Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 6:54 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 10:50 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:29 am
Posts: 2209
it's too late

_________________
I support Carlton, Fulham and I'm an accountant - my mate calls me a 3 time loser.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 10:51 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
Skippers Blues wrote:
i hear everybody talking about how we have bad cashflow and the board is to blame ect, I hear people saying we need more cashflow and a better board, well lets put up some answers, who should we get on the board to turn this around? do we have some alternatives, remember collingwood went through this in the mid 90's and eddie came in and turned it around i think we need a big high profile ruthless businessman to come in and take the reigns, i am not sure of any big high profile people that fit this bill but i am sure you melbournians could suggest a few.

the cash flow problem, ok maybe we need to start pushing the afl for these games like good friday against richmond, maybe anzac day night against west coast, playing interstate ect. Approach big businesses for more corporate support, get players on the phone to sign up members,

well i know this problem is severe and i am going to sign up for a membership now!


Really why I put up this thread. A) Who is out there who can do a better job? B) How can we help to get them on the Board?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 10:55 am 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:32 am
Posts: 620
Location: Hobart
mikkey wrote:
Skippers Blues wrote:
i hear everybody talking about how we have bad cashflow and the board is to blame ect, I hear people saying we need more cashflow and a better board, well lets put up some answers, who should we get on the board to turn this around? do we have some alternatives, remember collingwood went through this in the mid 90's and eddie came in and turned it around i think we need a big high profile ruthless businessman to come in and take the reigns, i am not sure of any big high profile people that fit this bill but i am sure you melbournians could suggest a few.

the cash flow problem, ok maybe we need to start pushing the afl for these games like good friday against richmond, maybe anzac day night against west coast, playing interstate ect. Approach big businesses for more corporate support, get players on the phone to sign up members,

well i know this problem is severe and i am going to sign up for a membership now!


Really why I put up this thread. A) Who is out there who can do a better job? B) How can we help to get them on the Board?


unfortunatly didnt work out like that mikkey, With people still focussing on what has happened in the past or is happening now, not what needs to happen in the future to return our once great club to its former glory. To get elected to the board does there have to be a majority of people on the board vote that person on? if that is the case how can we possibly get a new candidate on the board?, or is it the members who vote? if so do we have enough members to agree on a new board member and vote a particular person on the board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:01 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
Skippers Blues wrote:
mikkey wrote:
Skippers Blues wrote:
i hear everybody talking about how we have bad cashflow and the board is to blame ect, I hear people saying we need more cashflow and a better board, well lets put up some answers, who should we get on the board to turn this around? do we have some alternatives, remember collingwood went through this in the mid 90's and eddie came in and turned it around i think we need a big high profile ruthless businessman to come in and take the reigns, i am not sure of any big high profile people that fit this bill but i am sure you melbournians could suggest a few.

the cash flow problem, ok maybe we need to start pushing the afl for these games like good friday against richmond, maybe anzac day night against west coast, playing interstate ect. Approach big businesses for more corporate support, get players on the phone to sign up members,

well i know this problem is severe and i am going to sign up for a membership now!


Really why I put up this thread. A) Who is out there who can do a better job? B) How can we help to get them on the Board?


unfortunatly didnt work out like that mikee, to get elected to the board does there have to be a majority of people on the board vote that person on? if that is the case how can we possibly get a new candidate on the board?, or is it the members who vote? if so do we have enough members to agree on a new board member and vote a particular person on the board


Well, yes between elections the Board can invite soembody onto the Board (who has to be confirmed by members at the next AGM). At each AGM 2-3 Board members are up for re-election (you are elected for 2 or 3 years - not quite sure what it is). So without a "revolution" you can only get 2-3 new people onto the Board each year.

Iif you want a "clean out" you need to form a ticket and do what was done when we got rid of Elliott. Call an extraordinary AGM, and get a motion up that calls for the resignation of the Board and new elections.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:03 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:29 am
Posts: 2209
I'm not sure you people understand the reality of the situation we are in.

