Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:19 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 531 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 6:41 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 7375
bondiblue wrote:
Let’s assume, with a bit of luck, Dean isn’t called prior our pick and we have the opportunity to use pick 9. Would you take Dovatson? If so, you have explained what Dovatson can do for us, if he is selected ahead of Williams and Evans, or when Williams retires. If not, who would you think would be available and select at pick 9.

If we match Dean at say pick 7 or 8, I would be delighted to select Dovatson around pick 16, then match for ISON for reasons you posted.

I wouldn’t care if we go into deficit next year. We will still have enough assets to match for Walker, and with our later picks and upgrade rookies to make up our 3 picks, if the leftovers in the 2027 aren’t worth carrying.

I doubt we will trade in Butters next year. Feel Doggies are front runners IF Port want to do a deal. Our 2 first rounders will be off the table for Walker, and our 2 2027 F1s aren’t worth much in the compromised draft.

So, for me, the debate whether to take a mid over a small forward for 2026, depends if we have enough quality mids for 2026 with Cripps Hewett Walsh Cerra Lord Smith Ainsworth Williams Hollands Ben Fog, and in 2027 with the addition of Walker, and possible retirement of Williams and Fogarty.

I think we have cover for mids and with Dovatson Ainsworth and Evans (if he continues his form) give us enough small forwards.

Then, the only glaring holes I hope we fill this year with a bonafide KPD lined up in SSP, and a KPF next year.

I wouldn't take Dovaston with our pick #9, in this order I'd look at Grlj, Cumming, Farrow, Lindsay or Schubert if we wanted a KPF.
But honestly if Dean did make it past our first pick, I reckon we'd trade it anyway to make sure we had a pick in the late teens for another R1 player and extra points for Ison or Cody and another kid next season.

I'm with you on Cody though, unless the AFL stop the points deficit for matching bids next season we will be ok to go into deficit this season and next given we have 2 x 1sts in 2027 that will be much later than normal years. We need extra kid this year and next to make sure IMO, 3 this year and 2 next would be plenty for the few years Tassie will screw things up.

Butters is out of contract next year and all we have to do is offer him a mega deal then it is up to the Dogs and Port to match, if they do and trade off with each other then so be it, we have Cody coming in and I'd hope we have another crack at Humphrey anyway.

For our needs, as you know I still want more mids but if the top ones are gone and a gun small is available I reckon we go for it or if we can get a good KPF like Schubert of Ludowyke we should go for it also and target a player like Derksen for a mature KPD until Dean gets on his feet or for back up and this Tobyn Murray looks ok also (not many highlights online).
I do like the looks of a player you said, Onley but the only knock is his draft profile says he needs to work on his kicking on the run as well as his endurance.
He's super quick, tall, plays inside and can hit targets by hand, he sounds like Crippa on speed.
Potentially he could be that big body that goes into the middle to cause havoc, then goes into the F50 to really mess up the opposition defence.
Either way there is a lot to play out on the night as Cru said, should be interesting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 7:30 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 8488
Location: Bendigo
TAFKA BamBam7 wrote:
I suddenly feel very depressed.

I used to spend a fortune on clothes, and that never happened to me at Chasers... :banghead:

Not to worry Bam.

She went home VERY disappointed.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 8:41 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15219
Crusader wrote:
TAFKA BamBam7 wrote:
I suddenly feel very depressed.

I used to spend a fortune on clothes, and that never happened to me at Chasers... :banghead:

Not to worry Bam.

She went home VERY disappointed.

I am very confused by all of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2025 3:06 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26082
Location: Bondi Beach
Sidefx wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Let’s assume, with a bit of luck, Dean isn’t called prior our pick and we have the opportunity to use pick 9. Would you take Dovatson? If so, you have explained what Dovatson can do for us, if he is selected ahead of Williams and Evans, or when Williams retires. If not, who would you think would be available and select at pick 9.

If we match Dean at say pick 7 or 8, I would be delighted to select Dovatson around pick 16, then match for ISON for reasons you posted.

I wouldn’t care if we go into deficit next year. We will still have enough assets to match for Walker, and with our later picks and upgrade rookies to make up our 3 picks, if the leftovers in the 2027 aren’t worth carrying.

I doubt we will trade in Butters next year. Feel Doggies are front runners IF Port want to do a deal. Our 2 first rounders will be off the table for Walker, and our 2 2027 F1s aren’t worth much in the compromised draft.

So, for me, the debate whether to take a mid over a small forward for 2026, depends if we have enough quality mids for 2026 with Cripps Hewett Walsh Cerra Lord Smith Ainsworth Williams Hollands Ben Fog, and in 2027 with the addition of Walker, and possible retirement of Williams and Fogarty.

I think we have cover for mids and with Dovatson Ainsworth and Evans (if he continues his form) give us enough small forwards.

Then, the only glaring holes I hope we fill this year with a bonafide KPD lined up in SSP, and a KPF next year.

I wouldn't take Dovaston with our pick #9, in this order I'd look at Grlj, Cumming, Farrow, Lindsay or Schubert if we wanted a KPF.
But honestly if Dean did make it past our first pick, I reckon we'd trade it anyway to make sure we had a pick in the late teens for another R1 player and extra points for Ison or Cody and another kid next season.

I'm with you on Cody though, unless the AFL stop the points deficit for matching bids next season we will be ok to go into deficit this season and next given we have 2 x 1sts in 2027 that will be much later than normal years. We need extra kid this year and next to make sure IMO, 3 this year and 2 next would be plenty for the few years Tassie will screw things up.

Butters is out of contract next year and all we have to do is offer him a mega deal then it is up to the Dogs and Port to match, if they do and trade off with each other then so be it, we have Cody coming in and I'd hope we have another crack at Humphrey anyway.

