Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 7:53 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:35 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 940
Synbad wrote:
Livo isnt a gun but gives us defensive structure. He doesnt get smashed as often as people think... Not playing him costs us.Should remain on the list as we dont have a FB anyway.


I can't agree with you on this, Synbad.

IMO Livo has had MORE THAN ENOUGH time to cement his spot as the no.1 fullback for this club.

Maybe being blooded as fullback whilst Carlton is at the lowest ebb in its history - and having the ball constantly being pumped to his man on a string - hasn't helped his development. I'd be keen for the MC to persist with him if he has showed any sort of improvement and potential in his time at the club, but for mine he has showed neither.

Being dropped in recent games doesn't bode well for the bloke i'm afraid.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:51 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
ballistic blues wrote:
keogh wrote:
I would keep Bannister.


CRICKEY!


I'm with Keogh....Bannister has improved and doesnt deserve the axe.
Dominates at VFL level and played a very nice game vs the Roos , his once dodgy disposal has improved and his marking is a sure as most who play down back for us. I didnt think he deserved to be dropped last time he was sent back to the Bullants and am a bit sick of him being the fall guy every time we lose. ...one thing he does do is run with the footy and try and create unlike Teague for example is just a mark and kick player...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:33 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 2:18 pm
Posts: 81
Location: South Of The Border Down Mexico Way
RoK wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Rhys26 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Bring in more spare parts players from other clubs and have those supported by players who cant get a game at other clubs....
Dont give blokes like Bryan , Livo, Sporn a game.....


Synbad,

Agree 100% about the hacks from other clubs.
But
Bryan - Talented but doesn't work hard enough, can't afford to reward blokes who don't put the effort in.
Livo - Quality person but seriously he is not up to AFL standard unfortunately
Sporn - has been really hard done by. Has been made to play too defensive by our current super coach and Brittain
.


i think Sporn would be beautifully suited to a Crows type game...
Livo isnt a gun but gives us defensive structure. He doesnt get smashed as often as people think... Not playing him costs us.Should remain on the list as we dont have a FB anyway.
Bryan should be just played.... i really dont understand this thing they seem to have that everyone should be a coal miner.


you have to earn a game bryan has not.


And Deluca has? dont make me laugh!!!

Ooops, sorry, youre a clown.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:39 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
one from left field - bentick?

Similar to blackwell/murphy/carazzo, suspect disposal and not overly quick. If the club starts running out of players to cull due to contracts (deluca, teague?, etc) then he might have to make way - particularly if we manage to nab extra draft picks which can be utilised on midfielders.

Persoanlly my list atm would be
longmuir (run out of opportunities)
chambers (done nothing)
teague (slow)
kouta (retire)
mcgrath (dont think he is good enough)
french (retire)
sporn (doesnt look like making it unfortunately)
de luca (contracted unfortunately)
davies (doesnt sound as if he is recovering from injury that well)

edit: given the option I'd lose saddington as well though I imagine he will get another year


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:51 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
Quote:
longmuir (run out of opportunities)
chambers (done nothing)
teague (slow)
kouta (retire)
mcgrath (dont think he is good enough)
french (retire)
sporn (doesnt look like making it unfortunately)
de luca (contracted unfortunately)
davies (doesnt sound as if he is recovering from injury that well)


pretty much agree with your list 4thchicken with prob the addition of Livo who i believe is one we just cut our losses and accept that he is one top 5 pick that hasnt worked only reason he prob survived so long if Livo had been pcik 30 - 40 he would have been there as long as he has.

Prob in your list in place of Deluca if he is still contracted with Livo
other than that your list is pretty close to the mark

_________________
CFC TAC Squad everyone over 25 must be traded sounds like Loguns Run


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:58 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
I'm not really understanding all the O'hAilpin hate going on. Geez some of you people are impatient. It's not as if we're struggling to find players to delist.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:07 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Listed:

Longmuir
Bannister
Chambers
Sporn
Teague
Kouta
Davies
Livingston
Prendergast

Rookies:

Smith
Batson

Promote:

Flint
Jackson

Leaves 6 picks in National (No Trades) plus 1 Pre-Season and besides Aiskae a full complement of Rookies to choose.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:57 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 797
Location: Funky Town
Andain wrote:
I'm not really understanding all the O'hAilpin hate going on. Geez some of you people are impatient. It's not as if we're struggling to find players to delist.