Don't worry about players calling ex-members, Anzac day matches, salary caps etc.

IT'S TOO BLOODY LATE.

WHY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

WHAT PART OF "BANKRUPT" DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND??????????

_________________
I support Carlton, Fulham and I'm an accountant - my mate calls me a 3 time loser.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:07 am 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:32 am
Posts: 620
Location: Hobart
womack wrote:
I'm not sure you people understand the reality of the situation we are in.

Don't worry about players calling ex-members, Anzac day matches, salary caps etc.

IT'S TOO BLOODY LATE.

WHY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

WHAT PART OF "BANKRUPT" DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND??????????


so what should we do womack, lay down and let it happen? Carlton supporters are some of the most pasionate supporters i know, we will not let our club go down!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:11 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
womack wrote:
I'm not sure you people understand the reality of the situation we are in.

Don't worry about players calling ex-members, Anzac day matches, salary caps etc.

IT'S TOO BLOODY LATE.

WHY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

WHAT PART OF "BANKRUPT" DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND??????????


Don't shout at us please. The club has been insolvent for a while and is operating on re-direction orders from the AFL.

So it is not too late as long as the AFL underwrites us. The problem is that the current Board are not the people to get us out of the mire, but it is not too late mostly because Carlton has a large supporter base. Much larger then other clubs in financial pooh, pooh.

Bullies, North amd Melbourne are also in debt and cash negative and have been so for years. Our advantage is that we have a much larger potential supporter base both in melbourne and especially interstate (which is important to sponsors).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:15 am 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:32 am
Posts: 620
Location: Hobart
mikkey wrote:
womack wrote:
I'm not sure you people understand the reality of the situation we are in.

Don't worry about players calling ex-members, Anzac day matches, salary caps etc.

IT'S TOO BLOODY LATE.

WHY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

WHAT PART OF "BANKRUPT" DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND??????????


Don't shout at us please. The club has been insolvent for a while and is operating on re-direction orders from the AFL.

So it is not too late as long as the AFL underwrites us. The problem is that the current Board are not the people to get us out of the mire, but it is not too late mostly because Carlton has a large supporter base. Much larger then other clubs in financial pooh, pooh.

Bullies, North amd Melbourne are also in debt and cash negative and have been so for years. Our advantage is that we have a much larger potential supporter base both in melbourne and especially interstate (which is important to sponsors).


we need to be utilising this fact i reckon mikkey, for example i never hear of any carlton events here in tassie, but teams like hawthorn and st kilda always have stuff over here, the club should organise an event maybe when the devils play tassie in the vfl, capatalise on the bullants and tassie supports might be able to translate into another few hundred members, we just dont seem to any imagination, we seem to just think this will work its self out when the team starts winning, we need to be proactive!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:15 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
womack wrote:
I'm not sure you people understand the reality of the situation we are in.

Don't worry about players calling ex-members, Anzac day matches, salary caps etc.

IT'S TOO BLOODY LATE.

WHY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

WHAT PART OF "BANKRUPT" DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND??????????


If we are actually insolvent, then the Board of the club could be prosecuted by ASIC under s588G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for trading whilst insolvent.

We are close, but not yet. The penalties for trading whilst insolvent include gaol. Why would any of the board want to do that?

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:15 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Womack take a deep breath and relax for a second, we are not bankrupt, we have not even gone to the AFL yet for a handout which is what the Dogs, Kangas & Dees have been doing, while the TV rights demand 16 teams the AFL will help us out. We can turn this around but it will require a combination of many things, one thing we don't need is rash, spur of the moment decisions that can bite us down the track (like playing in Tassie).