For our needs, as you know I still want more mids but if the top ones are gone and a gun small is available I reckon we go for it or if we can get a good KPF like Schubert of Ludowyke we should go for it also and target a player like Derksen for a mature KPD until Dean gets on his feet or for back up and this Tobyn Murray looks ok also (not many highlights online).
I do like the looks of a player you said, Onley but the only knock is his draft profile says he needs to work on his kicking on the run as well as his endurance.
He's super quick, tall, plays inside and can hit targets by hand, he sounds like Crippa on speed.
Potentially he could be that big body that goes into the middle to cause havoc, then goes into the F50 to really mess up the opposition defence.
Either way there is a lot to play out on the night as Cru said, should be interesting.


I wouldnt take Dovaston at #9 either, despite liking the scenario posed by Cru.
You'd take the best available, usually a mid at the pointy end, unless there's a stand out KPF with heeps more upside. That's based on need.
Point is, small forwards have to be the ilk of Pickett, Cyril, or Watson to be taken Top 10. They can also play minutes in the middle.

Absolutely go for Derksen, unless there's a better KPD in the bag.
Good thing about Derksen is he's good on both ends, sorta gives us KP depth both ends, a bit like Lewis Young.
I actually really like Ludowyke.

A lot has changed since Onley's write up early in the season.
These tall kids have to adapt their technique/timing if they are growing quickly. He's one I think.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 9:30 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 7375
bondiblue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Let’s assume, with a bit of luck, Dean isn’t called prior our pick and we have the opportunity to use pick 9. Would you take Dovatson? If so, you have explained what Dovatson can do for us, if he is selected ahead of Williams and Evans, or when Williams retires. If not, who would you think would be available and select at pick 9.

If we match Dean at say pick 7 or 8, I would be delighted to select Dovatson around pick 16, then match for ISON for reasons you posted.

I wouldn’t care if we go into deficit next year. We will still have enough assets to match for Walker, and with our later picks and upgrade rookies to make up our 3 picks, if the leftovers in the 2027 aren’t worth carrying.

I doubt we will trade in Butters next year. Feel Doggies are front runners IF Port want to do a deal. Our 2 first rounders will be off the table for Walker, and our 2 2027 F1s aren’t worth much in the compromised draft.

So, for me, the debate whether to take a mid over a small forward for 2026, depends if we have enough quality mids for 2026 with Cripps Hewett Walsh Cerra Lord Smith Ainsworth Williams Hollands Ben Fog, and in 2027 with the addition of Walker, and possible retirement of Williams and Fogarty.

I think we have cover for mids and with Dovatson Ainsworth and Evans (if he continues his form) give us enough small forwards.

Then, the only glaring holes I hope we fill this year with a bonafide KPD lined up in SSP, and a KPF next year.

I wouldn't take Dovaston with our pick #9, in this order I'd look at Grlj, Cumming, Farrow, Lindsay or Schubert if we wanted a KPF.
But honestly if Dean did make it past our first pick, I reckon we'd trade it anyway to make sure we had a pick in the late teens for another R1 player and extra points for Ison or Cody and another kid next season.

I'm with you on Cody though, unless the AFL stop the points deficit for matching bids next season we will be ok to go into deficit this season and next given we have 2 x 1sts in 2027 that will be much later than normal years. We need extra kid this year and next to make sure IMO, 3 this year and 2 next would be plenty for the few years Tassie will screw things up.

Butters is out of contract next year and all we have to do is offer him a mega deal then it is up to the Dogs and Port to match, if they do and trade off with each other then so be it, we have Cody coming in and I'd hope we have another crack at Humphrey anyway.

For our needs, as you know I still want more mids but if the top ones are gone and a gun small is available I reckon we go for it or if we can get a good KPF like Schubert of Ludowyke we should go for it also and target a player like Derksen for a mature KPD until Dean gets on his feet or for back up and this Tobyn Murray looks ok also (not many highlights online).
I do like the looks of a player you said, Onley but the only knock is his draft profile says he needs to work on his kicking on the run as well as his endurance.
He's super quick, tall, plays inside and can hit targets by hand, he sounds like Crippa on speed.
Potentially he could be that big body that goes into the middle to cause havoc, then goes into the F50 to really mess up the opposition defence.
Either way there is a lot to play out on the night as Cru said, should be interesting.


I wouldnt take Dovaston at #9 either, despite liking the scenario posed by Cru.
You'd take the best available, usually a mid at the pointy end, unless there's a stand out KPF with heeps more upside. That's based on need.
Point is, small forwards have to be the ilk of Pickett, Cyril, or Watson to be taken Top 10. They can also play minutes in the middle.

Absolutely go for Derksen, unless there's a better KPD in the bag.
Good thing about Derksen is he's good on both ends, sorta gives us KP depth both ends, a bit like Lewis Young.
I actually really like Ludowyke.

A lot has changed since Onley's write up early in the season.
These tall kids have to adapt their technique/timing if they are growing quickly. He's one I think.

If he has improved his endurance and kicking we should be looking at him, he'd be a very hard match up.
I posted somewhere else (can't remember) that Ludowyke gives me Curnow vibes the way he plays.
He could well be a late round pick gun forward, not sure what the recruiters are saying but the more I think about it, I'd be looking at bringing both him and Dean in, then we could to sure up both ends for another 10 years.
I really like Dovaston for our needs now, but geez a possible gun tall forward might be to hard to pass up.
The talent this year may not be as good as last year as a whole, but there are some really good players in the first 2 rounds IMO.
It'll be interesting to see who and what the club prioritises this draft.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 11:42 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 8488
Location: Bendigo
Just my opinion, but I’ve got the key forwards in this order:

Marsh
Schubert

Daylight

Hetherton
Curtin
Ah Mu
McCarthy
Ludowyke

I haven’t seen enough of Leach, but he’s shaping as a high-reward project for someone.

Top two aside, I would try & convert Onley before picking any of them.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 12:19 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 7375
I doubt we'd get a look at Schubert, but aside from his skip step approach another right footer would be good.
And I'd put Marsh as a medium forward, he's only 191cm, 1cm shorter than Kemp.
I don't know much about the other names you've put up, but Ludowyke just has something about him.
Like I said, he reminds me of Curnow, he's mobile, jumps and marks well and his coaches say he could play in defence if needed.

Onley is a big lad 195cm and quick, really quick 2.884s 20m.
I'd have no issue if we got him to replace Cripps when he is done.
He could play midfield and go forward.

