Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 6:15 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 11:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
HTP wrote:
Livingston on Thompson, Synbad? Certainly Thornton had no answers. Or are you referring to having a spine without actually suggesting match ups?
thompso will kill us if Livo is at FB.. and he will kill us if T Bird is at FB.... but by having Livo in the side.. and not Saddington ... or Teague.. or just about anyone else Pagan hatches up to rob Livo from playing FB...Livo releases T Bird to play a more creative role.

And Lance for that matter cos he has to take the fourth forward and not the third.... .........

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 11:54 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
4thchicken wrote:
Synbad wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
HTP wrote:
Fevola - I've never considered the possibility of him being injured

I have and its not a pretty thought - hence my preparedness to trade him. Having said that though, I was spitting chips when I saw him land - thought he had done his ACL for certain. Good to see him running later in the game but I certainly would have kept him off the ground.


Why trade Fev when you can trade Murphy?
Murphy is just as likely to be injured as Fev.

Look... the one man to be traded is Lance.

Just not mobile...


I reckon the kids were great again today.
We have a real nucleus to build upon...

Im rapt with that!!!

PS Im almost to the point that im not joking here but Fev is just about captaincy material in our side.

Also Deluca - credit to him.. he looked like a real CHF tonight.

The negative is when Livo is dropped the balance suffers.


synbad - why fev and not murphy? - mainly positional. I'd cop a weaker forward line if it meant we could build up the rest of the team quicker (midfield/back/ruck). If we get caned in the midfield then having the best FF in the comp (where I place fev atm) is useless to us.

why fev and not lance? - trade value. I'm pretty sure you have asked me a dozen times before and I've given the same answer everytime.

Its a thread for positives - lets at least try to keep it on topic. My comments werent a criticism of Fev - I was extremely concerned when he landed and very happy when it appeared he was ok. I just wouldnt have brought him back on.


Ok assuming its Fev..l who to and for what????

See.,.. the shit teams wont trade their EARLY oicks.. and the good teams have picks 13/14 on.. so what would we trade our ONLY marketable commodity for????

And only A grade footballer.

And only goal kicker....

Just to hold onto Lance....

Spit it out.. give me a realistic scenario.... and it better be a rip snorter cos the club will be left with a gaping hole....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:08 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:27 pm
Posts: 597
Synbad wrote:
HTP wrote:
Livingston on Thompson, Synbad? Certainly Thornton had no answers. Or are you referring to having a spine without actually suggesting match ups?
thompso will kill us if Livo is at FB.. and he will kill us if T Bird is at FB.... but by having Livo in the side.. and not Saddington ... or Teague.. or just about anyone else Pagan hatches up to rob Livo from playing FB...Livo releases T Bird to play a more creative role.

And Lance for that matter cos he has to take the fourth forward and not the third.... .........

Yes! .... and he may even get time to learn and 'develop'. Presti 'used' to take the hit every week for the Pies just so Clement didn't have to. Now Presti is reliable and Clement is AA. We just hope that Lance and Lappin fix everything. Imagine if Livo had 3 full years at FB! We've [REDACTED] him over that much that Watt has overtaken him!

Yep.. blame the recruiters! 8)

_________________
Patrick Smith - Just another reason to HATE Essendon*!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:12 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:01 pm
Posts: 1381
Murph
Carrazzo
Blackwell
Russell
Fevola would have kicked 10 if he could move in the 2nd half
Walks
De Luca

and

Simon Wiggins and his continued great form.

our 3rd quarter generally was super, with fast attacking football giving our kids the confidence to take the game on and give our forwards a chance

_________________
SMFC 1959 : ONE LIFE, ONE LOVE, ONE CLUB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:14 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
They dont have any faith in him but he isnt any worse than anyone else.

So go figure why he doesnt get the games.

Just reallllllllllllllllllllllllly pissssssssssssssssssesssssssssss me off!!!

Our defence always looks better OVERALL with Livo out there... im not talking about FB spot in particular.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:25 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
we need two top defenders. Livo is never going to be one of them so lose a few games and pick the draft apart. isn;' that what yoiu all advocate? or should we play Livo, maybe beat Roos but realy still end up 2 defenders short?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:30 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
dannyboy wrote:
we need two top defenders. Livo is never going to be one of them so lose a few games and pick the draft apart. isn;' that what yoiu all advocate? or should we play Livo, maybe beat Roos but realy still end up 2 defenders short?


mate dont get hissy like an old woman at me just cos we lost again...

I give solutions ... get all hissy at the MC and the coaches or something.. theyre the ones without the answers....

I know youre disapointed dannyboy... but fair dinkum!!!... :lol:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:36 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
I am happy. The lads are developing (remember when that was the big word around here) slowly assuming the main roles within the team. Like I hoped. But still people here bag and bag and bag and bag and bag and bag

But of course it is easy, we all know how far back we ae coming from - even you know that - so yes, there are still holes that hurt, thats why we have to keep drafting well I thought

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:42 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:27 pm
Posts: 597
There were stages tonight (3rd qtr) where the 'kids' pushed the senior players aside and ripped the game open... I nearly chubbed up!

Bannister... finally used (for more than 5 mins) in a position he has been 'groomed' for. Looked very comfortable sweeping across half back.

