Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 5:34 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 2:00 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35993
Location: Half back flank
anfield wrote:
Out of interest does nayone know the running costs of Windy Hill? Its still their training and admin base. Does it cost them $1.8 mil to maintain? Why are PP's running costs so high?



It's confusing isn't it - the question was asked of Collo at the AGM & he said it was close to 800K :?

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 2:05 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
One of the things that IMO has gone wrong is the revenue of the average membership. There is a large difference if the % of people paying $400 + for a membership shifts declines.

When playing at PP there was a high percentage of members who were SC members and SC members with reserved seats.

With the move away from PP a lot of the "value" in the SC membership was eroded and then the Club was stupid enough to give many SC members absolute sheit seats. I am sure that the SC membership is probably close to 50% of what it used to be.

This cost the club big $.

IMO the move away from PP was strategically the correct one. Execution was however very poor and the Club is paying for this now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 2:20 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
Sydney Blue wrote:

Prez I think you will find that the Collins board when doing the sums on the move were anticipating larger revenue through crowds and the G and at the Dome - We had a few games there last year when two men and a dog turned up - The club would have taken a hit there quite dramatically. I think they looked at the finances of Essendon* and Collingwood and thought they were strong due to playing on the big grounds and pulling in the crowds . If we had a done this 4-5 years earlier it may have paid off but to do it when the club was at its lowest ebb was almost madness in hind sight . And by the state of the books it may have been better to stay at Optus until the on feild results improved .

Another peice of short sightness was the notion that we only got Saturday afternoon games at Optus this meant no Free to air in Melbourne thus limiting the chances to pull in sponsors . These Saturday afternoon games were being telecast to a much wider audience interstate in QLD and NSW and with a bit of thought this avenue could have been used to attract interstate sponsors or even partnerships.


By the way when are you going to get a bowling attack that can dismiss 4 tail enders in a day . Bloody pathetic effort that was


agree with most things, i too think, if we where going to do it, we should have got in when the filth did i.e. as soon as melbourne new it was going to get the 2006 commonwealth games and redevelop MCG - if we where going to leave OO - that is when we should have done it, not when we did, for many i think where under the impression "lets take what we can" and that has turned around to bite us in the ass.

but like i said ealier, our current plight is two fold, a. being elliot, b. the board @#$%&! up our move badly.

if we can get this passed from the AFL - we will finally be getting what we should have got in the beginning from the AFL and we will finally be on a level playing field. :-D

i agree with everything you wrote except the last part :wink:

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 2:22 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
mikkey wrote:
One of the things that IMO has gone wrong is the revenue of the average membership. There is a large difference if the % of people paying $400 + for a membership shifts declines.

When playing at PP there was a high percentage of members who were SC members and SC members with reserved seats.

With the move away from PP a lot of the "value" in the SC membership was eroded and then the Club was stupid enough to give many SC members absolute sheit seats. I am sure that the SC membership is probably close to 50% of what it used to be.

This cost the club big $.

IMO the move away from PP was strategically the correct one. Execution was however very poor and the Club is paying for this now.


spot on mate, spot on

as it is, i see no reason what so ever to get SC membership next year, im building a house this year so money could be tight.

and considering what i get for $470 as a SC member i see no reason what so ever to not get a normal membership next year.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 4:18 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4961
Asking the AFL to do the following is real "pie in the sky" stuff:

i) change the rules for us in order to receive a PP.
ii) pay off all our debts

However HOPEFULLY they will cover the maintenance costs associated with MC Labour Park which would be a huge bonus.