Also someone mentioned that clubs need 35,000 to survive, if you look at St Kilda, I think they are still below us in membership and they are making a profit, so with good form will come many good things.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:20 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21658
Location: North of the border
Mikkey 90 % of our financial woes will disappear if we win

I posted a few weeks back of the importance of the game against Richmond . That loss alone could have cost the club close to $1mill
in lost members and lost crowds at the two home games against Coll and ESS

But once again my post was dismissed as being stupid..

It doesn't look that stupid now .

The AFL was quite kind to us in the draw scheduling the so called block busters early in the year when the fans still had hope . The return games towards the end of the year (if we keep this present form) will draw smaller crowds.

If we were 3 and 3 going into this week you could add 5-10k extra fans and in turn add $300k to the bottom line.


This may explain Denis Pagans selection policies . He is trying to win not the develop. (But it does not explain his gameplan)

With the membership numbers we have had in the last three years we should have been doing better. If we had won more games we would not be in this position

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:23 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:29 am
Posts: 2209
mikkey wrote:
womack wrote:
I'm not sure you people understand the reality of the situation we are in.

Don't worry about players calling ex-members, Anzac day matches, salary caps etc.

IT'S TOO BLOODY LATE.

WHY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

WHAT PART OF "BANKRUPT" DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND??????????


Don't shout at us please. The club has been insolvent for a while and is operating on re-direction orders from the AFL.

So it is not too late as long as the AFL underwrites us. The problem is that the current Board are not the people to get us out of the mire, but it is not too late mostly because Carlton has a large supporter base. Much larger then other clubs in financial pooh, pooh.

Bullies, North amd Melbourne are also in debt and cash negative and have been so for years. Our advantage is that we have a much larger potential supporter base both in melbourne and especially interstate (which is important to sponsors).


The Bulldogs are building a state of the art facility in the west in conjunction with State Govt/Fed Govt/Vic Uni etc = SAFE
Melbourne = MCC = SAFE
Carlton = North Melbourne + supporters - debt = BIG TROUBLE

_________________
I support Carlton, Fulham and I'm an accountant - my mate calls me a 3 time loser.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:26 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
CarltonClem wrote:
womack wrote:
I'm not sure you people understand the reality of the situation we are in.

Don't worry about players calling ex-members, Anzac day matches, salary caps etc.

IT'S TOO BLOODY LATE.

WHY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

WHAT PART OF "BANKRUPT" DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND??????????


If we are actually insolvent, then the Board of the club could be prosecuted by ASIC under s588G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for trading whilst insolvent.

We are close, but not yet. The penalties for trading whilst insolvent include gaol. Why would any of the board want to do that?


The only reason we are not in breach of the Act can be seen in the Auditors report (from last annual report):

[quote]As indicated in Note 1 “Going Concernâ€


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:28 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Womack were you overseas a few years ago when Melbourne were very close to merging with the Hawks? The MCC does nothing for them, they are in as bad a position as the Kangaroos AND they have made the finals the last 2 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 11:38 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:29 am
Posts: 2209
fair point Kingkerna - but are we going to get another $2.6 million this year for moving grounds again??

_________________
I support Carlton, Fulham and I'm an accountant - my mate calls me a 3 time loser.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 12:03 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
Sydney Blue wrote:
Mikkey 90 % of our financial woes will disappear if we win

I posted a few weeks back of the importance of the game against Richmond . That loss alone could have cost the club close to $1mill
in lost members and lost crowds at the two home games against Coll and ESS

But once again my post was dismissed as being stupid..

It doesn't look that stupid now .

The AFL was quite kind to us in the draw scheduling the so called block busters early in the year when the fans still had hope . The return games towards the end of the year (if we keep this present form) will draw smaller crowds.

If we were 3 and 3 going into this week you could add 5-10k extra fans and in turn add $300k to the bottom line.


This may explain Denis Pagans selection policies . He is trying to win not the develop. (But it does not explain his gameplan)

With the membership numbers we have had in the last three years we should have been doing better. If we had won more games we would not be in this position


SB you can not run a Club's finances relying on that you win a certain number of games. Going into this year the Board should have known that we most likely would end up down in the bottom again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 1:31 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25712
Location: Bondi Beach
Ever heard of the saying United we stand, Divided we fall?

