Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 17, 2025 11:38 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:52 am 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:39 pm
Posts: 487
Mrs Caz wrote:
Betting's a mugs game.


Your one liners turn me on like you wouldnt believe..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 12:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
I have that effect on omniscient beings


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 12:06 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
Hmmmm.........

guitarist hey..........that'd probably do it Keogh.........!

sorry i'm bored with this now........till next time...........!


kindest regards tommi








Gartlon Cod...........your BACK.............!





triffic............!

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 12:24 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:12 am
Posts: 10076
That was like Zorro, just woooosh out the door... :-D

_________________
Oompa loompa doompety dee
If you are wise you'll listen to me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:37 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:24 pm
Posts: 420
I think Keogh has embarassed himself enough here guys. Logic is his downfall, that much is obviousy... :oops:

Lets just discuss the topic at hand and forget all this bickering, its not needed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 3:34 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:12 am
Posts: 10076
Seagull wrote:
I think Keogh has embarassed himself enough here guys. Logic is his downfall, that much is obviousy... :oops:

Lets just discuss the topic at hand and forget all this bickering, its not needed


SHut up Seagull, this is not bickering!!! :twisted: :evil:



























waits for seagull to take bait.......... :?




8)

_________________
Oompa loompa doompety dee
If you are wise you'll listen to me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:20 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6476
Seagull

I aint embarrased one bit and what I posted makes perfect sense and I will keep posting for as long as I like.

Given your line of thinking are you going to put some money on the blues finishing last cause your collect wont be vast unless you put ya house on it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
What about the blokes who after hearing the first innings score of the Aussies v Sth Africa bet $200K to win $200? :shock:

A mugs game I tells ya.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:02 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:24 pm
Posts: 420
keogh wrote:
Seagull

I aint embarrased one bit and what I posted makes perfect sense and I will keep posting for as long as I like.

Given your line of thinking are you going to put some money on the blues finishing last cause your collect wont be vast unless you put ya house on it.


No, odds are too short. I bet on football, not aussie rules. Chelsea have been making me quite alot of money the past 2 seasons and will continue to do so.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:04 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:24 pm
Posts: 420
Mrs Caz wrote:
What about the blokes who after hearing the first innings score of the Aussies v Sth Africa bet $200K to win $200? :shock:

A mugs game I tells ya.


haha yeh ridiculous. Although it was $20k wasnt it?

Given that these people can afford to bet this much in the first place, a profit of $200 would be hardly worth it surely...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
Seagull wrote:

haha yeh ridiculous. Although it was $20k wasnt it?



oh...what's a few $K between friends? :P I do remember that I nearly choked on my breakfast when I heard that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:15 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:24 pm
Posts: 420
IF you read the same article as me it also said that when australia lost to bangladesh, a punter also lost $50,000 to win $500... I cant work out why someone which is obviously wealthy would risk so much to win so little?

Why not just back chelsea scorelines each week, easy money


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:23 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
Seagull wrote:
IF you read the same article as me it also said that when australia lost to bangladesh, a punter also lost $50,000 to win $500... I cant work out why someone which is obviously wealthy would risk so much to win so little?

Why not just back chelsea scorelines each week, easy money


Every punter I meet only tells me about their winnings.... :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:42 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:24 pm
Posts: 420
mikkey wrote:
Seagull wrote:
IF you read the same article as me it also said that when australia lost to bangladesh, a punter also lost $50,000 to win $500... I cant work out why someone which is obviously wealthy would risk so much to win so little?

Why not just back chelsea scorelines each week, easy money


Every punter I meet only tells me about their winnings.... :wink:


You think your the sheik now? I'll tell you what i told her, why would you brag about losing money? :oops:

Chelsea to win 1-0 or 2-0 pays between $6-$7 each match, Chelsea scoring is a given and Chelsea keeping a cleansheet is a regular occurance (although not lately :x )

In 29 games this EPL season, Chelsea have won 1-0 five times (1 in every 5.8 games) and 2-0 eight times (1 every 3.6 games). So going by that Chelsea will have a 1-0 or 2-0 result 1 in every 2 games. You put $10 on each and thats a $50-60 profit every second week. Put $50 on each and thats $350.

Ive made a shit load the last 2 years doing this, although lately Chelsea have been conceding a bit.

Also keep in mind that Liverpool have won 8 games 1-0 and five 2-0 and keep more clean sheets than Chelsea. Everton have won 1-0 nine times this year but have lost 0-2 five times. West Ham have won six games 2-1.

Keep an eye out on Chelsea and Liverpool scores for the rest of the season and watch how often these results occur, you'll be supprised


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:44 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
Yeah Australia were paying $1.01 for every $1.00. A few bucks on SA at the break must of paid big $ though...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Kangaroos easily defeat Port Round 1. :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 83 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group