Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 6:44 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:23 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 4:44 am
Posts: 539
dannyboy wrote:
Now if you want to argue Lance could be moved back in the last as a chance to win the game that's a different argument. But to say the move should not have been made, just how were we going to get the ball down to Lance - osmosis?


Well, we're certainly not going to get the ball down to Lance if he's not there. The Richmond coaches were apparently praying that Pagan would play Lance on Richo so Richo could run him all over the park - which was what he did. This limits Lance's ability to create run and assist others which are usually his main tasks when he's back. Given that I'd hardly call it a proactive move. It just smacks of a we've-done-this-before-and-it-worked move. And as the commentators said, it really doesn't matter who you put on Richo - everything revolves around whether Richo comes to play or not.

And the problem wasn't just Richo - the problem was they were belting us at the stoppages. What did we do that was proactive in that area? Did we try to man up around the ground and put some pressure on the Tiges? We could have let Lance run down from CHF and play loose back for a while - afterall he's been doing that since 2001. Put him in at the centre bounces (not as the ruckman) - certainly couldn't do any worse.


I don't know - it just seemed like a tired old move - a robbing Peter to pay Terry type of thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:48 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Wolfe wrote:
Blues2005 its a lost cause with Synbad on Lance dosnt matter what he does he aint gonna get any credit ... I agree with you when he has been used correctly in all the games this season he has been among the best



so i have to give him credit for last night do i????

What for???

And yes, im the one that says you have to build a whole gameplan around Lance so he can play footy/ not to be exploited... and you have to hand pick his opponents.
Compare that to Richo.
Richo commands his position on the ground and in the game.

I think thats the kind of playeryou must give credit to.


Credit for what again???
One trick pony?

I just think we need to make the hard call on him.. and im crossing everything i have his currency goes up...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 9:06 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8229
TruBlueBrad wrote:
dannyboy answered this in another thread and it makes sense. We needed someone back there to set up play, Richmond were starting tot ake control so we did need Lance back there. The ball wasn't getting down there so he wasn't going to be effective up forward any longer anyway
We were 3 goals up and playing ok after kicking the previous 4 goals. That's our problem, too defensive a mindset. Hence they won the game. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Pagan failed us again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 9:22 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
we were not 3 goals up when Denis moved Lance - I'll ay it again (sorry BV) Lance was moved with about 8 minutes to go in the 2nd and we had it past our forward 50 5 or 6 times - Lance was doing nothing bit getting cold while our backline was under seige and pannicking - hence the turnovers. So Denis moved Lance back and we actually did better in the 3rd and 4th.

However yes I felt he should have done something about the midfield and yes maybe Lance could have been moved back at 3/4 time and yes i wish we had a decent strategy for kicking out

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:26 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Blue Vain wrote:
Jarusa wrote:
I'm a bit more on the fence with this one.

I think the initial move of Whitnall onto Richo was understandable given the way Richmond started the second quarter.


But why is it understandable Jarusa?
Matthew Richardson has to be the best and most consistent exponent of the contested mark for years.
Where was plan B?
Livo should have been selected on the bench as second crack on Richo.........or Stafford.......or Simmonds.

We took our most effective forward and placed him in the backline.
Whilst we were in front!
We played a team with an abundance of tall forwards and didnt have the brains to structure up.

Same ol' same ol'



Good point....Livo should have been used as plan B rather than taking Lance away from down forward..I think Denis is struggling with tactics and its a bit like playing chess and you need to be think a few moves ahead rather than one....Saddington's role needs to be defined as does Mclarens....we need more out of them..

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:39 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Which goes to show Elwood, that Pagan doesn't have much tactical nous at all. He sets a plan but if a good coach finds a way to out-think him, then he's GAWN. There's no tactical plan B.

I have been a Pagan supporter in the past but whilst some of his football methods might still be worthy of support - in being direct down the corridor (see the Doggies), his people skills and lack of tactical nous is costing us badly.

He's a terrible psychologist as well. He's conceded the game's lost before he's even started.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:48 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
Wolfe wrote:
Frig even put Kouta on Richo would have been a possible match up



Don't be silly that would be showing leadership!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 11:52 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21658
Location: North of the border
If Pagan had done the right thing and played Livo

He wouldnt have had to move Lance


No Livo - No Carlton

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:36 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35993
Location: Half back flank
I have been accepting & patient with Denis during his time at Carlton, but after last night, the tide's turning.

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:45 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
Kouta on Richo - Richo would have kicked 15 - Kouta cannot keep up (remember that practise game at Princes Park... shudder...)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:45 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2148
Synbad wrote:
The best form of defence is attack.
Lance isnt a CHB.. he is way too reactive when the screws are turned and he doesnt play close to his man.

Id rather see him in the forward line.. but we have to start looking beyond Lance and into the future.

Youre not going anywhere with a forward line consisting of Waite Fev Lance Fisher and throw in Kennedy... its just not balanced.

I cant wait for Kennedy to come in and develop.
He is a Collossus in stature and will straighten us up.


Can't they try a few things.

Thornton is being bled dry down in defence. He gives 110% and i admire his determination. Fisher does so /so in attack... still learning etc.. can't they try Fisher in defence and Thorton half forward flank? I mean Maclure was a defender for most of his early career and eventually took the CHF position.

Surely we have got to try a few things a bit different... otherwise for F sake give Thornton the right match up. Thornton vs Richardson is not a good match up- he is giving away height, weight and experience. Stupid decision.

Where would you put Whitnall?

Should he play off the bench?... his endurance is a weakness. Off the bench it becomes less of an issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group