Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 7:50 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 633 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 32  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:35 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2173
Location: East Melbourne
TheGame wrote:
marciblue wrote:
TheGame wrote:
Synbad wrote:
As for the priority pick.. we will now ask the AFL for it again............ :shock: :roll:


We're going to say 'pretty please with a cherry on top' this time. :wink:


Why is the issue of the PP one that you treat with such scorn? I just dont understand why you think it matters so little. Do you think we deserve what's ended up happening out of all this?


The draft penalties should have been contested immediately after they were handed out. I said at the time when we accepted the dosh from the AFL we might as well hand in the keys and we have. We were not allowed to sack our own coach. You're dreaming if you think we can fight the AFL now. There are bigger issues than the PP and that is throwing out this entire board. They know they are on their way out and trying to get the PP is their last ditch effort like Jack with Pagan.

I agree that we should have contested the change in rules for the PP when they were made. It is too late now. Let's just drop it before we embarrass ourselves further.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:44 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
steve wrote:
I think the AFL was right to tighten up the PP rules, Collingwood getting one last year was a complete farce.

However, I think the AFL deliberately changed the rules to preclude any club from qualifying this year to stop any whinging from other clubs if only one or two had a chance to qualify this year.

In hindsight, considering our situation, this is grossly unfair. But we have buckley's chance of the AFL changing it. Our best bet would be for Smorgon to write to every other club and plead our case, and ask them (each CEO and President) to sign a petition to the AFL to support us getting the PP from 17 moved to 2. If we got close to a consensus we'd at least stand a small chance.


Like your work Steve....but writing to every other club to plead our case????....and for this draft......more chance of winning tattslotto I would suggest....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:09 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24663
Location: Kaloyasena
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
steve wrote:
I think the AFL was right to tighten up the PP rules, Collingwood getting one last year was a complete farce.

However, I think the AFL deliberately changed the rules to preclude any club from qualifying this year to stop any whinging from other clubs if only one or two had a chance to qualify this year.

In hindsight, considering our situation, this is grossly unfair. But we have buckley's chance of the AFL changing it. Our best bet would be for Smorgon to write to every other club and plead our case, and ask them (each CEO and President) to sign a petition to the AFL to support us getting the PP from 17 moved to 2. If we got close to a consensus we'd at least stand a small chance.


Like your work Steve....but writing to every other club to plead our case????....and for this draft......more chance of winning tattslotto I would suggest....



And the winning numbers are ................. :cry:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:50 pm 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7562
Location: NowHere.....
Quote:
What came first lentil soup or envelops.????


Thrylos beat me to fuko!

But wait theres more Foki! (seal)

flower, fako, fakelo, foki the founders of the word @#$%&!!

Ps the board has no balls :cry:

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:44 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4639
Location: lygon street
surely there has to be some angle on the fact that to gain pre round 1 priority pick you have to have had 16 points or less for consecutive years which is a total of 32 points over two seasons. well in the past 2 seasons we have won 32 points. the spew is an absolute c#$%. f#$% him and the AFL. whilst we are doing a pretty good job of killing ourselves, the AFL are certainly more than happy to aid the demise.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:13 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
SurreyBlue wrote:
steve wrote:
Our best bet would be for Smorgon to write to every other club and plead our case, and ask them (each CEO and President) to sign a petition to the AFL to support us getting the PP from 17 moved to 2. If we got close to a consensus we'd at least stand a small chance.


Steve, these are the same people who enforced the AFL in 2002 to go hard, these are the same people who danced on our grave and are circling now around our carcus. :evil: Sorry mate, Ain't going to happen.


Do you mean carcass or circus. I've tried them both and they both make a valid sentence....... :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:38 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:49 am
Posts: 315
Location: South Melbourne
How about a tactic like this....

Smorgon : Can we have our 2002 PP back please Andrew?
Jabba: No
Smorgon : Fine then, deal with Fraser Brown's mob in 2007 coz I'll be voted out unless I deliver it.
Jabba : OK then, good point - it's yours.

