Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 11:50 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 5:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
jack_4 wrote:
Just heard that Bentick is out for the last two games with a shoulder problem he's been carrying all year.


If he's been injured for most of the year carrying the shoulder injury, he shouldn't have been playing. Another poor decision by the MC. It's not like we're short on his type of player, eg Blackwell & Smith.

These guys need to be given enough of a go to see if they are any better in this position and other positions on the ground.

Hopefully AB gets his shoulder right for the pre-season cause this will be a career defining pre-season for him IMHO.

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:50 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3196
Location: Whistler
The Duke wrote:
Wow, 9 pages on poor ol' AB?

What about the fact that he's high up in the stats in our 1%ers and tackles etc yet down the bottom in errors :o .

He's a good kid and will play many games for us, get off his back!!


Been there done that 4 pages back: http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB2/vi ... 020#341020 :wink:

And team stats like these ones most certainly DO still have significant meaning in today's game ... e.g. blocks and screens give protection for centre bounce takeaways.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:58 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
Headplant wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Wow, 9 pages on poor ol' AB?

What about the fact that he's high up in the stats in our 1%ers and tackles etc yet down the bottom in errors :o .

He's a good kid and will play many games for us, get off his back!!


Been there done that 4 pages back: http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB2/vi ... 020#341020 :wink:

And team stats like these ones most certainly DO still have significant meaning in today's game ... e.g. blocks and screens give protection for centre bounce takeaways.


Headplant - what are the stats for effective disposals?? This counts as far as I'm concerned.

As I've said previously - IMHO next year will define this kids' career.

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:20 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3196
Location: Whistler
Wangers wrote:
Headplant wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Wow, 9 pages on poor ol' AB?

What about the fact that he's high up in the stats in our 1%ers and tackles etc yet down the bottom in errors :o .

He's a good kid and will play many games for us, get off his back!!


Been there done that 4 pages back: http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB2/vi ... 020#341020 :wink:

And team stats like these ones most certainly DO still have significant meaning in today's game ... e.g. blocks and screens give protection for centre bounce takeaways.


Headplant - what are the stats for effective disposals?? This counts as far as I'm concerned.

As I've said previously - IMHO next year will define this kids' career.


Can't find effective disposals ... according to Champion Data stats, Sam Mitchell has 11.4% clangers, AB has 12.5% season 2006, so similar in that respect, and respectable for in and under players.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:23 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
Thanks Headplant. :wink:

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:25 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
No1Blue wrote:
We desperately need players with foot skills in our team which is evident from after watching the match at the dome last sunday...

I've been a Carazzo fan but i am starting to go off him... I love Bentick for his attack on the ball at the stoppages but his foot skills still leave a bit to be desired.. especially when passing to forward targets like Fevola and such..

Players with poor foot skills in our CURRENT best team include..

* Bentick
* Carrazzo
* McGrath (in general)
* O'Hailpin (he's getting better)
* Wiggins (who has improved)

My thinking is a trade that would be something like this..

Carrazzo and Bentick are C Grade footballers who have some talent and ability..

We could do a trade with the Bulldogs that would go...

* Carrazzo and Bentick for * Daniel Giansiracusa (who i'd consider a B Grade footballer with good skills)

I've found watching or guys this year is that most of the time... we are more than competitive but luck the skills to make the most of our advances on the field... This is an area which has hurt us deeply... we can be 3 goals up on a side and then within minutes the scores can be cut back to level all due to our own mistakes and poor skills on the field...

Now I know we have a lot of young players who will get better with experience in that area but are we sure players like Carrazzo and Bentick will be part of our next premiership team on talent alone...

With a substantial membership loss this year and another poor performance on the field (plus 4 out of 5 years as cellar dwellers) I think its all the more important to deliver a message to the members that a competitive carlton unit is right around the corner.. so we can get our membership back up, which correlates to more profit from the club.. which will help our our club in some small way get back to the glory days when we were a rich and proud club...

