Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Mar 13, 2026 10:09 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 107 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2026 8:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 15731
Location: Sydney
TIme on ground %

Q1 / Q2
Blakey 100 / 86
McInerney 100 / 82
Cripps 86 / 59
Gulden 84 / 84
Jagga 84 / 66
Heeney 82 / 61
Warner 79 / 95
Walsh 79 / 85
Lord 71 / 75
Rowbottom 62 / 79
Hewett 60 / 82

I can't see that they were saving themselves any more than we were... maybe Heeney


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 07, 2026 8:04 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19969
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Changes to Sydney's midfield mix:

https://x.com/fantasynut_afl/status/2029707173987803473

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 07, 2026 6:10 pm 
Online
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 11062
Location: Australia
Effes wrote:


Aha, that’s CBA, not TOG.

Yes, they burnt us with speed out of the middle in the third. Grundy just smashed it to space and they ran onto it. Pittonet couldn’t stop Grundy and make sure the ball dropped to the inside, and our mids couldn’t keep up with theirs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 07, 2026 7:34 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1360
bender wrote:
Dodo27 wrote:
bender wrote:
diesel95 wrote:
looking forward to all the simplistic solutions being offered up.

sack the coach. trade the captain. drop worst 10 offenders to the twos. burn our membership cards in the Ikon Park car park tomorrow.


if i had my card sent to me , i'd do it.....

instead, i just created a whole post to vent my unwanted opinion....

oh, and sakc voss



We need to come up with real Solutions.. we can't keep asking to Sack the Coach etc...

I say Sack the Cheer Squad.... Problem Solved :grin: :grin: :donk:



the only thing we got right tonight was the banner......

i think we need to sack those blokes that run onto the field with the water bottles too....


pls excuse my omissions — you could be on to something there!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 07, 2026 7:46 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1360
Sidefx wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Braithy wrote:
abysmal.

even with not the greatest list. rolling over like that in the 3rd. no leadership, no coaching (we've not had coaching in decades, tbh), no pride in the jersey and each to a player, no pride in themselves.


it's as bleak as anything served up in the salary cap penalty years.



every team knows ho to unravel us. flood back in defence and we will turn it over. we can't hit wide open, uncontested targets, so we ain't hitting high contested targets and threading needles.

then Cox hit the switch at HT. we are not going to chip the ball around and kick over them. we're gonna run it right down their throats. handball chains, get on your bikes and run these softcocks off the pitch.

.... and they did. the formula to beat us hasn't changed. it's just gotten easier to execute.


Swans played the same way all night they just didn't connect in first half - they just run and spread and we were clueless.

Can someone please explain how in a meaningless jog around the park practice game last week we go out an lay 82 tackles with Cooper Lord laying 13 - Last night opening night of the season 38 all night and Cooper Lord zero tackles.

Tackling is effort - why put the effort in on a practice fame and not when the real stuff arrives

Swans kicked more goals than we made tackles in 2nd half

I dont care what game plan you have or cattle available to you if you lack effort you are no chance



my brother in christ, they absolutely did change it up.

wayyy more focus on give and go, handball support and run in waves. Every stoppage they took a number from the immediate stoppage & put someone - gulden, heeney, chad or McInerney about 15/ 20m goalside of the stoppage. and the whole stoppage was about getting the ball to that point. toe poke, slap, handball, parry doesn't matter how, just get it to that point bcos they won't catch us. and we didn't.

at HT Cox took the extra player from the stappage and placed him goalside - he backed his players to win the stoppage with one less man ahead of the ball. and they did.

walsh, cripps, hewett - none of them ran backwards or chased. hewett and cripps physically can't, and walsh didn't.

cripps and hewett look another year older and another 3-4 years slower than last season, which is going to make for one helluva long season.

I watched Cox presser post game and he pretty much said they didn't change anything.
They backed their processes and what they trained pre-season and his key players all stepped up, referring to their lack of impact in the first half.
He basically said his stars took responsibility and came out with shit on the liver and schooled us.
They have a much better midfield than we do.