I just hope we have a second top pick so we can get one of these other boys with Dean and Ison.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 3:22 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 8488
Location: Bendigo
I think we’ve got the last link in the chain covered pretty well with Harry, Skull, the rucks & (hopefully) a mature tall via the SSP.

We need blokes that are going to play a part in taking and keeping the ball away from the opposition between the arcs. If Vossy can’t get something going across half forward, he’s gone.

We’ve paid big money to recruit a couple, and we’ve fallen arse backwards into Ison. If we draft one more, we’re still a couple short.

In this draft, that’s Cumming, Robey, Nairn, Onley, Swadling, Marsh, Ison, King, Evans, Hibbins-Hargreaves, Rodriguez, Oudshoorn-Bennier, Greeves, Barker, Holmes.

One of those will be better for us in the short to medium term.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 6:49 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 7375
I do prefer more mids as I was saying to Bondi and I agree our biggest issue is between the arcs.
However, I don't see as much of an issue with HF now we have Ainsworth, Hayward and Cottrell coming back.
Plus there is Kemp and Williams that can play a role also, Ison is going to be the surprise package across that line.
Our wings are still weak, Chesser will be a gun if he gets going but if Florent, Walsh or Smith aren't on the other we are still one short.
Grlj is the player I really want, 5:59 2km so he's got Ollie/Binns endurance and 2.92s 20m he will be quicker than most on our team.
And loves to break lines and run and carry and he's a Carlton fan.
I could see him on the wing or coming off half back killing it for us.
I do like Cumming and Farrow also but like Grlj, I really doubt they would be available.
I agree on Onley as long as he's being drafted as a quick big bodied inside mid.
But I still worry about the knock on his kicking.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 8:58 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26082
Location: Bondi Beach
Sidefx wrote:
Our wings are still weak, Chesser will be a gun if he gets going but if Florent, Walsh or Smith aren't on the other we are still one short.


That's IF, you don't rate 20yo Ollie Hollands, for a start (which I know you don't) think 30yo Acres is shot, and 19yo Lucas Camporeale and 23yo Chesser wont make it.

I thought you liked mids, and you are hopeful 2 of our best mids (pick 1 & 3) can make a fist of the wing?????

I also think that Ollie is miles ahead of Chesser was at the same age, let alone, ahead of Chesser. The proof is in the eating. Ollie has played 65 games and winning Finals teams playing on the wing in his first year. Chesser just got going in the last 5 games this year.

I'm going to say it again, Ollie is only 20yo and has heaps of growth to come; upside. He will continue to grow his game (on a wing) in terms of speed, strength and skills. He will learn to steady before he kicks. For now, he goes at full pace and takes on all comers such is his confidence. I can live with that. Watch the kid grow. He turns 21yo this year.

You do like mids Sidey, so do I, but, you cant keep bringing them in, only to have no room in the midfield and push them out onto the wings or other specialist spots (HB, small forward). I know Williams was recruited as a mid, but we have a $900K mid playing as a small forward who has stints in the midfield, but he's a damn good small forward.

I want Walsh and Smith in the midfield mix. I dont think we rotate through there enough.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 9:10 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10985
Bravo Bondi!
Hope Chesser was only held back dut to injuries, let’s see. He does need to earn his spot!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 9:14 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26082
Location: Bondi Beach
1. Cripps 30yo....Inside Mid
2. Hewett 28yo...Def Mid
3. Cerra 26yo.....In out mid
4. Walsh 24yo.....In Out mid
5. Smith 19yo.....In Out mid
6. Lord 20yo......Inside mid

7. Williams 31yo...In out mid (Sm Fwd)
8. Ainsworth 27yo...In Out mid (HHF)
9. B.Camporeale 19yo ..Inside mid
10. Walker 17yo ... In out mid

There isn't enough spots to fit all these mids in the team in 2026 and 2027.

I don't mind Walsh playing HHF but running in midfield as an extra mid.

I want wings playing the wing role on the wing. Walsh has a knack of going for the ball instead of being outside stretching the ground.
I thought Luca Camporeale showed this year in the preseason and the first couple of rounds he does strech the ground for us providing an option out wide as well as providing a defensive outlet.
Still think Ollie Hollands - Acres combo has been our best for the winds. Acres is the vulnerable one, and this is where I am hoping Chesser, Lucas, Florent Young or Cottrell can take that spot.

I actually see Cowan as a midfielder when big bodied mids Cripps and Hewett retire, and would love to add an Onley type to the mix for that purpose too.

For this reason, I feel we have enough mids ... but there's always room for improvement. One Butters can be player, but do we really need him with Smith and walker growing before our eyes? We will know by the end of next year with Smith and Lord, if we need Butters to add to Walker.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 9:23 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26082
Location: Bondi Beach
SurreyBlue wrote:
Bravo Bondi!
Hope Chesser was only held back dut to injuries, let’s see. He does need to earn his spot!


Everyone has to earn their spot.

I wonder is Acres will just flop over and let the younguns take his spot.
I don't think he's going down without a fight.

Love competition for spots, and feel we have depth for midfield, wings, HB and HF like we haven't before.

Its the KPD, in particular CHB spot I feel most vulnerable, but grateful we have Lewis Young. An injury to either Weiters or Young leaves CHB to 193cm Haynes, or 194cm 19yo Dean.

I have faith in McKay and O'Keefe as our KPF targets but would like some developing KPF, knowing we have Lewis Young IF we find someone to cover CHB. Have a feeling its going to be Philips because we have the pick ahead of Pies in the SSP....unless Philips puts his name in the Draft and Pies take him.

I'm loving the list and feel we can cover our depth issue this Draft/SSP period, till O'Farrell comes back from injury. I think we will only cover CHB, and I'm happy with that.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 9:39 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10985
Just on previous wing discussion, you can add Florent as an option as well. IMO, that’s probably his best position.
I feel Newman, Cowan, Saad, Boyd, Carroll (just to name a few) will hold down the small backs.