Fingers Crossed.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 4:24 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
ThePrez wrote:
ahh, you see, this is where i disagree.

i think our board was incompontent with our move from OO and didnt consider the ramifications at all and got no where near what they should have at the time.

in large part that was due to the vast majority suggesting the old nutshell "we have no currency - we have nothing to bargain with" and all that other tripe that alot of people tried to convince me off, i never thought it then, and i dont think it now.

its all bullshit - we got shafted and shafted badly and anyone that suggests otherwise is mad.

we are now asking for a deal that we should have got when we moved and i wonder how different we would have been if we did get something like what we are asking back then.


for me the board was indeed incompontent and deserves as much blame as elliot does.

we got 2.5 million as a bonus from leaving OO

thats fantastic isnt it.

right - 1.8 in upkeep costs for the first year

right - 1.5 in loss social club revenue due to leaving OO

thats 3.3 million and us in the shit for 700k before we even start to look at it from a yearly point of view. :roll:

so for the first year we are 700k in the shit

but from every year we are also 3.3 million in the shit instantly, and that doesnt even include our debt that we are servicing.

and you think the board was compotent for the deal we got from the AFL for our move and consider everything? i say bullshit, they drastically over estimated things and are now paying the price for it. Elliot was buy part 1 of our problems, the current board is part 2.

im treading the danger line of the big "i told you so" and that is not my intention, but we got shafted and shafted hard at the time, was this to bring the club to its knees, no doubt IMO and was indeed payback for all the shit that Elliot had got up to over the year.

what we are asking for now, is what we should have asked for when we first left/dragged from OO.

now consider all that gone.

we have no debt, no upkeep for the ground and we consider the income from our social club, around the 250k a bonus.

so here we are 250k infront before we begin instead of 4 million in the shit.

now lets start looking at other things now that we have close to an extra 4 million in revunue to use. (upkeep as well as no debt) that we can use to invest in other sources of revenue.


Prez - your numbers are wrong

We didnt get 2.5 mill $ to leave optus - we got the money to compensate for broken contracts (I presume for catering, cleaning services and what not). In other words we werent really offered any real $ to leave - It wasnt explained as such at the time of the move but it was mentioned that was how the money went earlier during the year


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 4:56 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Solution:

Sell MC Hammer oval full stop and relocate out west. In Truganina is a private school called Westbourne Grammer which so happens to be across the road from house :-D .

Anyway plenty of paddocks and a brand new training facility used by the Westbourne Old Boys Amateurs team. Would be cheap to rent and better yet great location. All we need is a local pub and I'd be in heaven, not being selfish or anything :wink:

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 5:26 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
4thchicken wrote:

Prez - your numbers are wrong

We didnt get 2.5 mill $ to leave optus - we got the money to compensate for broken contracts (I presume for catering, cleaning services and what not). In other words we werent really offered any real $ to leave - It wasnt explained as such at the time of the move but it was mentioned that was how the money went earlier during the year



im fully aware of where the 2.5 million was supposed to go, i just didnt think it went there.

i think part of the cost of the "upkeep" of the ground includes these contracts that where in place at the time as i dont think any of that 2.5 mill went to the existing contracts and that is why our "upkeep" is so expensive at the moment at that is why i didnt include it before.

i should of explained it abit further really :oops:

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 7:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
I pity David Parkin after he saw Caroline Wilson naked when he walked into the wrong rooms, because her attitude towards Carlton on 3AW tonight was bad enough. She got stuck into Carlton about everything and about 5 Bluesfans rang up to have a go at the cow.

Collo burnt that bridge! :evil:

Wilson also said she doesn't read club sites because they give "an unrealistic view" (sic) of what the supporters want, yet the she-devil stated Bombers fans are livid about their jumper change.

She won't read this!

Back on topic :wink: , she re-iterated a lot of what Niall wrote in the link I posted on this thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 8:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 1239
prez you haven't got it right at all.

we got $2.5 million plus the best stadium deal in Victoria to go to TD (ie as good as Essendon*'s). That was an absolute gift. No other club has got near that for their matches.

We also got money from the AFL to compensate for broken contracts.

The costs at Optus Oval have been reduced from not playing matches there as maintenance, turf costs etc.. would have been reduced.

This was an unbelievable deal for Carlton that was only on the table coz of the then Prez wore two hats. Playing four interstate teams at Optus would cost the CLub fortune.


Plus we go from playing at a crap 25,000 seat stadium that no opposition supporter wanted to go to and now we play at a $340 million indoor stadium which is one of the best in the world. We play in front of bigger crowds than ever before.

We were flower financially before that coz of JE's dumb ass Legends Stand decision.

