Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 05, 2025 6:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Should we use pick 1 in the PSD to get Thornton back if he's available?
Yes! He's been holding the backline together for the last 5 years almost single-handedly. 7%  7%  [ 4 ]
Yes. That will show other players that we mean business when it comes to contract negotiations. 63%  63%  [ 37 ]
No. If Notting's available, he'd do a better job than Thornton anyway 19%  19%  [ 11 ]
No. If McDonald is available, re-stocking our ruck department is more important short-term 12%  12%  [ 7 ]
Total votes : 59
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Fair enough, nightcrawler. I guess we'll probably never agree about this one.

In a lot of ways, I see the Thornton issue as dead and buried, and it will benefit the club better in the long-term by swallowing a bitter pill, and walking away from Thornton regardless.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:40 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Fair enough, nightcrawler. I guess we'll probably never agree about this one.

In a lot of ways, I see the Thornton issue as dead and buried, and it will benefit the club better in the long-term by swallowing a bitter pill, and walking away from Thornton regardless.


Fair enough mate, we will agree to disagree. It's like the Stevens/PSD thing all over again. Some people think they did the right thing and that there is intrinsic value in taking a stand. Others think they were just stupid and should have taken what they could get.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:55 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 2663
nightcrawler wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Fair enough, nightcrawler. I guess we'll probably never agree about this one.

In a lot of ways, I see the Thornton issue as dead and buried, and it will benefit the club better in the long-term by swallowing a bitter pill, and walking away from Thornton regardless.


Fair enough mate, we will agree to disagree. It's like the Stevens/PSD thing all over again. Some people think they did the right thing and that there is intrinsic value in taking a stand. Others think they were just stupid and should have taken what they could get.


Port made up for the Stevens deal the next year by getting a 1st, 2nd & 3rd rounder (if i recall correctly??) for Josh Carr by drawing a line in the sand.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:29 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9115
Location: Nth Fitzroy
re-sign him in PSD. Teach him and others a lesson. It will save us players and money in the long run BNZ.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:22 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
@#$%&! him, let Essendon* have him unless Hawthorn produce the goods. Let the bombers drool and let him sink into their burning wreckage.

Why are we so scared?

He's a player (think Godspell)

he's just a player

and I've seen so many players before
in oh so many positions
he's just one more.

He don;t know how to love us
doesn;t know how to play for us
he's just a player
another player
etc...


This provides opportunity
and space
and maybe a good pick or two

so hell trade him
or dump him in the PSD
and move on Carlton

there are plenty of other players in the deep blue sea.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:52 pm
Posts: 1857
nightcrawler wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
nightcrawler wrote:
Were is the "Yes, if that's what it takes to not get screwed by Hawthorn" option.


a) I didn't think of that
b) that option would be incredibly short-sighted and counter-productive


I am sorry but I don't agree. If we didn't have the the 1st pick in the PSD, the Hawks would put pick 24 and a hack on the table and say take it or lose him to the PSD for nothing. Your choice.

In our current situation we have the third choice of re-drafting him, and I expect us to use that as leverage to get a fair deal like the ones I have discussed in the "What would you take". You will note that I haven't asked for pick 6 outright or anything absurd like that.

Now if the Hawks won't pay a fair price then I expect us to call their bluff and not accept a substandard deal as if we don't have that third option of re-drafting him. It would be negligent not to as far as I am concerned.


^^I agree with this. If Hawthorn don't offer us fair compensation, I'd rather re-draft him or let him go to a shit hole like Essendon* or Kangaroos than see us buckle and take a substandard deal satisfying both the traitor and the Hawks.

Also, why is pick 6 absurd for a player who has (and is capable of) playing full back for 5 years with a 100 games under his belt, considering Danny Jacobs went for pick 6 + Alvey in 2003 when he was a 3rd tall in the Essendon* team?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:12 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 2821
Location: In The Boot Of Brendan Fevola Car
Forget that, how about this Marc Murphy plays well next year and his contract is up and he ask for $500 000 or more next year,while another club is willing to pay up to $700 000, what do u think will happen,will our board cave in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:35 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
None of the above poll suggestions.....I wouldnt redraft him and would take it on the chin like Port did with Stevens...didnt harm them and earned some respect..something we dont have much of at the moment.
I'd fix the board and coaching problem and make sure no one else decides its time to bail out of the sinking ship....thats more important than Thornton...or the draft...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:17 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
PSD is always full of hacks.
If dont see a diamond in the rough, draft thornton again, give him a fresh start at carlton. if he wants to play hard, lets play harder.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:27 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
none of the above as I don't see it happening.

