Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 15, 2025 2:48 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 6:51 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18078
padre wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Mentoring our players?
When did Chapman suddenly become Iron man? Its funny that the same posters complaining that Eddie, Yazz and Jeffrey cant play midfield are the same ones wanting to get a 32 year old half forward with dodgy hammys who's past it as a midfield option.

Lets be real here. Murphy averages more contested possessions, more tackles and more 1% ers than Chapman. Yet some of Murphys biggest critics are wanting to get Chappy. :lol:
Geelong aren't flicking him for fun. They understand he's taking the place of a young player. FFS, I'm sure some of you trawl around peoples nature strips looking through their hard rubbish.

Maybe they are getting rid of him because he is keeping out younger players who are ready to step up. This just shows how well the cats are developing their list. We are not in the same category.


You're not wrong there. We're not in the same category by choice

padre wrote:
We need leadership and hardness, geelong have buckets of it. We dont yet have young guys crying out to step up. I am all in favour if he rounds off our list for 1-2 seasons while others are developing.


Hardness?
We average more contested possessions, contested marks, one percenters than Geelong and we smash them in clearances. Its our uncontested possessions that kill us.
Now that is where Chapman specialises. The trouble is, its our gamestyle that doesnt endear itself to uncontested possessions. Bringing in a 32 year old wont change that. As for not having young guys crying to step up, bringing in old blokes to take their place on the list doesnt help. Use that spot on a young draftee.
Graham was killing it in the VFL this season and should have received more games. He shouldnt have to battle a Paul Chapman for a spot in the side.The young bloke should always get preference if he's showing enough.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:53 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Blue Vain wrote:

Hardness?
We average more contested possessions, contested marks, one percenters than Geelong and we smash them in clearances. Its our uncontested possessions that kill us.
Now that is where Chapman specialises. The trouble is, its our gamestyle that doesnt endear itself to uncontested possessions. Bringing in a 32 year old wont change that. As for not having young guys crying to step up, bringing in old blokes to take their place on the list doesnt help. Use that spot on a young draftee.
Graham was killing it in the VFL this season and should have received more games. He shouldnt have to battle a Paul Chapman for a spot in the side.The young bloke should always get preference if he's showing enough.


..yes, and yet geelong are still a much harder side than us.. ..harder physically first off.. ..game stats have a lot to do with game style.. ..harder mentally, and by a long margin.. ....i'd even say harder emotionally.... ..in regards to graham 'killing it' in the vfl goes, sure.. ..late in the year.. ..earlier on he had setbacks, lets not make it out that he was on fire for months and 'old blokes' kept him out of the side.. ..and if there is only one last spot left in our best 22 for a young bloke and a fit chapman is keeping him out of the side.. ..yanno, we're in a good place.... ..thing is, an old bloke [1 of] isn't keeping young kids out, cos our side has plenty of positions/spots up for grabs.. ..and we have a coach that history says does play young kids.. ..he's not ross lyon..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:33 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
Savage took the money at the saints

Docherty will do the same with the doggies

Our problem is we don't haveuch space in the salary cap and are being outbidded by some of the struggling clubs who have plenty of room.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:37 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
Hate to say this, but the pies are killing it this year.

They will have three first round picks to with the three they had last year. That's 6 quality players in two years to compliment the list they have.

In two years, they have rebuilt there list by being bold and brave.

Where as we can't even convince fringe players to commit to our club because we are paying overs for a players who's played no footy in two years


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:37 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
trublu wrote:
Savage took the money at the saints

Docherty will do the same with the doggies

Our problem is we don't haveuch space in the salary cap and are being outbidded by some of the struggling clubs who have plenty of room.



No, he is part of a bigger deal between Hawks and Saints. He is not a free agent and can't freely choose.

_________________
TC suffers from the social media illness - the death of respect and constructive discourse by keyboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:38 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
Some of the rubbish posted here is astonishing.

_________________
TC suffers from the social media illness - the death of respect and constructive discourse by keyboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:41 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
I thoroughly recommend taking the 20 minutes and adding to your foe list at length. (Start here, the Dustin Martin thread and then the Daisy one).

My risk levels of having a stroke have plummeted.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:42 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
trublu wrote:
Savage took the money at the saints

Docherty will do the same with the doggies

Our problem is we don't haveuch space in the salary cap and are being outbidded by some of the struggling clubs who have plenty of room.


The Saints having exactly the player the Hawks want would have helped and it shows in them giving up pick 17 as well.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:45 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
mikkey wrote:
trublu wrote:
Savage took the money at the saints

Docherty will do the same with the doggies

Our problem is we don't haveuch space in the salary cap and are being outbidded by some of the struggling clubs who have plenty of room.



No, he is part of a bigger deal between Hawks and Saints. He is not a free agent and can't freely choose.


Well picked up Mickey.

17 and Savage for McEvoy is great for the Aints.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:55 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
trublu wrote:
Hate to say this, but the pies are killing it this year.

They will have three first round picks to with the three they had last year. That's 6 quality players in two years to compliment the list they have.

In two years, they have rebuilt there list by being bold and brave.

Where as we can't even convince fringe players to commit to our club because we are paying overs for a players who's played no footy in two years


..rubbish.. ..this year DT left them, not their choice.. ..Shaw went a bit off the rails, not their choice.. .... ..they have benefited, but by default.. ..last year they pushed out dawes, lynch as a cheap alternative a big bust.. ..dawes played his role [kpf, not fwd/ruck that bucks tried to make him], but was also cheap cash and provided good leadership and helped keep the team smooth, there's more to him leaving than just his onfield role.. ..ripple effect saw ruffled feathers this season.. ..yes they got grundy i think with that pick [actually dee's 2nd rounder, not a 1st round], but could have used their first rounder on him just the same just a few picks earlier..

