it off his boots, YET Carlton supporters Are quick to jump on someone and demand for their sacking... why? cuase our pride eats us away everyyyyyyyyy time we are down or losing....

Before people fire shots at Fev, you have got to understand that his case wasnt helped at all this year.... We have had a joke of a midfield who couldnt even make a 10m pass, for them to be delivering the kind of balls a forward needs....

i am not here to make excuses for him, but a fact is a fact... the Guy has been under a Groin injury for most of the second half, he tried as much as he could to drag out the best defenders of every opposition team so others can do something.....

His attitude is a problem and always has been a problem, but its something he can work on.....YOU just dont let go of such rare Talent....

We will never get a Fair Trade for FEV.... we will always end up with a shocking selection that will come to haunt us....history proves that.....

As a Club we need to stop this hypocracy and protect our best players, and i see Fevola as one of them.....

O'halapin isnt going to be half as good as Fevola, and no HE will NOT run the Carlton forward line..... the more i watch him in the VFL, the more i realise he is just not for AFL footy... he needs at least 3 more years before he can carry a forward line and become a match Winner....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:35 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
St Kilda traded quality in Lockett, Hall, Everitt for good draft picks, and look where they are now.

Bag them to shit if you want. But I'd rather Carlton be in the top 4.

St Kilda is the model we should be following. Its proven, its progressive.

Piss them both off, but if only one, piss of Lance this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
4thchicken wrote:
Effes wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Lance.
Fev has higher trade value.

Lance offers more to the forward line in terms of player direction/movement which will be beneficial for setantas development going forward and has better on field leadership. Has also had his first real injury free season (esp preseason) for a few years. Should get better next year (and with the consistency will come the higher trade value IF we decide to go that way). Having said that though, I wouldnt be prepared to pay more than 350k/year for lance.

If however the club only wanted to trade one player and Fev was that player, I would probably be prepared to offer a 1 year, 400k incentive loaded contract for lance - incentive being based on skinfolds, fitness levels and B&F finish.


I think mobile forwards are the way forward - Lance is not mobile and doesn't show any onfield leadership. Fancy him asking for 400K after his lack of effort the past 4 years (besides his last year, which is the last year on his contract)


400k is incentive loaded - if he can maintain good skinfolds/fitness and finishes top5 in the B&F then he will have had a good year. Which means 2 consecutive good years - which means higher trade value as opposed to this year. If he doesnt achieve everything in the contract he would end up a fair way below 400k (ie 250-300k).


Wont happen.. the club has drawn a line in the sand and wont be bullied by players that have negotiated huge contracts iun the past only to do nothing....

If the club yeilds on this stance.. we deserve everything we get for the next decade.. (it wont be good).. cos it will mean we have NO leadership on or off the field.

Lance HAS to go.. and take his baggage with him....

Then we can make a decision on Fev next year....

The club needs to reinvent itself...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:38 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Dodo27 wrote:
If people wants to get rid of Fevola, u might as well Get rid of them all, Close the Club and lets go find ourseleves another Club to barrack for...


We have one of the best potential players in the league who is the only one who can kick 50+ goals and nails them.... he Can turn a game so quickly and win it off his boots, YET Carlton supporters Are quick to jump on someone and demand for their sacking... why? cuase our pride eats us away everyyyyyyyyy time we are down or losing....

Before people fire shots at Fev, you have got to understand that his case wasnt helped at all this year.... We have had a joke of a midfield who couldnt even make a 10m pass, for them to be delivering the kind of balls a forward needs....

i am not here to make excuses for him, but a fact is a fact... the Guy has been under a Groin injury for most of the second half, he tried as much as he could to drag out the best defenders of every opposition team so others can do something.....

His attitude is a problem and always has been a problem, but its something he can work on.....YOU just dont let go of such rare Talent....

We will never get a Fair Trade for FEV.... we will always end up with a shocking selection that will come to haunt us....history proves that.....

As a Club we need to stop this hypocracy and protect our best players, and i see Fevola as one of them.....

O'halapin isnt going to be half as good as Fevola, and no HE will NOT run the Carlton forward line..... the more i watch him in the VFL, the more i realise he is just not for AFL footy... he needs at least 3 more years before he can carry a forward line and become a match Winner....


You're right. BUT ... if we trade either of these guys I don't think Pagan will allow himself to be dudded by another club.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19596
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
CB, is it possible to change my vote since the question has been changed.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:41 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:25 am
Posts: 787
Effes wrote:
CB, is it possible to change my vote since the question has been changed.