Hawthorn will have to offer us something good or he nominates for the PSD.

We get in his ear that we will re-draft him anyway so he might as well sign so we don't waste that pick. It would look good for all concern if he did that etc etc.

We keep Thornton AND get the best available player in the PSD.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:39 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
just cause t-bird wants out doesnt mean everyone wants out! shit dont do this too me!

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:31 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
If he went into the draft there is no way we could take him.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:43 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
TheGame wrote:
If he went into the draft there is no way we could take him.


Why?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:42 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:57 pm
Posts: 2180
Location: Melb
I wouldn't want him to be drafted back. If he is un-happy and he dosen't wanna play for us then goodbye.
We don't need shit like this at the club with all these young guys that we got and the guys that are comming.

Yes he will leave a hole in the back line, but he could do more harm if he stays when he dosen't wanna be there. First time he has 4 goals kicked on him the papers will be all over us. It's bad enough they will be watching Pagan like Hawk for 1st half of the season, we don't need this sort of stuff in the playing group aswell.

T-Bird is an un-happy footballer at Carlton and yes he is a handy player, but this opens the door for a younger guy. We have atleast 2 players who I feel should really be putting there hand up for a spot in the backline and that is Saddo and Hartlett.
A huge hole has opened for them and (bar injury) should both be pushing very very hard for that spot.

And besides if we pick him again we will be going through the same stuff in 2 years time.

Lets not hold onto something that we don't need and focus on the stuff we do need, draft picks!!

Hawks want T-Bird then have him, but we want picks. Carlton should be talking about getting the best pick the can for T-Bird and not talking about keeping him.

_________________
Not so best of TheSexySquad


AWWWWWW STEVENS.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:13 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
fullmont101 wrote:
I wouldn't want him to be drafted back. If he is un-happy and he dosen't wanna play for us then goodbye.
We don't need shit like this at the club with all these young guys that we got and the guys that are comming.

Yes he will leave a hole in the back line, but he could do more harm if he stays when he dosen't wanna be there. First time he has 4 goals kicked on him the papers will be all over us. It's bad enough they will be watching Pagan like Hawk for 1st half of the season, we don't need this sort of stuff in the playing group aswell.

T-Bird is an un-happy footballer at Carlton and yes he is a handy player, but this opens the door for a younger guy. We have atleast 2 players who I feel should really be putting there hand up for a spot in the backline and that is Saddo and Hartlett.
A huge hole has opened for them and (bar injury) should both be pushing very very hard for that spot.

And besides if we pick him again we will be going through the same stuff in 2 years time.

Lets not hold onto something that we don't need and focus on the stuff we do need, draft picks!!

Hawks want T-Bird then have him, but we want picks. Carlton should be talking about getting the best pick the can for T-Bird and not talking about keeping him.


gaping hole.
it is big trouble. lets hope that someone can step up.
i think we need sos back to help train someone to plug this hole.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:18 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18059
fullmont101 wrote:
I wouldn't want him to be drafted back. If he is un-happy and he dosen't wanna play for us then goodbye.
We don't need shit like this at the club with all these young guys that we got and the guys that are comming.

Yes he will leave a hole in the back line, but he could do more harm if he stays when he dosen't wanna be there.


He'll get over it.
If Thornton is available in the PSD and he's the best option, we'd be negligent to pass him over.

Wayne Campbell is an example of a player who shit in his nest and demanded a trade, only to stay and play good footy.
Its "character building". :wink:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:21 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:57 pm
Posts: 2180
Location: Melb
Yeah it is a hole that will need to be filled, but it's not like he is now going to cost us winning the Grand Final, we have time to give somebody a chance to grow and fill the the space he has left.

We can give a player a chance, and player who wants to play for Carlton.

_________________
Not so best of TheSexySquad


AWWWWWW STEVENS.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:24 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:15 am
Posts: 1196
Location: Terra Australis
I agree. Time and overall balanced development is of greater concern.

_________________
Ich bein ein Carltonian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:26 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
fullmont101 wrote:
Yeah it is a hole that will need to be filled, but it's not like he is now going to cost us winning the Grand Final, we have time to give somebody a chance to grow and fill the the space he has left.

We can give a player a chance, and player who wants to play for Carlton.


I'm feeling that.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:48 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
fullmont101 wrote:
I wouldn't want him to be drafted back. If he is un-happy and he dosen't wanna play for us then goodbye.
We don't need shit like this at the club with all these young guys that we got and the guys that are comming.


My sentiments exactly.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group