The thing that frustrates me is since 2023 when only 2 teams were playing this modern spread game, we have only added an 18 year old kid to our slow aging midfield.
Like I said a few weeks ago and before the game, having Cripps and Hewett in the midfield together will not work anymore and adding Cerra to that mix is midfield suicide.
CBAs
Walsh %84
Cripps %62
Hewett %53
Smith %53
Lord %22
Williams %16

Williams needs more time in there even though he was kicking at %40, but he made a few things happen.


and somehow the mid we let go of is getting record numbers (for him) at the Dogs as a mid/half-foward. It think you can have slower players but it cant be you one wood, two wood and three wood. Walsh and Smith are both runners (and Ollie Holland), all game long so I wonder if its as much game-style and tactics as a slow midfield.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 07, 2026 9:58 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1360
OMG just saw Kennedy's states against Lions. 2nd highest of the Dogs for disposals, kicks and AF points. pure midfielder. lacking in pace?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:45 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:58 pm
Posts: 2420
diesel95 wrote:
OMG just saw Kennedy's states against Lions. 2nd highest of the Dogs for disposals, kicks and AF points. pure midfielder. lacking in pace?


Another notch on the belt of Crazy Vossy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 12:43 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2464
Location: East Melbourne
Traveller86 wrote:
diesel95 wrote:
OMG just saw Kennedy's states against Lions. 2nd highest of the Dogs for disposals, kicks and AF points. pure midfielder. lacking in pace?


Another notch on the belt of Crazy Vossy.
We're narrowing down the common denominator for the last four years: Voss, Cripps, Weitering, Walsh, McKay, McGovern, Saad, Williams, Fogarty, Austin. One of them must have the curse.

Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk

_________________
Jagga


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 10:10 am 
Online
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 11062
Location: Australia
Traveller86 wrote:
diesel95 wrote:
OMG just saw Kennedy's states against Lions. 2nd highest of the Dogs for disposals, kicks and AF points. pure midfielder. lacking in pace?


Another notch on the belt of Crazy Vossy.


Kennedy wasn’t the problem, the problem was (and is) that we have too many “Kennedy’s” in the midfield. Walsh and Ollie can run all day, but they don’t have that express speed to burst from a stoppage and spread. Jagga may have it, Cody may have it. Cripps, Hewett, Lord, Walsh, O Hollands, E Hollands, none of them have it.

We need to think about putting guys like Williams, Chesser, and Byrne through the midfield.

This is also why we shouldn’t have selected Dean, Young and Weitering all in the same team. We need run and spread from the backline and none of those three will give us any. Dean may in a year or two, but not this year. Derksen seems more mobile than any of them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 9:35 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 7547
sinbagger wrote:
Traveller86 wrote:
diesel95 wrote:
OMG just saw Kennedy's states against Lions. 2nd highest of the Dogs for disposals, kicks and AF points. pure midfielder. lacking in pace?


Another notch on the belt of Crazy Vossy.


Kennedy wasn’t the problem, the problem was (and is) that we have too many “Kennedy’s” in the midfield. Walsh and Ollie can run all day, but they don’t have that express speed to burst from a stoppage and spread. Jagga may have it, Cody may have it. Cripps, Hewett, Lord, Walsh, O Hollands, E Hollands, none of them have it.

We need to think about putting guys like Williams, Chesser, and Byrne through the midfield.

This is also why we shouldn’t have selected Dean, Young and Weitering all in the same team. We need run and spread from the backline and none of those three will give us any. Dean may in a year or two, but not this year. Derksen seems more mobile than any of them.

Spot on. :thumbsup:
More and more supporters are starting to get it, we just need the club to get it.
Williams needs more midfield time, 16% CBAs is not enough and I have also suggested giving Byrne a run, I think he'd be a jet, his only issue could be his tank (not sure what that is like).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 10:08 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 11084
sinbagger wrote:
Traveller86 wrote:
diesel95 wrote:
OMG just saw Kennedy's states against Lions. 2nd highest of the Dogs for disposals, kicks and AF points. pure midfielder. lacking in pace?


Another notch on the belt of Crazy Vossy.


