Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 8:19 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 285 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 15  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 12:17 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 1566
Location: Melbourne
azzablue wrote:
Trading whitnall...you all must be crazy...this guy loves the navy blue...the young players look up to him...he has had a bad run with injuries over last few years and he isnt like certain other players who hold the club for ransom...this guy will be our next captain...so instead of everybody being so bloody negative for a change lets be postive about some good things that are happening around our club...

wasnt is whitnall that was instructing the players to go to the fans after the Essendon* game...remember is start from the top and it works its self down...leadership and steadying of the ship so we can move forward...whitnall is providing that...

So get real and start being postive........


Spot on Azzablue!!! I am a big fan of Whitnall. He is as passionate about the Navy Blues as anyone. I think he should be our next captain too. I have been advocating that for a very long time, albeit not on this forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 1:16 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
verbs wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
Lets put Lance on Riewoldt or Gehrig for a real test... why not? He's a gun CHB now

I think what Synbad is saying is that history is not on Lance's side. He's playing really well at the moment.... everyone can see that... but decisions are made about the future, not the now... and history doesn't bode well for Lance.

Then again, he might have "turned a corner" and play out his career as our gun defender.... and I hope he has!

but its only 7 rounds in.... Lets have Pagan keep the heat on Lance and give him a test with Gehrig.... and keep up the momentum that way.

Our gun defender shouldn't be exposed by a certain percentage of the league's forwards..... so lets see if that will happen or not.

I'm cautiously optimistic


I disagree, or do not understand where you're coming from about decisions being made for the future and not the now. You argue it's only 7 rounds in so we shouldn't be jumping up and down or something, and history is not on Whitnall's side. I'd argue history is not on any players side as eventually they all have to move on. The fact that Whitnall has played 7 good weeks of footy has no bearing on the next seven week or the next seven years. There is only right here and right now. And right here and right now Whitnall is playing very good footy.

At the end of the season, when the footy is over, and Whitnall isn't playing any games because the finals are over, the people in charge will make a decision about the future. Right now they are very very focussed on the now and what has to be done this weekend.

The trouble is people are always looking so far ahead they can't appreciate what's around them. I guess that's where the saying came from that you need to stop and smell the flowers or coffee or whatever it is.

I also find the crackpot theory that Teague won the B&F a couple of years ago and now he's in the reserves, so the same thing will happen to Whitnall, quite laughable. It's a bit like when you hide a ball from a dog, and it eventually sniffs it out, and then when you hide it in a different place, the first place the dog goes to is where you hid the ball the other time.


my post about the future was in reference to people trying to predict what to do with Lance at the end of the year.... history not boding well is about him between now and then potentially getting a form slump or something.

Discussion about potential trades is significantly less absolute in round 7 than "he's the best player... we shouldn't trade him" and "he's fat... trade him" remarks.

I also concede that his CURRENT form is so high that we should be using him CURRENTLY (ie, against Stkilda) on one of their gun forwards (ie, Riewoldt or Gehrig)

So your response is actually quite a tangent from the premise of my post.

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 1:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
I did say I couldn't understand it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 1:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
exsing wrote:
azzablue wrote:
Trading whitnall...you all must be crazy...this guy loves the navy blue...the young players look up to him...he has had a bad run with injuries over last few years and he isnt like certain other players who hold the club for ransom...this guy will be our next captain...so instead of everybody being so bloody negative for a change lets be postive about some good things that are happening around our club...

wasnt is whitnall that was instructing the players to go to the fans after the Essendon* game...remember is start from the top and it works its self down...leadership and steadying of the ship so we can move forward...whitnall is providing that...

So get real and start being postive........




Spot on Azzablue!!! I am a big fan of Whitnall. He is as passionate about the Navy Blues as anyone. I think he should be our next captain too. I have been advocating that for a very long time, albeit not on this forum.



We will see how passionate and how good he is over a period of time.
Last 4 years.. zilch passion..passion for 7 games.
still needs to be a player for 4 years.. and a great player to make it worth keeping him.
If we dont trade him and he falls away .... youll get plenty of "i told you so..."

Just trust me on that..

PASSIONATE???
CHAMPION?????

No flower idea .... :lol:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Last edited by Synbad on Thu May 18, 2006 1:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 1:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
verbs wrote:
I did say I couldn't understand it.


then why would you quote me, and then post something completely irrelevant to my quote.... for fun?

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 1:34 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
The Tyrant wrote:
verbs wrote:
I did say I couldn't understand it.


then why would you quote me, and then post something completely irrelevant to my quote.... for fun?


To try and understand it, and to illustrate how I didn't understand it? :?

What are the rules? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 1:53 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
Lance has been nothing short of sensational this year. As someone said earlier being able to complete a full pre-season and having no injuries makes a huge difference. Lance has also been allowed to settle into a position and make it his own rather than playing'spareparts' man as he has had to over the last couple of years.

