The Duke wrote:
A crap Carlton affects the pies and bombres as much as anybody. home games for those clubs v us will be down from 90,000 to 32,000(last week). That would be a big chunk of their anual budget in one hit. A more successful on field Carlton means more bums on seats for everybody and greater national TV coverage.
Make no mistake, our poor 4 years IS having an effect on TV ratings as much as people through the gate.
If these turds who say Carlton should fold or re-locate thought it through, especially the poorer clubs, they'd realise they need us healthy and in Melboourne to survive.
How many people would you get to a Kangas v West Sydney Blues game at the dome?
The only reason we let them stay in the competition for 100 years is so we had someone to beat

.
Great post Duke!! That is the heart of the issue right there. Some emotive d1ckhe@d on Bigfooty thinking this is all some kind of universal Karma and that the league is run on some kind of emotional balance to keep fans happy is totally deluded. There is only one religion for the AFL and that is the cult of $$$.
Everybody knows that a strong and successful Carlton brings in the $$ both at the ground and on the TV. A rejuvanated CFC can be a power again in 3 years, the Carrara Kangaroos or West Sydney Blues wont be a force for the next 30. Dont know about the rest of you guys but if the CFC aint around, my membership $$ every year goes to the Melb Victory (might send some there anyway). I barrack for the Carlton Blues, no-one else.
I reckon some of the suspicion might be based upon the fact that we have some well heeled supporters. If you were Smorgo, Pratt, Grollo, Mathieson etc why would you tip in mega $$ when there is a chance that the AFL will do it anyway. The AFL and the other clubs wouldnt want to see their shared money used when some of Pratt's millions could be in the offing otherwise.
Love that last sentence too. I'd started to forget what the old arrogance was all about over the last couple of years