bondiblue wrote:
robertbb wrote:
Speaking of run-and-gun. I am absolutely certain if we hadn't have sacked Ratts when we did, we'd have either won a flag (or few) or competed in Prelims/GF's in the ensuing years.
We had that run-and-gun list that had been put together a few years before its time. We just needed another year without injuries and perhaps a FA to complete the puzzle. Blinked a year too soon. Look what happened with the Tigers when they backed their man, their list and their style instead of torching him.
i subscribe to this theory.
The Amigos with Fev or Setanta ran amok.
Midfield group was pretty good.
I do not, at least with the setup we had at the time.
On-field, Ratts benefitted from a generational midfielder who allowed his understudies (Murphy, Gibbs, Carrots etc) to reach their peaks as well. But when we got found out, there was never a plan B, an essential ingredient to taking that next step. Just look at St Kilda this year compared to last. The same thing, and this is after years gaining an apprenticeship under Clarkson. We had a team at its peak, good enough to sit at 5-6, but no plans to make it better.
Off-field we were (and some would say still are) way behind other clubs. List management was non-existent (with the exception of Wayne Hughes, who did nothing but call names out on draft day), leaving Ratts to take a more active role than a coach should, thereby contributing to the bad drafting choices we're still paying for today. And as much as we (rightly) bag the shit out of the Malthouse appointment, when he arrived everyone was contracted, leaving us with no options. No flags would be forthcoming without this area getting sorted out, regardless of who was coaching.
Player behaviour was clearly an issue as well. As much as we groan at giving away Garlett, Robinson, Waite and Yarran, their positions at the club were untenable at that time, let's not sugarcoat it. But who was running the asylum? Why did most of those guys (sadly, not including Yarran) suddenly "wake up" when they were in a different environment and become consistent contributors they never could under our regime?
Ratts may have thrived as a coach with a better support network around him at the club that his successors have enjoyed, but we'll never know. But to continue to look at his coaching career with rose-coloured glasses and assume it would've gotten any better is a big mistake IMO.