Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 8:48 am

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 34 of 61
  [ 1219 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ... 61  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
AGRO
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:52 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24930
Location: Kaloyasena
born in 72 wrote:
Whilst we are all blinded by the talent at the top end of this draft (and why wouldn't we be), the strength of this draft is in the depth. I would seriously consider two second rounders (both under pick 30) for Thornton. This allows Hawthorn to save face with their supporters, whilst we end up with 6 picks in the first 35 of what is possibly the strongest draft ever. Remember most experts believe second round picks this year are equal to first round picks from previous years.



PICK 2 PICK 2 PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK2


PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Last edited by AGRO on Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
GWS
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:55 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 19784
Location: threeohfivethree
AGRO wrote:
born in 72 wrote:
Whilst we are all blinded by the talent at the top end of this draft (and why wouldn't we be), the strength of this draft is in the depth. I would seriously consider two second rounders (both under pick 30) for Thornton. This allows Hawthorn to save face with their supporters, whilst we end up with 6 picks in the first 35 of what is possibly the strongest draft ever. Remember most experts believe second round picks this year are equal to first round picks from previous years.



PICK 6 PICK 6 PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6


PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6

PICK 6 PICK 6


Agro - pick 6 is what we'd settle for. When you talk it up you need to go for more.

Try it like this:

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

PICK 2 PICK 2

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb
Top
 Profile  
 
frank dardew
 Post subject: Agree Molly
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:56 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
In fact we should say to Hawthorn we wont deal with them unless they better everyone elses offer which must be a first round pick at least otherwise pre-season draft - why not say to Melbourne if you give us first round pick and ferguson/wheatley or a late pick you have got him or say to the dogs first round pick and faulkner/birss or alate pick you have him -tell richmond that first pick and something else may snare him even better tell Brisbane
These over the top deals are what we should be trying to do and you never know someone may get stupid -North did over Hay -geelong did over OTTENS
Top
 Profile  
 
AIRCAV
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:58 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 1:26 am
Posts: 8046
Location: Melbourne
Its official. We are a Joke!

The bloke has been holding up a KPP with a non-KPP body. You think we've been flogged in 2205/2006? So woopee do, we get Pick 6 (in our wildest dreams I might add). Which even if it was a KPP and will take 3 years if one to develop. We just gave the hawks a premiership player, mark my words.

And in the mean time we throw in another 3rd ranked defender against a Hall or Tredrea.

My club is a disgrace.

_________________
Everything before the word "but" is horseshit - J Snow
Top
 Profile  
 
GWS
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 19784
Location: threeohfivethree
AIRCAV wrote:
Its official. We are a Joke!

The bloke has been holding up a KPP with a non-KPP body. You think we've been flogged in 2205/2006? So woopee do, we get Pick 6 (in our wildest dreams I might add). Which even if it was a KPP and will take 3 years if one to develop. We just gave the hawks a premiership player, mark my words.

And in the mean time we throw in another 3rd ranked defender against a Hall or Tredrea.

My club is a disgrace.


Can always count on you AIRCAV... :lol:

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb
Top
 Profile  
 
Wild Blue Yonder
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:00 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
He was no good against those players anyway Cav.


Just got to turn average into extraordinary in the deal and I'm stoked.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...
Top
 Profile  
 
Molly
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:03 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
The other big question is:

where's Sybad? Doesn't look like he's been on-line today...

C'mon Synners, why did TBird decide to leave? Is it because of the coach? Was it because of the money? Is it because he has mates at Hawthorn? Or did we not make much of an effort to keep him?
Top
 Profile  
 
steve
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:03 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
AIRCAV wrote:
Its official. We are a Joke!

The bloke has been holding up a KPP with a non-KPP body. You think we've been flogged in 2205/2006? So woopee do, we get Pick 6 (in our wildest dreams I might add). Which even if it was a KPP and will take 3 years if one to develop. We just gave the hawks a premiership player, mark my words.

And in the mean time we throw in another 3rd ranked defender against a Hall or Tredrea.

My club is a disgrace.