IMO, leave Young to be the shutdown KP defender and release Weitering to play the 2nd more attacking/intercept role.
Fingers crossed on HoK.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:18 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 7375
bondiblue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Our wings are still weak, Chesser will be a gun if he gets going but if Florent, Walsh or Smith aren't on the other we are still one short.


That's IF, you don't rate 20yo Ollie Hollands, for a start (which I know you don't) think 30yo Acres is shot, and 19yo Lucas Camporeale and 23yo Chesser wont make it.

I thought you liked mids, and you are hopeful 2 of our best mids (pick 1 & 3) can make a fist of the wing?????

I also think that Ollie is miles ahead of Chesser was at the same age, let alone, ahead of Chesser. The proof is in the eating. Ollie has played 65 games and winning Finals teams playing on the wing in his first year. Chesser just got going in the last 5 games this year.

I'm going to say it again, Ollie is only 20yo and has heaps of growth to come; upside. He will continue to grow his game (on a wing) in terms of speed, strength and skills. He will learn to steady before he kicks. For now, he goes at full pace and takes on all comers such is his confidence. I can live with that. Watch the kid grow. He turns 21yo this year.

You do like mids Sidey, so do I, but, you cant keep bringing them in, only to have no room in the midfield and push them out onto the wings or other specialist spots (HB, small forward). I know Williams was recruited as a mid, but we have a $900K mid playing as a small forward who has stints in the midfield, but he's a damn good small forward.

I want Walsh and Smith in the midfield mix. I dont think we rotate through there enough.

Ollie turns 22 in January Bondi, you missed a year.
You can only marginally build on burst speed, you either have it or you don't and there are a lot more players coming into the system that do.
That kid you like Onley, 2.88s 20m, he'd make Ollie and pretty much our whole midfield look like they're standing still.
And at 195cm, that would be impressive to watch.

I'll ask one question about Ollie, do you trust him to hit a target in the F50 under pressure and to a pressure spot most if not all of the time?
For me, I'm surprised if he does and even if he did it once a game, it is still not enough to be competitive with the other teams that have players doing it multiple times a game.
He is not reliable in that way.

Like I've said before, he has the running, is great defensively, not afraid to hit or get hit and does not give up - a defender.
But for the wing, he is too light and gets brushed off the ball or drops tackles easily, especially in open space, he has no burst speed and although his kicking is getting marginally better, let's not kid ourselves, most of his kicks are 'safe' kicks.
Our biggest issue is between the arcs, we are slow, poor kicking and can't make space to open games up.
Ollie will not fix that, as much as we would like him to, he is not that kind of player IMO.
And because our midfield is pretty much 1 geared still (not counting Smith chickens until they hatch) we especially need outside speed on the wings, HF and HB to offset that.
We need a wing that can open a game up and create options going into F50 instead of just bombing or hitting safe options and slowing ball movement down to let defenders set up properly.
We are a fast ball moving team, that is not fast or accurate by foot and that is why our F50 entries are high and our scoring is low.

Chesser, although less experienced (mainly because of injuries) is exactly what we need on the wing, the big question is if he can deliver.
Rotating Florent (who I would prefer) or Hayward into the mix is also great but like we have been doing for years, we are robbing Peter to pay Paul.
For the centre I still think we are 2 quick mids too short in our rotation, 1 young and another mature.
That is why I was hoping we'd get Bailey, he would've been perfect for us.
I like the Campo boys but they are not lighting quick either and from what I've seen, they are not elite kicks, much like their old man.
I hope they can build on this but I'm not putting all my eggs in that basket.
I will put them in the Cody basket though.

I agree about having Smith and Walsh in the midfield mix but my suggestion for them on the wing is out of desperation I guess.
We need outside run and damage and what we have will not produce that, I think the club knows this also and is why a comment was made about the wings (can't remember who, maybe Voss) and is why they dumped Binns and targeted Chesser. It is an area of weakness, Ollie and Acres didn't fix it (just remember the prelim against Brisbane) when they were on them and in fact it has evolved again and they would be even less effective IMO.
If Ollie was the answer, they wouldn't have put him in defence all year this year, he was training with them before Newman went down too.

I disagree we can't keep bringing more mids in, obviously there is a limit, but we are not there yet because our balance is wrong.
Our midfield is slow and they need support, we have tried to rotate backs and forwards into the centre and it has not worked.
We need to bring in mids that can play back or especially play forwards.
For example Grlj is a mid that can play HB and has the attributes our midfield lacks.
Cumming is another, that can go forward and hit the score board.
Just think of what Rayner can do and ask who we have that can produce what he does, that is what we are lacking in the centre.
Williams would be our closest but so far that has not worked and his body can't be relied upon.

We are only missing a few pieces IMO, fix the midfield (wings and centre) and we fix most of our problems with ball movement into F50.
Ison is a good prospect, I'm hoping he can start on ball and push up to HFF also but if he can get his work rate up he could be that tall wing we both like that is also damaging going forwards.

On another note and going against what I've just said about mid first, if we want speed off of HB, Oskar Taylor looks like a Saad replacement.
Very quick HB, 2.82s 20m and 7.84 agility, the kid has wheels, moves and can kick the footy.
Could be a good wing option also.

Sorry for the long post, but this is the way I see our between the arcs problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:35 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 7375
bondiblue wrote:
1. Cripps 30yo....Inside Mid slow, average kick
2. Hewett 28yo...Def Mid slow, average kick
3. Cerra 26yo.....In out mid a bit quicker than slow, better than average kick
4. Walsh 24yo.....In Out mid yet to get back to his speed but not lighting quick anyway, lethal kick when not injured
5. Smith 19yo.....In Out mid not played yet but looks great in both
6. Lord 20yo......Inside mid quick but still developing, kick is still hit an miss but can be lethal

7. Williams 31yo...In out mid (Sm Fwd) defender turned forward, injured too much so not reliable, elite kick
8. Ainsworth 27yo...In Out mid (HHF) I like the idea, who replaces him in F50
9. B.Camporeale 19yo ..Inside mid not quick, kicking needs work
10. Walker 17yo ... In out mid perfect but not even in the team yet

There isn't enough spots to fit all these mids in the team in 2026 and 2027.

I don't mind Walsh playing HHF but running in midfield as an extra mid.

I want wings playing the wing role on the wing. Walsh has a knack of going for the ball instead of being outside stretching the ground.
I thought Luca Camporeale showed this year in the preseason and the first couple of rounds he does strech the ground for us providing an option out wide as well as providing a defensive outlet.
Still think Ollie Hollands - Acres combo has been our best for the winds. Acres is the vulnerable one, and this is where I am hoping Chesser, Lucas, Florent Young or Cottrell can take that spot.

I actually see Cowan as a midfielder when big bodied mids Cripps and Hewett retire, and would love to add an Onley type to the mix for that purpose too.

For this reason, I feel we have enough mids ... but there's always room for improvement. One Butters can be player, but do we really need him with Smith and walker growing before our eyes? We will know by the end of next year with Smith and Lord, if we need Butters to add to Walker.


I get where you are coming from but our midfield has limitations and was exposed badly this year.
All the rest I have addressed in my other post.
Butters or Bailey is a must if we want to win a flag IMO.
Or at least a kid that will be like them in the next couple of years on top of Smith, Ison and Walker.
I'd really like Dovaston so players like Ainsworth could get midfield minutes or Ludowyke as a need for a future CHF.
But if we want to further address our ball movement, you can't beat adding a quick footed elite kick to the midfield or wing.
The confusing part is we still have a couple of positions to address but neither have the draft capital or ability to bring anyone of value in this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 11:33 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26082
Location: Bondi Beach
Thanks for the response Sidey.

We always have differing opinions on Ollie. I think youre way too harsh on him, and see what you want to see. I see as lot more postives. Enjoyed you post regardless. Food for thought

Sidefx wrote:
Ollie turns 22 in January Bondi, you missed a year. Thanks for that. Still very young
You can only marginally build on burst speed, you either have it or you don't and there are a lot more players coming into the system that do. He's quick as it is. Can only improve on that
That kid you like Onley, 2.88s 20m, he'd make Ollie and pretty much our whole midfield look like they're standing still. Exaggeration doesnt ever work with me, unless we both have a beer in hand.
And at 195cm, that would be impressive to watch. Happy to add his pace into the mix. I really wanted Josh Smillie last year as a replacement for Cripps. He would have to wait for Cripps to hand over the mantle, but Onley's pace gives us something different and can be used sooner

I'll ask one question about Ollie, do you trust him to hit a target in the F50 under pressure and to a pressure spot most if not all of the time? I don't think anyone can do that. The statement and expectation is an exaggeration of the norm and to believe anyone can hit a target every kick under extreme pressure is fanciful. watched the replay of the last 3 games of the year, and Ollie was hitting targets. I thought of you every time he hit a tit at full pace. Stop making out he's hopeless and more than likely to miss a target.
For me, I'm surprised if he does and even if he did it once a game OMG. Is that an exaggeration? I think so. This is an example why I can't take you serious with your POV on Ollie it is still not enough to be competitive with the other teams that have players doing it multiple times a game.
He is not reliable in that way. If you say so

Like I've said before, he has the running, is great defensively, not afraid to hit or get hit and does not give up - a defender.
But for the wing, he is too light and gets brushed off the ball or drops tackles easily, especially in open space, he has no burst speed and although his kicking is getting marginally better, let's not kid ourselves, most of his kicks are 'safe' kicks. Most wingmen are light at 21yo. Most wingmen are lighter than Acres. I like big wingmen. In fact I prefer them. But I admire what Ollie brings to the table on a wing, and until all those on our list pass him, let alone play the wing, he's da man for me.
Our biggest issue is between the arcs, we are slow, poor kicking and can't make space to open games up.And you lay the blame on Ollie. Hey theres a bigger bodied wingman who DOES have a shocking record with his foot passing.
Ollie will not fix that, as much as we would like him to, he is not that kind of player IMO. IYO; that's OK. I remember when that all started. One crucial miss, like Marchbank did vs Pies one game, and he's a shit kick forever. He hits more targets than you allude to sidey
And because our midfield is pretty much 1 geared still (not counting Smith chickens until they hatch) we especially need outside speed on the wings, HF and HB to offset that. So Ollie isnt the reason for our slow ball use
We need a wing that can open a game up and create options going into F50 instead of just bombing or hitting safe options and slowing ball movement down to let defenders set up properly. Its our midfield group and Acres who have failed us. by the way, you were happy saying Hollands was better this year playing in defense, yet heap it on Ollie for poor disposal F50. FMD Sidey, can you see what a tangled web you weave?
We are a fast ball moving team, that is not fast or accurate by foot and that is why our F50 entries are high and our scoring is low. See above. I think you will find we lost 6-7 games because our forwards failed to kick straight after the ball was given to them on a platter. Kick straight at goal and we would be playing Finals. As simple as that.

Chesser, although less experienced (mainly because of injuries) is exactly what we need on the wing, the big question is if he can deliver. ???
Rotating Florent (who I would prefer) or Hayward into the mix is also great but like we have been doing for years, we are robbing Peter to pay Paul. Wing mix? Midfield mix?
For the centre I still think we are 2 quick mids too short in our rotation, 1 young and another mature. I can buy that, but we are talking mids again....you agree that's where we need more pace and separation??
That is why I was hoping we'd get Bailey, he would've been perfect for us. YES!!!! Maybe next year he can push Ollie from a wing...hang on...you're talking about mids arent you :wink:
I like the Campo boys but they are not lighting quick either and from what I've seen, they are not elite kicks, much like their old man. Agree at this early stage . Developing. But they can improve. They are still first year players till season starts.
I hope they can build on this but I'm not putting all my eggs in that basket.
I will put them in the Cody basket though.

I agree about having Smith and Walsh in the midfield mix but my suggestion for them on the wing is out of desperation I guess. That's not what we are after. Desperate to get Ollie off the wing. Cutting your nose to spite your face imo
We need outside run and damage and what we have will not produce that, I think the club knows this also and is why a comment was made about the wings (can't remember who, maybe Voss) and is why they dumped Binns and targeted Chesser. It is an area of weakness, Ollie and Acres didn't fix it (just remember the prelim against Brisbane) when they were on them and in fact it has evolved again and they would be even less effective IMO. Geez youre selective. Added Chesser before Binns delisted. Binns was a bust and weak as depth. Chesser only signed for 2 years...he's no guarantee, nor brought in to push Ollie out. Ollie is not Binns You know Acres played injured all year despite shoulder op in off season. You know we robbed Ollie to play mid to start the season to give us more pace then. Then we needed his pace in the backline after Newman got injured and saad was required to play more lockdown
If Ollie was the answer, they wouldn't have put him in defence all year this year, he was training with them before Newman went down too. Whaaaaaat??? He trained with the midfield group in preseason.

I disagree we can't keep bringing more mids in, obviously there is a limit, but we are not there yet because our balance is wrong.
Our midfield is slow and they need support, we have tried to rotate backs and forwards into the centre and it has not worked. OK, back to mids now. Smith, Walsh, Walker Williams not quick enough? When Walsh joined us late in season we saw what his additional pace gave us...a different look. Now imagine what Smith will do. Now add Walker. That's 3 players who will fix that. You don't think so?
We need to bring in mids that can play back or especially play forwards. Yeah. Who are they? Why play a mid in defense again?
For example Grlj is a mid that can play HB and has the attributes our midfield lacks. He's a kid. Would he walk into our senior team in 2026? I don't think so.
Cumming is another, that can go forward and hit the score board. Are we likely to draft either Cumming or Grij? Lets be realistic here. We are not building an Under 18 AA team. Nor an AA team. WE can't have stars everywhere. We have a cap. We have to play within the rules. Youre dreaming big. I get that. I like wishful thinking, but I think our team balance is better than it wa slast year (albeit injury killed us)
Just think of what Rayner can do and ask who we have that can produce what he does, that is what we are lacking in the centre. Yes I know grass is greener on the other side. Can we get Raynor? How do we make it work without him? That's the million dollar question. Like I said be realistic. Every team is different. Very different for obvious reason. No single player plays for 2 teams.
Williams would be our closest but so far that has not worked and his body can't be relied upon.


We are only missing a few pieces IMO, fix the midfield (wings and centre) and we fix most of our problems with ball movement into F50. Keep them injury free fixes everything. I would suggest KPD continues to be our BIG hole. Ruck is the unknown, and other than Lewis Young, we have no depth for KPF IMO. Fix that and we have a great list for 2026
Ison is a good prospect, I'm hoping he can start on ball and push up to HFF also but if he can get his work rate up he could be that tall wing we both like that is also damaging going forwards. He will and he wont do that in 2026

On another note and going against what I've just said about mid first, if we want speed off of HB, Oskar Taylor looks like a Saad replacement. Love it
Very quick HB, 2.82s 20m and 7.84 agility, the kid has wheels, moves and can kick the footy.
Could be a good wing option also. Love it

Sorry for the long post, but this is the way I see our between the arcs problem.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 11:35 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26082
Location: Bondi Beach
Sidefx wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
1. Cripps 30yo....Inside Mid slow, average kick
2. Hewett 28yo...Def Mid slow, average kick
3. Cerra 26yo.....In out mid a bit quicker than slow, better than average kick
4. Walsh 24yo.....In Out mid yet to get back to his speed but not lighting quick anyway, lethal kick when not injured
5. Smith 19yo.....In Out mid not played yet but looks great in both
6. Lord 20yo......Inside mid quick but still developing, kick is still hit an miss but can be lethal

7. Williams 31yo...In out mid (Sm Fwd) defender turned forward, injured too much so not reliable, elite kick
8. Ainsworth 27yo...In Out mid (HHF) I like the idea, who replaces him in F50
9. B.Camporeale 19yo ..Inside mid not quick, kicking needs work
10. Walker 17yo ... In out mid perfect but not even in the team yet

There isn't enough spots to fit all these mids in the team in 2026 and 2027.

I don't mind Walsh playing HHF but running in midfield as an extra mid.

I want wings playing the wing role on the wing. Walsh has a knack of going for the ball instead of being outside stretching the ground.
I thought Luca Camporeale showed this year in the preseason and the first couple of rounds he does strech the ground for us providing an option out wide as well as providing a defensive outlet.
Still think Ollie Hollands - Acres combo has been our best for the winds. Acres is the vulnerable one, and this is where I am hoping Chesser, Lucas, Florent Young or Cottrell can take that spot.

I actually see Cowan as a midfielder when big bodied mids Cripps and Hewett retire, and would love to add an Onley type to the mix for that purpose too.

For this reason, I feel we have enough mids ... but there's always room for improvement. One Butters can be player, but do we really need him with Smith and walker growing before our eyes? We will know by the end of next year with Smith and Lord, if we need Butters to add to Walker.


I get where you are coming from but our midfield has limitations and was exposed badly this year.
All the rest I have addressed in my other post.
Butters or Bailey is a must if we want to win a flag IMO.
Or at least a kid that will be like them in the next couple of years on top of Smith, Ison and Walker.
I'd really like Dovaston so players like Ainsworth could get midfield minutes or Ludowyke as a need for a future CHF.
But if we want to further address our ball movement, you can't beat adding a quick footed elite kick to the midfield or wing.
The confusing part is we still have a couple of positions to address but neither have the draft capital or ability to bring anyone of value in this year.


Lets see what we get this year and then see how they go in 2026. Humphries is a target from what I hear, and highly possible we land him, if we have 3 2026 F1's

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 2:10 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 7375
bondiblue wrote:
Thanks for the response Sidey.

