bondiblue wrote:
I think that Pagan should meet with the coaching fraternity to discuss the inequitable treatment Fev gets from the umps, just as Roos did for Hall, Sheedy for Lloyd in defence of their players' mistreatment from the umpires.
Duty of Care for his players is the duty of the coach. Do not make it public. There's enough footage to refer to. It is becoming very frustrating from a supporter point of view, and personally I am accepting the harsh treatment he receives from umpires as it has become, unfairly, the norm.
Lance is the other one, and why he cops it from the umps, I do not understand. He never back chats, nor does he openly disagree with their decisions, and just gets on with it.
you're right, but i just can't see pagan doing it unfortunately.
lance was "featured" in the umpires' dvd in relation to shepherding or blocking the run and therefore denying the other guy a FAIR marking attempt. i'm convinced that this has inprinted in the umpires' minds so that lance will always get pinged for it. anytime lance takes his eye off the ball to see what's coming he will be penalised.
richo did NOT make a fair attempt to take the mark anyway. he put his hands on lance's back to give himself a ride. lance's act had nothing to do with richo's use of the hands. but, that idiot umpire (jeffries?) did NOT take richo's illegal launch into account, just referred to the dvd footage inprinted in his mind.
that beg's the question, how many other players used in that dvd are associated with the infringement and get pinged for it every time as lance does?
why doesn't gieschen the flower use suburban players or actors etc instead?