Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 13, 2025 8:54 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:46 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 395
keogh wrote:
There are 3 reasons why some players havent kicked on
1When a club wins 21.5 games over 4years thats pressure on everyone to peform
2Lack of leadership in the senior group
3 Basically not good enough to play consistently at AFL level

I cannot see us improving a great deal in 2006 and the half dozen players mentioned in the line of posts here will be moved on if their contracts are up.

You simply cannot substantiate any of the above in terms of point 1-3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:04 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 54
DOA wrote:
keogh wrote:
There are 3 reasons why some players havent kicked on
1When a club wins 21.5 games over 4years thats pressure on everyone to peform
2Lack of leadership in the senior group
3 Basically not good enough to play consistently at AFL level

I cannot see us improving a great deal in 2006 and the half dozen players mentioned in the line of posts here will be moved on if their contracts are up.

You simply cannot substantiate any of the above in terms of point 1-3


There ar emany many reasons why someone wont kick on including fitness, maturity, relationship to coach, relationship to other players, being played out of position, being played for limited periods of time, not being played, personal issues. The list goes on and on and on and on. To try to summarise it in 3 is just not good enough, like you say some of these players are. Plus there is a combination of all of these reasons.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:43 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 940
keogh wrote:
There are 3 reasons why some players havent kicked on
1When a club wins 21.5 games over 4years thats pressure on everyone to peform
2Lack of leadership in the senior group
3 Basically not good enough to play consistently at AFL level

I cannot see us improving a great deal in 2006 and the half dozen players mentioned in the line of posts here will be moved on if their contracts are up.


No, there is one simple reason why they haven't kicked on, they just should not have been drafted in the first place. There are a number of them who were thought to be full of potential but this was just a furphy. We have gone for speculative picks at times hoping that they come good when the chances were very slim overall. Identifying the wrong option has been our forte in the past.

Better quality research into the player's mental capacity, will to succeed, general football ability, body development potential & genuine upside overall may see us imporve our hit rate at the draft.

_________________
GROUND ZERO + DRAFTING YOUTH = SUSTAINED SUCCESS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 10:04 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 17015
Location: Melbourne
Which ones in particular Shiek. While you are at it can you supply a few of the names of players you would have picked instead and why. Should make for interesting discussion........again. Can't ever have tooooo much discussion about past picks.

By the way who should we pick this year at 1, 4, 20 and 36. Get it on record now......just for future reference. Actually I'll make it easy for you. Tell me which players picked inside 25 will play 100 games.

I know you will say you don't have the information you need and you are not the one being paid to make the calls but have a crack at it anyway......just to humor me and many others here on TC.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 10:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Cazzesman wrote:
Which ones in particular Shiek. While you are at it can you supply a few of the names of players you would have picked instead and why. Should make for interesting discussion........again. Can't ever have tooooo much discussion about past picks.

By the way who should we pick this year at 1, 4, 20 and 36. Get it on record now......just for future reference. Actually I'll make it easy for you. Tell me which players picked inside 25 will play 100 games.

I know you will say you don't have the information you need and you are not the one being paid to make the calls but have a crack at it anyway......just to humor me and many others here on TC.

Regards Cazzesman


:lol: :lol: :lol: Good one Cazzesman.

will look forward to TheSheik's non-response! :lol:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 10:34 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 940
Jarusa wrote:
will look forward to TheSheik's non-response! :lol:


Get out of his arse 'Mr. $2 shop', I'll happily give you a response, meanwhile, you go create a graph or colour-in your McDonalds book.

First of all, let me further explain, I'm not talking about the guys picked up immediately last year or the year before, I'm confident two out of Blackwell, Hartlett. Walker & Russell will become 200 game players for us. What I'm looking at is those who should be performing infinitely better than they have given the amount of time they have been in the system. And this also applies to some of the trade deals.

Davies - way too erratic & prone to brainsnaps
Sporn - to become our CHB and taken at pick #10 :shock:
Wiggins - he's a trier admittedly but has he actually improved at all ??
Livingston - I reckon this was a bummer though, I thought he was a good pick but just was grabbed way too high
DeLuca - will he ever take a one grab mark ??
Prendergast - great tank of petrol but is he really going to make it ??
Longmuir - once a dud always a dud
McGrath - second stringer at best
Bannister - flash in the pan
Chambers - will be a champ for the Ants

Apart from the Chambers, Longmuir & McGrath, those guys on that list are still considered 'young' but have been in the system for around 4-5 years but are not going to be the future of our football club.

We have been lucky with some solid pick-ups at cheap cost with Simpson & Fisher but late picks like that have saved our arse way from complete embarrassment way too often.

I could go back through the drafts and pick out the obvious names that stand out after we have drafted those bozos but that's too easy with the value of hindsight and a no-brainer. We didn't have the infrastructure in place then and still don't (even though it appears that the club is about to make the necessary changes) to identify the better credentialled players. This is the intent of my previous post, we should have done heaps better than we have over the past 4-5 years, if we had of, we would be much further down the track in the rebuilding stage.

_________________
GROUND ZERO + DRAFTING YOUTH = SUSTAINED SUCCESS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 10:35 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 940
Cazzesman wrote:
Tell me which players picked inside 25 will play 100 games.


None of them !!

_________________
GROUND ZERO + DRAFTING YOUTH = SUSTAINED SUCCESS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 10:41 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 940
Cazzesman wrote:
I know you will say you don't have the information you need and you are not the one being paid to make the calls but have a crack at it anyway......just to humor me and many others here on TC.