Kennedy wasn’t the problem, the problem was (and is) that we have too many “Kennedy’s” in the midfield. Walsh and Ollie can run all day, but they don’t have that express speed to burst from a stoppage and spread. Jagga may have it, Cody may have it. Cripps, Hewett, Lord, Walsh, O Hollands, E Hollands, none of them have it.

We need to think about putting guys like Williams, Chesser, and Byrne through the midfield.

This is also why we shouldn’t have selected Dean, Young and Weitering all in the same team. We need run and spread from the backline and none of those three will give us any. Dean may in a year or two, but not this year. Derksen seems more mobile than any of them.


Someone better tell the coach - sorry the match committee - to select the right players and then to start rotating different types through the middle, because they have NFI.

So please tell them before it's too late for some. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 9:42 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18403
I heard an interview with Josh Fraser pre-season and from memory he mentioned role compliance. What is role compliance? We had Sydney held to one goal halfway through the second quarter. We get a stoppage 15m from our goal and the ruckman (Reidy) was told by Cripps to get away and Cripps nominates as the ruck. He blocks the opposition ruck, gives away the free kick and the ball goes up the other end for a goal.
Is that "role compliance"? A midfielder telling the ruckman not to contest the ruck? And as a consequence of him giving away the free, the ruckman is supposed to do what? Pick up a midfielder and chase him when Cripps infringes?

Third quarter Sydney kick a couple but we're still leading. We kick a point and Gulden takes the kick in and plays on. McKay (on the mark), who could have easily cut the angle, jogs across, watches Gulden chip the ball to a team mate and run on for the handball receive. Harry jogs and points to players upfield to apply the pressure. The loose man is created and Sydney hit the lead. Is that role compliance? Refusing to chase your opponent and expecting others to cover your arse?

I saw a clip by Jeff White on Youtube where he highlights the Swans unrewarded running and how they created space. That's not the @#$%&! problem. If Harry chased, applied pressure and did his job, the players upfield could have been accountable to their opponent instead of pushing up to pressure Harry's opponent. Players spend a heap of time training to create an outnumber and capitalising on it. We handed them the scenario.

Fraser has his hands full. We have talent down there but no lynch pin. Harry had 3 touches inside 50 and only one mark forward of centre from memory. One of his touches inside 50 was a gift handball from a Sydney player and another was him gifting a kick back to them.
I'm not sure what's happened to him but he's a shadow of his previous self. He had one good match sim and the remainder of his pre-season has been rubbish.

The key for the coaches is how to get the most out of him. He's on a long term contract on big dollars. IMHO, his value is pushing up the ground and marking the D50 exit kicks. He's good when he can run into space and use his athleticism. Play him as a high forward where he can play that role for us and keep him out of the forward 50. He has great pace, good hands and he reads the play up the ground well. He also seems to get into the game more when he's relieving ruck so I'd put him back into that role. Reidy out.

The issue is who competes the high ball in the front half. We have 2 options IMHO. Derksen who has been a reasonably successful forward in the VFL or Young. Young is a battler but he's shown in the past that he is given a role in the front half, he at least competes.
And we need a crumber. I wanted Byrne in and posters were saying he can't see the game out. Look at what other teams are doing with their 5th bench player. Sydney bought Papley on when the heat was off the game and he bought energy and chaos to their front half. 5 score involvements would have had him equal second for us. He played 57% game time.
Byrne did the same for us in the match sims. At least he chases, creates chances and he's a deadly finisher. 3 things we lacked badly.

5th bench spot for Scott Pendlebury. McRae said he wouldn't come on until the 20m mark of the first quarter. He played limited minutes, ran circles around the other players who were fatigued and was probably best on ground. He played 55% game time. 2nd least amount by a large margin. 10score involvements. Easily second most on ground. Impact matters more than quantity.


Out- Reidy, Chesser, Saad (injured), Moir, Fogarty (injured)
In. Carroll, Boyd, Byrne, Flynn Young. Derksen. (Carroll to the wing, Williams forward. He can't defend)

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 10:20 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6598
Blue Vain wrote:
I heard an interview with Josh Fraser pre-season and from memory he mentioned role compliance. What is role compliance? We had Sydney held to one goal halfway through the second quarter. We get a stoppage 15m from our goal and the ruckman (Reidy) was told by Cripps to get away and Cripps nominates as the ruck. He blocks the opposition ruck, gives away the free kick and the ball goes up the other end for a goal.
Is that "role compliance"? A midfielder telling the ruckman not to contest the ruck? And as a consequence of him giving away the free, the ruckman is supposed to do what? Pick up a midfielder and chase him when Cripps infringes?

