Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 9:52 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:59 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
http://www.realfooty.theage.com.au/real ... 90250.html

title change as requested by we are = we're :P

edited a second time to remove the political slant? :lol:


Last edited by 4thchicken on Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:02 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:39 am 
Offline
formerly Army the Wonderkid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 2058
Location: The Burbs
Look its great and all that...

So he'll only put money in if he gets a tax deduction? I guess that's how he got rich in the first place?

_________________
Formerly: Ackland the Wonderkid / Army the Wonderkid / quivering mess / molsey / Tony Lynn Fan Club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:49 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3194
Location: Whistler
He is under no obligation to put in any money at all. I hardly think it's appropriate to criticise him for using the most cost effective mechanism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:36 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:20 am
Posts: 8172
Location: PMQ
Athorn the Wonderkid wrote:
Look its great and all that...

So he'll only put money in if he gets a tax deduction? I guess that's how he got rich in the first place?


how much cash have you put in?

_________________
Back like a raging case of pubic lice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:38 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
bnz wrote:
Athorn the Wonderkid wrote:
Look its great and all that...

So he'll only put money in if he gets a tax deduction? I guess that's how he got rich in the first place?


how much cash have you put in?


As a percentage of my net worth I've put in a reasonable amount I reckon ;)

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:48 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
Can he leave now??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:49 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Athorn the Wonderkid wrote:
Look its great and all that...

So he'll only put money in if he gets a tax deduction? I guess that's how he got rich in the first place?


Just taking advantage of rules which have been in place for some time.

Good on him.

Thank you, Smorgon.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:53 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
I reckon it's a bit rough to criticise the guy when he's putting money towards the new training facility. He'd cop it if he didn't and he cops it if he does.

I'm more interested about the line concerning the four term limit on board members. Seems a bit daft to try and scrap it 5 minutes after it was introduced. Sticks might be popular, but is he any good as a board member?!

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:11 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24660
Location: Kaloyasena
camelboy wrote:
I'm more interested about the line concerning the four term limit on board members. Seems a bit daft to try and scrap it 5 minutes after it was introduced. Sticks might be popular, but is he any good as a board member?!



I would have to agree as the reason this rule was introduced was to prevent what happened to our club in the first place.

The Yanks bought in a 2 term rule for their Presidents - specifically to stop a situation where they had an extremely popular 4 Term President in F.D. Roosevelt.

I know Sticks is popular and a club legend - but do we need to amend a rule so soon after bringing it in. :?

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:30 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
What's to stop Sticks stepping down from the board for a year, and being re-appointed a year later?

I'd rather see directors be churned after 4 terms than potentially entrench board members, a la JE.

Now, if only Smorgon can tip some of his cash into getting himself an on-air personality..... :?

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:31 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
How can you criticise the guy for putting money in to the club, when it was just last night that people were giving it to him for not doing so?

And now that he is, you're still giving it to him.

Man, some people are never happy.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:32 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
phoenix johnson wrote:
How can you criticise the guy for putting money in to the club, when it was just last night that people were giving it to him for not doing so?

And now that he is, you're still giving it to him.

Man, some people are never happy.


Got that right, PJ.

Sand.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:34 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
They want him to stay on because of the lack of football nous on the board.

The option, of course, is to find a suitably-credentialled candidate and endorse him to replace Kernahan.

Perhaps the amendment could be 4 terms or 10 years, whichever is greatest. I wouldn't be comfortable with a return to the open-ended nature of the previous arrangement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:36 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
JohnM wrote:
They want him to stay on because of the lack of football nous on the board.

The option, of course, is to find a suitably-credentialled candidate and endorse him to replace Kernahan.

Perhaps the amendment could be 4 terms or 10 years, whichever is greatest. I wouldn't be comfortable with a return to the open-ended nature of the previous arrangement.


I'd agree with that.

Are those changes to the contitutions/articles a matter to be voted on by members?

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:50 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:13 pm
Posts: 1044
Location: sydney
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
JohnM wrote:
They want him to stay on because of the lack of football nous on the board.

The option, of course, is to find a suitably-credentialled candidate and endorse him to replace Kernahan.

Perhaps the amendment could be 4 terms or 10 years, whichever is greatest. I wouldn't be comfortable with a return to the open-ended nature of the previous arrangement.


I'd agree with that.

Are those changes to the contitutions/articles a matter to be voted on by members?


All changes to Constitution or articles must be voted on by those holding FULL VOTING MEMBERSHIP.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:53 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 1:13 pm
Posts: 972
Thankx Smorgan every cent counts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:10 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:00 pm
Posts: 4055
Location: Recovering from the 1st effort
Say what you like about the bloke's personality/media savvy but as far as I am concerned he has put his $$ where his mouth is. We're not currently in a postion to be too choosy about where the $$ come from, so good on you Graham for tipping in!!

_________________
"Who discovered we could get milk from cows, and what did he think he was doing at the time?" Billy Connolly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:15 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18083
The board want Sticks on side, Pagan wants Sticks on side......

These people are well aware of the benefits of having an alliance with Kernahan. Sticks is loved by Carlton people and the powerbrokers are well aware of the "insulation" Sticks affords them.

As for smorgon, good on him. On one hand we've got a President who puts in big hours at the club and tips in his own cash to assist us. Remember, everything he does for the club and every hour he spends there is voluntary and time he could be spending with his family.

When Pagan gives up his 700 grand a year and tips in his own money, make Smorgon your target. Until then, value every cent his offers.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:26 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
Everyone may have deficiencies but I see Smorgon working hard for the benefit of the club. He's now put his dough where it can help, so good on him.

We buy memberships to support the club or do what we can, where and when we can; he's done his bit and in doing so proven his heart and head are in alignment.

Now if he can get a big coterie group together to do the same ...

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:28 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
Blue Vain wrote:
The board want Sticks on side, Pagan wants Sticks on side......

These people are well aware of the benefits of having an alliance with Kernahan. Sticks is loved by Carlton people and the powerbrokers are well aware of the "insulation" Sticks affords them.

As for smorgon, good on him. On one hand we've got a President who puts in big hours at the club and tips in his own cash to assist us. Remember, everything he does for the club and every hour he spends there is voluntary and time he could be spending with his family.

When Pagan gives up his 700 grand a year and tips in his own money, make Smorgon your target. Until then, value every cent his offers.


faill call that.

im not a big fan regards his approach, smorgon almost appeared to go from getting the presidency to asking for help in afl before he finished his acceptance speech.

however, he has put his money where his mouth is - well done to him :)

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], GWS, jim, keogh, Traveller86 and 70 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group