Regards Cazzesman


Well if it's humour you are after Yoda, then why don't you put your nuts on the line and tell me ?? You're the avid TAC games watcher, you spend hours compiling information about all of the players. Why don't you give us your expert opinion instead of me plucking it out of my arse ?? You've got the formguide, the pages & pages of notes you have made on every player who has done anything anywhere ??

Go on, dazzle us with an informed opinion after all of this indepth research ??

_________________
GROUND ZERO + DRAFTING YOUTH = SUSTAINED SUCCESS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
So what's the go on here?

Do you need to have "inside" contact to be able to post?

Or simply live in Melbourne?

Or just be a Carlton fan?

I'm confused as to what the posting parameters are.

:?:

No matter what...no-one's gonna stop me!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19596
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
You love stirring that pot don't you Verbs :wink:

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Effes wrote:
You love stirring that pot don't you Verbs :wink:


Depends what's in the pot. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:37 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
:lol: :lol: Great non-answer Captain Happypants!

Deflectabot lives!!

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:38 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 940
Jarusa wrote:
:lol: :lol: Great non-answer Captain Happypants!

Deflectabot lives!!


And your post is ....... ?? No wonder you are up to 4300+ posts , no content, just your standard emoticons anser "$2 shop", it's roolly roolly good.

_________________
GROUND ZERO + DRAFTING YOUTH = SUSTAINED SUCCESS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:45 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 54
TheSheik wrote:
Jarusa wrote:
will look forward to TheSheik's non-response! :lol:


Get out of his arse 'Mr. $2 shop', I'll happily give you a response, meanwhile, you go create a graph or colour-in your McDonalds book.

First of all, let me further explain, I'm not talking about the guys picked up immediately last year or the year before, I'm confident two out of Blackwell, Hartlett. Walker & Russell will become 200 game players for us. What I'm looking at is those who should be performing infinitely better than they have given the amount of time they have been in the system. And this also applies to some of the trade deals.

Davies - way too erratic & prone to brainsnaps
Sporn - to become our CHB and taken at pick #10 :shock:
Wiggins - he's a trier admittedly but has he actually improved at all ??
Livingston - I reckon this was a bummer though, I thought he was a good pick but just was grabbed way too high
DeLuca - will he ever take a one grab mark ??
Prendergast - great tank of petrol but is he really going to make it ??
Longmuir - once a dud always a dud
McGrath - second stringer at best
Bannister - flash in the pan
Chambers - will be a champ for the Ants

Apart from the Chambers, Longmuir & McGrath, those guys on that list are still considered 'young' but have been in the system for around 4-5 years but are not going to be the future of our football club.

We have been lucky with some solid pick-ups at cheap cost with Simpson & Fisher but late picks like that have saved our arse way from complete embarrassment way too often.

I could go back through the drafts and pick out the obvious names that stand out after we have drafted those bozos but that's too easy with the value of hindsight and a no-brainer. We didn't have the infrastructure in place then and still don't (even though it appears that the club is about to make the necessary changes) to identify the better credentialled players. This is the intent of my previous post, we should have done heaps better than we have over the past 4-5 years, if we had of, we
would be much further down the track in the rebuilding stage.


You took half a page to say to say that we've made recruiting errors over the past few years? Deerrrrr?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:52 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 940
Puck Knuckle wrote:
You took half a page to say to say that we've made recruiting errors over the past few years? Deerrrrr?


It is because of these errors in drafting that Blackwell, Hartlett, Walker & Russell are now under immense pressure to perform. We cannot afford to have any more blowouts in regards to players not making it. If those four don't cut it, then we are in more shit than a Werribee duck.

If guys like Sporn and Wiggins were actually up to the task, then we wouldn't be wanting to fast track the development of those four. We have also been waiting for a while to see Simpson blossom too, thankfully he was finally given some ground time to show that he has what it takes.

_________________
GROUND ZERO + DRAFTING YOUTH = SUSTAINED SUCCESS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:22 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
TheSheik wrote:
Puck Knuckle wrote:
You took half a page to say to say that we've made recruiting errors over the past few years? Deerrrrr?


It is because of these errors in drafting that Blackwell, Hartlett, Walker & Russell are now under immense pressure to perform. We cannot afford to have any more blowouts in regards to players not making it. If those four don't cut it, then we are in more shit than a Werribee duck.

If guys like Sporn and Wiggins were actually up to the task, then we wouldn't be wanting to fast track the development of those four. We have also been waiting for a while to see Simpson blossom too, thankfully he was finally given some ground time to show that he has what it takes.



Sheik....if you read my update of the "Collo"thread today; it may make you feel better.

Also ; the Herald Sun (no URL yet) goes a bit further and says Collo gives "A promise to use picks 1, 4, 20 and 26 for youth in the November 26 National Draft; a change to the recycling policies of Coach Denis Pagan of the last three seasons.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:31 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
*ahem*

Do I need to keep reminding everyone to cut out the personal attacks?

Ask a question, answer a question, leave the rest of it with your ego's at the front door please.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:35 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:59 pm
Posts: 2134
Location: Feeding the ducks at the Percy Treyvaud Memorial Park
I need to stay away from Werribee.....

_________________
In Bolts we trust.......Until we don't anymore


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 10:37 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 940
Warby wrote:
Sheik....if you read my update of the "Collo"thread today; it may make you feel better.



I did read the info and it's the best thing I've read in ages, any restructuring or upgrading of our recruitment department is long overdue.

_________________
GROUND ZERO + DRAFTING YOUTH = SUSTAINED SUCCESS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 10:42 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 940
Mrs Caz wrote:
*ahem*

Do I need to keep reminding everyone to cut out the personal attacks?



Do you remind your husband of this during your dinner conversations ? :shock:

_________________
GROUND ZERO + DRAFTING YOUTH = SUSTAINED SUCCESS


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group