SA Blue wrote:
CarltonClem wrote:
Do you understand English SA Blue? Elwood answered your question - by explaining what his source said, he's demonstrated his point re: Carey pulling the strings - by which Pagan relied upon to gain his success.
I am not sure if you even bothered to read my response, of if you swallow the same drivel put forward.
Elwood's 'inside source', I am not sure how many degrees of separation we are having, stated that Carey was allowed to do what he liked. Did this source mention anything about Pagan building this team from the u/19's. Did the source mention anything about Pagan being loved by these players, as evidenced many times by what players like Carey, Archer, Stevens had said about him?? Did the source talk about the tactics used? Did the source talk about his reinvention of many players? Did his source talk about having to do it with ber limited resources? No.
This inside source offers nothing but gossip about the internal affairs at the club. There is nothing here even football related. I have no doubt, Carey played a huge role at the club, but to state that Pagan just sat back and enjoyed the ride is just drivel. I guess they just named him coach of the century (Roos) because he was great at hiding things?!?!?
Don't think you read Elwood's post.
1) The source is the partner of an ex-Roos PLAYER - yes, who played under PAGAN!
2) Carey, Stevens, Archer said that about him. How about the others? How about McKernan? How about others?
3) How can the relationship between the coach and his players not be football related as you insinuate? IMO that's the problem that faces the Carlton FC at the moment. The players and the coach are clearly not on good terms; where is the team spirit and the playing for the coach like they have at the Swans?
I ask you this SA Blue. Why do you think it's drivel just because there's no mention of tactics blah blah.
Your post is drivel because it's got no mention of tactics, how Pagan's "reinvented" players at Carlton, how he has had to do it with limited resources.
My previous paragraph sound like crap - well, it is - and it's no different to what you posted.