Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 9:28 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 633 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 32  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 5:28 pm
Posts: 23
Location: Terror Lake
Does the fact that we'd traded away one of the subsequently stripped picks (in exchange for Barnaby French) before the penalties were imposed have any relevance to the oddity of losing the 2002PP but not the 2003PP?

_________________
"...... I think he's talking to you...."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:10 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 6154
How can 18 equate to destitute?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:13 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 6154
Tap...tap...tap...tap...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:47 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:20 am
Posts: 8172
Location: PMQ
What did we lose out on.....Goddard? a player who has no real position? and Wells? a player who in the last year might as well have been playing for the bumphuc 2nds....yeah, would have ben nice to add BJ to the list, but @#$%&! it....we got better with simmo anyway.

im over it.

_________________
Back like a raging case of pubic lice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:54 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
its not so much what we have lost bnz, but what we could gain... think about it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:10 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
Do we expect this to go through the AFL / or through the courts in time for this year's draft?

That's some sort of speed involved.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:27 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24663
Location: Kaloyasena
Wild Blue Yonder wrote:
Do we expect this to go through the AFL / or through the courts in time for this year's draft?

That's some sort of speed involved.



As I mentioned before - the AFL Commission left it as late as the night before the 2002 National Draft to @#$%&! us up the arse right royally.

Their is PLENTY of time to re-adjust the draft in order to assist us.

And if I hear any @#$%&! bullshit from "The Spew" about prejudicial to the Draft etc - tell that to Richmond who traded away Pick 4 in the 2002 National Draft and it ended up being Pick 2.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:58 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
sticksaftersiren87 wrote:
we cheated, we got punished (yes severely, but it wasn't our first breach), get over it.


I aggree!

We needed to be punished, and we were!

No Doubt we were punished way to hard and the AFL IMHO are regretting it somewhat now, but let's move on.

I'm just happy that we managed to get Simpson out of that draft.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:52 pm
Posts: 1857
HomerThompson wrote:
Does the fact that we'd traded away one of the subsequently stripped picks (in exchange for Barnaby French) before the penalties were imposed have any relevance to the oddity of losing the 2002PP but not the 2003PP?


Good question, anyone know the answer?

Remember reading somewhere (bigfooty :P ) that we were to lose the picks but because we traded one of them, our priority pick got taken off instead.

Any confirmation?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 4:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
That sounds a bit spiteful; given that (I don't believe) the penalties had been properly imposed at the time.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25749
Location: Bondi Beach
Ryan wrote

Quote:
We needed to be punished, and we were!

No Doubt we were punished way to hard and the AFL IMHO are regretting it somewhat now, but let's move on.


OK Ryan, so we got punished and the AFL (as does everybody else) punished as, regretably too harsh. So here we may have a chance to salvage something, and maybe, just maybe, if you're right about the way the AFL feel about their unprecedented decision to sink us, then we have a chance for them to agree that they had made a mistake.

So, if we have a chance to snag Gibbs and Hansen/ Gumbleton we should forget about it?

It's like walking away from something that takes a lifetime to achieve, like receiving $1M Ryan, when all it may just need to get it is a bit of effort. You'd walk away?

Look it's all about values. Doesn't matter what you value such as principle, player or money, it's what are your values that count; to want to be an achiever or a receiver. Do you value something more that you have to earn or receive for free? Reward for effort is what I'm eluding to.

If you value something that is achievable, you'd be foolish or weak or %$%**)& to not make a short term effort to get it.

We'll have a few wins if we get the PP. Pride, admission from the AFL that we were harshly dealt with, hence our current position (deflects from our own stuff ups), gives us our just reward in obtaining Hansen/ Gumbleton. This move helps us fast forward our progress, their is light, the supporters rally and feel vindicated, the sponsors follow the masses, the story, the hysteria....then next you know we're winning 2 games in a row, then 3, then in a couple of years, rather than 10 years we are back in the top half with a bunch of kids with a decade in front of them.

We've got nothing to lose if its our pride that we're fighting for, that's a good thing. Win or lose we have won. If we lose and whilst the opposition will be glad to see us lose again, they will feel even stronger in their beliefs that the AFL Commission has far to much brutal dictatorial power for their liking. From that they will forever remember the AFL's harsh punishment of CFC, rather than our own failure in the past and in the present. People usually remember the last thing that happened in a period of perpetual conroversy/ events; like our 5 year F%%* up.

It's a defelection.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
I don't get it to be honest.

Why now?

It makes me feel we're like the dero in the back alley begging for scraps. :|

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 9:02 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 11:00 am
Posts: 449
bnz wrote:
What did we lose out on.....Goddard? a player who has no real position? and Wells? a player who in the last year might as well have been playing for the bumphuc 2nds....yeah, would have ben nice to add BJ to the list, but F@%&#! it....we got better with simmo anyway.

im over it.



We also lost out on Brock McLean and a lot more picks in first/second round. We got right royaly [REDACTED]!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:31 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
so what is actually going on?

are we asking for the PP we should have got in 02?

or

are we asking for the PP we should get this year?

or

are we asking for both?

that wodul be awesome.

Pick 1, 2 & 3 :shock:

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:37 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
ScottSaunders wrote:
so what is actually going on?

are we asking for the PP we should have got in 02?

or

are we asking for the PP we should get this year?

or

are we asking for both?

that wodul be awesome.

Pick 1, 2 & 3 :shock:


and we could even argue for the 1st round pick we lost in 02 with which north picked up wells and also the first round pick we lost in 03 which went to melbourne who picked up brock mclean and then we could have pick 1,2,3,4 AND 5!

no i wish but as far as i understand it we're making a case for the PP we lost in 2002 which st kilda used on goddard.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:58 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 3:23 pm
Posts: 210
Location: TC>TBV
i thought we're chasing to upgrade our PP pick from 17 to 1 (before the draft)....thought the board were trying to get the AFL to reverse the PP decision they made this year regarding winning no more than 4 games in 2 consecutive years to receive the pick earlier.

_________________
All at Carlton are Equal, Except some are More Equal than others


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 12:00 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
brad2311 wrote:
i thought we're chasing to upgrade our PP pick from 17 to 1 (before the draft)....thought the board were trying to get the AFL to reverse the PP decision they made this year regarding winning no more than 4 games in 2 consecutive years to receive the pick earlier.


that sounds more logical and initially i thought that too but i'm pretty sure it's to do with the 2002 one being taken away from us. i may be wrong.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 12:06 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
aghhhhh @#$%&!.
what the @#$%&! have we become.
we cheated we got caught we got made an example of.
give it up. it would be great to have another pick, but its not going to happen.
the afl is a well structured money making machine, we have no chance in hell. @#$%&! close this thread down.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 12:24 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14751
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
dane wrote:
aghhhhh F@%&#!.
what the F@%&#! have we become.
we cheated we got caught we got made an example of.
give it up. it would be great to have another pick, but its not going to happen.
the afl is a well structured money making machine, we have no chance in hell. F@%&#! close this thread down.


Alright, thanks for sorting that then..

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 1:48 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
dane wrote:
aghhhhh F@%&#!.
what the F@%&#! have we become.
we cheated we got caught we got made an example of.
give it up. it would be great to have another pick, but its not going to happen.
the afl is a well structured money making machine, we have no chance in hell. F@%&#! close this thread down.


My thoughts exactly!

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 633 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 32  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Humpers and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group