Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 6:56 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Russell
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:46 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:32 am
Posts: 620
Location: Hobart
thoughts on his game on friday? he made a couple of errors yes, but was good to see he was on in the last quarter when the game was in the balance, great experience for the kid, does the 1% so well i think he will be a good winger for us and has the speed exactly what we need,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:50 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 1239
obviously reasonably tall and athletic, but looks a bit scared to me.

Reminds of Sam Power when he came into the league. He needs some good caoching to reach his potential

_________________
Go Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:04 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
I've just posted this in the "Changes" thread....should've been in here.

Notwithstanding his age and lack of experience; I'm a a bit worried that Russell doesn't seem to have any inbuilt footy smarts for a Pick 9 Draftee.

Hindsight yes; but Monfries at pick 14 in the same draft (also from Adelaide) seems to be a very special talent.

I'll get rubbished for not supporting the kid; but it's just an observation.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:17 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21658
Location: North of the border
Warby wrote:
I've just posted this in the "Changes" thread....should've been in here.

Notwithstanding his age and lack of experience; I'm a a bit worried that Russell doesn't seem to have any inbuilt footy smarts for a Pick 9 Draftee.

Hindsight yes; but Monfries at pick 14 in the same draft (also from Adelaide) seems to be a very special talent.

I'll get rubbished for not supporting the kid; but it's just an observation.


At this stage of his football career - I'd have to agree with you Warby- It may be just a confidence thing as Monfries has been allowed to play ever since game one - Russell hasn't had the chances that Monfires has had

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:39 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Posts: 2095
Location: handcuffed to a seasoned drinker
Physically he looks fantastic, a few years and he'll be built like Lenny Hayes. I don't have any queries over his courage, I'm not totally sold on his abilty yet, but I'm led to believe this is a confidence thing. In about 2 years all of these kids are going to come on at once and supporters wont know what hit them.

As an aside, check out this BF thread from mid 2003. Cats supporters unhappy with their season to date, questioning player's futures, outlining who should be traded etc. They were in a similar situation to us, a stack of highly rated teenagers and a bunch of journeymen senior players who weren't getting the job done. James Bartel's name comes up a fair bit as underperforming trade bait, hopefully history repeats itself with this thread.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthrea ... mes+bartel


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 2:32 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
blu944 wrote:
Physically he looks fantastic, a few years and he'll be built like Lenny Hayes. I don't have any queries over his courage, I'm not totally sold on his abilty yet, but I'm led to believe this is a confidence thing. In about 2 years all of these kids are going to come on at once and supporters wont know what hit them.

As an aside, check out this BF thread from mid 2003. Cats supporters unhappy with their season to date, questioning player's futures, outlining who should be traded etc. They were in a similar situation to us, a stack of highly rated teenagers and a bunch of journeymen senior players who weren't getting the job done. James Bartel's name comes up a fair bit as underperforming trade bait, hopefully history repeats itself with this thread.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthrea ... mes+bartel


Mostly agree.
RE footy smarts, this week he did present fairly well and was rewarded with passes from his teamates. When he got the ball he didn't hesitate too much in finding a quick option. His disposal on a couple of occasions was way off target but I'd like to think with a bit more experience & confidence he'll hit his targets.
He does look shaky at times atm but he has kept his position in a couple of physical clashes and taken the hit and gotten on with the job which is very pleasing.
I hope he retains his spot in the seniors and continues making progress and finding his feet.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 3:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25712
Location: Bondi Beach
The more we see of Russell the more we seem to be a little more impressed. Especially so after the famous 5 minute game he got in 2005.

At first he was rated as kid who could get the ball who was blessed with great disposal skills. This was at a time (2004) when Carlton were desperate to find improvement in skill and honed in on skilled players like him instead of the other 60 choices.

He looks eager rather than timid to me. Great size now, so there's more to look forward in his development. Given he has natural ability with disposal, his clangers were probably much to do with experience in the faster tempo game and confidence ( Ist game nerves? He has yet to play 100 minutes of football).

He's got the spot in the 22 and now others have to earn his spot and he loses it. He hasn't done much wrong for a kid who has played less than 100 minutes of footy in his 3 games.

I was with jimmae that he hadn't earned the position and it gave the wrong message. But he's here now. The more we see of him, as we did in the Ants last year, the more he will blossom, and the more we'll be impressed.

2006 is the year of the kids.