Third quarter Sydney kick a couple but we're still leading. We kick a point and Gulden takes the kick in and plays on. McKay (on the mark), who could have easily cut the angle, jogs across, watches Gulden chip the ball to a team mate and run on for the handball receive. Harry jogs and points to players upfield to apply the pressure. The loose man is created and Sydney hit the lead. Is that role compliance? Refusing to chase your opponent and expecting others to cover your arse?

I saw a clip by Jeff White on Youtube where he highlights the Swans unrewarded running and how they created space. That's not the @#$%&! problem. If Harry chased, applied pressure and did his job, the players upfield could have been accountable to their opponent instead of pushing up to pressure Harry's opponent. Players spend a heap of time training to create an outnumber and capitalising on it. We handed them the scenario.

Fraser has his hands full. We have talent down there but no lynch pin. Harry had 3 touches inside 50 and only one mark forward of centre from memory. One of his touches inside 50 was a gift handball from a Sydney player and another was him gifting a kick back to them.
I'm not sure what's happened to him but he's a shadow of his previous self. He had one good match sim and the remainder of his pre-season has been rubbish.

The key for the coaches is how to get the most out of him. He's on a long term contract on big dollars. IMHO, his value is pushing up the ground and marking the D50 exit kicks. He's good when he can run into space and use his athleticism. Play him as a high forward where he can play that role for us and keep him out of the forward 50. He has great pace, good hands and he reads the play up the ground well. He also seems to get into the game more when he's relieving ruck so I'd put him back into that role. Reidy out.

The issue is who competes the high ball in the front half. We have 2 options IMHO. Derksen who has been a reasonably successful forward in the VFL or Young. Young is a battler but he's shown in the past that he is given a role in the front half, he at least competes.
And we need a crumber. I wanted Byrne in and posters were saying he can't see the game out. Look at what other teams are doing with their 5th bench player. Sydney bought Papley on when the heat was off the game and he bought energy and chaos to their front half. 5 score involvements would have had him equal second for us. He played 57% game time.
Byrne did the same for us in the match sims. At least he chases, creates chances and he's a deadly finisher. 3 things we lacked badly.

5th bench spot for Scott Pendlebury. McRae said he wouldn't come on until the 20m mark of the first quarter. He played limited minutes, ran circles around the other players who were fatigued and was probably best on ground. He played 55% game time. 2nd least amount by a large margin. 10score involvements. Easily second most on ground. Impact matters more than quantity.


Out- Reidy, Chesser, Saad (injured), Moir, Fogarty (injured)
In. Carroll, Boyd, Byrne, Flynn Young. Derksen. (Carroll to the wing, Williams forward. He can't defend)


How about we don’t play blokes who are simply not good enough to start with
Make a statement
Drop Cripps for showing not just zero leadership but being a prick to a teammate playing his first game
Make a real @#$%&! statement
How about playing Ison
He would be better than half the spuds out there Thursday night

And your view that I’m off the mark about Walsh
Walsh isn’t a game breaker
Yet another mid who doesn’t hurt enough offensively
8years 10 mill no way
Florent Haywood 5 year deals
The club doesn’t learn
My message
Play kids at every opportunity
And if Williams L Young and The Gov get contracts in 27 and beyond it just wouldn’t suprise me anymore


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 11:34 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 11084
I’ll just add this here, clingers for R0.

https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ ... t=LA&st=CG

Interesting top 10. Elijah did have a bad night but it’s not the norm for him.
Doubt it will stop the misconceptions on some of our players though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 11:44 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2688
Blue Vain wrote:
I heard an interview with Josh Fraser pre-season and from memory he mentioned role compliance. What is role compliance? We had Sydney held to one goal halfway through the second quarter. We get a stoppage 15m from our goal and the ruckman (Reidy) was told by Cripps to get away and Cripps nominates as the ruck. He blocks the opposition ruck, gives away the free kick and the ball goes up the other end for a goal.
Is that "role compliance"? A midfielder telling the ruckman not to contest the ruck? And as a consequence of him giving away the free, the ruckman is supposed to do what? Pick up a midfielder and chase him when Cripps infringes?