I am hurting watching the division metamorphisising into slander and hate and Carltonians turning on each other. I know we are bigger than that. Knee jerk reactions are not needed in times like these. Serious long term planning is. Mikkey is providing the conduit to explore for the solutions. Those of you who can't see how we can do it , or don't believe we can get out of this mess, should just let those with the desire to do so, do so.

Venting frustrations about the past and creating warring splinter groups are not going to help you or the club. I am sure the past will not be repeated. We are living in a different modern world than what was the past, and we will play the game, if we survive, by playing within the rules.

The first business rule we must accept is that whether you like him or not, we can't afford to sack Pagan in 2006, and by the look of our recent events we wont till the end of 2008. So don't waste you energy on this issue when we have bigger fish to fry, until a white knight allows this to happen. Furthermore, get real about our young list, the kids' who haven't been selected will one day be selected when they are ready, and if a new coach came on board in 2006 or even 2007, they are not going to get us to the finals sooner than Pagan in this period. Lets at least try and keep this group intact.

Reality is that we've been broke for a few years now, and it didn't just happen last night on TV. Smorgon has a responsibilty to tell us the truth, and we have to accept it as it is; with no frills no fanfare, no entertainment value. Surely everyone could be doing a better job; supporters, coaches, MC, Board, committee men and women and Players.

We will survive if we stand united and in agreement that the most important thing right now is The Carlton Football Club and the Carlton Brand.

Here's the positive reasons why we will survive as the Carlton Blues, IMO:

Due to AFL's agreement with TV , 16 teams must be retained; that's a start in our quest for survival. There will be no relocation or merger this year, and there's good reasons why that wont happen thereafter.

Doggies, Demons and Kangas do not have a $7M debt to service, but they have been in far worse situations than we have at present; merges in particular. Extra memberships and can rattling didn't save them, the AFL and Gutnick (with the Demons) saved them and continue to support them as a Melbourne based clubs.

More damage and supporter backlash to the AFL will occur in forcing a Carlton merger or relocation than they would with Demons, Doggies and Kangas.

Doggies, Demons and Kangas do have more serious issues with membership, brand and reach than Carlton.

It's in the interests of all other Melbourne based clubs for Carlton to survive and remain as Carlton Blues, because 15-25,000 Carlton supporters will still attend their home games (equals revenue to them).

It's in the AFL's interest to increase crowd attendances and to achieve this it is not in their interest to jeopardise the proven potential for a rise from 60,000 to 80,000 crowds at traditional blockbusters with Ess, Coll and Rich at the MCG (100,000 seat capacity). A healthy and successful Carlton will achieve that again given it's youth ploicy. That's an minimum extra 60,000 in gate recepits or $3M.

Carlton (Sharks) in SE Qld or Carlton (Hens) in western Sydney would struggle to get 10,000 attending the games (especially with our current on field form, as well as a loss of identity), whereas Carlton (Blues) in Melbourne still have a traditional base of 25,000 members (in bad times). Too much to lose. It took 20 years for the Swans to sell out 40,000 tickets.

The AFL's interest in growing the game would be stifled if it lost 25,000 Carlton members, let alone all the non members who turn up on the day due to closing them down or changing their identity (same thing).

The AFL has underwritten our debt, and it is in their interest to work through this than to write it off for no result.

The AFL assistance grant is not a loan, and it is assistance we may have access to, if we swallow our pride (*assumming no white knight is lurking in the shadows)

Hawks have turned aroung the bleak years of merger threats, financial upheavel and boardroom battles. Hawks were broke, down and out (on and off field) and turned it around. They dropped their connection with the past (Glenferrie) and now have state of the art facilities and a stable board. They survived.