I know this is simplifying things, but Jabba is a very political being & with the enemy of my enemy being my friend & all that, I tihnk he'd rather keep dealing with Smorgon rather than Brown.

_________________
From little things, big things grow - Paul Kelly (The singer, not the Swan)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:43 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24663
Location: Kaloyasena
Harmes37 wrote:
but Jabba is a very political being.



No "The Spew" is just a cauliflower. :roll:


But if the tactic works go for it. :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:46 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:15 am
Posts: 1196
Location: Terra Australis
Jabba is imune to the force.

_________________
Ich bein ein Carltonian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:59 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:39 pm
Posts: 487
Evans is as much Essendon* as Mcguire is Collingwood.

The only way is legal action.

_________________
"Davies could eventually become a player of Judd's ability" - Paganite03 Click here to see for yourself!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 5:09 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10654
Carlton God wrote:
Evans is as much Essendon* as Mcguire is Collingwood.

The only way is legal action.


Agree. Fitzpatrick obviously can't get the deal done so lets move it on.
Could be the best money the AFL have invested in. :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 5:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18793
Location: threeohfivethree
SurreyBlue wrote:
Agree. Fitzpatrick obviously can't get the deal done so lets move it on.


It's a problem isn't it?

When you get one of your people onto the AFL commission it would make more sense to put one of your corrupt ones on there rather than an honest bloke like Mike.

We should have shunted Elliott in there years ago. It'd probably be the Carlton Football League by now if we had. :lol:

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:47 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
I want Gibbs plus another top 5 pick. The board needs to show some real cojones.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:29 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
Take the bastards to court if we have to get what is rightfully ours and the pay off is there if we succeed.

If they really want to get re-elected and their legal advice tells them they can win, then Smorgon, et al should cough up the bikkies needed to take this further. But I doubt we'll do it because they didn't have the balls to trade Whitnall when we had the chance to bring another quality young player into the club.

And the Hawks might get Hansen, Thornton cheaply and another young player for Everitt. :evil:

Weak efforts and we're going backwards at 100 miles an hour.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:32 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
The case sheet probably says 'arguable' - legal speak for you have a case. Doesn't mean you will win.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25745
Location: Bondi Beach
Then it's worth a shot!!

Arguable = you have a case. There is no precedence. But the devil is in the detail. However there may have been an oversight as far as the AFL is concerened and that may imply that Carlton does have a case.

What was stipulated in writing?
Was the PP just taken away, or was it categorically stipulated?
Was it again stipulated when we got Walker as a PP?

We don't know, but I'm sure that Carlton's Counsel have uncovered the gap. If Councel are confident in a win go for it, if they are confident and we lose, then don't pay them for their services.

I want Gibbs and Berger. Berger and Hansen would do me fine too, as would Berger and Gumbleton...Selwood, Sellars...2 top 10's will make a significant impact to the resurgency of the Blues.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:01 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
take the cauliflower to the cleaners.

pick 1, pick 2 - we trade throton for pick 6

christ - i would near wet myself.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:04 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I've disagreed with people's posts on timing and cost, but we seemingly come from different viewpoints and experience...

But there is no way known that this would get resolved prior to this year's draft. There is no way possible to conclude this before then, assuming success.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:06 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24663
Location: Kaloyasena
molsey wrote:
I've disagreed with people's posts on timing and cost, but we seemingly come from different viewpoints and experience...

But there is no way known that this would get resolved prior to this year's draft. There is no way possible to conclude this before then, assuming success.



We have got until 2.00am of the morning of the National Draft to do this thing - as that is as late as the AFL have changed the draft order to suit themselves - they can always change it this late again. :evil:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Draft pick
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:14 pm
Posts: 16
Location: Upton Park
Although it is an absolute bolter longshot has there been any movement on this draft pick issue?

Has Barry Mitchell been reappointed or moved on?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 633 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 32  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CFC8795, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group