_________________
Patrick Smith - Just another reason to HATE Essendon*!


Last edited by Knackers on Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:42 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
dannyboy wrote:
I am happy. The lads are developing (remember when that was the big word around here) slowly assuming the main roles within the team. Like I hoped. But still people here bag and bag and bag and bag and bag and bag

But of course it is easy, we all know how far back we ae coming from - even you know that - so yes, there are still holes that hurt, thats why we have to keep drafting well I thought



you will notice .. i never bag a kid... i have faith in kids cos u dont know what youre getting.,, its all untapped.

Its the others that get up my goat...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:16 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
can't wait til they are no longer kids 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:32 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:57 pm
Posts: 48
Synbad wrote:
I give solutions ... get all hissy at the MC and the coaches or something.. theyre the ones without the answers....


My first 'real' post.

Sorry Synbad, but you don't have solutions - you have ideas and opinions (which are welcomed by many here), but they are not necessarily solutions.

The MC doesn't have all the answers either, but surely you can see that we are on the right path. Murphy / Blackwell / Kennedy / Russell / Simpson / Carazzo etc etc are all showing glimpses (except Murphy who is already playing at a consistently high level).

You yourself said in another thread that our kids are better than North's. Who's responsible for that? Recruiters? Coaching staff?...or you?

Maybe the MC and coaching staff have taken the right approach - develop the kids slowly and carefully. I for one, am confident that success is on its way.

We all get frustrated at losing, and some of the decisions that are made. We all have players that we believe aren't up to it that get played, and others that we believe need more opportunity. But for Christ's sake, this continual bagging of the coaching staff and the MC and claims that we have the answers is just bull****! If some of the posters on this site actually new half as much as they claim, they'd be coaching some kind of unbeatable AFL super team by now.

That is all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:26 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 2821
Location: In The Boot Of Brendan Fevola Car
The Pigeon on the ground,who was definitely playing for us, he had a great game on that wing,the star of the day, Murphy did well as usual,my god, f**k we actually picked a good kid in the draft, how did that happen?
I thought we had rich no talent hacks who have no clue when selecting draft picks.

Betts,Blackwell and Fevola played well and some others while the rest can go stuff it,no names,they know who they are they can go and drop the soap after the game, bunch of pansys,really no excuse losing to the weakest club.

I forgive them for the eagles,but not a poor team like the roos or Essendon*.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:28 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Watching the replay last night I thought about our midfield, but someone else brought it up and I felt like I'd be copying.

Watching the game again this morning, I can't help but be enthused.

Stevens is always in there, but getting a go were Murphy, Blackwell, Bentick, Russell. It was being rotated with some promising young guys.

Bentick was exceptional at getting the ball in the hard clinches in the centre. He definitely looks like a god in and under centreman. It got me quite enthralled.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:45 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
Young kids were fantastic
Murphy is a special player. not long before he is captain of the club
Blackwell coming along nicely. Looked a really good AFL player last night. Great kick of the footy
Fevola was awesome
Carazzo was very good
Stevens showed great leadership in that 3rd quarter. He should be captain and not Whitnall
Bannister was pretty good. How he hasn't been getting a game but yet mcgrath and teague do is baffling.
We lost a meaningless game


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 10:15 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
I agree with everything said about Murphy, AB, Carrots, etc.

Carrots' disposal has been improving.

Fev played strong.

Eddie Betts was everywhere. My mate said last night: "How many of him do you have? How much does that little bugger run?"

DeLuca played hard, took at least 4 one-grabbers (those gloves!!!), stood up when he was needed.

Slight tangent: Another positive was Harvey staging for a free in the 2nd (3rd?), stopping as if the free had been paid, and the umps let it go because it was that obvious.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 10:50 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Agree with the focus on the kids. Murphy, Simpson, Betts, Carrazzo.

Walker was only average last night but has been better this year. We know what he's capable of and given the amount of ball that went into our backline Tex couldn't play as offensively as he would have liked.

Blackwell showed a fair bit too I thought, nice goal with poise through traffic and good skills to bend it back.

McGrath got thrashed and Teague was playing out of his weight division. I don't rate the North talls all that much. If they were that good, then they'd be a lot higher on the ladder because Hale is 200cm, Petrie 197cm Thompson 196cm, Chad Jones 196cm - and all of them mobile. Why wasn't McLaren used as a KP defender against Petrie or Hale and instead we persisted with Teague? Bewildering...

At least that meant we lost the game :)

8 goal burst in the 3rd quarter shows the kids that they can do it and all they have to do is produce it over 4 quarters. There were very few turnovers in the 3rd quarter and we would have scored at least 5 goals against a top 8 team in that quarter. Pity about the last...we didn't run, we didn't create.

Teague and McGrath look gone as AFL players. McGrath has lost a yard of pace since last year. Teague's never been quick but is now a liability.

Bannister was good I thought and his disposal is pretty good.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:03 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Yep, for me it's ALL about the u/23 age group.
Good to see they're getting more game time to learn the ropes on the job.
Blackers looked terrific I thought.
AB worked liked a trojan as usual. With more experience he'll hopefully gain more awareness and not get caught as much as he will never be a speedster midfielder.
Good to see Pagan (wake up &) put Carrots in the play upfield where he works very smoothly. Kicked a nice setshot goal from 45m as well.

If we can keep our young blokes off the injury list LOOK OUT! :-D

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:14 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
Tex played well - how many did Grant kick after Tex went on him? Problem was (and why Denis avoided it for as long as he could) we missed his run when he went deep.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:16 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
i was looking through the afl record and our best 3rd quarter score at telstra dome was 40 points against the ducks last year and we bettered that by 10 points last night we had 8.2.50 the premiership quarter is back!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group