Watching Lance at his best is a sheer joy. Have always had faith in him and have had no doubt he would prove his many detractors once given an oppotunity.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
verbs wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
verbs wrote:
I did say I couldn't understand it.


then why would you quote me, and then post something completely irrelevant to my quote.... for fun?


To try and understand it, and to illustrate how I didn't understand it? :?

What are the rules? :?


most people would ask a question and wait for an answer if they're not sure. questions asked within the same context of responding to perceived points can only be assumed to be rhetorical.

does my post make sense now that I've explained it?

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:39 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
BlueMark wrote:
Lance has been nothing short of sensational this year. As someone said earlier being able to complete a full pre-season and having no injuries makes a huge difference. Lance has also been allowed to settle into a position and make it his own rather than playing'spareparts' man as he has had to over the last couple of years.

Watching Lance at his best is a sheer joy. Have always had faith in him and have had no doubt he would prove his many detractors once given an oppotunity.


He has earn't close to 2 million dollars in the last 4 years. My expectation would be for him to be nothing short of sensational over that whole period. As to not being able to complete a full pre-season as justification for the shortfall in his performance, we can also say that he, on a regular basis, has not presented himself in an appropriate condition to allow himself to complete a pre-season.
It is a pity that there are still question marks over a man who is absolutely flying. Only if we all felt confident we knew how long it will last.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
The Tyrant wrote:
verbs wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
verbs wrote:
I did say I couldn't understand it.


then why would you quote me, and then post something completely irrelevant to my quote.... for fun?


To try and understand it, and to illustrate how I didn't understand it? :?

What are the rules? :?


most people would ask a question and wait for an answer if they're not sure. questions asked within the same context of responding to perceived points can only be assumed to be rhetorical.

does my post make sense now that I've explained it?


I would've had to wait 24 hours for answer, which I'm too impatient for. :-D I prefer to go about things by typing the first thing that comes into my head and to see what comes out.

Yes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:47 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18082
woof wrote:
BlueMark wrote:
Lance has been nothing short of sensational this year. As someone said earlier being able to complete a full pre-season and having no injuries makes a huge difference. Lance has also been allowed to settle into a position and make it his own rather than playing'spareparts' man as he has had to over the last couple of years.

Watching Lance at his best is a sheer joy. Have always had faith in him and have had no doubt he would prove his many detractors once given an oppotunity.


He has earn't close to 2 million dollars in the last 4 years. My expectation would be for him to be nothing short of sensational over that whole period. As to not being able to complete a full pre-season as justification for the shortfall in his performance, we can also say that he, on a regular basis, has not presented himself in an appropriate condition to allow himself to complete a pre-season.
It is a pity that there are still question marks over a man who is absolutely flying. Only if we all felt confident we knew how long it will last.


It's good to see some perspective sneak in to the debate.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
woof wrote:
BlueMark wrote:
Lance has been nothing short of sensational this year. As someone said earlier being able to complete a full pre-season and having no injuries makes a huge difference. Lance has also been allowed to settle into a position and make it his own rather than playing'spareparts' man as he has had to over the last couple of years.

Watching Lance at his best is a sheer joy. Have always had faith in him and have had no doubt he would prove his many detractors once given an oppotunity.


He has earn't close to 2 million dollars in the last 4 years. My expectation would be for him to be nothing short of sensational over that whole period. As to not being able to complete a full pre-season as justification for the shortfall in his performance, we can also say that he, on a regular basis, has not presented himself in an appropriate condition to allow himself to complete a pre-season.
It is a pity that there are still question marks over a man who is absolutely flying. Only if we all felt confident we knew how long it will last.


completely agree

I'm not saying Lance isn't playing really well at the moment... but if we lost sight of its context then we're not being analytical.

And its not just about trading him or not trading him... its everything to coaching, positioning, training, whether to make him captain or not etc etc.

Its like the age old: is the player who's awesome for 1 season have a better career than a consistently good contributor?

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:54 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
What Whitnall earned in 2005 for his output is irrelevant to whether his sort of player is required by our Club (for whatever reasons) in 2007 (and beyond).

Feeling 'ripped off' is an emotion that this can do without.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
The Tyrant wrote:
woof wrote:
BlueMark wrote:
Lance has been nothing short of sensational this year. As someone said earlier being able to complete a full pre-season and having no injuries makes a huge difference. Lance has also been allowed to settle into a position and make it his own rather than playing'spareparts' man as he has had to over the last couple of years.

Watching Lance at his best is a sheer joy. Have always had faith in him and have had no doubt he would prove his many detractors once given an oppotunity.


He has earn't close to 2 million dollars in the last 4 years. My expectation would be for him to be nothing short of sensational over that whole period. As to not being able to complete a full pre-season as justification for the shortfall in his performance, we can also say that he, on a regular basis, has not presented himself in an appropriate condition to allow himself to complete a pre-season.
It is a pity that there are still question marks over a man who is absolutely flying. Only if we all felt confident we knew how long it will last.


completely agree

I'm not saying Lance isn't playing really well at the moment... but if we lost sight of its context then we're not being analytical.