Third quarter Sydney kick a couple but we're still leading. We kick a point and Gulden takes the kick in and plays on. McKay (on the mark), who could have easily cut the angle, jogs across, watches Gulden chip the ball to a team mate and run on for the handball receive. Harry jogs and points to players upfield to apply the pressure. The loose man is created and Sydney hit the lead. Is that role compliance? Refusing to chase your opponent and expecting others to cover your arse?

I saw a clip by Jeff White on Youtube where he highlights the Swans unrewarded running and how they created space. That's not the @#$%&! problem. If Harry chased, applied pressure and did his job, the players upfield could have been accountable to their opponent instead of pushing up to pressure Harry's opponent. Players spend a heap of time training to create an outnumber and capitalising on it. We handed them the scenario.

Fraser has his hands full. We have talent down there but no lynch pin. Harry had 3 touches inside 50 and only one mark forward of centre from memory. One of his touches inside 50 was a gift handball from a Sydney player and another was him gifting a kick back to them.
I'm not sure what's happened to him but he's a shadow of his previous self. He had one good match sim and the remainder of his pre-season has been rubbish.

The key for the coaches is how to get the most out of him. He's on a long term contract on big dollars. IMHO, his value is pushing up the ground and marking the D50 exit kicks. He's good when he can run into space and use his athleticism. Play him as a high forward where he can play that role for us and keep him out of the forward 50. He has great pace, good hands and he reads the play up the ground well. He also seems to get into the game more when he's relieving ruck so I'd put him back into that role. Reidy out.

The issue is who competes the high ball in the front half. We have 2 options IMHO. Derksen who has been a reasonably successful forward in the VFL or Young. Young is a battler but he's shown in the past that he is given a role in the front half, he at least competes.
And we need a crumber. I wanted Byrne in and posters were saying he can't see the game out. Look at what other teams are doing with their 5th bench player. Sydney bought Papley on when the heat was off the game and he bought energy and chaos to their front half. 5 score involvements would have had him equal second for us. He played 57% game time.
Byrne did the same for us in the match sims. At least he chases, creates chances and he's a deadly finisher. 3 things we lacked badly.

5th bench spot for Scott Pendlebury. McRae said he wouldn't come on until the 20m mark of the first quarter. He played limited minutes, ran circles around the other players who were fatigued and was probably best on ground. He played 55% game time. 2nd least amount by a large margin. 10score involvements. Easily second most on ground. Impact matters more than quantity.


Out- Reidy, Chesser, Saad (injured), Moir, Fogarty (injured)
In. Carroll, Boyd, Byrne, Flynn Young. Derksen. (Carroll to the wing, Williams forward. He can't defend)



mckay needs to stat in the forward line alone with crumbers running into the forward line. Our forward line is crampet and dysfunctional, we cannot score freely. Harry is the biggest threat to defences we need to isolate him.
We can get it in there but cannot score


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 11:50 am 
Online
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 11062
Location: Australia
Blue Vain wrote:
I heard an interview with Josh Fraser pre-season and from memory he mentioned role compliance. What is role compliance? We had Sydney held to one goal halfway through the second quarter. We get a stoppage 15m from our goal and the ruckman (Reidy) was told by Cripps to get away and Cripps nominates as the ruck. He blocks the opposition ruck, gives away the free kick and the ball goes up the other end for a goal.
Is that "role compliance"? A midfielder telling the ruckman not to contest the ruck? And as a consequence of him giving away the free, the ruckman is supposed to do what? Pick up a midfielder and chase him when Cripps infringes?