What if next year our total membership drops to around 25k!!... That would be nothing short of a disaster and eventually one of the worst membership bases in the AFL...

Thats why I think it's important to pick up a couple of YOUNG players (Not an akermanis type!) with GOOD FOOT SKILLS and overall disposal in general...



Why not add Deluca,Bryan and Livo with Bentick and Carazzo and ask for Cooney instead????

Fair dinkum!!!... and you think you have a grip on understanding football...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:26 pm 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7562
Location: NowHere.....
He lacks faith in his kicking.

If he could improve in this area you would find that he might be more creative by foot, which would make him more damaging.

Has to take a footy with him where ever he goes, time is running out.

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Ok to all those astute football watchers that think Bentick has no place in the side... can you please tell me (dont fly off to la la land) who you would replace him in the guts with????

Thats what i wanna know...

Ok... knock me over....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:33 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 615
No1Blue wrote:
* Wiggins (who has improved)

My thinking is a trade that would be something like this..

Carrazzo and Bentick are C Grade footballers who have some talent and ability..

We could do a trade with the Bulldogs that would go...

* Carrazzo and Bentick for * Daniel Giansiracusa (who i'd consider a B Grade footballer with good skills)

.


If there was a "Talking Footscray" website I'm sure they would be all over this trade.

_________________
Get comfortable being uncomfortable


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:46 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
Synbad wrote:
Ok to all those astute football watchers that think Bentick has no place in the side... can you please tell me (dont fly off to la la land) who you would replace him in the guts with????

Thats what i wanna know...

Ok... knock me over....


I can see some posters here getting frustrated and somewhat emotional over AB, for one reason or another, just by reading some of the responses and their words.

Synners, I think he has a place in the side, but needs to be more damaging to the opposition in terms of disposal and decision making. He has talent, but is limited. Whether his place in the side is long term - this is where I'm doubting based on what I've seen thus far. If he can be half as good as Ratten, we have a winner in AB - I don't see that, though.

Other options in the centre (guts or in and under) are Smith (only just getting a go, so will need a season or two to see if he can cut it), and Blackwell (his first season, so same as Smith).

I think the MC have much to answer for my opinion on AB as his job is a difficult one and the kid needs help in the middle and further development in other parts of his game, otherwise he's very vulnerable.

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Wangers wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Ok to all those astute football watchers that think Bentick has no place in the side... can you please tell me (dont fly off to la la land) who you would replace him in the guts with????

Thats what i wanna know...

Ok... knock me over....


I can see some posters here getting frustrated and somewhat emotional over AB, for one reason or another, just by reading some of the responses and their words.

Synners, I think he has a place in the side, but needs to be more damaging to the opposition in terms of disposal and decision making. He has talent, but is limited. Whether his place in the side is long term - this is where I'm doubting based on what I've seen thus far. If he can be half as good as Ratten, we have a winner in AB - I don't see that, though.

Other options in the centre (guts or in and under) are Smith (only just getting a go, so will need a season or two to see if he can cut it), and Blackwell (his first season, so same as Smith).

I think the MC have much to answer for my opinion on AB as his job is a difficult one and the kid needs help in the middle and further development in other parts of his game, otherwise he's very vulnerable.




Wangers i read all of that but i didnt hear who youd replace Bentick in the guts with.

also can someone give me the statistics (these statistics are not useless) of Benticks tackling before his injury and since???

Just remember he is 21 and we have no grunt.
he is the only inside player we have with ANY KIND of grunt.
He stands up in tackles which is something we dont do collectively.
He is under every pack.

I really dont understand what some people are watching when they watch football.

To have a go at Bentick just outlines how out of touch supporters are with the reality of this football club.

If you had Sam Mitchell you might not need Bentick as much.

stKilda take the pressure of Harvey and Ball with a guy like Powell. Who is one tough bastard and is close to 30 years old. His body has broken down because like Bentick he is at the heart of every pack clutch.