With Russell, Kennedy will join him very soon. Add Hartlett (injured), who IMO looked destined to be there at the beginning of the year, Bower, Blackwell and Setanta. Thats a lot of height and pace. By the second half of the year most of these kids will have found their feet and will be there if we are at the bottom of the ladder.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 3:39 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 3:48 pm
Posts: 1392
Quote:
He looks eager rather than timid to me


Yeah agree with that seems that he is trying too hard if he relaxes a little which will come with more game time i reckon he will look alot better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:01 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
He's beginning to get a feel of the game, and that's good to see.

I don't like that he was dropped in the pre-season because he had put his hand up in a big way until then so I figured it was an issue of not doing what was required. Looking at all the one percenters, team things and reading back on assessments of his personality (shy, withdrawn and naturally an introvert) it would seem he was just rotated through and his confidence was shot as a result.

Did his form prior to selection last week warrant his return to AFL footy? No.

Did anyone elses form warrant their selection first? Maybe.

Was it far more likely that any other runner selected before him would have been one of our journeyman and they would have performed only slightly better in terms of possessions? You bet.

In the end it looks like they made the right choice and Russell is becoming less of a passenger with each game. He took being rotated out of the pre-season team badly and is getting back on track. Onya Jordy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:12 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Posts: 919
Without having seen much of him, our tendancy to draft 187cm flankers has bombed over the last decade.
Lets give him the rest of the year to see if hes gonna make it.
He seems to be a bit timid, but lets remember Simmos first 3 games.
Monfries was highly rated but we seem reluctant to take small types (except MM) anywhere near the first round.

_________________
Too Legit to quit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:20 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 10:45 pm
Posts: 423
only notable thing he did all night was cost carlton a goal from shocking disposal.
some people on this thread are digging in search of china.
needs to be dropped.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: RUSSELL
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:21 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 9:56 am
Posts: 79
May be just me but when i saw him he looked like simon Fletcher..........I got scared for a minute.......


Ok its just me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:27 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
Abaddon wrote:
only notable thing he did all night was cost carlton a goal from shocking disposal.
some people on this thread are digging in search of china.
needs to be dropped.

I agree!

Lets bring in Teague, Chambers, Prendergast, Sporn or Wiggins because their skills are dynamite and they're players of the future.

Do you even look at the big picture or do you like bagging our young players?

I think he's more likely to improve and pick up the speed of the game with more gametime in the firsts than the seconds.

And we all know he was the reason we lost last week! :roll:

If only we had a Goddard, Wells or Ray so we could drop Houlihan! :x


Last edited by Kouta on Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:29 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Apart from Walkers debut he looked frantic at times throughout the last couple of years too.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
I don't agree he should be dropped at all.

He'll never come on in the twos.

Our future lies with the kids; and he's only 19.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
a couple of notes:

Monfries is a smart player but a little short-arse who does all his work at the minute around half-forward. Murphy's already a bigger body than Monfries. I wouldn't get overly excited about Monfries just yet, unless he builds up his legs and hips heaps, and can run and run all day (doesn't do it yet)

Russell isn't the same kind of 187cm flanker as the Massies of the past. Whereas those blokes were talls who never grew, and not quick, Russell is a genuine winger/flanker who is really quick. He's the only kind of flanker you WOULD draft.

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Tyrants for death
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:59 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7497
Very good post T for D. Agree with a lot of posters who state that Russell was not dominant at VFL level, BUT ,he did show glimpses at VFL.You could instantly recognise the abundant pace and dash.The necessary attributes for the AFL,and that is why it was a good move to promote him.Gotta give this kid at least a couple of more senior games.Russell has the pace and balance,and if he can develop the poise,watch out.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
More importantly he wasn't afraid to back himself and take them on last week by having a shot on the run from 50! :-D

When have Massie and Sporn done that in their time at Carlton?

He still needs to do a lot or work with his game but it's a good sign nonetheless. I am looking forward to the day when Hartlett and Russell are picked in the one match. At least Hartlett would have come in and defended Russell more than his Captain did last week!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:24 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
Personally... and this is just my humble opinion, but I wouldn't be waiting on Hartlett.... I don't reckon he has that much upstairs to be a top player.

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:28 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 1702
Location: Smorgyland Village North Carlton
Russell should try to get some confidence (and game time) in the Ants and make another tilt at it in a few weeks. He will lose match fitness if he plays twenty minutes a game. Will be be dropped for mine, if only to get a full game.
FWIW I think he doesn't deserve the chances he's had.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group