Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 10:16 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 633 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 32  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:03 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Head Plant wrote:
Not necessarily inconsistent A team which just won the premiership could instead have been penalised maybe 2 additional first round picks in subsequent years.


They could, but the thought probably would not have occurred to them. I think the fact that they allowed us to draft Walker hints that there may have been a chance to catch them out if the whole thing was scrutinised.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:17 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Siegfried wrote:
Apparently there's a kid called GibbSenBerger??


Kid?? :shock: :shock:

Here I was thinking that they came of a production line with the words "may need stretching" printed on them? :?

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:23 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:15 am
Posts: 1196
Location: Terra Australis
the board is more like a twisted plank

_________________
Ich bein ein Carltonian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:42 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 12:02 pm
Posts: 53
Location: australia
I told you all this was going to happen 3 months ago. If you can recall my inside information post...

_________________
delist the whole carlton list


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
Yeah Rashee.........

that's right i remember receiving that..............!

i think Dee Boy gave it to me............yeah yeah.....Dee Boy
gave it to me........!


kindest regards tommi

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:38 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4629
Headplant wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
Had any other club been penalised that year it would have only cost them their first, second pick etc. not a priority pick and the AFL decided to award the priority pick the next year which is inconsistant.


Not necessarily inconsistent A team which just won the premiership could instead have been penalised maybe 2 additional first round picks in subsequent years.


What we could and did say back then was that it was far more severe than the penalties handed to Essendon* for similar offences.



Happened didn't it...with Melbourne and Gutnik dobbing themselves in...? a) he didn't get any slack...they lost two rounds....BUT they had just played in a Grannie so lost pick 17 and 34...or similiar....

Or did I dream that???

We lost our picks at the worse possible time and shouldn't have lost the PP.

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:49 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
rash wrote:
I told you all this was going to happen 3 months ago. If you can recall my inside information post...


very interesting rash, you called this from a very long way out. I went over the thread just now

just focusing on the argument it is clear cut that Carlton has an EXTREMELY strong case. That's pretty obvious.

What is also obvious is that we have a board and club administration clearly in tatters and focussing on farcical issues when they should have all their energies and attention focussed on list management and recruitment issues which this clearly covers.

The pieces are in place
- two successive wooden spoons
- extraordinarily bad success rate in that period @ 18%
- club teetering on total collapse if not for AFL underwriting. On-field success a certain stimulus to turn this around
- improving our list the only way to achieve this
- with us finishing last it doesn't compromise the scum by having us pick before them
- the fallout wouldn't be as bad as people think because essentially it was a game in 2005, when these rules were not in existence that is denying us a PP. It is not unreasonable for the AFL to rule in our favour. It is unreasonable to have us denied this pick when the pros and cons are weighed up

The thing that will f#^k this up is our pathetic incumbents :evil:

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:39 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 760
Location: Noble Park, Vic
marciblue wrote:
rash wrote:
I told you all this was going to happen 3 months ago. If you can recall my inside information post...


very interesting rash, you called this from a very long way out. I went over the thread just now

just focusing on the argument it is clear cut that Carlton has an EXTREMELY strong case. That's pretty obvious.

What is also obvious is that we have a board and club administration clearly in tatters and focussing on farcical issues when they should have all their energies and attention focussed on list management and recruitment issues which this clearly covers.

The pieces are in place
- two successive wooden spoons
- extraordinarily bad success rate in that period @ 18%
- club teetering on total collapse if not for AFL underwriting. On-field success a certain stimulus to turn this around
- improving our list the only way to achieve this
- with us finishing last it doesn't compromise the scum by having us pick before them
- the fallout wouldn't be as bad as people think because essentially it was a game in 2005, when these rules were not in existence that is denying us a PP. It is not unreasonable for the AFL to rule in our favour. It is unreasonable to have us denied this pick when the pros and cons are weighed up

The thing that will f#^k this up is our pathetic incumbents :evil:




But ....... this all started with ......

Synbad wrote:
The board is currently looking into seeing if it can take the AFL to court and reclaim the lost Goddard pick... which it believes the AFL stole from us...

I kid you not...



:?


Its all just getting too confusing !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:54 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:24 am
Posts: 1217
Location: Melbourne
But what would the remedy be?

Sure - let's assume that the AFL got it wrong - what would we get -

1.damages? How would you quantify that?
2.Another pick this year? I think that there will be all sorts of objection to that.
3.A Priority pick before the first round? There is no basis for suggesting that the decision in an earlier year is remedied by changing this years order?
4.An increase in the salary cap? We have no money, so that's not going to help.

So, what's the purpose?

_________________
"Two roads diverged in a wood,
and I,
I took the one less travelled by,
and that has made all the difference."

Robert Frost


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:22 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34572
Location: The Brown Wedge
The Vet wrote:
But what would the remedy be?

Sure - let's assume that the AFL got it wrong - what would we get -

1.damages? How would you quantify that?
2.Another pick this year? I think that there will be all sorts of objection to that.
3.A Priority pick before the first round? There is no basis for suggesting that the decision in an earlier year is remedied by changing this years order?
4.An increase in the salary cap? We have no money, so that's not going to help.

So, what's the purpose?


Demetriou "Priority pick#1, Carlton"
Hughsey - "Bryce Gibbs"
Demetriou - "Pick#1, Carlton"
Hughsey - "Lachlan Hansen"


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:58 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 2665
Mate the way we are going ...