Look on the bright side, it means Setanta will get a full season in the firsts, Flint will be promoted and we'll be a step closer to picks 1 and 2 in the 2007 draft ;)
Top
 Profile  
 
DocSherrin III
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:04 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17577
I think a more relevent question here is can this thread get more posts on it than the 'Bryce Gibbs' thread.

I'm betting it will slow down in the 50's - then rise again once merged with the 'Dogs target Thornton' thread next week.

Bryce Gibbs - 3/1

Thornton thread - 7/1

great odds at 7's and I'd take those early before they come right in on the back of the afformentioned merged thread.
Top
 Profile  
 
club29
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:04 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9122
Location: Nth Fitzroy
The article states that Carlton have offered Thornton what the hawks offered and money has nothing to do with it. That means if a suitable trade does not come up we can pick him up with the first pick in the psd.
This means we hold the upper hand. Surely Thornton + 19 can net us pick 6. If it doesn’t then at the end of trade week we tell Bett we are going to pick him up in the pre season draft (we have already matched his asking price). He then signs with us before the PSD knowing he is coming anyway. If he brings a bad attitude then play him in the rezziez.

I think we have done quite well really. The club and the board is showing some balls.

This deal is going according to plan.
Top
 Profile  
 
Wangers
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:05 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
Let's play the Dawks tactics - two 1st round picks, and let's work from there. Thornton has been a superior defender for a poor side - he has plenty of value, otherwise, @#$%&! off dawks if your not willing to come to the party. This is the same club that want a first round pick for a 33 year old, yet for a player with 8 to 10 years in him aren't willing to part with their first rounder - what a joke of a club are the dawks.

Let the bidding start - don't underestimate the value of Thornton.

The Dawks have that flower Pelchen dealing with list management - the guy that let Stevens go from Port for nothing - funny that, Port moved him on - wonder if it was for that reason?

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!
Top
 Profile  
 
bondiblue
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26793
Location: Bondi Beach
Shit, what have I done.

I was on another post when I received a PM...I had this inkling that I started something stupid.

NO there is nothing cryptic...........there's no news on the PP...

I'm not the cryptic type....spider is.

The point is we lose Thornton, doesn't mean that the AFL is going to continue to screw Carlton by not allowing us to replace him ON THE FIELD.

ie we will still be allowed to field 18 players, just like all the other teams.

Thornton goes, another steps up; that's life:

Setanta (who would have thought he would be our #1 backman)
Bower (this is the year you make a name for yourself son)
Waite (can you stand up...keep your feet... as a CHB?)

.......Hartlett (take your chance as Thornton did)

.......Flint (might be elevated)

.......Pick #1 Hansen? (better than Thornton)

......Pick #6 (better than Thronton?)

......Saddington? (could he?)

.....McGregor? (might we?)

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue
Top
 Profile  
 
bluehammer
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20717
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
I think a more relevent question here is can this thread get more posts on it than the 'Bryce Gibbs' thread.

I'm betting it will slow down in the 50's - then rise again once merged with the 'Dogs target Thornton' thread next week.

Bryce Gibbs - 3/1

Thornton thread - 7/1

great odds at 7's and I'd take those early before they come right in on the back of the afformentioned merged thread.


I think Thornton is Palestinian.

There. Should crank it up to 100 pages by tonight.

_________________
Congratulations CK95
Top
 Profile  
 
steve
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
bondiblue wrote:
Shit, what have I done.

I was on another post when I received a PM...I had this inkling that I started something stupid.

NO there is nothing cryptic...........there's no news on the PP...

I'm not the cryptic type....spider is.

The point is we lose Thornton, doesn't mean that the AFL is going to continue to screw Carlton by not allowing us to replace him ON THE FIELD.

ie we will still be allowed to field 18 players, just like all the other teams.

Thornton goes, another steps up; that's life:

Setanta (who would have thought he would be our #1 backman)
Bower (this is the year you make a name for yourself son)
Waite (can you stand up...keep your feet... as a CHB?)