We always have differing opinions on Ollie. I think youre way too harsh on him, and see what you want to see. I see as lot more postives. Enjoyed you post regardless. Food for thought

Sidefx wrote:
Ollie turns 22 in January Bondi, you missed a year. Thanks for that. Still very young
You can only marginally build on burst speed, you either have it or you don't and there are a lot more players coming into the system that do. He's quick as it is. Can only improve on thatIf you say so, I guess that is why he closes down so many players. :donk:
That kid you like Onley, 2.88s 20m, he'd make Ollie and pretty much our whole midfield look like they're standing still. Exaggeration doesnt ever work with me, unless we both have a beer in hand.yet you seem to keep doing it :wink:
And at 195cm, that would be impressive to watch. Happy to add his pace into the mix. I really wanted Josh Smillie last year as a replacement for Cripps. He would have to wait for Cripps to hand over the mantle, but Onley's pace gives us something different and can be used sooner

I'll ask one question about Ollie, do you trust him to hit a target in the F50 under pressure and to a pressure spot most if not all of the time? I don't think anyone can do that. The statement and expectation is an exaggeration of the norm and to believe anyone can hit a target every kick under extreme pressure is fanciful. watched the replay of the last 3 games of the year, and Ollie was hitting targets. I thought of you every time he hit a tit at full pace. Stop making out he's hopeless and more than likely to miss a target. As for Ollie hitting his 'safe' targets I also remember him running through the wing and just bombed it into F50 to no one and over our players head who was in the clear for it to rebound with interest. Literally our whole seasons problem in 1 play and you want more of it FMD. There are a lot of players out there that are more reliable under pressure and hitting their targets and we had Martin, Williams is another, Lord is doing some good work also, McLovin is capable, Curnow was, even his own brother can and that is just in our team.
For me, I'm surprised if he does and even if he did it once a game OMG. Is that an exaggeration? I think so. This is an example why I can't take you serious with your POV on Ollie I haven't said Ollie can't hit targets, but if you can't differentiate 'safe' kicks from kicks that open options and games up then I can't help you see that.
So if I'm exaggerating, you 100% have the blinkers on.
it is still not enough to be competitive with the other teams that have players doing it multiple times a game.
He is not reliable in that way. If you say so Wait until Florent, Hayward and Ainsworth are showing the class difference with their F50 entires.

Like I've said before, he has the running, is great defensively, not afraid to hit or get hit and does not give up - a defender.
But for the wing, he is too light and gets brushed off the ball or drops tackles easily, especially in open space, he has no burst speed and although his kicking is getting marginally better, let's not kid ourselves, most of his kicks are 'safe' kicks. Most wingmen are light at 21yo. Most wingmen are lighter than Acres. I like big wingmen. In fact I prefer them. But I admire what Ollie brings to the table on a wing, and until all those on our list pass him, let alone play the wing, he's da man for me.
Our biggest issue is between the arcs, we are slow, poor kicking and can't make space to open games up.And you lay the blame on Ollie. Hey theres a bigger bodied wingman who DOES have a shocking record with his foot passing.
Ollie will not fix that, as much as we would like him to, he is not that kind of player IMO. IYO; that's OK. I remember when that all started. One crucial miss, like Marchbank did vs Pies one game, and he's a shit kick forever. He hits more targets than you allude to sidey
And because our midfield is pretty much 1 geared still (not counting Smith chickens until they hatch) we especially need outside speed on the wings, HF and HB to offset that. So Ollie isnt the reason for our slow ball use
We need a wing that can open a game up and create options going into F50 instead of just bombing or hitting safe options and slowing ball movement down to let defenders set up properly. Its our midfield group and Acres who have failed us. by the way, you were happy saying Hollands was better this year playing in defense, yet heap it on Ollie for poor disposal F50. FMD Sidey, can you see what a tangled web you weave? My reference on Ollie was pre him playing in defence and you wanting him on a wing, I thought that was obvious and not that tangled.
My point is he would not make our between the arcs ball movement any better if he was added back on a wing and not that he was the issue this year, clearer?
I don't want to go back to an option that did not work.

We are a fast ball moving team, that is not fast or accurate by foot and that is why our F50 entries are high and our scoring is low. See above. I think you will find we lost 6-7 games because our forwards failed to kick straight after the ball was given to them on a platter. Kick straight at goal and we would be playing Finals. As simple as that. If only, we both know it was a little more than that as did the club or Charlie would still be here.

Chesser, although less experienced (mainly because of injuries) is exactly what we need on the wing, the big question is if he can deliver. ???
Rotating Florent (who I would prefer) or Hayward into the mix is also great but like we have been doing for years, we are robbing Peter to pay Paul. Wing mix? Midfield mix?
For the centre I still think we are 2 quick mids too short in our rotation, 1 young and another mature. I can buy that, but we are talking mids again....you agree that's where we need more pace and separation?? Yes, but if we are not addressing the inside we need to at least address the outside, clearer?
That is why I was hoping we'd get Bailey, he would've been perfect for us. YES!!!! Maybe next year he can push Ollie from a wing...hang on...you're talking about mids arent you :wink: Has to be on a wing first :wink:
I like the Campo boys but they are not lighting quick either and from what I've seen, they are not elite kicks, much like their old man. Agree at this early stage . Developing. But they can improve. They are still first year players till season starts.
I hope they can build on this but I'm not putting all my eggs in that basket.
I will put them in the Cody basket though. We can only hope.

I agree about having Smith and Walsh in the midfield mix but my suggestion for them on the wing is out of desperation I guess. That's not what we are after. Desperate to get Ollie off the wing. Cutting your nose to spite your face imo Might be true if he was actually on a wing, but it is you that wants him on there, remember?
We need outside run and damage and what we have will not produce that, I think the club knows this also and is why a comment was made about the wings (can't remember who, maybe Voss) and is why they dumped Binns and targeted Chesser. It is an area of weakness, Ollie and Acres didn't fix it (just remember the prelim against Brisbane) when they were on them and in fact it has evolved again and they would be even less effective IMO. Geez youre selective. Added Chesser before Binns delisted. Binns was a bust and weak as depth. Chesser only signed for 2 years...he's no guarantee, nor brought in to push Ollie out. Ollie is not Binns You know Acres played injured all year despite shoulder op in off season. You know we robbed Ollie to play mid to start the season to give us more pace then. Then we needed his pace in the backline after Newman got injured and saad was required to play more lockdown The order of Chesser/Binns is not important as you know https://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/1802742/a-change-in-perspective-hollands-thriving-in-defensive-role#:~:text=After%20previously%20playing%20on%20the,key%20part%20of%20the%20group.
If Ollie was the answer, they wouldn't have put him in defence all year this year, he was training with them before Newman went down too. Whaaaaaat??? He trained with the midfield group in preseason.
https://www.carltonfc.com.au/video/1719039/pre-season-report-card-ollie-hollands?videoId=1719039&modal=true&type=video&publishFrom=1736298600001

