Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 12:10 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1854 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 89, 90, 91, 92, 93  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 8:16 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
cecil89 wrote:
The list certainly appears to have increased depth, but as psych mentioned above I think we are lacking for top level talent.

3-4 years ago I would've rated Judd and Murphy as elite, with high hopes still for Henderson, Kreuzer, Gibbs and Yarran.

Right now I'd say Gibbs is elite (possibly being a touch generous there). Murphy hasn't produced to an elite level for a couple of seasons, Judd is the wrong side of 30, Kreuzer and Henderson have been injury hit and while I still hope they become elite, the odds are now worse than before. Yarran is very good at his role, but not elite.

My point is that our top end talent is less than it was previously. Our depth is stronger, but we really need 2-3 players to step up and become stars. Menzel has that potential. Boekhorst, Cripps, Docherty and Jaksch seem the next most likely. Do they fill me with as much confidence as the Henderson, Kreuzer, Gibbs & Yarran group of 3-4 years ago.. probably not.


I'm tipping Thomas for our 2015 B & F.
He almost seems to have been forgotten about.
I've got a hunch with a full pre-season behind him he's set for a blinder.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 9:06 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25552
Location: Bondi Beach
Cazzesman wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Could of easily had Laverde or Goddard or McKenzie who I rated much much higher.


Alot of AFL clubs didn't.

Enjoy 2015 regardless.

Regards Cazzesman



Good point. There you have 17 reasons to overlook all of those players.

No one will ever know.

What's the point? We've got our list well sorted for 2015.

So far before preseason starts, we have had 3 players undergoing ops, and now only Giles missing the preseason.
Last year it was 25 odd. BIG difference.

I will not be surprised if our boys, this list, ends the season in the Top 4.
Im going to enjoy 2015 more than the last 2-3. Just know it.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Last edited by bondiblue on Fri Dec 05, 2014 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 9:16 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 202
Friday is 1st List Lodgment day.
Is it possible to get the player numbers sorted out on the CFC website by the COB on Friday?
Is there any reason to delay this any longer?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 7:14 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
It is a better balanced list lacking star Fire power to be top 4. Also 15 players that are virtually starting their careers. Enjoy the development. We are 2 seasons off a serious rise up the ladder


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 8:26 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
Carlton and the culture club

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/c ... 21qw9.html

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 6:23 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6750
Location: Echuca
Good article.

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 7:50 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2436
murraycray wrote:
Good article.



If only they had done a fan survey 19 years ago :donk:

Let's get that full back Sticks rates ...

And on it goes.

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 8:36 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Not a bad article, and sums it up quite well, even when it uses some of the tiresome cliches (such as "should've traded Kruezer for Judd").

I found this part most interesting

Quote:
Greg Swann, who did this deal and had been successful in presiding over Collingwood's youth-focused philosophy, was unable to shift the collective thinking at his second club, despite employing the same coach (Mick Malthouse). Carlton have not drafted for an extra first-round draft pick in 14 years. Collingwood, meanwhile, for all its recent warts, has had seven top-20 picks over the past three post-seasons, eight if you count the swapping of Heath Shaw for Taylor Adams. Whether it works or not, the Collingwood direction is as clear and unambiguous as Carlton's has been muddled.

In 2001, Carlton drafted out of the Judd-Hodge-Ball-Bartel-Dal Santo-Stevie J-Mitchell-Swan superdraft to get Corey McKernan and Justin Murphy. Then the salary cap cheating penalties hit. The playing list eventually was restored to respectability, probably peaking in 2011. Since then, the Blues have been caught in the twilight zone between contention delusion and a half-baked rebuild. Their draft haul from this year can only be judged in retrospect, but the question must be asked why they always trade for a player, and never for a pick.


I agree with this, that we've traditionally shown zero creativity come trade-time and its hurt us. That said, I'm very pleased with the Jaksch/Whiley/#19 deal for #7 (all the Boekhorst rantings aside...hell for all we know Rogers might've picked him at #7 anyway!), as well as the Everitt and Docherty deals, so we are showing more lateral thinking in this area. But Niall's right that we also need to look at ways to improve our draft position. I'll be curious to see what we do next year, as its supposed to be a pretty busy FA period.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 10:21 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2436
Dunno about Swan ... he loved landing the big fish as much as anyone.
It's been a constant source of frustration that we have never really put much effort into improving our draft position. It's no guarantee, of course, but it increases the chances.
Last year we successfully targeted players like Everitt and particularly Docherty ... but that was partly forced upon us because so many of our kids in that age bracket have been busts.
And the Fev trade fell into our lap ... we went for players first and the pick plus Hendo deal wasn't our doing.

Like what we're hearing about chasing up and comers rather than the top-priced big fish - especially now that Boyd has gone.
History will soon determine the merits of our decisions with pick 7 this year but I think most of us are comfortable with what the club has done.