.......Hartlett (take your chance as Thornton did)

.......Flint (might be elevated)

.......Pick #1 Hansen? (better than Thornton)

......Pick #6 (better than Thronton?)

......Saddington? (could he?)


Great post Bondi, really enjoyed reading the "waht if's" :)
.....McGregor? (might we?)
Top
 Profile  
 
Elwood Blues1
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:14 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
GWS wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
Everyone on this site, and every other carlton site, must maintain that he is worth a pick 6.

It's our responsibility to flood the market with his worth.


More than that.

I can't believe how people are writing down his value suddenly.

How can you be devastated that he's going and in the same post suggest we're unlikely to receive a first round pick for him?

You can't have it both ways but there are many in here who are.

I think Thornton is an excellent second or third defender in a good side. That's worth something decent.

Yes this is meant to be a superdraft but don't underestimate the value of a known quantity.

We should be asking for a top 10 pick and then some. Pick 6 would be a minimum.

Hawthorn are currently asking Sydney for their first and second round pick for a bloke who might have two years of football left in him and is a bit of a flower. This is a bloke whose character Sydney rate so highly they had to check with their senior players that it'd be okay to pick him up.

Pick 6 would be the least I'd accept but I'd also consider say 12 and 24. If the Hawks want him they can deal with the Dees and trade someone for pick 12. Same goes for any other club.

Talk it up fellas...talk it up. :wink:


Swans think they can win a flag with Everitt thats why he is worth a bit more to them and they are prepared to pay above market value....even for a flower...
Thornton must have been approached months ago....I think Chris Pelchen is a good operator and has been working behind the scenes luring Thornton....we should be doing the same.......

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen
Top
 Profile  
 
TruBlueBrad
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28541
Location: Free Beer!!
I still think its a money thing. His manager is trying to avoid making Thornton look greedy.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010
Top
 Profile  
 
bigyellowjoint
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:16 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:29 am
Posts: 74
Location: The Banana Stand
Club is bigger than the player. I say we sit on our hands till the trade period finishes, offer him whatever, and if he doesn't accept then we pick him up in the PSD.

This way players will know not to f@#$% with us in the future. Let Carlton be Alcatraz and the players be inmates. Put our foot down now before they all go Shawshank on us and screw us over.


JuzzCarlton, passers by are unbelievably sickened by this image of gratuitous behaviour. What product are they selling again? Put me down for five.
Image

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw60JKnwy2g
Top
 Profile  
 
bondiblue
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26793
Location: Bondi Beach
I would think that Thornton's manager has been talking to a few clubs, and has looked at the likely scenarios, and presented Thornton with his summation:

"Hawks will go hard at the trade and probably will offer rnd 2 pick plus player (if not accepted)
Hawks offer Carlton pick 6 (if not)
Hawks offer Carlton pick 6 and pick round 2/3 or player (if not)
If a deal can't be struck, Carlton will not waste their PSD on you
Essendon* have agreed to match the Hawks offer and you go there via PSD.

There are other teams that will want to trade....but maybe not pick in round 1. I'll look out for more offers......mate, don't worry about Carlton, leave it to me."

Eade has stated that 1st round (pick 12) for the doggies is a no go!!

Blue Skies, Anger, Blue Skies, Anger, Blue Skies, Anger, Pick 6, Blue Skies.

Pick 1 Lueneberger Pick 6 Selwood or Sellars.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue
Top
 Profile  
 
CK95
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 36978
Location: Jendell
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
Thornton must have been approached months ago....I think Chris Pelchen is a good operator and has been working behind the scenes luring Thornton....we should be doing the same.......


Quite possibly

But wasn't there some rule from the AFL that you couldn't approach players with offers pre trade week? Anyone know?
Top
 Profile  
 
Wojee
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35398
Pick 6.

He's not worth pick 6, but Hay wasn't worth a pinch of shit and the Hawks got two picks for him.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 34 of 61
  [ 1219 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ... 61  Next

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue Vain, Google Adsense [Bot], Humpers, Mickstar and 96 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group