CarltonClem wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Wayne Brittain is as tactically adept as anyone in the game.
If he is a shattered man, its Carlton that shattered him.
He was shafted by old men struggling to retain their last bit of relevance.
David Parkin, Ross Lyon, John Worsfold, current and ex Carlton players rate him up with the best.
That may be the case? But what happened at Richmond?
Not to take away from Brittain.
I dont understand how we continually assume assistant coaches are responsible.
We got the wooden spoon last year but Barry Mitchell is as good an AFL coach in the making as any.
Essendon* had their most unsuccessful season for a long time in 2005.`
Does that mean Mark Harvey is a better assistant coach than Gary O'Donnell?
Assistant coaches are there to assist.
How much the senior coach requests or utilises information is varied I'd suggest.
I'd also suggest some senior coaches want to do it their way exclusively, especially when they are under pressure.
When is the last time you saw anyone other than Pagan or Elshaugh speak in the box?
Jimmae wrote:
I'd say that's as a result of the sacking he has brought that into his style. He tried to continue the Parkin legacy, in which the players themselves were highly professional and took it upon themselves to motivate the less experienced in the playing group.
It all began to unravel in 2002 when a good number of these were injured and some had already retired. That and a severe lack of depth due to shoddy recruiting.
This is all known information guys, Brittain had a thing he could do with the playing group and that was connect with them, it was unique to the situation and when that connection was lost, so was his job. Kind of like a player's form if you will. He didn't have the skills to rebuild that.
This is all known information is it Jimmae?
Some of the shit you sprout on here as fact is amazing.
We should introduce a fiction section of TC just for you.