Third quarter Sydney kick a couple but we're still leading. We kick a point and Gulden takes the kick in and plays on. McKay (on the mark), who could have easily cut the angle, jogs across, watches Gulden chip the ball to a team mate and run on for the handball receive. Harry jogs and points to players upfield to apply the pressure. The loose man is created and Sydney hit the lead. Is that role compliance? Refusing to chase your opponent and expecting others to cover your arse?

I saw a clip by Jeff White on Youtube where he highlights the Swans unrewarded running and how they created space. That's not the @#$%&! problem. If Harry chased, applied pressure and did his job, the players upfield could have been accountable to their opponent instead of pushing up to pressure Harry's opponent. Players spend a heap of time training to create an outnumber and capitalising on it. We handed them the scenario.

Fraser has his hands full. We have talent down there but no lynch pin. Harry had 3 touches inside 50 and only one mark forward of centre from memory. One of his touches inside 50 was a gift handball from a Sydney player and another was him gifting a kick back to them.
I'm not sure what's happened to him but he's a shadow of his previous self. He had one good match sim and the remainder of his pre-season has been rubbish.

The key for the coaches is how to get the most out of him. He's on a long term contract on big dollars. IMHO, his value is pushing up the ground and marking the D50 exit kicks. He's good when he can run into space and use his athleticism. Play him as a high forward where he can play that role for us and keep him out of the forward 50. He has great pace, good hands and he reads the play up the ground well. He also seems to get into the game more when he's relieving ruck so I'd put him back into that role. Reidy out.

The issue is who competes the high ball in the front half. We have 2 options IMHO. Derksen who has been a reasonably successful forward in the VFL or Young. Young is a battler but he's shown in the past that he is given a role in the front half, he at least competes.
And we need a crumber. I wanted Byrne in and posters were saying he can't see the game out. Look at what other teams are doing with their 5th bench player. Sydney bought Papley on when the heat was off the game and he bought energy and chaos to their front half. 5 score involvements would have had him equal second for us. He played 57% game time.
Byrne did the same for us in the match sims. At least he chases, creates chances and he's a deadly finisher. 3 things we lacked badly.

5th bench spot for Scott Pendlebury. McRae said he wouldn't come on until the 20m mark of the first quarter. He played limited minutes, ran circles around the other players who were fatigued and was probably best on ground. He played 55% game time. 2nd least amount by a large margin. 10score involvements. Easily second most on ground. Impact matters more than quantity.


Out- Reidy, Chesser, Saad (injured), Moir, Fogarty (injured)
In. Carroll, Boyd, Byrne, Flynn Young. Derksen. (Carroll to the wing, Williams forward. He can't defend)



I think the Jeff White thing and the Harry chasing thing are two different aspects of the overall problem.

- our forwards need to chase and pressure opposition backs
- our backs need to do lots of unrewarded running and create space (see Syds report of John Barker and Mil Hanna highlighting our lack of run and spread)
- our mids need a burst of speed to match the opposition once the game gets more outside than inside

Points one and two are pretty much what Docherty was saying in his rant to Gorringe. We all know and have discussed it here. What’s scary is that the players also seem to know about it, and train for it (I assume), but don’t do it when the pressure is on.

Point three is a lack of the right players issue, we can bandage over with players like Byrne and Williams in the short term, but longer term only players like a mature Jagga, Walker, plus someone like Butters can solve.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 12:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 15731
Location: Sydney
Agreed with BV on the 5th interchange usage, I'd noticed the trend from other games and as usual we've gone our own way and looked the worse for it. I'd not seen Reidy play before so I was just blindly hoping he'd be the agile and athletic lieutenant to Pitto, but it appears he's a lumbering beast, and Pitto is now an elite crumbing forward anyway so I, too, would ditch Reidy and get H into that forward/ruck role at least until he breaks out of his funk, as this role seems to have done for him on previous occasions.

Hopefully The Tank will be back for Richmond, in which case I'd have Reidy, Saad(inj) and Fog as the minimum outs, replaced by Byrne, Carroll and Evans. Maybe Kemp out for DDMJ, but again I've never seen the latter so only going off what you mob say - profiles well, at least.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 2:47 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26313
Location: Bondi Beach
Only got back home last night and just watched the replay for first time.

Haven't changed my mind on the game too much after watching game again.

I'm not over thinking this one too much either.