These blokes sacrifice their bodies by being TOUGH BASTARDS doing amazing bulldoze work to make others look good.

Youre not serious when you bag him for not being silky are you??? :lol:

Its horses for courses but if you understand the role and the kid you have to appeciate AB not bag him....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:06 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
Synbad wrote:
Wangers wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Ok to all those astute football watchers that think Bentick has no place in the side... can you please tell me (dont fly off to la la land) who you would replace him in the guts with????

Thats what i wanna know...

Ok... knock me over....


I can see some posters here getting frustrated and somewhat emotional over AB, for one reason or another, just by reading some of the responses and their words.

Synners, I think he has a place in the side, but needs to be more damaging to the opposition in terms of disposal and decision making. He has talent, but is limited. Whether his place in the side is long term - this is where I'm doubting based on what I've seen thus far. If he can be half as good as Ratten, we have a winner in AB - I don't see that, though.

Other options in the centre (guts or in and under) are Smith (only just getting a go, so will need a season or two to see if he can cut it), and Blackwell (his first season, so same as Smith).

I think the MC have much to answer for my opinion on AB as his job is a difficult one and the kid needs help in the middle and further development in other parts of his game, otherwise he's very vulnerable.




Wangers i read all of that but i didnt hear who youd replace Bentick in the guts with.

also can someone give me the statistics (these statistics are not useless) of Benticks tackling before his injury and since???

Just remember he is 21 and we have no grunt.
he is the only inside player we have with ANY KIND of grunt.
He stands up in tackles which is something we dont do collectively.
He is under every pack.

I really dont understand what some people are watching when they watch football.

To have a go at Bentick just outlines how out of touch supporters are with the reality of this football club.

If you had Sam Mitchell you might not need Bentick as much.

stKilda take the pressure of Harvey and Ball with a guy like Powell. Who is one tough bastard and is close to 30 years old. His body has broken down because like Bentick he is at the heart of every pack clutch.

These blokes sacrifice their bodies by being TOUGH BASTARDS doing amazing bulldoze work to make others look good.

Youre not serious when you bag him for not being silky are you??? :lol:

Its horses for courses but if you understand the role and the kid you have to appeciate AB not bag him....


I understand his role, and you describe it to a tee. However, unlike Powell, Bentick is not damaging other teams by disposal when he's free out of the packs after being belted breaking tackles and bullocking?

I did state Smith & Blackwell as the other options, plus whoever we target in this years draft/trading period that can play this position.

I'm stating why I don't think he'll make it based on my assessment of what I've seen thus far, but of course I hope he does make it for his and the clubs' sake.

I think we'll agree to disagree on this one, Synbad. 8)

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19608
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Since when was powell damaging?

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:17 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 2665
Wangers wrote:
However, unlike Powell, Bentick is not damaging other teams by disposal when he's free out of the packs after being belted breaking tackles and bullocking?


Powell damaging :shock: ...you sure you've got the right Powell??

Wangers wrote:
I did state Smith & Blackwell as the other options, plus whoever we target in this years draft/trading period that can play this position.


I can't believe people who question Bentick's worth think that Smith is a better option!! That is akin to St Kilda saying Kosi is too injury prone let's trade him for Hartlett...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:23 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
Effes wrote:
Since when was powell damaging?


He has speed and and can hit a target. Has been good for the Aints since they picked him up in the PSD. In fact many on here were hoping we'd pick up Powell in PSD.

Answer this, is Bentick damaging in your eyes? Be honest, too!

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
showbag wrote:
Wangers wrote:
However, unlike Powell, Bentick is not damaging other teams by disposal when he's free out of the packs after being belted breaking tackles and bullocking?


Powell damaging :shock: ...you sure you've got the right Powell??

Wangers wrote:
I did state Smith & Blackwell as the other options, plus whoever we target in this years draft/trading period that can play this position.