Demons have made the finals against a background of financial and board adversity. They have a 92.5% salary cap. With supporters' funding their rookies through their cotaries eg Davies.

Kangas continue to field a competitive team regardless of their financial position. They have a 92.5% salary cap.

Doggies have had a youth policy in place for 6 years. After being on the bottom for several lean years and putting up with it (in terms of on field success and revenues), they are now finally making their push to the finals, as well as attracting Fed govt funds for facilities imptovements. They have a 92.5% Salary cap. and only ONE Rookie on the rookie list.

Carlton can retain their young players and stars of the future by biting the bullet with a smaller playing list (42?), and only 1 rookie (if any).

If Carlton supporters band together and focus on the club's survival as the Carlton Blues instead of breaking up into camps of warring tribes/ splinter groups focussing on Pagan, then the collective strength would far outweigh anything Doggies, Demons, Kangas, Hawks, or Tigers could muster in the past in their quest to ensure their club's survival.

We focus on the big issues and learn to be pragmatic regading our young list (ie have some realistic expectations regarding player efforts, results and team's picked), then we will learn to enjoy the true development that is going on with our lists.

Patience, and a collective desire to support the club with a positive view of the future will send the right message to sponsors and the whole football community.

Cammo I know your intentions are good, but your timing, your focus and your opinion is wrong.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 1:51 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:26 pm
Posts: 1771
Location: Not bloody close enough to the action!!
POW, ROW and WOW!! Post of the Week, Rant of the week and you all know the other one :P :-D

Great post Bondi. Luv ya work! 8)

_________________
2002:> "In their Masters Chambers
They Gathered for their Feast
They Stabbed us with their Steely Knives
But They Just Can't Kill The Beast!" <2016

THE BLUEBAGGER BEAST IS BAACKK!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 1:52 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Hawthorn have been low longer than we have but theyre not a basket case right now...Whilst winning or losing hass a bearing ... more importantly its what youre doing to fix things.

are we farming areas for growth?
Are we prortraying ourselves as the kind of investment a corporate company should move towards??

What are we doing ??

Were expecting ma and pa to kick in time and time again.... becuse we have supporters... but when its the same ol same ol.. that dies...

What are they offering corporates and members for their dollar???
Its not happening out on the field so what else have they come up with.??
WhaT dream are they manufacturing for us as the carrot???

Thats what i want to know....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 1:53 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:21 am
Posts: 434
Location: Wandering the Sunshine State
bondiblue wrote:
Ever heard of the saying United we stand, Divided we fall?

I am hurting watching the division metamorphisising into slander and hate and Carltonians turning on each other. I know we are bigger than that. Knee jerk reactions are not needed in times like these. Serious long term planning is. Mikkey is providing the conduit to explore for the solutions. Those of you who can't see how we can do it , or don't believe we can get out of this mess, should just let those with the desire to do so, do so.

Venting frustrations about the past and creating warring splinter groups are not going to help you or the club. I am sure the past will not be repeated. We are living in a different modern world than what was the past, and we will play the game, if we survive, by playing within the rules.

The first business rule we must accept is that whether you like him or not, we can't afford to sack Pagan in 2006, and by the look of our recent events we wont till the end of 2008. So don't waste you energy on this issue when we have bigger fish to fry, until a white knight allows this to happen. Furthermore, get real about our young list, the kids' who haven't been selected will one day be selected when they are ready, and if a new coach came on board in 2006 or even 2007, they are not going to get us to the finals sooner than Pagan in this period. Lets at least try and keep this group intact.

Reality is that we've been broke for a few years now, and it didn't just happen last night on TV. Smorgon has a responsibilty to tell us the truth, and we have to accept it as it is; with no frills no fanfare, no entertainment value. Surely everyone could be doing a better job; supporters, coaches, MC, Board, committee men and women and Players.

We will survive if we stand united and in agreement that the most important thing right now is The Carlton Football Club and the Carlton Brand.

