Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 12:06 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 3:37 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 713
Location: New York
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20657003-2722,00.html

Boy doesn't it make you want to have the priority pick at 1 rather than 17!

_________________
I send an SOS to the world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:39 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 4:44 am
Posts: 539
Good article...Leuey's da man.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:41 am 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:07 pm
Posts: 236
fjanyc wrote:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20657003-2722,00.html

Boy doesn't it make you want to have the priority pick at 1 rather than 17!



Problem is that even if last year's system was in place, we might still only have one of Gibbs or Leunberger, as the Bombers would still have pick 2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:41 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 362
Location: Hoppers Crossing
I still think we will take Gibbs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:18 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Ok i'm back on the Berger bandwagon :lol:

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:14 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 3411
Location: East Perth, WA
Quote:
"I haven't spoken to Bryce but when I speak to Gumby and a few of the other guys, no-one wants to go that high," he said. "The lower you go the less pressure you are going to get."


Already worried about the pressure, pass.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:38 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
spuddie wrote:
fjanyc wrote:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20657003-2722,00.html

Boy doesn't it make you want to have the priority pick at 1 rather than 17!



Problem is that even if last year's system was in place, we might still only have one of Gibbs or Leunberger, as the Bombers would still have pick 2

Luenburger wouldn't get picked up with pick 2 if we passed on him for Gibbs :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:50 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Ruckman don't get too many years at their prime. They take 3 or 4 seasons to develop, have a couple of good years then their bodies give up on them. Allan, Primus, Gardiner, King, Darcy, Keating etc. All were brilliant at their best but would you choose any of them over a decade of brilliance of Nathan Buckley?

I value ruckman highly but not number 1 pick in a 'super draft' highly.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:58 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
just take gibbs... even tho luey loves carlton. :( why cant we just have the first 3 picks. then everyone would be happy. well except all the other teams... but that doesnt really matter does it.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
TheGame wrote:
Ruckman don't get too many years at their prime. They take 3 or 4 seasons to develop, have a couple of good years then their bodies give up on them. Allan, Primus, Gardiner, King, Darcy, Keating etc. All were brilliant at their best but would you choose any of them over a decade of brilliance of Nathan Buckley?

I value ruckman highly but not number 1 pick in a 'super draft' highly.


Good point Game. I was talking with Teddy yesterday, he was saying the same thing. For some reason, these days ruckmen tend to have 4 or 5 yesrs at their peak, and then wane. Who was the last ruckman to dominate the competition for 10 years? Simon Madden? Everett probably comes closest, but there is noone else for 15 years who has dominated for more than a few years.

Surely for a number 1 pick, you want to get a guy who's going to dominate the game for 10-12 years, at least.

As tantalising as Leuenberger seems, Gibbs for me.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:20 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
TheGame wrote:
Ruckman don't get too many years at their prime. They take 3 or 4 seasons to develop, have a couple of good years then their bodies give up on them. Allan, Primus, Gardiner, King, Darcy, Keating etc. All were brilliant at their best but would you choose any of them over a decade of brilliance of Nathan Buckley?

I value ruckman highly but not number 1 pick in a 'super draft' highly.

Would you choose Buckley over the 311 games of Nicholls or Simon Madden and flags? :P

Leuenberger allegedly plays like a tall midfielder who can win the ball and push forward to kick goals so I don't see a problem with selecting him at one. Note that article claims Cox wasn't anywhere near as mobile or "elegant" in his running at the same age. :shock:

Headland was drafted at pick one and ran home to his home state. :twisted:

Draft Leuenberger. :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:27 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14751
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
yibbida wrote:
Already worried about the pressure, pass.


Not sure that it really means anything but its not the first time he's made mention of not wanting the pressure of going high :?

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:30 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:56 pm
Posts: 174
The question is if both players have around equal talent/upside do we want the one who MIGHT want to go back home in 2 years or the one who would bleed navy blue blood?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18794
Location: threeohfivethree
Quote:
"If you look at (Dean) Brogan and (Brendon) Lade in 2004, Jason Ball's influence in 2005 and Cox this year, the last three years have emphasised the need for quality ruckmen," Hawthorn personnel manager Chris Pelchen said. "Hence Matthew Leuenberger is being spoken about in glowing terms." And Pelchen will pinch himself if he lands Leuenberger at No.6.


When Chris Pelchen says something I listen!



And do the opposite.

Leuenberger is Satan.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:52 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24663
Location: Kaloyasena
All clubs with picks 4 to 8 are playing mind games - in the hope that they can get Leuenberger, Hansen or Gumbleton to fall that low.

Felchen has to pull a rabbit out of the hat to make up for his @#$%&! up during trade week. :roll:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
Its not impossible that L-berg will fall to pick 6. I reckon its either Carlton, Port or Hawthorn for L-berg (and my guess is Port).

The thing about Carlton is our admin is very very risk averse. They make safe boring decisions. They don't take risks

that might not translate into the recruiting team, but if you can read culture you'd say there wouldn't be much chance of them dropping a bombshell and not picking Gibbs.

Maybe the other clubs are spouting off trying to make it look like less of a bombshell so we are more likely to take the risk!??

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 17049
Location: Melbourne
yibbida wrote:
Quote:
"I haven't spoken to Bryce but when I speak to Gumby and a few of the other guys, no-one wants to go that high," he said. "The lower you go the less pressure you are going to get."


Already worried about the pressure, pass.


His mothers thoughts are spot on. There are thousands of uninformed supporters who would simply not be prepared to give a kid like Leuy a couple of years to find his feet and put on some weight if he went #1.

The pressure is enormous so it is not unexpected that a young kid has some reservations. Those reservations come about because he knows full well there will be unreasonable expectations placed on by some fans. Expectations he is unlikely to fulfill early on and through no fault of his own, just the plain reality of physical development.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 17049
Location: Melbourne
The Tyrant wrote:
Its not impossible that L-berg will fall to pick 6. I reckon its either Carlton, Port or Hawthorn for L-berg (and my guess is Port).

The thing about Carlton is our admin is very very risk averse. They make safe boring decisions. They don't take risks

that might not translate into the recruiting team, but if you can read culture you'd say there wouldn't be much chance of them dropping a bombshell and not picking Gibbs.

Maybe the other clubs are spouting off trying to make it look like less of a bombshell so we are more likely to take the risk!??


So reading between your lines, if WH decides to go with Leuy you would be happy as it would mean CFC were A) no longer boring & B) it was now a risk taker. :wink:

I'm glad we have cleared that up. :P

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:16 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
but not from Ty Caz, not from Ty, he's a reasonable person - never gets hysterical does our Ty, never jumps the gun either apparently. 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:33 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
Posts: 1291
Location: Sydney
GWS wrote:
When Chris Pelchen says something I listen!



And do the opposite.



Absolutely GWS!!!

'Sif this guy's gonna give away who he really wants at the Dorks!

More CHEAP mind games from the Idiot!! :roll: :garthp: :garthp: You've already proven that you are full of shit Felchin!! PISS OFF!! :twisted:

It's either Gibbs or Hansen AFAIC!

And Lachie wins by a short head!! 8)

_________________
When Dick became President, it was as if everyone at Carlton came out of the hailstorm and into the sunshine - Stephen Kernahan

YARRAN!!





.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group