Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 2:03 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 3:31 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
and how soon can we expect to know something about our off-field future? The silence is deafening.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 3:42 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
One item on the agenda is whether or not to give Carlton a priority pick in both drafts (National & Preseason). The AFL is aware that the penalties have hurt Carlton more than they envisaged.

The priority pick in the Preseason draft will be designed to get Carlton more competitive on the field next year by allowing Carlton to recruit two quality experienced players. There may be an independent committee created to analyse the list before a decision is made.

I believe the rising popularity of soccer has forced the AFL to start thinking that a winning Carlton is great for the AFL and a losing Carlton is great for the world game.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 3:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Two PSD picks? Might end up using them on kids... or passing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 3:49 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
Was there supposed to be a meeting?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 3:52 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Posts: 2194
Location: Melbourne
If we had 2 picks last year we could have had McLaren AND Guerra. Why would we pass when these type of quality players are up for grabs?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:25 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:04 pm
Posts: 717
Location: kensington
Zippy wrote:
If we had 2 picks last year we could have had McLaren AND Guerra. Why would we pass when these type of quality players are up for grabs?


are you being sarcastic?????

There is a board meeting tonight and a decision will be made whether or not we go to the AFL for assistance via the CBF or some other way as we dont qualify for the CBF as it is for clubs how have not as big of a following like thebigger clubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:26 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:33 pm
Posts: 4079
Location: The corner of BumF*** and YouGotAPrettyMouth
The CBF is the Centre Back Flank, right?

_________________
R A D I C A L B R O T H E R S

Inspired by the One-Minute Sculptures of Erwin Wurm

"All in all is all we are..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1651
Hypothetical - If Essendon* or some other team ends up last and we 2nd last. Surely we cannot be given a PP. The team ending up last would be screaming blue murder!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:34 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:00 pm
Posts: 4055
Location: Recovering from the 1st effort
Rod Waddell wrote:
Hypothetical - If Essendon* or some other team ends up last and we 2nd last. Surely we cannot be given a PP. The team ending up last would be screaming blue murder!!


No idea the AFL are a law unto themselves. Wouldnt it be great though!! How much fun could we have with their supporters!!

_________________
"Who discovered we could get milk from cows, and what did he think he was doing at the time?" Billy Connolly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Our whole future rests on what the AFL will give us....

Gimme a break!!!... theyre embarassing!!!!

So forever and ever to a day StKilda supporters will always throw this back at our face .. just cos the board was not capable off their own bats.

Taking over the ground is one thing... charity is embarassing... We had the opportunity to do it like every other club... and we chose to win 10.. Now we have to beg for mercy....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:40 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:04 pm
Posts: 717
Location: kensington
2ndeffort wrote:
Rod Waddell wrote:
Hypothetical - If Essendon* or some other team ends up last and we 2nd last. Surely we cannot be given a PP. The team ending up last would be screaming blue murder!!


No idea the AFL are a law unto themselves. Wouldnt it be great though!! How much fun could we have with their supporters!!


i'm thinking our board might have asked the AFL to change the 4 games to 4.5 games to gain a priority pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:44 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:04 pm
Posts: 717
Location: kensington
Synbad wrote:
Our whole future rests on what the AFL will give us....

Gimme a break!!!... theyre embarassing!!!!

So forever and ever to a day StKilda supporters will always throw this back at our face .. just cos the board was not capable off their own bats.

Taking over the ground is one thing... charity is embarassing... We had the opportunity to do it like every other club... and we chose to win 10.. Now we have to beg for mercy....


why was it ok when the saints, bulldogs and cats sat on the bottom and wracked up picks and now its our turn we get done over by the draft penalties and now a change in the priority pick system.

i think the bombers would be a little un happy about the decision aswell


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:46 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
So what theyre saying is we DO NEED priority picks now.. and that winning ten was meaningless???
Ok good idea.. carry on...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:47 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
according to the media (radio before Sunday's game) the club has asked for the number of wins to be averaged over 2 years. Apparently with the new system, only 2 PP's would have been given out over the past 10 or so years, and if it was averaged it would be only 4 (under last years system well above 10 have been given out, but I can't remember the exact figure).

What they didn't explain was if by PP they meant only before the first round or not (ie PP's as defined by the old system or the new).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:49 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:04 pm
Posts: 717
Location: kensington
earlier on in the year it was mentioned we could pick up Ken Sheldons son via father/son, going by all reports this years draft is the best we could see is he worth a 3rd rounder considering this years draft has depth


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:55 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
steve wrote:
according to the media (radio before Sunday's game) the club has asked for the number of wins to be averaged over 2 years. Apparently with the new system, only 2 PP's would have been given out over the past 10 or so years, and if it was averaged it would be only 4 (under last years system well above 10 have been given out, but I can't remember the exact figure).

What they didn't explain was if by PP they meant only before the first round or not (ie PP's as defined by the old system or the new).


18 was the number that Malouf quoted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
So is there a meeting scheduled, or did I imagine hearing that?

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:59 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:04 pm
Posts: 717
Location: kensington
i dont think there is a meeting today and i recall Malouf saying on the radio that a proposal was not put forward regarding the sale of the PP lease or am i wrong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 5:00 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
bluechucky wrote:
steve wrote:
according to the media (radio before Sunday's game) the club has asked for the number of wins to be averaged over 2 years. Apparently with the new system, only 2 PP's would have been given out over the past 10 or so years, and if it was averaged it would be only 4 (under last years system well above 10 have been given out, but I can't remember the exact figure).

What they didn't explain was if by PP they meant only before the first round or not (ie PP's as defined by the old system or the new).


18 was the number that Malouf quoted.


Cheers Chucky :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 5:01 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
I thought I heard the AFL met at the weekend and would provide feedback in prepation for our board meeting tonight?

Yes Malouf said that Carlton have not put forward a proposal for the lease of MC Hammer Park. This will be discussed at tonights board meeting also.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 60 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group