There's nothing more exciting than watching gun kids emerge.

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 11:03 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
chubbyruss wrote:


Finally the media are getting an handle on what most in the industry and most supporters have known for years.

Our management, planning, strategies and recruitment are archaic and second rate. We think we know more than everyone else, ignore the correct pathways and allow people who are simply not good enough at their jobs to guide the club forward.

Again, this year it was the same. The whole recruiting and draft strategy doesn't make sense and is actually in reverse to what most other clubs do. Are we buidling a club for mid range or a Premiership?

Our draft strategy defies belief and any logic. I don't understand getting Jones, Tutt & Dick. Average players at best. How will they help a poor side. Most clubs get these players to fill a role when challenging for a Premiership, not when you are supposed to be rebuilding.

I have said it before but within the industry our recruiting and the people involved are a joke. Not one of them would get a job at another club.

MLG seems to be making the right noises but not much has changed so far. I hope things will because to be honest hope is all we've got. Our membership numbers and bottom line prove that. We are no longer a powerful club.

We may win a few more games next year but we are a long way from being a Premiership contender and for me that's what I want to see.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 12:18 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2652
ThePsychologist wrote:
chubbyruss wrote:


Finally the media are getting an handle on what most in the industry and most supporters have known for years.

Our management, planning, strategies and recruitment are archaic and second rate. We think we know more than everyone else, ignore the correct pathways and allow people who are simply not good enough at their jobs to guide the club forward.

Again, this year it was the same. The whole recruiting and draft strategy doesn't make sense and is actually in reverse to what most other clubs do. Are we buidling a club for mid range or a Premiership?

Our draft strategy defies belief and any logic. I don't understand getting Jones, Tutt & Dick. Average players at best. How will they help a poor side. Most clubs get these players to fill a role when challenging for a Premiership, not when you are supposed to be rebuilding.

I have said it before but within the industry our recruiting and the people involved are a joke. Not one of them would get a job at another club.

MLG seems to be making the right noises but not much has changed so far. I hope things will because to be honest hope is all we've got. Our membership numbers and bottom line prove that. We are no longer a powerful club.

We may win a few more games next year but we are a long way from being a Premiership contender and for me that's what I want to see.



I do enjoy reading your posts psych
The only part I might not agree with is the logic of our drafting.
It has logic (maybe not to us) and purpose.
You answer your own puzzlement in part of your last statement. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 7:06 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
"I don't understand getting Jones, Tutt & Dick. Average players at best. How will they help a poor side. Most clubs get these players to fill a role when challenging for a Premiership, not when you are supposed to be rebuilding."

There are a lot of assumptions built into that statement. They can all be challenged. But as of now it is just personal opinion. I think we should wait before being so certain.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 8:49 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
padre wrote:
"I don't understand getting Jones, Tutt & Dick. Average players at best. How will they help a poor side. Most clubs get these players to fill a role when challenging for a Premiership, not when you are supposed to be rebuilding."

There are a lot of assumptions built into that statement. They can all be challenged. But as of now it is just personal opinion. I think we should wait before being so certain.


Jones - Waite
Tutt - Garlett
Dick - McLean

If you look at the whole season and look at the 3 that are going out I am pretty sure that we are not going to be worse off in terms of output.
In terms of character we won't miss Waite and Garlett and in terms of $$ I'd say the 3 coming in would be cheaper than the 3 going out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 9:02 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24655
Location: Kaloyasena
Donstuie wrote:
Not a bad article, and sums it up quite well, even when it uses some of the tiresome cliches (such as "should've traded Kruezer for Judd").

I found this part most interesting

Quote:
Greg Swann, who did this deal and had been successful in presiding over Collingwood's youth-focused philosophy, was unable to shift the collective thinking at his second club, despite employing the same coach (Mick Malthouse). Carlton have not drafted for an extra first-round draft pick in 14 years. Collingwood, meanwhile, for all its recent warts, has had seven top-20 picks over the past three post-seasons, eight if you count the swapping of Heath Shaw for Taylor Adams. Whether it works or not, the Collingwood direction is as clear and unambiguous as Carlton's has been muddled.

In 2001, Carlton drafted out of the Judd-Hodge-Ball-Bartel-Dal Santo-Stevie J-Mitchell-Swan superdraft to get Corey McKernan and Justin Murphy. Then the salary cap cheating penalties hit. The playing list eventually was restored to respectability, probably peaking in 2011. Since then, the Blues have been caught in the twilight zone between contention delusion and a half-baked rebuild. Their draft haul from this year can only be judged in retrospect, but the question must be asked why they always trade for a player, and never for a pick.


I agree with this, that we've traditionally shown zero creativity come trade-time and its hurt us. That said, I'm very pleased with the Jaksch/Whiley/#19 deal for #7 (all the Boekhorst rantings aside...hell for all we know Rogers might've picked him at #7 anyway!), as well as the Everitt and Docherty deals, so we are showing more lateral thinking in this area. But Niall's right that we also need to look at ways to improve our draft position. I'll be curious to see what we do next year, as its supposed to be a pretty busy FA period.