Yes me to. I voted for Fev to stay. Changing it to be traded means I would vote for Lance now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:42 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Synbad wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Effes wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Lance.
Fev has higher trade value.

Lance offers more to the forward line in terms of player direction/movement which will be beneficial for setantas development going forward and has better on field leadership. Has also had his first real injury free season (esp preseason) for a few years. Should get better next year (and with the consistency will come the higher trade value IF we decide to go that way). Having said that though, I wouldnt be prepared to pay more than 350k/year for lance.

If however the club only wanted to trade one player and Fev was that player, I would probably be prepared to offer a 1 year, 400k incentive loaded contract for lance - incentive being based on skinfolds, fitness levels and B&F finish.


I think mobile forwards are the way forward - Lance is not mobile and doesn't show any onfield leadership. Fancy him asking for 400K after his lack of effort the past 4 years (besides his last year, which is the last year on his contract)


400k is incentive loaded - if he can maintain good skinfolds/fitness and finishes top5 in the B&F then he will have had a good year. Which means 2 consecutive good years - which means higher trade value as opposed to this year. If he doesnt achieve everything in the contract he would end up a fair way below 400k (ie 250-300k).


Wont happen.. the club has drawn a line in the sand and wont be bullied by players that have negotiated huge contracts iun the past only to do nothing....

If the club yeilds on this stance.. we deserve everything we get for the next decade.. (it wont be good).. cos it will mean we have NO leadership on or off the field.

Lance HAS to go.. and take his baggage with him....

Then we can make a decision on Fev next year....

The club needs to reinvent itself...


the line in the sand is movable - as we have seen with Fev's contract earlier in the year. If they were serious about it they should have stuck to their guns (re: 3 year contract). IMHO, for every year we keep Fev, his trade value diminishes as he builds more baggage and gets older- he is less likely to 'mature' and is already at his physical peak (fitness base aside).

My suspicion/hope is that we will sign lance (for around 350k) though it wont happen until very very late in the process.

As an aside, any idea how old hall was when he was traded to sydney? Is Fev already at or past that age?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Scrub it and begin the poll again.....

No point having a poll thats not an accurate refelection of a sample of votes...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:45 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
4thchicken wrote:
Synbad wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Effes wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Lance.
Fev has higher trade value.

Lance offers more to the forward line in terms of player direction/movement which will be beneficial for setantas development going forward and has better on field leadership. Has also had his first real injury free season (esp preseason) for a few years. Should get better next year (and with the consistency will come the higher trade value IF we decide to go that way). Having said that though, I wouldnt be prepared to pay more than 350k/year for lance.

If however the club only wanted to trade one player and Fev was that player, I would probably be prepared to offer a 1 year, 400k incentive loaded contract for lance - incentive being based on skinfolds, fitness levels and B&F finish.


I think mobile forwards are the way forward - Lance is not mobile and doesn't show any onfield leadership. Fancy him asking for 400K after his lack of effort the past 4 years (besides his last year, which is the last year on his contract)


400k is incentive loaded - if he can maintain good skinfolds/fitness and finishes top5 in the B&F then he will have had a good year. Which means 2 consecutive good years - which means higher trade value as opposed to this year. If he doesnt achieve everything in the contract he would end up a fair way below 400k (ie 250-300k).


Wont happen.. the club has drawn a line in the sand and wont be bullied by players that have negotiated huge contracts iun the past only to do nothing....

If the club yeilds on this stance.. we deserve everything we get for the next decade.. (it wont be good).. cos it will mean we have NO leadership on or off the field.

Lance HAS to go.. and take his baggage with him....

Then we can make a decision on Fev next year....

The club needs to reinvent itself...


the line in the sand is movable - as we have seen with Fev's contract earlier in the year. If they were serious about it they should have stuck to their guns (re: 3 year contract). IMHO, for every year we keep Fev, his trade value diminishes as he builds more baggage and gets older- he is less likely to 'mature' and is already at his physical peak (fitness base aside).

My suspicion/hope is that we will sign lance (for around 350k) though it wont happen until very very late in the process.

As an aside, any idea how old hall was when he was traded to sydney? Is Fev already at or past that age?


Youre suspicion is wrong......

Lance wont stay for 350k.... unless u believe bullistics mail....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group