Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Nov 08, 2025 7:19 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30285
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
PJ, you are bloody frustrating! Explain to me why a 'Carlton Man' is not suited to any assistant role at our club (or head coach)? Back you comment up with some reasons! You mention David Parkin, are you aware that he also coached Hawthorn to a premiership(s? ) after he played there? Robert Walls was a Carlton man and coached us to a flag & gosh, look at John Worsfold - now where did he play again? Even take Dennis Penguin (please take him) played at North and actually had success there.

Oh, but I'm the one with my head in the clouds - just show me why ex-Carlton people shouldn't be involved. I am not saying take them because they are ex-carlton, I am saying don't reject them because they are.

Would make a nice change to have people that care about the club coaching.

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:39 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
kingkerna wrote:
PJ, you are bloody frustrating! Explain to me why a 'Carlton Man' is not suited to any assistant role at our club (or head coach)? Back you comment up with some reasons! You mention David Parkin, are you aware that he also coached Hawthorn to a premiership(s? ) after he played there? Robert Walls was a Carlton man and coached us to a flag & gosh, look at John Worsfold - now where did he play again? Even take Dennis Penguin (please take him) played at North and actually had success there.

Oh, but I'm the one with my head in the clouds - just show me why ex-Carlton people shouldn't be involved. I am not saying take them because they are ex-carlton, I am saying don't reject them because they are.

Would make a nice change to have people that care about the club coaching.


Pagan is ex-carlton as well.


_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:43 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Conflict of interest, KK.

If Hawthorn have taught us anything it's that having too many former players on the board, coaching panel etc etc ruins the club. People start thinking with their heart instead of their head and eventually everything goes arse up.

I want a coach or a group of coaches who aren't going to have any bias at all.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:49 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28382
Location: *Currently banned*
phoenix johnson wrote:
Conflict of interest, KK.

If Hawthorn have taught us anything it's that having too many former players on the board, coaching panel etc etc ruins the club. People start thinking with their heart instead of their head and eventually everything goes arse up.

I want a coach or a group of coaches who aren't going to have any bias at all.


Just because you want that doesn't mean your head isn't in the clouds either. Unless you are calling the shots, your doing nothing else but dreaming like the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:51 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
verbs wrote:
phoenix johnson wrote:
Conflict of interest, KK.

If Hawthorn have taught us anything it's that having too many former players on the board, coaching panel etc etc ruins the club. People start thinking with their heart instead of their head and eventually everything goes arse up.

I want a coach or a group of coaches who aren't going to have any bias at all.


Just because you want that doesn't mean your head isn't in the clouds either. Unless you are calling the shots, your doing nothing else but dreaming like the rest of us.


Of course. It's obviously all just opinion here.

I just don't think a fairy tale panel of ex Carlton players is the right answer.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28382
Location: *Currently banned*
Nor is it the wrong answer. It's a highly romantic answer though, and one that excites me when I think about it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:18 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30285
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
PJ - how about Paul Roos at the Swans? Grant Thomas at St.....ok, scrap that one,

regardless - what you are talking about doesn't fit into a conflict of interest situation. Are you insinuating that ex-blues won't be able to make the tough decisions?

Collingwont already want 'Bucks' and Essendon* want 'Harvs' or 'God' . North have Laidley - in fact what we are talking about is the rule rather then the exception.

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:54 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 3:44 pm
Posts: 99
I'm not for Mitchell, let's get an Essendon* bloke down to the club, harvey or O'Donell would do just fine


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
I agree with PJ. I think that another advantage of having someone from another club is that they have been exposed to different coaches and philosphies. I think that can help to strengthen a club if used in the right way.

If you stick with inside people for too long, I think it leads to stagnation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28531
Location: Free Beer!!
steve wrote:
I agree with PJ. I think that another advantage of having someone from another club is that they have been exposed to different coaches and philosphies. I think that can help to strengthen a club if used in the right way.

If you stick with inside people for too long, I think it leads to stagnation.


Not necessarily if they've been away from the club for a period of time and you surround them with others with fresh ideas.

It depends really on whether you're talking about having ex-Carlton as head coach or on the coaching staff. I dont think there are any ex-Carlton players in an assistants role that could take over at this stage.

A Coaching Staff of

John Longmire - Head Coach
Paul Hudson
Brett Ratten
Peter Dean

With Ken Sheldon in a Manager/Mentor role

Would provide plenty of fresh, new ideas from guys not long out of the game. Ideas from outside the club and some history well well touted ex-Carlton players in Ratten and Dean.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30285
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
steve wrote:
I agree with PJ. I think that another advantage of having someone from another club is that they have been exposed to different coaches and philosphies. I think that can help to strengthen a club if used in the right way.