One of the main reasons we haven't been able to improve our draft position in recent years has been the poor state of our list and lack of trade currency that our players have, (save for the recent Hampson trade for pick 30 odd which landed us Docherty).

We will need to make some bold player for draft pick trades in the future in order to keep rejuvenating out list.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 10:16 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
AGRO wrote:
One of the main reasons we haven't been able to improve our draft position in recent years has been the poor state of our list and lack of trade currency that our players have, (save for the recent Hampson trade for pick 30 odd which landed us Docherty).

We will need to make some bold player for draft pick trades in the future in order to keep rejuvenating out list.

I think this is symptomatic of our list management issues also. We throw money and multi-year contracts at these guys, and when we finally decide to offload them they've either lost any trade value they might've once had, or they're locked into a contract that one of the parties would have to pay out. Our trading strategy is a reflection of our list management strategy, which is a reflection of our development, which is a reflection of our upper management etc. It's all one big snowball.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 10:19 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
we've got snowie balls
we got great big snowie balls...

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 10:26 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Posts: 1639
Location: Within the old Carlton recruting zone ...
AGRO wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
Not a bad article, and sums it up quite well, even when it uses some of the tiresome cliches (such as "should've traded Kruezer for Judd").

I found this part most interesting

Quote:
Greg Swann, who did this deal and had been successful in presiding over Collingwood's youth-focused philosophy, was unable to shift the collective thinking at his second club, despite employing the same coach (Mick Malthouse). Carlton have not drafted for an extra first-round draft pick in 14 years. Collingwood, meanwhile, for all its recent warts, has had seven top-20 picks over the past three post-seasons, eight if you count the swapping of Heath Shaw for Taylor Adams. Whether it works or not, the Collingwood direction is as clear and unambiguous as Carlton's has been muddled.

In 2001, Carlton drafted out of the Judd-Hodge-Ball-Bartel-Dal Santo-Stevie J-Mitchell-Swan superdraft to get Corey McKernan and Justin Murphy. Then the salary cap cheating penalties hit. The playing list eventually was restored to respectability, probably peaking in 2011. Since then, the Blues have been caught in the twilight zone between contention delusion and a half-baked rebuild. Their draft haul from this year can only be judged in retrospect, but the question must be asked why they always trade for a player, and never for a pick.


I agree with this, that we've traditionally shown zero creativity come trade-time and its hurt us. That said, I'm very pleased with the Jaksch/Whiley/#19 deal for #7 (all the Boekhorst rantings aside...hell for all we know Rogers might've picked him at #7 anyway!), as well as the Everitt and Docherty deals, so we are showing more lateral thinking in this area. But Niall's right that we also need to look at ways to improve our draft position. I'll be curious to see what we do next year, as its supposed to be a pretty busy FA period.


One of the main reasons we haven't been able to improve our draft position in recent years has been the poor state of our list and lack of trade currency that our players have, (save for the recent Hampson trade for pick 30 odd which landed us Docherty).

We will need to make some bold player for draft pick trades in the future in order to keep rejuvenating out list.


The early 2000s still cripples us even to this day. A bad list with too many veterans then smashed by drafting penalties left us with no room to move with trades for a number of years. All we had to deal was our draft picks to bring in the types of players that could change our culture for the better.

The article also conveniently omits the fact that Collingwood have traded out premiership players with currency which is why they are able to get first round picks in return. I'm not sure their strategy should be held up as the beacon because never in the history of the AFL has such a young premiership team been dismantled in such a short period of time. Time will tell if it leads to sustained success or just another succession of rebuilds.

_________________
In WADA we trust


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 12:01 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10627
chubbyruss wrote:


Rubbish article.
We tanked to draft top picks and failed miserably with our drafting not trading.
We embraced the draft (how many top 20 picks did we get again) but failed to nail the picks.
I will debate this until the cows come home. We did very little trading during that period, actually have done more trading during the last 2 years than the last 7.
Judd was a once off trade and journalists have built a case over it. :yikes:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 12:14 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Huh?

We failed miserably by drafting Murphy, Gibbs and Kreuzer?

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2014
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 12:21 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24655
Location: Kaloyasena
SurreyBlue wrote:
chubbyruss wrote:


Rubbish article.
We tanked to draft top picks and failed miserably with our drafting not trading.
We embraced the draft (how many top 20 picks did we get again) but failed to nail the picks.
I will debate this until the cows come home. We did very little trading during that period, actually have done more trading during the last 2 years than the last 7.
Judd was a once off trade and journalists have built a case over it. :yikes:




Image

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1854 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 89, 90, 91, 92, 93  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Traveller86 and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group