Here's the positive reasons why we will survive as the Carlton Blues, IMO:

Due to AFL's agreement with TV , 16 teams must be retained; that's a start in our quest for survival. There will be no relocation or merger this year, and there's good reasons why that wont happen thereafter.

Doggies, Demons and Kangas do not have a $7M debt to service, but they have been in far worse situations than we have at present; merges in particular. Extra memberships and can rattling didn't save them, the AFL and Gutnick (with the Demons) saved them and continue to support them as a Melbourne based clubs.

More damage and supporter backlash to the AFL will occur in forcing a Carlton merger or relocation than they would with Demons, Doggies and Kangas.

Doggies, Demons and Kangas do have more serious issues with membership, brand and reach than Carlton.

It's in the interests of all other Melbourne based clubs for Carlton to survive and remain as Carlton Blues, because 15-25,000 Carlton supporters will still attend their home games (equals revenue to them).

It's in the AFL's interest to increase crowd attendances and to achieve this it is not in their interest to jeopardise the proven potential for a rise from 60,000 to 80,000 crowds at traditional blockbusters with Ess, Coll and Rich at the MCG (100,000 seat capacity). A healthy and successful Carlton will achieve that again given it's youth ploicy. That's an minimum extra 60,000 in gate recepits or $3M.

Carlton (Sharks) in SE Qld or Carlton (Hens) in western Sydney would struggle to get 10,000 attending the games (especially with our current on field form, as well as a loss of identity), whereas Carlton (Blues) in Melbourne still have a traditional base of 25,000 members (in bad times). Too much to lose. It took 20 years for the Swans to sell out 40,000 tickets.

The AFL's interest in growing the game would be stifled if it lost 25,000 Carlton members, let alone all the non members who turn up on the day due to closing them down or changing their identity (same thing).

The AFL has underwritten our debt, and it is in their interest to work through this than to write it off for no result.

The AFL assistance grant is not a loan, and it is assistance we may have access to, if we swallow our pride (*assumming no white knight is lurking in the shadows)

Hawks have turned aroung the bleak years of merger threats, financial upheavel and boardroom battles. Hawks were broke, down and out (on and off field) and turned it around. They dropped their connection with the past (Glenferrie) and now have state of the art facilities and a stable board. They survived.

Demons have made the finals against a background of financial and board adversity. They have a 92.5% salary cap. With supporters' funding their rookies through their cotaries eg Davies.

Kangas continue to field a competitive team regardless of their financial position. They have a 92.5% salary cap.

Doggies have had a youth policy in place for 6 years. After being on the bottom for several lean years and putting up with it (in terms of on field success and revenues), they are now finally making their push to the finals, as well as attracting Fed govt funds for facilities imptovements. They have a 92.5% Salary cap. and only ONE Rookie on the rookie list.

Carlton can retain their young players and stars of the future by biting the bullet with a smaller playing list (42?), and only 1 rookie (if any).

If Carlton supporters band together and focus on the club's survival as the Carlton Blues instead of breaking up into camps of warring tribes/ splinter groups focussing on Pagan, then the collective strength would far outweigh anything Doggies, Demons, Kangas, Hawks, or Tigers could muster in the past in their quest to ensure their club's survival.

We focus on the big issues and learn to be pragmatic regading our young list (ie have some realistic expectations regarding player efforts, results and team's picked), then we will learn to enjoy the true development that is going on with our lists.

Patience, and a collective desire to support the club with a positive view of the future will send the right message to sponsors and the whole football community.

Cammo I know your intentions are good, but your timing, your focus and your opinion is wrong.


POW - and quite timely too.

Although I would still like to see us play a game or two on the Gold Coast for acouple of years to gain greater support outside of Melbourne amongst potential members in SE Queensland, improve our marketability and press coverage, and broaden our appeal to potential sponsors, as well as give the AFL further reason to help us out in the short term.

_________________
A Blues Supporter - not a Blues Bagger.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group