If you stick with inside people for too long, I think it leads to stagnation.


To answer your comments:
Sheldon - St Kilda
Ratten - Melbourne
SOS - Bulldogs/Swans/ Collingwood
Mitchell - Sydney/Collingwood

At the moment we have about 5 people from other clubs - mmmm, that's really working isn't it?

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:20 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:31 am
Posts: 317
Location: At the Coalface.
Why is Mitchell such a great option? Is it because of the Bullants winning form?

I am not trying to be smart. Just asking the question. I have only seen him in action once or twice.

_________________
Working alone. At the coalface. Scott's gone for lunch! Said he would be back in 30 mins.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:36 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I dont get it either Shakin. Ive listened to Mitchell enough and yes, he's clear, concise and direct with the boys.

But we shouldn't read everything into the Bullants performances. For a list with relatively few injuries over the past 2 years, he'd be expected to be competitive. But we all know we have a list with too many good VFL players. Prendergast, Livingston, Teague, Chambers - all good enough at the lowre levels that just are that step too slow or arm too short for AFL. WE've given them all enough games at senior level and we know they aren't the future. But at VFL they dominate, Livo and Teaguein particular. Mitchell has a good, settled list of good VFL players who take the key positions and make them a very good team.

Our list structure is all wrong - not enough kids coming through, too many VFL players. mitchell enjoys the benefit of that.

In the M&D interviews alot of the younger players mention him very positively. Thats good to have, but does it make him a senior Coach? Could it be good cop bad cop? Who knows for sure?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:46 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Shakin77 wrote:
Why is Mitchell such a great option? Is it because of the Bullants winning form?

I am not trying to be smart. Just asking the question. I have only seen him in action once or twice.


I don't think people are suggesting Mitchell JUST because the Bullants are on top. But there are very little other options out there that are proven!

Most of the 'possible' pagan replacement options have not been tried with the exception of maybe........................

Sheldon - it's been a while.
Ayres - no thanks.
Blight - is he to old?

etc, etc, etc.

I think people are suggesting Barry for the reasons being that he knows the club, he knows the players and more importantly the players seem to like him and gel with him.

He is an untried option, yes.........................but he is a great option to try.
Just my opinion.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 6:22 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2407
Location: East Melbourne
woof wrote:
malleefowl wrote:
I think that one of the keys is respect. Pagan doesn't appear to have the respect of the players, whereas I think that Mitch does. When you gain the respect of the players you can get them to do some great things.


So which players do not respect Pagan that are capable of doing great things?

I have nothing concrete on the current players. I am just basing my comments on rumour and innuendo. That is why I use the word "appear".

I certainly know that the players that left the club 3-4 years ago had no respect for Pagan and still don't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 6:30 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2407
Location: East Melbourne
phoenix johnson wrote:
Parkin was a perfect example. Played all his football at Hawthorn and is essentially a Hawthorn man, but began his coaching career at Carlton was relatively successful.

Parkin coached Hawthorn from 1977 to 1980 with a premiership in 1978. I think he had already cut his teeth before he got to us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:10 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Sheldon would be a possible COI problem if his son is drafted.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:53 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:39 pm
Posts: 487
THe bullants are on top because our 23-26 year olds listed players like Teague, Prendergast, Sporn, LIvingston, Chambers etc aren't up to AFL level yet dominate in the VFL. Throw in Harford, Morell and whoever else is there and its obvious why they are on top. Even Tim Watson could coach them to a flag. If those guys were playing AFL week in week out the Bullants would be no where and Mitchell wouldn't look like such a hero.

Our next coach should come from outside Carlton. SOmeone who can bring new ideas and who KNOWS how opposition clubs plan for matches, train, develop young guys, implements game plans etc. I wouldn't be surprised if we are stuck in a time warp. If MItchell has any plans of coaching Carlton he needs to get the hell out end of year and become an assistant at a rival club to see how they go about things.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Kangaroos
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:23 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 8007
The Kangaroos.......

Dean Laidley,Donald McDonald,and Tim Harrington are all running the show at the Roos.All ex Kangas.........they aint travelling too well at the moment..........no gaurentees that ex players will do the trick.

Ya take the best man available.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:34 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
malleefowl wrote:
woof wrote:
malleefowl wrote:
I think that one of the keys is respect. Pagan doesn't appear to have the respect of the players, whereas I think that Mitch does. When you gain the respect of the players you can get them to do some great things.


So which players do not respect Pagan that are capable of doing great things?

I have nothing concrete on the current players. I am just basing my comments on rumour and innuendo. That is why I use the word "appear".

I certainly know that the players that left the club 3-4 years ago had no respect for Pagan and still don't.


Of the players that did not respect Pagan and left, did any do great things?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jez1966 and 71 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group