Our shite brand, terrible board, short sighted recruiting approach and crap on field form has resulted in a downturn in a number of revenue streams. Sponsorhip, memebrship, corporate hospitality, merchandise, everything.

I hope that clears things up

Also, don't believe everything you read in the paper.....

_________________
Go Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: princes park
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:05 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
did anyone hear about carlton selling princes park to the afl for 10 million bucks?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:07 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:20 am
Posts: 8172
Location: PMQ
interesting first post....havent heard anything and i assume this would be fairly big news.

_________________
Back like a raging case of pubic lice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:09 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:11 am
Posts: 456
Location: Denmark
No, I think what he is referring too is the deal that is listed in the Age article, where we will seek 10 million from the league and that the league will take over the lease of Princess Park.

We don't own it so we can't sell it.

http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB2/vi ... hp?t=10267

_________________
"our guest is dressed by hand-me-downs, hair designed by pillow"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:11 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:20 am
Posts: 8172
Location: PMQ
forgive me for sounding stupid....and asking stupid questions, but as everyone on TC knows, this is what i am best at....

why would the AFL do that?
How do the AFL benefit from this deal? they give us 10 million and take over the lease??? thats like saying ok, you give me five grand and pay my rent while i live here....sweet? ta.

_________________
Back like a raging case of pubic lice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: princes park
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:17 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
i heard earlier gerard healy earlier on today on 3aw say that


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:17 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:39 pm
Posts: 1611
Location: charleston sc usa
Couple of processes here i think

a) AFL would turn around and play games that attract a small crowd for a venue
b) money spinner from VFL grand finals, womens football league games etc

_________________
Can smell the gf its there for the taking we are the form side


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 10:23 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:11 am
Posts: 456
Location: Denmark
Sandramd is right.

We give them the lease to the ground and they can do with it as they wish... Community development, AFL development, back-up ground for AFL matches (some are suggesting that the Telstradome/MCG scenario needs a back-up). We also act as a tenant giving the AFL an assured 100,000 AUD each year.

When we switched games to TD then we should have made the deal based on the fact that the league takes over the lease of PP anyway. What do we want with a huge empty stadium that costs a cool million each year just to train in. I am guessing at that point they still thought that the social club would use it.

We have no way of deriving a revenue from the ground and the AFL have a responsibility to take over the lease. It is by far the third best ground in Melbourne and there has to be a host of sporting events that you could play there where the crowd is somewhere between 10-20 thousand.

I know that it is our lease, but I think that it is a tad unfair for the league to expect us to bear the burdon for this ground when they have done all they can to drive us away from there.

I am not really sure what the league gains from this arrangement other than having a profitible club with a secure financial position again, I am not sure that there are many business arguments that you could use to "really" justify the deal.

_________________
"our guest is dressed by hand-me-downs, hair designed by pillow"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 11:17 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:44 pm
Posts: 63
The other interesting point in the Age article, was that if the AFL does not take over the lease then we will most likely have to access the fund (can't remember the name) they have for struggling clubs. In other words take over the lease or we will get funds off you to pay the lease anyway. If they takeover the management of the ground maybe they can make some income out of the venue. Maybe they can force one of the other clubs to share the ground as a training venue. I'm sure other clubs are put off by our control, when considering sharing Princes Park as a training facility. With the AFL in charge they can expect a fair deal in the sharing arrangements.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 8:20 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Andy Maher come out on SEN this morning talking about a rumour he heard last Friday involving GS. Basically whatever money we can get today from the AFL GS will dip into his pockets to cover the shortfall.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 8:35 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
sticksaftersiren87 wrote:
now we play at a $340 million indoor stadium which is one of the best in the world.


Agree with everything you wrote, except this bit, SAS87.

TelstraDome is a pile of crap.

It was compromised from the very beginning, due to the competing demands of the AFL and channel 7. Once the stadium was re-thought to include AFL matches (It was originally made for soccer and Rugby League/Union), the roof should have been totally re-designed to remove the problems which have happened with the playing surface due to the lack of sunlight, and shadowing due to the roof shape being incompatible with an oval playing area.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group