Humidity was a huge factor. ball was slippery and you could see that with the both teams (except that 3rd quarter when everything went right for Swans, including ball falling in their hands)

We played against a full strength Swans side on a ground every team struggles with. Apart from the (wrong) players selected to plug holes, we had Haynes, Newman, O'Farrell, Cowan, Carroll, Cerra, Evans, Wilson missing from our best. Saad went off with hammy tightness. He was one of our best in the first half, and clamped on Papley till he went off.

I've watched enough Sydney games to conclude that 2nd half was a Unicorn.

Also,

Having watched the State Of Origin, when the best of the best are up against each other, Warner was too quick and steady for everyone, so you can't conclude that half of the Victorian team should be dropped. You have to accept freaks like Warner exist, and Gulden's ability should not come as a surprise. As much as coaches try to nullify them, they still strut their stuff. Have to ensure the other 16 are doing thei job.

I could go on and on about what went Sydney's way that isn't the norm, but what I saw was at the game and on replay the ball bounce their way and everything they touched turned to gold. In fact, 12 times in one quarter. Shit happens. Wont happen again.

I went to the footy with sinbagger, and agree with him re forwards failing to chase hard enough, let alone long enough. Sinbagger would recall my disgust in McKay's effort in that Gulden kick out BV referred to. Its those little things that need to be addressed...the 100% effort to chase, and run and pressure, the things that should be non negotiable. Avoid silly corralling instead of attacking the hips with gusto to apply pressure on the kicker. To tackle like you mean it, and not only put the opponent on the ground, but try and take the wind out, and bruise them. To do your job on your own opponent at all times, instead of watching them.

There were Carlton players I was very disappointed in.

Why was Nick Blakey allowed to run wherever he liked? Who was on him? That's where their run started and always has.
Ollie Hollands had gulden's measure till Gulden went into the guts. Whose opponent was he?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 3:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26313
Location: Bondi Beach
There was a lot to like in the first half, and last quarter, and I was glad the boys wer able to kick 4 goals in the third.

Super impressed in Dean and Smith. Weitering was good (most of the time), Saad's speed is something we need, and we need to find someone to replace him before year's end, because I dont think he can run express like he did when younger. Williams was good, but watsed in the backline, and WTF is he doing minding Amartey? Walsh was a machine. Ollie worked hard and has speed, but his kicking MUST improve. He loses focus on his kicking. Fkn FiX it. please. Lord was good in the first half. Hewett tried his guts out.

BUT....

Our backmen need to attack the ball when its coming in, including Weitering. When he and the other defenders did attack the incoming ball no easy marks were taken by forwards. When they were ball watching, they did. Stay close to opponents like defenders should.

McGovern was.....imo, the most disappointing. He slows the game moreso than Young. Derksen showed more than Gov in preseason and can't understand what Gov gives us anymore.

Dean, cramped 5 mins into last, and is fit enough to play only 3 quarters (maybe humidity sapped his energy).

Kemp...is he a HF? Set shot dud.

Kemps and Elijahs hands were terrible, as was their kicking throughout the game. They did kick a goal each but snap shots are 50-50. They got lucky, otherwise.....show some skills or go the reserves.

A lot of average performances TBH.

I'm not going to over think this Unicorn performance, but I will keep my eye on some of the culprits from this game.

Players we traded in were OK. Chesser didnt look fast and reidy doesnt do much.

Grundy is a class ruckman and Pittonet battled manfully, but once Grundy is in front at the throw in, you've let him dominate you.

I'm going to focus on next Thursday's game now. Hopefully we dont have to see Gov in the backline again. Derksen please.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 6:09 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7659
bondiblue wrote:
...we had Haynes, Newman, O'Farrell, Cowan, Carroll, Cerra, Evans, Wilson missing from our best.

Which players from Thursday night do these 8 replace?

Fans wanted to execute Haynes and Newman not that long ago... father time is not on their side
O'Farrell will be a gun (fingers crossed)
Cowan, Carroll and Evans... week to week prospects... replaceable
Cerra, he played some good games once up a time
Wilson... meh

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 107 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: sinbagger and 128 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group