I disagree we can't keep bringing more mids in, obviously there is a limit, but we are not there yet because our balance is wrong.
Our midfield is slow and they need support, we have tried to rotate backs and forwards into the centre and it has not worked. OK, back to mids now. Smith, Walsh, Walker Williams not quick enough? When Walsh joined us late in season we saw what his additional pace gave us...a different look. Now imagine what Smith will do. Now add Walker. That's 3 players who will fix that. You don't think so? Smith I hope and should, Walsh we need to see if he can get back, Williams need up forward and Walker not in the team
We need to bring in mids that can play back or especially play forwards. Yeah. Who are they? Why play a mid in defense again? options and rotations
For example Grlj is a mid that can play HB and has the attributes our midfield lacks. He's a kid. Would he walk into our senior team in 2026? I don't think so. You don't know that, he has the talent and wouldn't be the first, Ollie did!
Cumming is another, that can go forward and hit the score board. Are we likely to draft either Cumming or Grij? Let's be realistic here. We are not building an Under 18 AA team. Nor an AA team. WE can't have stars everywhere. We have a cap. We have to play within the rules. Youre dreaming big. I get that. I like wishful thinking, but I think our team balance is better than it wa slast year (albeit injury killed us) No but at the draft we potentially have 3 picks and if we are not adding the best talent to address our shortcomings, then what are we doing?
Just think of what Rayner can do and ask who we have that can produce what he does, that is what we are lacking in the centre. Yes I know grass is greener on the other side. Can we get Raynor? How do we make it work without him? That's the million dollar question. Like I said be realistic. Every team is different. Very different for obvious reason. No single player plays for 2 teams.
Williams would be our closest but so far that has not worked and his body can't be relied upon.
It's not about the grass is greener, it is about having the right pieces in play to win and to do that you have to beat the best

We are only missing a few pieces IMO, fix the midfield (wings and centre) and we fix most of our problems with ball movement into F50. Keep them injury free fixes everything. I would suggest KPD continues to be our BIG hole. Ruck is the unknown, and other than Lewis Young, we have no depth for KPF IMO. Fix that and we have a great list for 2026
Ison is a good prospect, I'm hoping he can start on ball and push up to HFF also but if he can get his work rate up he could be that tall wing we both like that is also damaging going forwards. He will and he wont do that in 2026 Again you don't know what he is capable of and if he has been holding back or not, I'd prefer to optimistic

On another note and going against what I've just said about mid first, if we want speed off of HB, Oskar Taylor looks like a Saad replacement. Love it
Very quick HB, 2.82s 20m and 7.84 agility, the kid has wheels, moves and can kick the footy.
Could be a good wing option also. Love it

Sorry for the long post, but this is the way I see our between the arcs problem.

I agree we have differing opinions on Ollie.
I won't change your mind and you won't change mine.
Once again, happy to be proven wrong about him.............the clock is ticking though.

Geez it was hard to respond like that.
Can we work out another way. :lol:


Last edited by Sidefx on Tue Nov 11, 2025 2:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2026
PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 2:11 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 7375
bondiblue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
1. Cripps 30yo....Inside Mid slow, average kick
2. Hewett 28yo...Def Mid slow, average kick
3. Cerra 26yo.....In out mid a bit quicker than slow, better than average kick
4. Walsh 24yo.....In Out mid yet to get back to his speed but not lighting quick anyway, lethal kick when not injured
5. Smith 19yo.....In Out mid not played yet but looks great in both
6. Lord 20yo......Inside mid quick but still developing, kick is still hit an miss but can be lethal

7. Williams 31yo...In out mid (Sm Fwd) defender turned forward, injured too much so not reliable, elite kick
8. Ainsworth 27yo...In Out mid (HHF) I like the idea, who replaces him in F50
9. B.Camporeale 19yo ..Inside mid not quick, kicking needs work
10. Walker 17yo ... In out mid perfect but not even in the team yet

There isn't enough spots to fit all these mids in the team in 2026 and 2027.

I don't mind Walsh playing HHF but running in midfield as an extra mid.

I want wings playing the wing role on the wing. Walsh has a knack of going for the ball instead of being outside stretching the ground.
I thought Luca Camporeale showed this year in the preseason and the first couple of rounds he does strech the ground for us providing an option out wide as well as providing a defensive outlet.
Still think Ollie Hollands - Acres combo has been our best for the winds. Acres is the vulnerable one, and this is where I am hoping Chesser, Lucas, Florent Young or Cottrell can take that spot.

I actually see Cowan as a midfielder when big bodied mids Cripps and Hewett retire, and would love to add an Onley type to the mix for that purpose too.

For this reason, I feel we have enough mids ... but there's always room for improvement. One Butters can be player, but do we really need him with Smith and walker growing before our eyes? We will know by the end of next year with Smith and Lord, if we need Butters to add to Walker.


I get where you are coming from but our midfield has limitations and was exposed badly this year.
All the rest I have addressed in my other post.
Butters or Bailey is a must if we want to win a flag IMO.
Or at least a kid that will be like them in the next couple of years on top of Smith, Ison and Walker.
I'd really like Dovaston so players like Ainsworth could get midfield minutes or Ludowyke as a need for a future CHF.
But if we want to further address our ball movement, you can't beat adding a quick footed elite kick to the midfield or wing.
The confusing part is we still have a couple of positions to address but neither have the draft capital or ability to bring anyone of value in this year.


Lets see what we get this year and then see how they go in 2026. Humphries is a target from what I hear, and highly possible we land him, if we have 3 2026 F1's

That would be a great outcome.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 531 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group