Sydney Blue wrote:
GWS wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
GWS wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Why is it when ever I post a negative about Pagan there is a dozen or so poster who jump to his defence
Because they don't agree with you?
You cant keep making excuses for him - Time for excuses finished 2 years ago
I didn't make an excuse - I simply held a different opinion.
If you read my post you'll see that I wrote this:
GWS wrote:
There are a number of things that Pagan's done that deserve criticism but I think the way Walker's been brought through isn't one of them.
The problem I and many others have with many of your posts is that it appears that anything and everything that is wrong with the Carlton Football Club is Denis Pagan's fault. No-one else appears to have any responsibility for anything.
When you can actually debate an issue (such as the development of Andrew Walker) by looking at a number of variables rather than one (Pagan) then not only will the quality of your posting improve but others might actually take some of your drivel seriously.
Unfortunately you only seem to be able to manage "Pagan's shit - get rid of him".
I'm happy to criticize Pagan when I believe it's deserved but not when I believe it's not. That's fair. Laying the blame for everything at his feet isn't.
Sorry Rule No 1 in life - If your in charge it is your fault
Presumably that means it's Smorgan's fault, as he is the leader of the club.
Then again, maybe it's Demetriou's fault, as he's leader of the competition.
But that's silly, as Demetriou's not in charge; that would be Kemp, the federal minister for sport.
But his boss is John Howard, so it must be his fault, as he is ultimately in charge around here.
But Howard's busy on his knees with George Bush, so let's blame it all on the Texas brain surgeon.
Now, if all that seems silly, it's because the notion that only one person is responsible is of the same intellectual standard.
The reality is that Pagan bears some of the responsibility for where our club is at present, but not all. Our senior players, especially our captain, need to face up to some accountability as well. It was notable that our most errant performers yesterday were Lappin and Stevens when it came to turnovers. Koutoufides was his usual lamentable self on the rare occasions he got near the ball. Pagan made some coaching moves that were curious, such as the Walker match-up previously mentioned by GWS.
On the other hand, Walker is a far better player now than ever before, which is being recognised by several commentators, and some of the credit has to go to Pagan for that.
The game was much better than the critics suggest. The first quarter was ordinary, but improved dramatically thereafter. The goals Carlton scored were not 'junk time' variety, as we were in with a real chance of winning, as the magic atmosphere at the ground would suggest.
Is Pagan the answer for game plans? Maybe not, but he has achieved excellent results with our young blokes, and we will see the benefits continue to emerge.