The Duke wrote:
Speakers wrote:
I don't know why Carlton people keep defending the club. We're a shambles.
How can the vote go from 7-3 to 0-10 in an instant? Surely Mitchell's presentation wasn't that bad?
This Board is divided, it leaks, it lacks guts, and it keeps changing it's mind (which shows it doesn't understand football and/or is compromised, take your pick).
Forgive me if this has been confirmed elsewhere but where did you find out that it was 3 - 7 then 10 - 0 and when you say an instant, what do you mean? Like 30 seconds, 10 minutes, 2 hours

?? I have no idea as I was not there, were you??
Duke, don't let the facts get in the way of a good story....
If the Board voted 7-3 to sack PAgam...."Resolution passed...next item on the Agenda"
There are three things
1) what was "gumma" happen
2) what actually happened
3) What the press/Rumours/internet says happened.
TFrighteningly they areprobably mutually exclusive.
My big beef is the fact that all of this crap was "allowed" to be thrown around....
Yes...board leaks
.....calling the press for a 7pm press conference and then showing up at 11...(can you imagine the stories that were 'generated' just in that time?)..."interviewing" Mitchell with evryone knowing...etc etc...
Fundamental management just lost....
You have a message, you enunciate that message in the clearest possible terms, you act in a way that shows support for that message!
(Can't see any of this occurring)