I can't believe people who question Bentick's worth think that Smith is a better option!! That is akin to St Kilda saying Kosi is too injury prone let's trade him for Hartlett...


Between Effes and yourself, you haven't been able to articulate what Bentick brings to us, other than what Synbad has stated.

Talk about picking little pieces and scrutinising - like vultures waiting to swoop!!

And where did I say Smith was a better option? I said he's an alternative that needs to be tried there, not so much a better option. AB has had 2 years in the system, so you cannot claim that spot is AB's own particularly from what you've seen. Need to give others a go!!!

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19608
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Bentick creates paths for our midfielders, he also locks the ball in. How often do you see us tackling someone only for the ball to come loose and it be swooped away

Bentick is not very damaging. Is it his role to be damaging?

If you think Powell has good footskills then you must be watching another player. He is widely renouned for having some of the worst foot skills in the competition

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:38 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:50 pm
Posts: 809
Wangers wrote:
Effes wrote:
Since when was powell damaging?


He has speed and and can hit a target. Has been good for the Aints since they picked him up in the PSD. In fact many on here were hoping we'd pick up Powell in PSD.

Answer this, is Bentick damaging in your eyes? Be honest, too!


Hit a target, Powell?

You're having a laugh mate!

He is probably the worst left footer playing afl today, the king of the mongel, hospital floater, hence why he always looks to handball.

Tough bugger, granted.

I suggest you watch saints games a little more closely.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:09 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1651
Synbad - we're all astute judges here on TC. Does the CFC keep AB on the list indefinitely purely because he locks the ball in, creates paths for others, locks the opposition up with his tackles?

What do we do about his lack of leg speed, slow release of the footy from hand to foot, lack of penetration in his kicking? He will only ever be a plodder who with hard work may improve his kicking and may learn to position himself better to cover for his lack of pace and become a handy player on the list rated at 25-30 (a Graham Whitnall/Alan Mangels type). Mind you he's been in the system now for 3 years and he hasn't improved in these areas and in fact looked more likely in his first year.

Who do we put into the team in his place? God only knows because we ain't exactly overflowing with Judd-esque footballers. But here's my pick - Blackwell, Jackson (should of been elevated) and why not try Butch Edwards kid in the middle - what do we have to lose?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:15 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Rod Waddell wrote:
Synbad - we're all astute judges here on TC. Does the CFC keep AB on the list indefinitely purely because he locks the ball in, creates paths for others, locks the opposition up with his tackles?

What do we do about his lack of leg speed, slow release of the footy from hand to foot, lack of penetration in his kicking? He will only ever be a plodder who with hard work may improve his kicking and may learn to position himself better to cover for his lack of pace and become a handy player on the list rated at 25-30 (a Graham Whitnall/Alan Mangels type). Mind you he's been in the system now for 3 years and he hasn't improved in these areas and in fact looked more likely in his first year.

Who do we put into the team in his place? God only knows because we ain't exactly overflowing with Judd-esque footballers. But here's my pick - Blackwell, Jackson (should of been elevated) and why not try Butch Edwards kid in the middle - what do we have to lose?


Like the Carlton football club its one step at a time... isnt it???

Bentick is invaluable to this footy side right now.
firstly cos he cops all the crashes and takes the heat away from the others in THE GUTS...

when and if we find players that can do that role better you then consider making a call.. till then.. youre dreaming if you think we should deli9st him cos he aint silky!!!...


Its laughable how some of you think.

and Wangers if you think Powell is damaging with his footskills and run... (or ever was) you just showed yourself up as someone who doesnt have a clue on Bentick.. on Powell and on footy..

Its checkmate!!!

Sorry.. but youre the one opening yourself up to ridicule (because Bentick isnt silky for you)

again to you and Rod Waddell.

Please tell me who you would replace Bentick with TODAY if he is delisted...???

Go on....

Like i said earlier.. im happy to be floored by your footy nouse... :wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bookie, Cazzesman, GMCbris and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group