Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:41 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: In the gun
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
After tonight's game, I'd suggest the following should be discussed at selection this week:

DeLuca: totally ineffective, not really sure why we played him at Subiaco. Bring on Bryan or Kennedy.

Chambers: Looks great when he gets space and runs, just never gets space and runs

Sporn: I'll get a hiding for this, called him hopeless during the week and was crucified. Does a lot of good things, but for every good thing there's a turnover, dropped chest mark, etc. Too slow also. Not a fan at all.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:44 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:23 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Melbourne
stuff Sporn! yes he had a few kicks tonight, but that's because he doesn't have a role tonight and the opposition team doesn't bother puting a player on him. He's on our list for 5 years now and has he improve? He certainly hasn't grown any muscles, he's not gonna improve much so why still waste time on him, play blackwell or russell instead please!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:49 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 3:19 pm
Posts: 224
we could directly swap these players with no noticeable change

deluca > bryan

chambers > russell (or even wiggo) :)

sporn > teague or bannister


jeez we missed fish tonight .. comeback soon fish !


.. go fish ..

.. go blues ..


Last edited by markj on Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
The midfield.

The forwards rely on the midfield for delivery. No good delivery = no marks = no goals.

The backs rely on the pressure the midfield can exert on opposition players running the ball down the corridoor. No pressure = lace out passes to the opposition forwards.

Crucify our forwards and backs if you must, but at least take the midfield into account when you do so.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:53 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Wojee wrote:
The midfield.

The forwards rely on the midfield for delivery. No good delivery = no marks = no goals.

The backs rely on the pressure the midfield can exert on opposition players running the ball down the corridoor. No pressure = lace out passes to the opposition forwards.

Crucify our forwards and backs if you must, but at least take the midfield into account when you do so.


Agree with that, but I reckon the three I named continually disappoint.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Wojee wrote:
The midfield.

The forwards rely on the midfield for delivery. No good delivery = no marks = no goals.

The backs rely on the pressure the midfield can exert on opposition players running the ball down the corridoor. No pressure = lace out passes to the opposition forwards.

Crucify our forwards and backs if you must, but at least take the midfield into account when you do so.


Agree with that, but I reckon the three I named continually disappoint.

Chambers and Sporn are part of the midfield. Hacks both of them and we won't improve as a side until they're both, along with Deluca, playing in the VFL where they belong. I can't wait for Blackwell, Russell, Setanta and Kennedy to be fully ready for AFL senior football.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:15 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Andain wrote:
Chambers and Sporn are part of the midfield. Hacks both of them and we won't improve as a side until they're both, along with Deluca, playing in the VFL where they belong. I can't wait for Blackwell, Russell, Setanta and Kennedy to be fully ready for AFL senior football.


Where did they line up though? If they're on a half back flank then their priority is to negate their immediate opponent.
Chambers didn't seem to get much game time when compared to Stevens, who was flogged by Crowley early, and Kouta, who had very modest output.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:22 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Wojee wrote:
Andain wrote:
Chambers and Sporn are part of the midfield. Hacks both of them and we won't improve as a side until they're both, along with Deluca, playing in the VFL where they belong. I can't wait for Blackwell, Russell, Setanta and Kennedy to be fully ready for AFL senior football.


Where did they line up though? If they're on a half back flank then their priority is to negate their immediate opponent.
Chambers didn't seem to get much game time when compared to Stevens, who was flogged by Crowley early, and Kouta, who had very modest output.

I define midfielders a little differently then most. Midfielders for me include people who play in the middle (including rucks, wings, ect) roving HBFs like Lappin or Walker, and roving HFFs like Paul Chapman. They all play a similar role in the side. Some are defensive and some are offensively orientated but they're all midfielders.

If Chambers and Sporn were any good they could've replaced Stevens in the midfield and given him a rest like most backup midfielders do in every other side in the league. Chamber and Sporn just aren't good enough. Kouta's game is apparently underrated. He wasn't brilliant but he got plenty of the ball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Andain wrote:
Kouta's game is apparently underrated. He wasn't brilliant but he got plenty of the ball.


I'm not denying he got plenty of touches, but for mine he didn't have a huge impact on the game.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:31 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Wojee wrote:
Andain wrote:
Kouta's game is apparently underrated. He wasn't brilliant but he got plenty of the ball.


I'm not denying he got plenty of touches, but for mine he didn't have a huge impact on the game.

He played more of a link man role, and he got plenty of his own ball. But you're right, he didn't exactly set the world on fire when he had possession.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Andain wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Andain wrote:
Kouta's game is apparently underrated. He wasn't brilliant but he got plenty of the ball.


I'm not denying he got plenty of touches, but for mine he didn't have a huge impact on the game.