..and fringe players, aren't the sort to be gnashing teeth over when you miss out, after getting a genuinely topline player to come over.. ..and it's more like 1 year, he played most games last year..

..but if you'd rather pay overs for fringe players instead of an AA player, that's your perogative..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:56 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:06 pm
Posts: 12
We have expressed some interest in schoenmakers ..hawks want our first round pick .. we are offering players .. they are not interested in any of our players


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:00 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
Exactly Cimm. People forget that to trade you have to have "currency". We can safely assume that we offered Hammer for Savage to the Hawks, but they deemed him not good enough for their ruck needs. That is how it goes.

The issue is quite simple. The club wants to keep its first round pick and does not do a total rebuild atm. If we did Gibbs, Kreuzer etc would be on the table and we would not have recruited Daisy ad would have kept the compo pick for Betts. You can choose to agree or disagree with the club. The strategy is list improvement - not not list rebuild. This is a difficult strategy in a trade week. On one side you cant offer players with lots of currency on the other hand you don't want to give up you first round pick.

In this situation you are up against clubs who are rebuilding or those in the middle of the window and willing to give up first round picks. Never expected too much from this trade period except for free agent(s) and hopefully better recruiting in the draft (with the expertise of the Geelong guy we hired).

People need to adjust their expectations.

_________________
TC suffers from the social media illness - the death of respect and constructive discourse by keyboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:00 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
bluepill wrote:
We have expressed some interest in schoenmakers ..hawks want our first round pick .. we are offering players .. they are not interested in any of our players


Ratts giving too much inside information?

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:06 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
camelboy wrote:
bluepill wrote:
We have expressed some interest in schoenmakers ..hawks want our first round pick .. we are offering players .. they are not interested in any of our players


Ratts giving too much inside information?


Channel 7's outside information would probably do the trick.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:07 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
bluepill wrote:
We have expressed some interest in schoenmakers ..hawks want our first round pick ..

Yeah....nah....

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:12 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Don't mind Schoenmakers at all. Not for pick 12 though.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:12 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
mikkey wrote:
trublu wrote:
Savage took the money at the saints

Docherty will do the same with the doggies

Our problem is we don't haveuch space in the salary cap and are being outbidded by some of the struggling clubs who have plenty of room.



No, he is part of a bigger deal between Hawks and Saints. He is not a free agent and can't freely choose.


He is contracted and didn't have to go anywhere. HE WENT WITH THE HIGHER FINANCIAL OFFER


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:17 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
trublu wrote:
mikkey wrote:
trublu wrote:
Savage took the money at the saints

Docherty will do the same with the doggies

Our problem is we don't haveuch space in the salary cap and are being outbidded by some of the struggling clubs who have plenty of room.



No, he is part of a bigger deal between Hawks and Saints. He is not a free agent and can't freely choose.


He is contracted and didn't have to go anywhere. HE WENT WITH THE HIGHER FINANCIAL OFFER


AND IS CONTRACTED SO THE HAWKS CAN PICK THE BEST OFFER.

WE DON'T HAVE WHAT THEY WANT!!!

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:32 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
trublu wrote:
Hate to say this, but the pies are killing it this year.

They will have three first round picks to with the three they had last year. That's 6 quality players in two years to compliment the list they have.

In two years, they have rebuilt there list by being bold and brave.

Where as we can't even convince fringe players to commit to our club because we are paying overs for a players who's played no footy in two years


..rubbish.. ..this year DT left them, not their choice.. ..Shaw went a bit off the rails, not their choice.. .... ..they have benefited, but by default.. ..last year they pushed out dawes, lynch as a cheap alternative a big bust.. ..dawes played his role [kpf, not fwd/ruck that bucks tried to make him], but was also cheap cash and provided good leadership and helped keep the team smooth, there's more to him leaving than just his onfield role.. ..ripple effect saw ruffled feathers this season.. ..yes they got grundy i think with that pick [actually dee's 2nd rounder, not a 1st round], but could have used their first rounder on him just the same just a few picks earlier..

..and fringe players, aren't the sort to be gnashing teeth over when you miss out, after getting a genuinely topline player to come over.. ..and it's more like 1 year, he played most games last year..

..but if you'd rather pay overs for fringe players instead of an AA player, that's your perogative..


You just proved my point right. For a team thats had a heap of players leave, injuries to key players, culture problems, players not buying in they still managed to finish above us and in sixth position.

DT isn't a huge loss. They've had two years without him. They have a good core group of players to rebuild around. like Swan, Pendles, Beams, Sidebottom, Reed, Cloke, Brown. The last two years they have and will inject 6 top 20 players to that list. With there recruiting history, i reckon all 6 will be guns. They are going to add Taylor Adams and Jessie White.

They will be contending in a year or two.

They are a very smart football club. They have smart football people making the right decisions.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:35 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
cimm1979 wrote:
trublu wrote:
mikkey wrote:
trublu wrote:
Savage took the money at the saints

Docherty will do the same with the doggies

Our problem is we don't haveuch space in the salary cap and are being outbidded by some of the struggling clubs who have plenty of room.



No, he is part of a bigger deal between Hawks and Saints. He is not a free agent and can't freely choose.


He is contracted and didn't have to go anywhere. HE WENT WITH THE HIGHER FINANCIAL OFFER


AND IS CONTRACTED SO THE HAWKS CAN PICK THE BEST OFFER.

WE DON'T HAVE WHAT THEY WANT!!!


So we swap pick 28 for savage. Hawks swap pick 17 and 28 for Mcavoy.

Whats the difference?

He took the money. Docherty is going to take the money.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 71 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group