With all the discussion going on about our current woes, I can't help but return to the board. In particular, the process by which our board is selected. I have lost track a little I admit, but it used to be the case that only a very small proportion of our members were actually eligible to vote. This leads to us acquiring a board not truly representitive of our people. Only a genuinely democratically elected leadership group can fix our problems. So I have two questions: 1. Is this still the case? 2 if so how can we fix this? Seems to me until we all have a voice, we can shout about the board all we want but we will be only doing it on tc.

out with diggins!

_________________
dane's trolling again

They need to reduce the number of board menbers. its not like it is a multinational corporation with areas of expertise and speciality required of mutliple directors.

Good governance suggest 7 max but 5 ideal with more reular reporting and strict term limits of office

_________________
Ich bein ein Carltonian

Disagree champ they need to expand the board and bring in frash ideas if we have 4 or 5 only they might not see what needs to happen with a larger number it may bring fresh ideas

_________________
A macfart a day helps you work rest and play

Sounds like communism

_________________
Ich bein ein Carltonian

i cant vote if we have a an AGM this year
i however ticked the box on the new membership form!
everyone on this board should be doing that if they havent already signed up!

_________________
dane's trolling again