He played more of a link man role, and he got plenty of his own ball. But you're right, he didn't exactly set the world on fire when he had possession.


Which was the story of the entire midfield.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
Andain wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Wojee wrote:
The midfield.

The forwards rely on the midfield for delivery. No good delivery = no marks = no goals.

The backs rely on the pressure the midfield can exert on opposition players running the ball down the corridoor. No pressure = lace out passes to the opposition forwards.

Crucify our forwards and backs if you must, but at least take the midfield into account when you do so.


Agree with that, but I reckon the three I named continually disappoint.

Chambers and Sporn are part of the midfield. Hacks both of them and we won't improve as a side until they're both, along with Deluca, playing in the VFL where they belong. I can't wait for Blackwell, Russell, Setanta and Kennedy to be fully ready for AFL senior football.

Plus Hartlett who has a helluvalot more to offer up forward and downback than Deluca!

At least the alleged blacklisted player can kick the skin off the ball and roost it 70 metres!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:39 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
JuzzCarlton wrote:
Andain wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Wojee wrote:
The midfield.

The forwards rely on the midfield for delivery. No good delivery = no marks = no goals.

The backs rely on the pressure the midfield can exert on opposition players running the ball down the corridoor. No pressure = lace out passes to the opposition forwards.

Crucify our forwards and backs if you must, but at least take the midfield into account when you do so.


Agree with that, but I reckon the three I named continually disappoint.

Chambers and Sporn are part of the midfield. Hacks both of them and we won't improve as a side until they're both, along with Deluca, playing in the VFL where they belong. I can't wait for Blackwell, Russell, Setanta and Kennedy to be fully ready for AFL senior football.

Plus Hartlett who has a helluvalot more to offer up forward and downback than Deluca!

At least the alleged blacklisted player can kick the skin off the ball and roost it 70 metres!


Is hartlett THAT player? or just speculation on your part?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:56 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 3:23 pm
Posts: 436
JuzzCarlton wrote:
Andain wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Wojee wrote:
The midfield.

The forwards rely on the midfield for delivery. No good delivery = no marks = no goals.

The backs rely on the pressure the midfield can exert on opposition players running the ball down the corridoor. No pressure = lace out passes to the opposition forwards.

Crucify our forwards and backs if you must, but at least take the midfield into account when you do so.


Agree with that, but I reckon the three I named continually disappoint.

Chambers and Sporn are part of the midfield. Hacks both of them and we won't improve as a side until they're both, along with Deluca, playing in the VFL where they belong. I can't wait for Blackwell, Russell, Setanta and Kennedy to be fully ready for AFL senior football.

Plus Hartlett who has a helluvalot more to offer up forward and downback than Deluca!

At least the alleged blacklisted player can kick the skin off the ball and roost it 70 metres!


I also heard on the grapevine about the blacklisted player. Pagan got a call from Senantor Joe McCarthy alerting him to the communist infiltration of the Team and singled out a player with communist sympathies. Until he names the players who are playing under the guise of footballers from within the club he will have to stick it out in the magoos.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:11 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
When will people on the internet finally learn that 'than' and 'then' are two completely different words? :?

It is driving me stark-raving mad!! :x :x

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Last edited by Pafloyul on Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:14 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:11 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Wojee wrote:
Andain wrote:
Kouta's game is apparently underrated. He wasn't brilliant but he got plenty of the ball.


I'm not denying he got plenty of touches, but for mine he didn't have a huge impact on the game.


Kouta had 10 contested possessions. So did Houla.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:13 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
BlueWorld wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Andain wrote:
Kouta's game is apparently underrated. He wasn't brilliant but he got plenty of the ball.


I'm not denying he got plenty of touches, but for mine he didn't have a huge impact on the game.


Kouta had 10 contested possessions. So did Houla.


Kouta's kicking was as bad as I have ever seen it tonight, got a bit of it, but coughed it up a lot.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:13 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
BlueWorld wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Andain wrote:
Kouta's game is apparently underrated. He wasn't brilliant but he got plenty of the ball.


I'm not denying he got plenty of touches, but for mine he didn't have a huge impact on the game.


Kouta had 10 contested possessions. So did Houla.


Can you elaborate on your point?

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:23 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: Perth
Kouta was sadly out of touch and showed very little interest intrying to tackle, chase, spoil etc. I was surprised to see his stats.

I agree re Deluca - send him back to the Ants.

Sporn was okay and though every time he got it I cringed he only really clanged it once or twice, which is better percentage than Stevens, Whitnall and Lappin, who gave away a goal by kicking it into the man on the mark.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:32 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Ponkstar wrote:
Kouta was sadly out of touch and showed very little interest intrying to tackle, chase, spoil etc. I was surprised to see his stats.


Yet he had 5 tackles (equal highest in the team with Carrazzo).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group