Mosquito Fleet wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Mick wound up being a stain of his own accord, and anyone who cried about the nature of the coaching structure we have since put in place - or the contract - is not someone we'd want to install in a club that is trying to modernise.
We had our own agenda, and some chuckleheads probably wanted to do it their way. So do we want that kind of arrogance, or do we want to move forward with a little bitter medicine and humility?
you have no idea
the current 7 of the board of 8 sacked ratts, appointed mick and sacked mick
And no one rose up to stop them until MLG
Synbad wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Women's football is a growth market to invest in, and will absolutely drive up our female support. It shouldn't be the only driver we focus on, nor is it.
Right now though I can tell you the Women of Carlton aren't happy their coterie group has been dismantled (at least officially), so Trigg might want to hurry up and deliver the updated version he's planning.
Can't women join a man's coterie ( mom gender based)group and become equals?
Is this a gender based apartheid?
In an ideal world, yes, but it's not an ideal world, and they don't feel comfortable.
Is that their fault, or ours?
Synbad wrote:
Do you have the business plan you can refer us to jimmae?
Do you have any data ?
When you're making massive structural changes, it's because the data has been lying to you, or you don't have enough data sources to begin with.
As to future business plans, they are obviously privileged information until public.