Thats so true
He is still very keen and doesnt deserve to be delisted

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:31 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:20 pm
Posts: 789
Location: Melbourne
MJONC,
Agree with most of your post but Smith and Batson have to be either promoted or delisted as this is their 2nd year on the rookie list. Probably both delisted.

I think Lappin is starting to struggle and I think he should retire at season's end. Bryan is a listed player who would have to be included in any delistings. Despite getting smashed in the ruck and down the spine the MC have declared their hand and DelLuca is preferred and Bryan has not played a game. Unlike Carlos it would appear that he doesn't have the desire apparently to make the sacfrifices required and given the list size we can only keep one long term project player and at present our project player is Carlos.

Agree on promoting Jackson but not sure about Flint.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:49 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Quote:
given the option I'd lose saddington as well though I imagine he will get another year


Isn't Saddington still paid by the Swans and I think has another year on his contract? Can we delist him and get Swans to pay him out?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:56 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
amazonstud wrote:
I think Lappin is starting to struggle and I think he should retire at season's end.

Starting to struggle already after wanting a 3 year contract. Can't see him retiring this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:04 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
BlueWorld wrote:
amazonstud wrote:
I think Lappin is starting to struggle and I think he should retire at season's end.

Starting to struggle already after wanting a 3 year contract. Can't see him retiring this year.

Should have been rested after the shoulder injury IMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:15 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 1:13 pm
Posts: 972
What is the maximun allowed to be axed by a club?? we need to axe at least 12 players most of the one's mentioned above. Most likely the club will only axe half that due to contracts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:36 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
There is limit bb8 of 38 listed players for every club.

If we axe 8 players and are left with 30, we need to make up the 8 player shortfall in the national draft, pre-season draft and rookie draft.

If we axe, 12 players but have no way of replacing them all in the abovementioned drafts, then we are going to be smacked by the AFL.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:42 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
blueboy8 wrote:
What is the maximun allowed to be axed by a club?? we need to axe at least 12 players most of the one's mentioned above. Most likely the club will only axe half that due to contracts.


I don't think there's a maximum but you need to retain a bit of experience or do we want to go back to picking up recycled players?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:49 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
i think we've learnt from that and we have to have a strict policy on picking up only very young players we should play real hard at this year's trade week and try to get as many early draft picks as we can, if that means giving up players like lappin or french then so be it it'll do us good for the future


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34566
Location: The Brown Wedge
DownUnderChick wrote:
There is limit bb8 of 38 listed players for every club.

If we axe 8 players and are left with 30, we need to make up the 8 player shortfall in the national draft, pre-season draft and rookie draft.

If we axe, 12 players but have no way of replacing them all in the abovementioned drafts, then we are going to be smacked by the AFL.


This is exactly right. There's no point getting rid of fringe players just to recruit more from the tail end of the 2006 draft. Sure, clear out the dead wood (6-8) but any more means more 2 year minimum contracts which restricts us in the 2007 draft.

prenda, Sporn, Chambers, Longmuir, Bryan plus a few rookies but you have to keep Deluca and Wiggles because they just can't be replaced in the short term and if youy did, the chances are you'd end up with carbon copies.

We've got great young kids and some handy experience - let's just stick to the current plan.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:12 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
The Duke wrote:
prenda, Sporn, Chambers, Longmuir, Bryan plus a few rookies but you have to keep Deluca and Wiggles because they just can't be replaced in the short term and if youy did, the chances are you'd end up with carbon copies.


8) great point

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:29 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
true_blue24 wrote:
i think we've learnt from that and we have to have a strict policy on picking up only very young players we should play real hard at this year's trade week and try to get as many early draft picks as we can, if that means giving up players like lappin or french then so be it it'll do us good for the future


I'm sure all clubs will want young players. Can't see anyone wanting to pick up 30 year olds. I doubt either will be around more than another season (if that).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:45 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
BlueWorld wrote:
true_blue24 wrote:
i think we've learnt from that and we have to have a strict policy on picking up only very young players we should play real hard at this year's trade week and try to get as many early draft picks as we can, if that means giving up players like lappin or french then so be it it'll do us good for the future


I'm sure all clubs will want young players. Can't see anyone wanting to pick up 30 year olds. I doubt either will be around more than another season (if that).


no what about teams like adelaide, st kilda and west coast who are pushing for a premiership i'm sure picking up teenagers isnt going to help them win a premiership but if they pick up someone like akermanis that could help them.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group