Demetriou "Priority pick#1, Carlton"
Hughsey - "Michael Gardiner"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:14 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
I just cannot see the AFL giving us another pick this year. Especially seieng as though it is the Draft-of-the-century or whatever they're calling it!

15 other clubs out there would be furious if they gave us another pick, and they would have every right to be furious.

Could you imagine if we finsished 15th? And weeks before the draft the AFL gave Essendon* (for whatever reason may be) a PP at pick two giving them the opportunity at both Gibbs & Hansen........................MAN, I'd be flower pissed!

Wont happen. AFL are a pack of cauliflower that are screwing this game and our club into the ground! One day, they are gonna regret that! Seriously some things that Demetriou is doing are boardaring on 'Dictatorship'!

If this is true, and we are takin them to court, then i would be pushing heavily for our $1million (+ damages) back. They can keep their pick.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:18 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
ryan, we didn't finish 15th so it is pointless to the whole issue

However strong the validity is of Carlton seeking compensation for the draft penalties of 2002 is absolutely irrelevant AFAIC. We are 4 years to late to contest and seek litigation on this matter. It is dead and buried now. If there is any legs on this then our board is plain f#@ked!

Collo put his position as CEO of TD before what was best for Carlton in 2002 by refusing to contest and defend the clubs position against the brutal penalties. He decided that to achieve his objective of getting Carlton across to TD he would allow our club to be bent over and sodomised by the AFL. I was for our relocation but not at the cost of having our decisions as a club compromised by the greed and self-serving goals of Collo. So when Collo chose to essentialy not respond in the manner he did back then our moment to make a stand against the penalties passed. It is too late now.

The issue now, at present, that is confronting our club as we type and speak is the ridiculous, unreasonable burden that our club has to endure by the changes to the priority pick rules when we so clearly need this sort of draft assistance and rightfully so. I have raised the issues pertaining to my stance in previous posts but if this bunch of dropkicks we call a board are capable of doing anything remotely right then the issue they should be confronting is the unwarranted burden placed on our club by these rule changes. No deviations allowed.

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:18 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 940
ryan2000 wrote:
If this is true, and we are takin them to court, then i would be pushing heavily for our $1million (+ damages) back. They can keep their pick.


Ryan - are you serious about that?

You would prefer us to have $1mil over a first round priority pick?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:22 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
titimus wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
If this is true, and we are takin them to court, then i would be pushing heavily for our $1million (+ damages) back. They can keep their pick.


Ryan - are you serious about that?

You would prefer us to have $1mil over a first round priority pick?


Can you believe that? $1 million dollars is chook feed in todays game for God's sake!!!! Top draft picks are essentialy priceless because they can deliver you the players you need to deliver the ultimate - a premiership. But go for the mill, we wont even see it anyway because it will just go towards paying our interest bill... :roll:

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:29 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
titimus wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
If this is true, and we are takin them to court, then i would be pushing heavily for our $1million (+ damages) back. They can keep their pick.


Ryan - are you serious about that?

You would prefer us to have $1mil over a first round priority pick?


No..........hell no...............i'd love Gibbs/Hansen combo at Carlton. Who wouldn't!!!!!!!!!!

But just remember, this is the AFL we're talking about. And more importantly Andrew Demitriou.

I just see a financial compensation more of a probability than i do another pick.

The AFL is never wrong. Hellyou can be fined upwards of $20,000 if you even suggest it these days.

That's all i'm saying. That IF we are seeking legal action, that a financial compensation of our $1million fine + damages and legal fees would probably be all we could get out of the AFL.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:42 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Wangers wrote:
True GWS, and I hope you're theory is correct - but as we all know the communist AFL .........


BWAH HA HA HA HA. You have got to be kidding! The AFL is the ultimate in consumerist capitalism. Ensure that every punter thinks his team has a chance (at least once every 16 years), homogeneity, all run by a commission (bit like the 5 "families" in New York).

Nah. Communism? You gotta read some more Marx, mate. But throw out Groucho and try Karl.... :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:53 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 56
.

_________________
In other news.. Melbourne has stepped up its Bid for Whitnall.. offering a 2nd round pick and it's promise to Whitnall to offer him a spot up forward with a Mega box of Krispy Kremes!


Last edited by BlueBlood-101- on Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:54 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 56
Effes wrote:
jim wrote:
As for Goddard, soft outside player, who never has an opponent, and picks up easy kicks.


Utter tripe

He hurts the opposition with his disposal and provides a link through the midfield

If he was at Carlton he would start in the centre square


Effes young buddy i'd say your talking utter tripe!

Goddard is a GOOD player, not a champion!

Yeh so i suppose you would put him up there with established stars and up and coming superstars like Pavlich, Hodge, our Up and comer Murphy, Riewoldt, Deledio, Buddy Franklin, CHRIS JUDD!

Yeh Goddard is the true reflection of a No.1 pick! :roll:

_________________
In other news.. Melbourne has stepped up its Bid for Whitnall.. offering a 2nd round pick and it's promise to Whitnall to offer him a spot up forward with a Mega box of Krispy Kremes!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:56 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:31 am
Posts: 317
Location: At the Coalface.
Gee I hope your right GWS. That would make my year.

However there is an old saying that if it's a choice between a conspiracy theory and a f**k up, it is most likely a f**k up.

Wouldn't it send a dangerous precedent for every other AFL club?

_________________
Working alone. At the coalface. Scott's gone for lunch! Said he would be back in 30 mins.


Last edited by Shakin77 on Mon Sep 11, 2006 12:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 633 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 32  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group