And its not just about trading him or not trading him... its everything to coaching, positioning, training, whether to make him captain or not etc etc.

Its like the age old: is the player who's awesome for 1 season have a better career than a consistently good contributor?


I think this is exactly the reason why admin want one thread per player. It's strange to come into a Whitnall is playing really well thread and find out it's actually a trade Whitnall thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 3:14 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 1:13 pm
Posts: 972
verbs wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
woof wrote:
BlueMark wrote:
Lance has been nothing short of sensational this year. As someone said earlier being able to complete a full pre-season and having no injuries makes a huge difference. Lance has also been allowed to settle into a position and make it his own rather than playing'spareparts' man as he has had to over the last couple of years.

Watching Lance at his best is a sheer joy. Have always had faith in him and have had no doubt he would prove his many detractors once given an oppotunity.


He has earn't close to 2 million dollars in the last 4 years. My expectation would be for him to be nothing short of sensational over that whole period. As to not being able to complete a full pre-season as justification for the shortfall in his performance, we can also say that he, on a regular basis, has not presented himself in an appropriate condition to allow himself to complete a pre-season.
It is a pity that there are still question marks over a man who is absolutely flying. Only if we all felt confident we knew how long it will last.


completely agree

I'm not saying Lance isn't playing really well at the moment... but if we lost sight of its context then we're not being analytical.

And its not just about trading him or not trading him... its everything to coaching, positioning, training, whether to make him captain or not etc etc.

Its like the age old: is the player who's awesome for 1 season have a better career than a consistently good contributor?


I think this is exactly the reason why admin want one thread per player. It's strange to come into a Whitnall is playing really well thread and find out it's actually a trade Whitnall thread.


Isn’t it the same thing every time he plays well lets trade him if his playing bad lets trade him.

And guess who starts it of Mr Synbad always. Fair enough you don’t like him but why turn a thread from a praise thread into a trade thread.

You will never be able to accept what a good job Lance has done for the last two years after his injuries. When you see a thread that says lets trade Lance please put your view across but hijacking every thread about Lance is getting boring get over it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 3:47 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
molsey wrote:
What Whitnall earned in 2005 for his output is irrelevant to whether his sort of player is required by our Club (for whatever reasons) in 2007 (and beyond).

Feeling 'ripped off' is an emotion that this can do without.


what would you use for a predictive model? Solid data.

I think some of the arguments trying to "contextualise" the current form is that history indicates with this player that we should continue to monitor his output closely... and be conscious of that with his training, match-ups, limitations etc etc... and, if he were out of contract, his contract as well (but he isn't)

its not about trade-talk.. its about being realistic. Its about CONTEXT (verbs).......... yes he's playing well now... but how do we manage our expectations? Thats the issue right now with Lance

We know he's playing well now.... now, how do we as fans manage our expectations? How to the MC manage their expectations?

verbs.... is this thread for people to go "yeah, he's doing good", or is it ok to talk about the overarching implications of his good form? is that part of the rules?

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 3:57 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
Tyrants I didnt mention form - just income. Debate his form as much as you want but what he earned out of the Club in the past doesn't impact on his trading or not.

It may impact on his future salary negotiations but his income (purported or actual) does not affect our need for him (purported or actual) in 2007.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 4:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Whitnall is in elite form according to Wallsy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 4:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
molsey wrote:
Tyrants I didnt mention form - just income. Debate his form as much as you want but what he earned out of the Club in the past doesn't impact on his trading or not.

It may impact on his future salary negotiations but his income (purported or actual) does not affect our need for him (purported or actual) in 2007.


yes... you're quite right

The thing to remember is that income is being used as a proxy for "desired output"... ie, we would only pay someone $400k if we expected him to be a gun player.

So, thats being used to define how he performed accordnig to expectation.

Maybe its not a good proxy metric for performance vs expectation.... but his income isn't being used in isolation... its income vs performance. In 2005, the argument is that he performed below expectation.....

and to CONTEXTUALISE this for verbs, what we're saying now is that Whitnall is, in fact, either playing to expectation and (probably more the case) exceeding it. Thats great! good on him and good on the club... no one can take that away from him....

... but history shows that we should give it time before we use current form to model future expectation.

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 4:07 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
but couldn't you argue, Molsey, that a reason for his improved form is a desire to get back to his bigger pay and when he gets back there will he fall back into old habits he showed last time he was receiving a big pay cheque?

Not that I am at all concerned about this, but any debate must be allowed to bring in concerns raised from past actions and then discussion circumstances under which those actions occurred. After all we are discussing his improved - hence change and so we look at aspects of his life that have also changed



just call me tyrant with a very little t. 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 285 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group