Seems the tribunal agrees with me.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.

Next you will be using the views of Demitrispew and the AFL commission to back up your arguments.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|

Doesn't look good does it? The Sheik and the tribunal backing me up.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.

As against 'unintentionally' touching another player ?? It is a contact sport you know !!

_________________
GROUND ZERO + DRAFTING YOUTH = SUSTAINED SUCCESS

Found guilty Medhurst of negligently rather than recklessly causing contact so got reprimand rather than suspension - was lucky that it was downgraded to negligent
Flat track bullys the dockers and cant wait to play them again here in Melbourne -hopefully we will beat them and put paid to their finals chances

Not entirely, he still gets points to go toward his next suspension. Had they agreed with you they'd have said "No case to answer, next".

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa

Even Medhurst acknowledged he was guilty & that was the only thing that saved him, because had he not pleaded guilty he would have got a one match suspension.

But no the tribunal does not agree with you & he still carries a conviction, which if he's not more careful in the future will be added on next time.

He may have fooled the tribunal that it was unintentional but he went straight past the ball & deliberately lined up Houlihan.

It was a Mark Harvey-esque tactic..........come in off the square with the intention of cleaning someone up. I think Farmer also charged in to line someone up but couldn't get through the congestion

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch