london blue wrote:
backline - you have some risks there, but hell what have we got to lose? i.e big job for Hartlett. Your backline highlights our issues on this side of the ground. looking forward to seeing russell given a proper go and carrotts in his second full year.
It's definitely not our "best" backline. Round 1, I'd probably pick Livingston, and definitely Saddington if he was available. But Hartlett may well stand up, and if we're to exceed expectations this year it will require some out of the box efforts from some of our younger players. Hartlett has done enough to deserve his chance in my book, same with Russell.
london blue wrote:
Based on the reports to date and Denis's press release comments i'd be surprised not to see Blackwell named on the bench. And given our vulnerability in defence and the fact he has a one year contract i'd be giving a hopefully hungry Livo a seat on the bench (as back up to the punt on Hartwell)
It's definitely a line ball call. I'd really love to see Blackwell have a chance. But if I didn't slot Bannister and Prendergast into the lineup then there just weren't enough seasoned bodies, and I felt we were risking the kids a little too much. Wiggo, Sporn, Teague or Chambers could easily have got those roles. Bannister was very good in one match simulation, and Prender seems to have given something each time out, which got them the spots. Walker, Carrazzo, Simpson, Bentick and Murphy have shown me plenty of signs they'll command Navy Blue jumpers for a long time to come. But I want to see them given every opportunity to do that without having too much pressure. Without the big bodies of Bannister and Prendergast, too much falls to our younger players for my liking. Blackers to get a run in a later NAB cup or Country Circuit match if we lose for me.
I'm a big Livo supporter. I really want to see him put it together on the big stage. I just couldn't fit him in for balance reasons. I wanted a prety big midfield rotation (three midfielders on the bench), and a third ruck, which counted Livo out. He looks like he needs confidence to back himself, and maybe some time on lesser opponents in the 2s might help him find it in himself.
mjonc wrote:
I think Blackers should get a run before Bannister and Prendergast, niether are going to offer us a long term midfield solution.
IN = Blackwell and Stevens/Sporn
OUT = Prendergast and Bannister
Formation would change slightly for me but more or less the same rotations you have listed. I'd give the run with role to Russell on Ling/Corey and Carrazzo/McGrath taking Chapman and Ablett as they rotate forward/midfield.
As I've said above, I'm picking Bannister and Prendergast for balance reasons, rather than because I'm putting too much stock in them as 200 gamers for the Blues. I'd love to see all our kids (Aisake, Flint and Jackson too) get a run. But I think we need to be a little careful how we go about it.
I was tossing up between Carrazzo and Russell as the second small defender for Ablett and Chapman. In the end I thought we'd benefit more from freeing Carrazzo from a more defensive game in terms of run out of defence. Russell has been playing a close checking defender in practice matches, both in defence and the midfield. Carrazzo has been a more attacking defender, so I gave him that role. Could go either way.
All that said, I think every TC member could come up with a line up, and each could easily justify their choices. I'm not knocking yours, just clarifying mine.